Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: While several publications have focused on the intuitive role of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) in neurosurgical planning, the aim of this review was to explore other avenues, where these technologies have significant utility and applicability. Methods: This review was conducted by searching PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, the Scopus database, the Web of Science Core Collection database, and the SciELO citation index, from 1989–2021. An example of a search strategy used in PubMed Central is: “Virtual reality” [All Fields] AND (“neurosurgical procedures” [MeSH Terms] OR (“neurosurgical” [All Fields] AND “procedures” [All Fields]) OR “neurosurgical procedures” [All Fields] OR “neurosurgery” [All Fields] OR “neurosurgery” [MeSH Terms]). Using this search strategy, we identified 487 (PubMed), 1097 (PubMed Central), and 275 citations (Web of Science Core Collection database). Results: Articles were found and reviewed showing numerous applications of VR/AR in neurosurgery. These applications included their utility as a supplement and augment for neuronavigation in the fields of diagnosis for complex vascular interventions, spine deformity correction, resident training, procedural practice, pain management, and rehabilitation of neurosurgical patients. These technologies have also shown promise in other area of neurosurgery, such as consent taking, training of ancillary personnel, and improving patient comfort during procedures, as well as a tool for training neurosurgeons in other advancements in the field, such as robotic neurosurgery. Conclusions: We present the first review of the immense possibilities of VR in neurosurgery, beyond merely planning for surgical procedures. The importance of VR and AR, especially in “social distancing” in neurosurgery training, for economically disadvantaged sections, for prevention of medicolegal claims and in pain management and rehabilitation, is promising and warrants further research.

Stroke is a fatal morbidity that needs emergency medical admission and immediate medical attention. COVID-19 ischemic brain damage is closely associated with common neurological symptoms, which are extremely difficult to treat medically, and risk factors. We performed literature research about COVID-19 and ischemia in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus for this current narrative review. We discovered parallel manifestations of SARS-CoV-19 infection and brain ischemia risk factors. In published papers, we discovered a similar but complex pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection and stroke pathology. A patient with other systemic co-morbidities, such as diabetes, hypertension, or any respiratory disease, has a fatal combination in intensive care management when infected with SARS-CoV-19. Furthermore, due to their shared risk factors, COVID-19 and stroke are a lethal combination for medical management to treat. In this review, we discuss shared pathophysiology, adjuvant risk factors, challenges, and advancements in stroke-associated COVID-19 therapeutics.

Spine represents the most common site for metastatic disease involvement. Due to the close relationship between the spinal cord and critical structures, therapeutic management of spinal metastases remains challenging. Spinal localization can lead to neurological sequelae, which can significantly affect the quality of life in patients with a limited life expectancy. The authors conducted a systematic literature review according to PRISMA guidelines in order to determine the impact of the most updated palliative care on spinal metastases. The initial literature search retrieved 2526 articles, manually screened based on detailed exclusion criteria. Finally, 65 studies met the inclusion criteria and were finally included in the systematic review. In the wide scenario of palliative care, nowadays, recent medical or surgical treatments represent valuable options for ameliorating pain and improving patients QoL in such this condition.

PurposeTo systematically review the clinical features, management, and outcomes of diffuse midline H3K27-altered gliomas of the spinal cord (DMG-SCs).MethodsPubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to 23 September 2023 for histologically confirmed cases of DMG-SC. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, management information, and survival outcomes were extracted and analyzed.ResultsA total of 279 patients from 39 studies were collected. Patients were mostly male (61%), with an average age of 32 years. Patients were treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy combined (31%) or surgery only (24%), and extent of resection was most often subtotal (38%). Temozolomide was the most common chemotherapeutic agent (81%). Radiation therapy was delivered with mean dose of 47 Gy in 23 fractions. At mean follow-up time of 21 months, 13% of patients were alive. Average median overall survival was 24 months (range of 13 to 40 months) with a median progression-free survival of 14 months. Historical WHO grades of 2 or 3 appeared to exhibit a longer average median overall survival time than that of grade 4 DMG-SCs (32 vs. 23 months, p = 0.009).ConclusionsOutcomes for DMG-SCs are poor overall but appear to be favorable compared to intracranial DMGs. Despite the recent WHO 2021 grade 4 classification for all DMGs, given the differences in overall survival reported based on historical grading systems, future studies on DMG-SCs are needed to further define if DMG-SCs may represent a heterogeneous group of tumors with different prognoses.

PurposeExtraneural meningioma metastasis is a rare occurrence and may pose a clinical challenge due to its unclear prognosis. In this systematic review, we analyze patient demographics, clinical characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to February 23, 2024 for cases of metastatic meningioma according to PRISMA guidelines. Descriptive statistics, Mann–Whitney U test, Fisher's exact tests, Kaplan–Meier curves, and log-rank tests were used for selected analyses.ResultsA total of 288 patients (52% male) were included with an average age of 49 years at meningioma diagnosis. Tumors were distributed across WHO grade 1 (38%), 2 (36%), and 3 (26%). Most patients experienced intracranial recurrence (79%) and mean time to first metastasis was approximately 8 years. No change in WHO grade between primary and metastasis was observed for most cases (65%). Treatment of the initial metastasis was most often with surgery (43%), chemotherapy (20%), or no treatment (14%). Half of the patients were alive (50%) with an average follow-up of 3 years following metastasis. Overall median survival was 36 months for the entire cohort. This differed significantly between WHO grade 1 versus 2/3 meningioma primaries (168 vs. 15 months, p < 0.005).ConclusionMetastatic meningioma appears to be associated with more positive prognosis than other brain tumor types with extra-neural metastasis or metastasis in general. This is particularly true for cases arising from a WHO grade 1 meningioma.

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is categorized as a grade IV astrocytoma by the World Health Organization (WHO), representing the most aggressive and prevalent form of glioma. It presents a significant clinical challenge, with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of various nanotherapy approaches for GBM and explores future directions in tumor management. Nanomedicine, which involves nanoparticles in the 1–100 nm range, shows promise in improving drug delivery and targeting tumor cells. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of databases including Google Scholar, NCBI PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted to identify clinical trials on GBM and nanomedicine. The primary outcome measures were median overall survival, progression-free survival, and quality of life assessed through Karnofsky performance scores. The safety profile was assessed by adverse events. Results: The analysis included 225 GBM patients, divided into primary and recurrent sub-populations. Primary GBM patients had a median overall survival of 6.75 months, while recurrent GBM patients had a median overall survival of 9.7 months. The mean PFS period was 2.3 months and 3.92 months in primary GBM and recurrent GBM patients, respectively. Nanotherapy showed an improvement in quality of life, with KPS scores increasing after treatment in recurrent GBM patients. Adverse events were observed in 14.2% of patients. Notably, Bevacizumab therapy exhibited better survival outcomes but with a higher incidence of adverse events. Conclusions: Nanotherapy offers a modest increase in survival with fewer severe side effects. It shows promise in improving the quality of life, especially in recurrent GBM patients. However, it falls short in terms of overall survival compared to Bevacizumab. The heterogeneous nature of treatment protocols and reporting methods highlights the need for standardized multicenter trials to further evaluate the potential of nanomedicine in GBM management.

PurposeThis systematic review aims to investigate the role of nuclear imaging techniques in detecting incidentalomas and their impact on patient management.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted from February to May 2022. Studies in English involving patients undergoing nuclear medicine studies with incidental tumor findings were included. Data on imaging modalities, incidentaloma characteristics, management changes, and follow-up were extracted and analyzed.ResultsNinety-two studies involving 64.884 patients were included. Incidentalomas were detected in 611 cases (0.9%), with thyroid being the most common site. PET/CT with FDG and choline tracers showed the highest incidentaloma detection rates. Detection of incidentalomas led to a change in therapeutic strategy in 59% of cases. Various radiotracers demonstrated high sensitivity for incidentaloma detection, particularly in neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer.ConclusionNuclear imaging techniques play a crucial role in detecting incidentalomas, leading to significant changes in patient management. The high sensitivity of these modalities highlights their potential in routine oncology follow-up protocols. Future directions may include enhancing spatial resolution and promoting theranostic approaches for improved patient care.

PurposeGamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is feasible for pituitary adenomas, but post-surgery GKRS may cause severe hormone deficits. We reviewed the literature on primary GKRS for pituitary adenoma focusing on radiation-induced hormone deficiencies.MethodsPubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched upon the PRISMA guidelines to include studies describing primary GKRS for pituitary adenomas. Pooled-rates of GKRS-induced hormone deficiencies and clinical-radiological responses were analyzed with a random-effect model meta-analysis.ResultsWe included 24 studies comprising 1381 patients. Prolactinomas were the most common (34.2%), and 289 patients had non-functioning adenomas (20.9%). Median tumor volume was 1.6cm3 (range, 0.01–31.3), with suprasellar extension and cavernous sinus invasion detected in 26% and 31.1% cases. GKRS was delivered with median marginal dose 22.6 Gy (range, 6–49), maximum dose 50 Gy (range, 25–90), and isodose line 50% (range, 9–100%). Median maximum point doses were 9 Gy (range, 0.5–25) to the pituitary stalk, 7 Gy (range, 1–38) to the optic apparatus, and 5 Gy (range, 0.4–12.3) to the optic chiasm. Pooled 5 year rates of endocrine normalization and local tumor control were 48% (95%CI 45–51%) and 97% (95%CI 95–98%). 158 patients (11.4%) experienced endocrinopathies at a median of 45 months (range, 4–187.3) after GKRS, with pooled 5-year rates of 8% (95%CI 6–9%). GKRS-induced hormone deficiencies comprised secondary hypothyroidism (42.4%) and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (33.5%), with panhypopituitarism reported in 31 cases (19.6%).ConclusionPrimary GKRS for pituitary adenoma may correlate with lower rates of radiation-induced hypopituitarism (11.4%) than post-surgery GKRS (18–32%). Minimal doses to normal pituitary structures and long-term endocrine follow-up are of primary importance.

Background: Orbital metastases often lead to severe functional impairment. The role of resection, orbital exenteration, and complementary treatments is still debated. We systematically reviewed the literature on orbital metastases. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web-of-Science, and Cochrane were searched upon PRISMA guidelines to identify studies on orbital metastases. Clinical characteristics, management strategies, and survival were analyzed. Results: We included 262 studies comprising 873 patients. Median age was 59 years. The most frequent primary tumors were breast (36.3%), melanoma (10.1%), and prostate (8.5%) cancers, with median time interval of 12 months (range, 0–420). The most common symptoms were proptosis (52.3%) and relative-afferent-pupillary-defect (38.7%). Most metastases showed a diffuse location within the orbit (19%), with preferential infiltration of orbital soft tissues (40.2%). In 47 cases (5.4%), tumors extended intracranially. Incisional biopsy (63.7%) was preferred over fine-needle aspiration (10.2%), with partial resection (16.6%) preferred over complete (9.5%). Orbital exenteration was pursued in 26 patients (3%). A total of 305 patients (39.4%) received chemotherapy, and 506 (58%) received orbital radiotherapy. Post-treatment symptom improvement was significantly superior after resection (p = 0.005) and orbital radiotherapy (p = 0.032). Mean follow-up was 14.3 months, and median overall survival was 6 months. Fifteen cases (1.7%) demonstrated recurrence with median local control of six months. Overall survival was statistically increased in patients with breast cancer (p < 0.001) and in patients undergoing resection (p = 0.024) but was not correlated with orbital location (p = 0.174), intracranial extension (p = 0.073), biopsy approach (p = 0.344), extent-of-resection (p = 0.429), or orbital exenteration (p = 0.153). Conclusions: Orbital metastases severely impair patient quality of life. Surgical resection safely provides symptom and survival benefit compared to biopsy, while orbital radiotherapy significantly improves symptoms compared to not receiving radiotherapy.

Background: The development of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET tracers has garnered interest in neuro-oncology, to increase accuracy in diagnostic, radiation planning, and neurotheranostics protocols. We systematically reviewed the literature on the current uses of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET in brain tumors. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to include published studies and ongoing trials utilizing [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET in patients with brain tumors. Results: We included 63 published studies comprising 1030 patients with 1277 lesions, and 4 ongoing trials. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET was mostly used for diagnostic purposes (62.5%), followed by treatment planning (32.7%), and neurotheranostics (4.8%). Most lesions were meningiomas (93.6%), followed by pituitary adenomas (2.8%), and the DOTATOC tracer (53.2%) was used more frequently than DOTATATE (39.1%) and DOTANOC (5.7%), except for diagnostic purposes (DOTATATE 51.1%). [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies were mostly required to confirm the diagnosis of meningiomas (owing to their high SSTR2 expression and tracer uptake) or evaluate their extent of bone invasion, and improve volume contouring for better radiotherapy planning. Some studies reported the uncommon occurrence of SSTR2-positive brain pathology challenging the diagnostic accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for meningiomas. Pre-treatment assessment of tracer uptake rates has been used to confirm patient eligibility (high somatostatin receptor-2 expression) for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) (i.e., neurotheranostics) for recurrent meningiomas and pituitary carcinomas. Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies may revolutionize the routine neuro-oncology practice, especially in meningiomas, by improving diagnostic accuracy, delineation of radiotherapy targets, and patient eligibility for radionuclide therapies.