Explore the vast range of titles available.

We aimed to explore the role of interleukin (IL)‐6, interferon‐gamma (IFNγ), IL‐10, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) as predictors of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical and serological activity, and their correlation with the treatment received. We performed a retrospective analysis of 77 patients with SLE according to the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborative Clinics (SLICC) criteria. The outcomes were serological activity (SA), active disease (AD), complete remission (CR), the low‐disease activity state (LDAS), and immunosuppressive treatment. SA was present in 17.1%, AD in 17.3%, CR in 13%, and LDAS in 64.9% of patients. IL‐6 values were higher in patients in SA, in AD, in those receiving steroids alone, and in patients without CR or LDAS (p < 0.05). IFNγ was associated with anti‐double stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies positivity and immunosuppression, whereas IL‐10 values were higher in patients with CR (p < 0.05). The IL6‐IFN product was able to predict anti‐double stranded DNA (anti‐dsDNA) antibodies positivity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC‐ROC] = 0.705, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.563–0.847), SA (AUC‐ROC = 0.720, 95% CI 0.542–0.899), AD (AUC‐ROC = 0.701, 95% CI 0.520–0.882), steroid treatment (AUC‐ROC = 0.751, 95% CI 0.622–0.879), and the absence of LDAS (AUC‐ROC = 0.700, 95% CI 0.558–0.834). The IL6‐IFN/IL10 ratio predicted AD (AUC‐ROC = 0.742, 955 CI 0.540–0.944), steroid treatment (AUC‐ROC = 0.721, 95% CI 0.572–0.870), and the absence of LDAS (AUC‐ROC = 0.694, 95% CI 0.536–0.853). In conclusion, IL‐6, IL‐10, and IFNγ might help to assess SLE serological and clinical activity. Their combination in the IL‐6‐IFN product and the IL‐6xIFN to IL‐10 ratio results in novel tools to determine and predict SA, AD, and LDAS. Prompt detection of SLE activity might allow a rapid intervention to avoid established or chronic damage.

Background The screening of high-risk populations using dried blood spots (DBS) has allowed the rapid identification of patients with Pompe disease, mostly in Neurology departments. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) among patients not previously diagnosed or tested for this entity despite presenting possible signs or symptoms of the disease in Internal Medicine departments in Spain. Methods This epidemiological, observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study included a single cohort of individuals with clinical suspicion of LOPD seen at Internal Medicine departments in Spain. The diagnosis of LOPD was initially established on the basis of the result of DBS. If decreased enzyme acid-alpha-1,4-glucosidase (GAA) activity was detected in DBS, additional confirmatory diagnostic measurements were conducted, including GAA activity in lymphocytes, fibroblasts, or muscle and/or genetic testing. Results The diagnosis of LOPD was confirmed in 2 out of 322 patients (0.6%). Reasons for suspecting LOPD diagnosis were polymyositis or any type of myopathy of unknown etiology (in one patient), and asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic hyperCKemia (in the other). The time between symptom onset and LOPD diagnosis was 2.0 and 0.0 years. Both patients were asymptomatic, with no muscle weakness. Additionally, 19.7% of the non-LOPD cases received an alternative diagnosis. Conclusions Our study highlights the existence of a hidden population of LOPD patients in Internal Medicine departments who might benefit from early diagnosis and early initiation of potential treatments.

ObjectiveInfections are a common complication of SLE. Our objective was to evaluate their causes and impact on the survival of patients with SLE.MethodsAnalysis of the admissions and death causes in patients diagnosed with SLE from the Spanish Hospital Discharge Database and the infection-related deaths of the Spanish population from the National Statistical Institute, between 2016 and 2018.Only infections recorded as the main diagnosis were analysed (severe or clinically relevant infection).ResultsAmong 18 430 admissions in patients with SLE, disease activity was the cause of admission in 19% of all patients and infection in 15%. However, infection was the main cause of death (25%) while SLE activity was responsible for only 6% of deaths (p<0.001). Severe infection exceeded SLE as a cause of death for patients dying at ages between 40–59 (23% vs 4%, p<0.001), 60–79 (26% vs 6%, p<0.001) and older than 80 years (25% vs 6%, p<0.001). Infection was the cause of death in 8% of the Spanish population, a significantly lower rate when compared with patients with SLE (p<0.001). Compared with the general population, infections were the highest relative cause of death in patients with SLE, particularly at younger ages: 40% vs 3% for those below 20 years old (p<0.01), 33% vs 4% between 20 and 39 (p<0.001), 23% vs 5% between 40 and 59 (p<0.001), 26% vs 5% between 60 and 79 (p<0.001) and 25% vs 9% for those older than 80 years (p<0.001).ConclusionOur nationwide study confirms that infections are the leading cause of death in SLE in Spain, with the highest proportion occurring in young patients with lupus compared with the general population of the same age range.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of the different types of neoplasms and lineages on mortality of patients with SLE.MethodsRetrospective and observational comparison of the neoplasm-related deaths in patients with SLE and the general Spanish population reported in the Spanish Hospital Discharge Database. To determine the impact of SLE on the risk of dying from each neoplasm lineage, a binary logistic regression considering age, female sex, tobacco and alcohol consumption, was performed.ResultsDuring 2016–2019, 139 531 in-hospital deaths from neoplasms were certified in Spain (91 in patients with SLE). Patients with SLE presented a lower mortality rate from solid organ neoplasms, (80.2% vs 91.1%, OR 0.393), linked to their lower risk of colorectal carcinoma (1.1% vs 10.8%, OR 0.110). By contrast, gynaecological neoplasms presented a higher risk (8.8% vs 3%, OR 3.039) in the deceased patients with SLE, associated with the higher frequency of vulvar neoplasms (2% vs 0.2%, OR 14.767) and cervical carcinomas (3.3% vs 0.5%, OR 3.809). Haematological neoplasm-related deaths were also more prevalent in patients with SLE (19.8% vs 8.9%, OR 2.546), mostly attributable to the higher proportion of deaths due to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (11% vs 2.9%, OR 4.060) of B cell lineage (9.9% vs 2.5%, OR 4.133).ConclusionsPatients with SLE present a higher risk of death from vulvar neoplasms, cervical carcinomas and B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in comparison with the general Spanish population. In addition to developing strategies that might help to attenuate their occurrence and impact, such as decreasing the immunosuppressive burden, specific early detection programmes for these conditions should be investigated and considered carefully.

Background The higher mortality rates in patients with Systemic sclerosis (SSc) are related to SSc activity, cardiovascular disease, and neoplasms, among other factors. Our objective was to assess the impact of solid organ neoplasms (SON) and hematological neoplasms (HN) on mortality among SSc patients. Methods A retrospective, observational comparison of SON and HN-related deaths in SSc patients with those in the general Spanish population was conducted using data from the Spanish Hospital Discharge Database. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the impact of SSc on mortality risk from each neoplasm. Results During 2016–2019, 139,531 in-hospital deaths from neoplasms were certified in Spain (67 in patients with SSc). Malignancies accounted for 9.7% of all deaths in SSc patients, and disease activity for 11.5% ( p  > 0.05). Compared to the general Spanish population, patients with SSc had a higher death ratio from lung neoplasms (18.6 vs. 25.4%, OR = 2.228, 95% CI 1.260–3.937), gynecological neoplasms (3 vs. 13.4%, OR = 4.804, 95%CI 2.372–9.730), attributable to the increased risk of uterine tumors (0.9 vs. 4.5%, OR = 6.177, 95% CI 1.931–19.758) and ovarian carcinomas (1.3 vs. 4.5%, OR = 3.456, 95% CI 1.083–11.032), and from T/NK lineage lymphomas (0.3 vs. 3.0%, OR = 8.955 95% CI: 2.181–36.767). Conclusion The detection of chronic comorbidities such as cancer is emerging as a noteworthy component of standard care for SSc patients. This can be addressed during their follow up or even in specific screening programs aimed at achieving better long-term quality of life and prognosis.

Patients with COVID-19 may develop a hypercoagulable state due to tissue and endothelial injury, produced by an unbalanced immune response. Therefore, an increased number of thromboembolic events has been reported in these patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in COVID-19 patients, their role in the development of thrombosis and their relationship with the severity of the disease. In this retrospective study, serum samples from 159 COVID-19 patients and 80 healthy donors were analysed for the presence of aPL. A total of 29 patients (18.2%) and 14 healthy donors (17.5%) were positive for aPL. Nineteen COVID-19 patients (12%) but no healthy donor presented a positive percentage of the IgA isotype aPL. IgA anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (anti-β2GPI) were the most frequent type (6.3%) in patients but was not detected in any healthy donor. The positivity of this antibody was found to be significantly elevated in patients with thromboembolic events (25% vs. 5%, p = 0.029); in fact, patients with positive IgA anti-β2GPI had an incidence of thrombosis over six times higher than those who had normal antibody concentrations [OR (CI 95%) of 6.67 (1.5–30.2), p = 0.014]. Additionally, patients with moderate-severe disease presented a higher aPL positivity than patients with mild disease according to the Brescia (p = 0.029) and CURB-65 (p = 0.011) severity scales. A multivariate analysis showed that positivity for IgA anti-β2GPI is significantly associated with disease severity measured by CURB-65 [OR (CI 95%) 17.8 (1.7–187), p = 0.0016]. In conclusion, COVID-19 patients have a significantly higher positive percentage of the IgA isotype aPL than healthy donors. IgA anti-β2GPI antibodies were the most frequently detected aPL in COVID-19 patients and were associated with thrombosis and severe COVID-19 and are thus proposed as a possible marker to identify high-risk patients.

We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of Systemic Autoimmune Diseases (SADs) patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Spain, before the introduction of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. A nationwide, retrospective and observational analysis of the patients admitted during 2020, based on the ICD10 codes in the National Registry of Hospital Discharges, was performed. Among 117,694 patients, only 892 (0.8%) presented any type of SAD before COVID-19-related admission: Sjogren’s Syndrome constituted 25%, Systemic Vasculitides 21%, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus 19%, Sarcoidosis 17%, Systemic Sclerosis 11%, Mixed and Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease 4%, Behçet’s Disease 4% and Inflammatory Myopathies 2%. The in-hospital mortality rate was higher in SAD individuals (20% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). After adjustment by baseline conditions, SADs were not associated with a higher mortality risk (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.78–1.11). Mortality in the SADs patients was determined by age (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.04–1.07), heart failure (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.10–2.49), chronic kidney disease (OR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.05–1.59) and liver disease (OR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.13–3.44). In conclusion, the higher COVID-19 mortality rate seen in SADs patients hospitalized in Spain in 2020 was related to the higher burden of comorbidities, secondary to direct organ damage and sequelae of their condition. Whilst further studies should evaluate the impact of baseline immunosuppression on COVID-19 outcomes in this population, efforts should be focused on the optimal management of SAD to minimize the impact of the organ damage that has been shown to determine COVID-19 prognosis.

Background: the admission and death causes of SLE patients might have changed over the last years. Methods: Analysis of the Spanish National Hospital Discharge database. All individuals admitted with SLE, according to ICD-9, were selected. The following five admission categories were considered: SLE, cardiovascular disease (CVD), neoplasm, infection, and venous-thromboembolic disease (VTED), along four periods of time (1997–2000, 2001–2005, 2006–2010, and 2011–2015). Results: The admissions (99,859) from 43.432 patients with SLE were included. The absolute number of admissions increased from 15,807 in 1997–2000 to 31,977 in 2011–2015. SLE decreased as a cause of admission (from 47.1% to 20.8%, p < 0.001), while other categories increased over the time, as follows: 5% to 8.6% for CVD, 8.2% to 13% for infection, and 1.4% to 5.5% for neoplasm (p < 0.001 for all). The admission mortality rate rose from 2.22% to 3.06% (p < 0.001) and the causes of death evolved in parallel with the admission categories. A significant trend to older age was observed over time in the overall population and deceased patients (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Better control of SLE over the past two decades has led to a decrease in early admissions, and disease chronification. As a counterpart, CVD, infections, and neoplasm have become the main causes of admissions and mortality.

ObjectivesLow serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) have been associated with a higher frequency of risk factors and cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association of 25(OH)D, cardiovascular risk factors, and subclinical atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.MethodForty-seven female SLE patients were studied. Data collected included demographics, SLE activity, disease damage, cardiovascular risk factors, and markers of subclinical atherosclerosis. Patient treatments and vitamin D and calcium supplementation (VitD-Ca) were recorded. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as serum 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/l measured by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography. Atherosclerosis was assessed by measuring the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) by Doppler velocimetry and intima-media thickness (IMT) by B-mode ultrasound scanning.Results61.7% of patients were vitamin D deficient with a mean level of 31.91 ± 10.21 nmol/l. Serum vitamin D concentration was significantly higher in the 23 patients taking VitD-Ca supplements than that in patients not supplemented (p = 0.004). No significant association was found between 25(OH)D serum levels and cardiovascular risk factors, disease activity, or different treatments for SLE. A significant positive correlation was found between 25(OH)D levels, PWV (p = 0.02), and IMT (p = 0.01); moreover, patients taking VitD-Ca supplements presented an increased arterial stiffness.ConclusionPatients with arterial stiffness showed higher levels of serum vitamin D and most of them were on VitD-Ca supplements. Although prospective studies with a larger number of patients and follow-up are needed, our findings suggest that VitD-Ca supplementation may have effects on SLE patients’ arterial stiffness.

Patients with COVID-19 may develop a hypercoagulable state due to tissue and endothelial injury, produced by an unbalanced immune response. Therefore, an increased number of thromboembolic events has been reported in these patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in COVID-19 patients, their role in the development of thrombosis and their relationship with the severity of the disease. In this retrospective study, serum samples from 159 COVID-19 patients and 80 healthy donors were analysed for the presence of aPL. A total of 29 patients (18.2%) and 14 healthy donors (17.5%) were positive for aPL. Nineteen COVID-19 patients (12%) but no healthy donor presented a positive percentage of the IgA isotype aPL. IgA anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (anti-β2GPI) were the most frequent type (6.3%) in patients but was not detected in any healthy donor. The positivity of this antibody was found to be significantly elevated in patients with thromboembolic events (25% vs. 5%, p = 0.029); in fact, patients with positive IgA anti-β2GPI had an incidence of thrombosis over six times higher than those who had normal antibody concentrations [OR (CI 95%) of 6.67 (1.5–30.2), p = 0.014]. Additionally, patients with moderate-severe disease presented a higher aPL positivity than patients with mild disease according to the Brescia (p = 0.029) and CURB-65 (p = 0.011) severity scales. A multivariate analysis showed that positivity for IgA anti-β2GPI is significantly associated with disease severity measured by CURB-65 [OR (CI 95%) 17.8 (1.7–187), p = 0.0016]. In conclusion, COVID-19 patients have a significantly higher positive percentage of the IgA isotype aPL than healthy donors. IgA anti-β2GPI antibodies were the most frequently detected aPL in COVID-19 patients and were associated with thrombosis and severe COVID-19 and are thus proposed as a possible marker to identify high-risk patients.