Explore the vast range of titles available.

Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary bifurcations is an unmet issue. The BIFURCAT registry was obtained by merging two registries on coronary bifurcations. Three groups were compared in a two-by-two fashion: short-term DAPT (≤ 6 months), intermediate-term DAPT (6-12 months) and extended DAPT (>12 months). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target-lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis) were the primary endpoint. Single components of MACE were the secondary endpoints. Events were appraised according to the clinical presentation: chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) versus acute coronary syndrome (ACS). 5537 patients (3231 ACS, 2306 CCS) were included. After a median follow-up of 2.1 years (IQR 0.9-2.2), extended DAPT was associated with a lower incidence of MACE compared with intermediate-term DAPT (2.8% versus 3.4%, adjusted HR 0.23 [0.1-0.54], p <0.001), driven by a reduction of all-cause death in the ACS cohort. In the CCS cohort, an extended DAPT strategy was not associated with a reduced risk of MACE. In conclusion, among real-world patients receiving PCI for coronary bifurcation, an extended DAPT strategy was associated with a reduction of MACE in ACS but not in CCS patients.

During the Covid-19 outbreak in northern Italy, the daily rate of admissions for acute coronary syndrome at 15 hospitals was significantly lower than the rate during two control intervals (13.3 admissions vs. 18.0 and 18.9 admissions for the two control periods).

Abstract Background Despite evidence supporting use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous waves-free ratio (iFR) to improve outcome of patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention, such techniques are still underused in clinical practice due to economic and logistic issues. Objectives We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based application to compute FFR and iFR from plain CA. Methods and results Consecutive patients performing FFR or iFR or both were enrolled. A specific multi-task deep network exploiting 2 projections of the coronary of interest from standard CA was appraised. Accuracy of prediction of FFR/iFR of the AI model was the primary endpoint, along with sensitivity and specificity. Prediction was tested both for continuous values and for dichotomous classification (positive/negative) for FFR or iFR. Subgroup analyses were performed for FFR and iFR. A total of 389 patients from 5 centers were enrolled. Mean age was 67.9 ± 9.6 and 39.2% of patients were admitted for acute coronary syndrome. Overall, the accuracy was 87.3% (81.2–93.4%), with a sensitivity of 82.4% (71.9–96.4%) and a specificity of 92.2% (90.4–93.9%). For FFR, accuracy was 84.8% (77.8–91.8%), with a sensitivity of 81.9% (69.4–94.4%) and a specificity of 87.7% (85.5–89.9%), while for iFR accuracy was 90.2% (86.0–94.6%), with a sensitivity of 87.2% (76.6–97.8%) and a specificity of 93.2% (91.7–94.7%, all confidence intervals 95%). Conclusion The presented machine-learning based tool showed high accuracy in prediction of wire-based FFR and iFR. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract

Bifurcation lesions are associated with higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).BACKGROUNDBifurcation lesions are associated with higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).To investigate the impact of imaging-guided PCI in a real-world population with coronary bifurcation lesions.AIMTo investigate the impact of imaging-guided PCI in a real-world population with coronary bifurcation lesions.From the ULTRA-BIFURCAT registry, we compared IVUS vs. angiographic guidance in a cohort of 3486 propensity matched patients. MACE a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target-lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent-thrombosis was the primary endpoint. Subgroup analyses were performed for unprotected left main (ULM) and non-ULM disease.METHODSFrom the ULTRA-BIFURCAT registry, we compared IVUS vs. angiographic guidance in a cohort of 3486 propensity matched patients. MACE a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target-lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent-thrombosis was the primary endpoint. Subgroup analyses were performed for unprotected left main (ULM) and non-ULM disease.PSM generated 1743 pairs. MACE occurred in 154 (9%) patients in the IVUS guided group and in 199 (11%) patients in the angio-guided group (p = 0.09). IVUS guidance was associated with lower MACE in the ULM population [HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.83], but had no impact in the non-ULM population [HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.83-1.51], p for interaction = 0.006. IVUS was associated with reduction in all-MI [HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.64] in the ULM population and with lower ST in the non-ULM population [HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.71]. Provisional stenting was associated with lower MACE in the ULM population [HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.98], whereas kissing balloon [HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.56-0.99] and ultra-thin stents [HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.67] were protective factors in the non-ULM population.RESULTSPSM generated 1743 pairs. MACE occurred in 154 (9%) patients in the IVUS guided group and in 199 (11%) patients in the angio-guided group (p = 0.09). IVUS guidance was associated with lower MACE in the ULM population [HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.83], but had no impact in the non-ULM population [HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.83-1.51], p for interaction = 0.006. IVUS was associated with reduction in all-MI [HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.64] in the ULM population and with lower ST in the non-ULM population [HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.71]. Provisional stenting was associated with lower MACE in the ULM population [HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.98], whereas kissing balloon [HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.56-0.99] and ultra-thin stents [HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.67] were protective factors in the non-ULM population.In a real-world scenario, IVUS guidance during DES implantation is associated with a lower rate of MACE in patients with ULM coronary bifurcation lesions. In non-ULM bifurcations, no difference was observed on MACE, while IVUS guidance was associated with a lower rate of ST.CONCLUSIONSIn a real-world scenario, IVUS guidance during DES implantation is associated with a lower rate of MACE in patients with ULM coronary bifurcation lesions. In non-ULM bifurcations, no difference was observed on MACE, while IVUS guidance was associated with a lower rate of ST.