Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundAcetabulum fracture is one of the most challenging fractures to manage and operate for orthopaedic surgeons; anatomical reduction of fractures and reconstruction of the joint is of utmost importance. These factors in turn are dependent on the appropriate surgical approach used to improve the clinical outcomes and reduce associated complications. Hence, this meta-analysis aims to compare the outcomes of ilioinguinal versus modified Stoppa approach for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of displaced acetabular fractures.MethodsMedline (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from their inception to 10th of June 2021 for both randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and or non-randomized studies comparing the outcomes of ilioinguinal approach and modified Stoppa approach for the ORIF of acetabular fractures. The estimates of treatment effects were described by mean difference (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous variables with corresponding 95% confidence (95% CI) intervals. The risk of bias was assessed by MINORS tool for the non-randomized, and the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool for RCTs.ResultA total of ten studies (717 patients), three RCTs and seven retrospective studies, were included. Modified Stoppa approach showed shorter mean duration of surgery (MD 47.13, 95% CI: 27.30–66.96), lesser number of overall complications (OR 2.14, 95% CI: 1.46–3.13), less intraoperative blood loss (MD 259.65, 95% CI: 152.66–366.64), and lower rates of infection (OR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.14–4.15). However, ilioinguinal approach showed a better quality of fracture reduction (OR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42–0.82). Results were equivocal in terms of vascular injuries (OR 1.88 (95% CI: 0.86–4.09), nerve injuries (OR 1.77, 95% CI: 0.99–3.17), heterotopic ossification (OR1.74, 95% CI: 0.63–4.82), and clinical outcome (OR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.45–1.47) between the two groups.ConclusionModified Stoppa approach carries a lesser duration of surgery, lesser intraoperative blood loss, fewer overall complications, and lesser postoperative infection rates compared to ilioinguinal approach. Although a better anatomical reduction is achieved by ilioinguinal approach, however, this does not translate into better clinic functional outcomes which remain comparable between the two approaches. So overall, modified Stoppa approach seems a better alternative for managing these fractures.

[3] In 1960, the Eugene Garfields Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) introduced the first citation index for papers published in academic journals, first the science citation index (SCI) and later social science's citation index and the arts and humanities citation index. NLM began computerizing indexing work in 1960 and called it MEDLARS, a bibliographic database, which later became MEDLINE. [...]IM became the print presentation of MEDLINE databases content.

Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a common orthopedic procedure. Most of the literature is on high-demand athletic patients, with little information about the outcomes of low-demand patients. Therefore, we aim to assess the outcomes of non-athletic patients following home-based rehabilitation. An observational cross-sectional comparative study was conducted with 30 non-athletic adults with ACL injuries whose pre-injury Tegner activity level was four or less. After six months of reconstruction, patients were assessed for functional outcomes using the Tegner activity level, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and ACL quality of life (QOL) score. Functional performance was assessed by the carioca test, one-leg hop test, and shuttle test. Functional outcome and performance were compared with an age, sex, and activity level-matched group. Knee stability was assessed by Lachman, anterior drawer, and pivot shift. All patients returned to their pre-injury Tegner activity level. A statistically significant difference was seen in the Lysholm score, IKDC score, ACL QOL score, carioca test, shuttle test, and one leg hop test (p= <0.001 in each); >5mm of translation of the tibia in the Lachman test was seen in three patients, whereas one patient had >5 mm of translation in the anterior drawer test but pivot shift was absent in all. We found that all patients returned to their pre-injury Tegner activity level. Most patients had improved knee stability; however, functional outcomes and performance were lower compared to the control group. Therefore, arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is a reasonable treatment option for non-athletic, low-demand patients to get back to their pre-injury functional activity level.

Purpose There is no consensus about the best option of internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The aim of the present study was to compare proximal femoral nail (PFN) with contralateral reverse distal femoral locking compression plate (reverse-DFLCP) in the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures with compromised lateral wall. Method In a randomized controlled study, from November 2011 to October 2012, 40 patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures with compromised lateral wall (AO 31A 2.2 to 3.3) had osteosynthesis by PFN ( n  = 20) or reverse-DFLCP ( n  = 20). Intra-operative variables compared were duration of surgery, blood loss during surgery, fluoroscopy time and surgeons perception of the surgery. Patients were followed up clinically for a minimum of one year. Functional outcome was assessed by Parker Palmer mobility score (PPMS), Harris hip score (HHS), and Short Form-12. Failure was defined as any condition which would necessitate revision surgery with change of implant. Results Duration of surgery ( p  = 0.022), blood loss during surgery ( p  = 0.008) and fluoroscopy time ( p  = 0.0001) were significantly less in the PFN group than in the reverse-DFLCP group. No significant difference was found in type of reduction, difficulty in reduction and surgeon’s perception of surgery. The PFN group had better functional outcome than the reverse-DFLCP group. HHS for the PFN group was 81.53 ± 13.21 and for the reverse-DFLCP group it was 68.43 ± 14.36 ( p  = 0.018). SF-12 physical ( p  = 0.002) and mental component ( p  = 0.007) scores in the PFN group was significantly better than in the reverse-DFLCP group. There was one failure in the PFN group as compared to six in the reverse-DFLCP group ( p  = 0.036). Conclusion Due to favourable intra-operative variables, better functional outcome and lower failure rates, we conclude that PFN is a better implant than reverse-DFLCP for intertrochanteric fractures with compromised lateral wall.