Explore the vast range of titles available.

A total of 1500 nonthoracic MRI examinations were performed on patients with a non–MRI-conditional pacemaker or ICD, after programming of the devices in accordance with a standardized protocol. No patient whose device was appropriately programmed had device or lead failure. The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) poses potential safety concerns for patients with an implanted cardiac device (cardiac pacemaker or implantable cardioverter–defibrillator [ICD]). These concerns are a consequence of the potential for magnetic field–induced cardiac lead heating, which could result in myocardial thermal injury and detrimental changes in pacing properties. 1 – 3 As a result, it has long been recommended that patients with an implanted cardiac device not undergo MRI scanning, even when it otherwise may be considered to be the most appropriate diagnostic imaging method for the patient’s clinical care. 4 Over the past two decades, cardiac devices have been . . .

Renal denervation has emerged as a safe and effective therapy to lower blood pressure in hypertensive patients. In addition to the main renal arteries, branch vessels are also denervated in more contemporary studies. Accurate and reliable imaging in renal denervation patients is critical for long-term safety surveillance due to the small risk of renal artery stenosis that may occur after the procedure. This review summarizes three common non-invasive imaging modalities: Doppler ultrasound (DUS), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). DUS is the most widely used owing to cost considerations, ease of use, and the fact that it is less invasive, avoids ionizing radiation exposure, and requires no contrast media use. Renal angiography is used to determine if renal artery stenosis is present when non-invasive imaging suggests renal artery stenosis. We compiled data from prior renal denervation studies as well as the more recent SPYRAL-HTN OFF MED Study and show that DUS demonstrates both high sensitivity and specificity for detecting renal stenosis de novo and in longitudinal assessment of renal artery patency after interventions. In the context of clinical trials DUS has been shown, together with the use of the baseline angiogram, to be effective in identifying stenosis in branch and accessory arteries and merits consideration as the main screening imaging modality to detect clinically significant renal artery stenosis after renal denervation and this is consistent with guidelines from the recent European Consensus Statement on Renal Denervation.Graphic abstract

Studies have shown that coronary artery calcium (CAC) incidentally identified on a noncontrast chest computed tomography (NCCT) performed for noncardiac indications has diagnostic and prognostic value. The frequency by which radiologists report incidental CAC and its impact on patient management are unknown. This study included 204 consecutive patients (63 ± 17 years, 59% men) without a history of coronary artery disease referred for an NCCT for noncardiac indications. The presence of CAC was determined by an expert cardiologist and compared with the radiology report. For each patient, the medical record was reviewed for changes in medications. Physicians caring for these patients were surveyed regarding their awareness and the clinical importance of incidental CAC after their patients had been discharged from the hospital. There were 108 of 201 patients (53%) with a CAC score >0 as determined by an expert reader. The interpreting radiologist reported the presence of CAC in 74 of 108 patients (69%). Of the 74 patients, there was an increase in stain and aspirin prescription of 4% and 5%, respectively. Of the 132 physicians surveyed, 54% of physicians surveyed believed that CAC on an NCCT scan was analogous to the presence of coronary artery disease, 23% were aware that incidental CAC was reported, and only 4% said they would make medical management decisions based on the finding of incidental CAC. In conclusion, incidental CAC is under-reported by the interpreting radiologists and suggests an integral role for a cardiovascular imaging specialist. When incidental CAC is reported, physicians are not cognizant of the meaning and importance of this finding. This lack of knowledge is reflected in the negligible impact reported incidental CAC has on clinical management decisions.

Clinical excellence, education, and research are fundamental to this mission. [...]the SCMR is committed to facilitating the publication of clinical documents that promote the standards of best practice and dissemination of clinically relevant advances in the field of CMR. In order to facilitate the publication of SCMR-endorsed documents, the publications committee performs the following specific activities: (1) soliciting and reviewing proposals for SCMR-endorsed publications from the SCMR leadership and its membership, (2) suggesting issues of importance for publication and recommending task groups to the SCMR Executive Committee, (3) making efforts to ensure that such task groups adequately represent the international membership of the SCMR in order limit bias and promote diversity, (4) broadly overseeing the writing process to ensure timely, state-of-the-art, and scientifically accurate communication that adequately meets the needs of CMR practitioners, (5) collaborating with other professional societies or joint task forces where appropriate, and (6) communicating with SCMR staff and the editorial staff of various peer-reviewed journals including SCMR’s own journal, the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance [JCMR]. C. Appropriate use criteria for CMR imaging, especially those specific to particular disease states or in the context of other imaging modalities and diagnostic tests A clinical practice guideline is an evidence-based document meant to improve clinical outcomes and promote efficiency of care by identifying best practices and reducing practice variations. A proposal for an SCMR-endorsed document should meet the following criteria: * Length the proposal should be 1–2 pages in length using Times New Roman 12 pt font size and double spaced text. * Title the title should include the phrases “SCMR” and “recommendations” or “expert consensus”. * Main purpose a statement of the aims, primary purpose, and audience of the proposal. * Justification the intended focus of the manuscript, the rationale for publication, and a confirmation that a brief literature review was performed to establish that paper does not overlap with previous or planned publications. * Relevance to SCMR provide the rationale as to why this proposal should be endorsed by the SCMR.

Although a coronary artery calcium (CAC) score of 0 is associated with a very low 10-year risk for cardiac events, this risk is nonzero. Subjects with a family history of coronary heart disease (CHD) has been associated with more subclinical atherosclerosis than subjects without a family history of CHD. The purpose of this study was to assess the significance of a family history for CHD in subjects with a CAC score of 0. The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort includes 6,814 participants free of clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) at baseline. Positive family history was defined as reporting a parent, sibling, or child who had a heart attack. Time to incident CHD or CVD event was modeled using the multivariable Cox regression; 3,185 subjects were identified from the original Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort as having a baseline CAC score of 0 (mean age 58 years, 37% men). Over a median follow-up of 10 years, 101 participants (3.2%) had CVD events and 56 (1.8%) had CHD events. In age- and gender-adjusted analyses, a family history of CHD was associated with an ∼70% increase in CVD (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 2.56) and CHD (hazard ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.91) events. CVD events remained significant after further adjustment for ethnicity, risk factors, and baseline medication use. In conclusion, asymptomatic subjects with a 0 CAC score and a positive family history of CHD are at increased risk for CVD and CHD events compared with those without a family history of CHD, although absolute event rates remain low. •A family history of coronary heart disease is a potent risk factor.•We investigated its significance in those with a coronary artery calcium score of 0.•A 70% increase in cardiovascular events was noted in those with a family history.•Family history is a potent risk factor, even in those with coronary artery calcium scores of 0.

In bileaflet mitral valve prolapse (BMVP) systolic leaflet displacement creates a pocket of blood on the left ventricular (LV) side of the leaflets, but on the atrial side of the annulus. This blood is excluded from the LV end-systolic volume if the mitral valve annulus is used to determine the most basal extent of the LV. The purpose of this study is to describe the quantitative implications of defining the LV base on mitral regurgitant severity and LV systolic function in BMVP. In 30 consecutive patients (53% male, 58 ± 14 years) with BMVP, LV endocardial and epicardial borders were determined from SSFP images. The LV base at end-systole was defined by the “Functional” method (at the mitral valve annulus) or the “Anatomic” method (at the mitral valve leaflets). Regurgitant volume was the difference between the LV stroke volume and mean forward flow. LV myocardial strain measurements were determined from the short axis endocardial and epicardial borders. The “Functional” method resulted in higher regurgitant volumes (mean difference: 22 ml, range 0–40 ml) and higher ejection fractions (mean difference: 9%, range 0–21%). The correlation between LV end-diastolic volume and regurgitant volume was better with the “Functional” method (r = 0.79, p < 0.0001) than the “Anatomic” method (r = 0.67, p < 0.0001). The correlation between global myocardial radial strain and LV EF was better with the “Functional” method (r = 0.86, p < 0.0001) than the “Anatomic” method (r = 0.68, p < 0.0001). In BMVP, the base of the LV should be defined at the level of the mitral valve annulus so that regurgitant volume most accurately reflects the functional significance of the mitral valve disease and LVEF most accurately reflects global systolic LV function. Defining the basal extent of the LV at the mitral valve leaflets leads to substantially lower regurgitant volumes and lower ejection fractions that could have important clinical consequences.

Background The treatment of patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) or mitral regurgitation (MR) relies on the accurate assessment of the severity of the regurgitation as well as its effect on left ventricular (LV) size and function. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is an excellent tool for quantifying regurgitant volumes as well as LV size and function. The 2008 AHA/ACC management guidelines for the therapy of patients with AR or MR only describe LV size in terms of linear dimensions (i.e. end-diastolic and end-systolic dimension). LV volumes that correspond to these linear dimensions have not been published in the peer-reviewed literature. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of regurgitant volume on LV volumes and chamber dimensions in patients with isolated AR or MR and preserved LV function. Methods Regurgitant volume, LV volume, mass, linear dimensions, and ejection fraction, were determined in 34 consecutive patients with isolated AR and 23 consecutive patients with MR and no other known cardiac disease. Results There is a strong, linear relationship between regurgitant volume and LV end-diastolic volume index (aortic regurgitation r 2 = 0.8, mitral regurgitation r 2 = 0.8). Bland-Altman analysis of regurgitant volume shows little interobserver variation (AR: 0.6 ± 4 ml; MR 4 ± 6 ml). The correlation is much poorer between regurgitant volume and commonly used clinical linear measures such as end-systolic dimension (mitral regurgitation r 2 = 0.3, aortic regurgitation r 2 = 0.5). For a given regurgitant volume, AR causes greater LV enlargement and hypertrophy than MR. Conclusion CMR is an accurate and robust technique for quantifying regurgitant volume in patients with AR or MR. Ventricular volumes show a stronger correlation with regurgitant volume than linear dimensions, suggesting LV volumes better reflect ventricular remodeling in patients with isolated mitral or aortic regurgitation. Ventricular volumes that correspond to published recommended linear dimensions are determined to guide the timing of surgical intervention.

The obesity paradox has been reported in several populations of patients with cardiovascular disease. Recent data have shown that physical fitness may attenuate the obesity paradox. Patients who undergo pharmacologic stress testing are known to have a higher risk of mortality than those who can exercise. The purpose of this study is to determine the interaction of obesity and exercise ability on survival among patients with a normal stress-rest single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). A total of 5,203 (60 ± 13 years, male 37%) patients without a history of heart disease and a normal stress-rest SPECT between the years 1995 and 2010 were included in this analysis. Body mass index categories were defined according to the World Health Organization classification: normal weight, 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2; overweight, 25 to 29.9 kg/m2; and obese, ≥30 kg/m2. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on their ability to exercise: those who reached ≥6 METs on exercise, those who attained a level of <6 METs, and those who required pharmacologic stress. Patients in each of these fitness groups were further divided into 3 subgroups based on their body mass index. There were 939 (18%) deaths during a mean follow-up of 8.1 ± 4.1 years, for an overall event rate of 2.3%/y. Both exercise to ≥6 METs and being obese were associated with lower mortality. Adjusted multivariate analysis using the obese high-fit patients as the reference showed a wide heterogeneity in annualized mortality rates according to exercise and weight status, with annualized event rates which varied from 0.6%/y in the obese subjects who were physically fit to 5.3%/y among healthy subjects who underwent pharmacologic stress testing (P < .001). Stress mode and body weight impacted long-term survival in patients with a normal stress SPECT. The benefit of being physically fit was evident in all weight groups, as was the adverse effect of being unable to exercise. However, with regard to body weight, there was a paradoxical survival advantage for those patients who were overweight and obese, regardless of their exercise ability.

In patients with normal results on stress single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) studies, coronary artery disease risk factors (RFs) and the mode of testing can influence the trajectory of long-term outcomes. Nevertheless, the combined prognostic impact of these commonly assessed factors has heretofore not been considered. In this study, all-cause mortality rates were assessed in 5,762 patients with normal results on stress SPECT studies. Patients were divided according to mode of stress testing, exercise or pharmacologic, and by number of coronary artery disease RFs. Patients were followed for a mean of 8 ± 4.2 years for all-cause mortality. There were 1,051 deaths (18%), with an annualized mortality rate of 2.2% per year. The RF-adjusted event rate was significantly higher for pharmacologic versus exercise SPECT studies (3.6% per year vs 1.2% per year, p <0.0001) and for patients with increasing numbers of coronary artery disease RFs (p <0.0001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed wide heterogeneity in all-cause mortality rates when RF burden and performance of exercise versus pharmacologic testing were considered, ranging from only 0.8% per year in exercise patients with no RFs to 4.2% per year in pharmacologic patients with ≥2 RFs. Mortality rates in exercise patients with ≥2 RFs were comparable to those in pharmacologic patients with no RFs. In conclusion, long-term outcomes after cardiac stress testing are synergistically and strongly influenced by RF burden and inability to exercise. Given these findings, prospective study is indicated to determine whether enhanced risk categorization that combines the consideration of these 2 factors improves patient counseling and physician risk management among patients manifesting normal results on stress SPECT studies.