Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundThe optimal threshold of surgical margins for breast malignant phyllodes tumors (MPTs) and the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were investigated.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a multicenter nationwide retrospective study of all MPT cases with central pathological review within the French Sarcoma Group. Endpoints were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) rates.ResultsOverall, 212 patients were included in the study. All non-metastatic patients underwent primary surgical treatment, including 58.6% of conservative surgeries. An R0 resection was achieved in 117 patients (59.4%: 26.9% of patients with 1–2 mm margins, 12.2% of patients with 3–7 mm margins, 20.3% of patients with ≥ 8 mm margins). Ninety-four patients (45%) underwent a second surgery (SS) to obtain R0 margins, with a final mastectomy rate of 72.6%. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were performed in 91 (43.1%) and 23 patients (10.9%), respectively, but were not associated with better outcomes. Mastectomy was significantly associated with better LRFS (p < 0.001). Margins of 0, 1, or 2 mm with SS were associated with better MFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.3, p = 0.005) and OS (HR 0.32, p = 0.005) compared with margins of 0–1–2 mm without SS. Wider margins (> 8 mm) were not superior to margins of 3–7 mm (3–7 mm vs. > 8 mm; HR 0.81, p = 0.69). Age (HR 2.14, p = 0.038) and tumor necrosis (HR 1.96, p = 0.047) were found to be poor prognostic factors and were associated with MFS.ConclusionsThis study suggests that 3 mm margins are necessary and sufficient for surgical management of MPTs, and emphasizes the importance of SS to obtain clear margins in case of 0–1–2 mm margins. No impact of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy was detected in this study.

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare malignant tumor of uterine mesenchyme, accounting for 15–20% of uterine sarcomas. It is classified into low-grade (LG-ESS) and high-grade (HG-ESS) subtypes, each defined by distinct histopathological and molecular features. LG-ESS exhibits slow progression, resembling proliferative-phase endometrial stroma, with genetic alterations like JAZF1-SUZ12 fusions. HG-ESS is more aggressive, characterized by high mitotic activity, necrosis, and genetic markers such as BCOR internal tandem duplication, often leading to advanced-stage diagnosis. Surgical resection is the cornerstone for managing early-stage ESS. A total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is recommended to prevent recurrence. Fertility-preserving approaches may be considered in LG-ESS but are associated with high recurrence rates. Lymphadenectomy is not routinely performed, given its limited prognostic value. HG-ESS, due to its aggressiveness, often requires additional treatment, including chemotherapy. Adjuvant therapy varies by subtype. LG-ESS responds well to hormonal treatments such as aromatase inhibitors and progestins, while tamoxifen is contraindicated. HG-ESS, lacking hormonal receptor expression, is managed with chemotherapy, often incorporating doxorubicin-based regimens. Radiotherapy may improve local control in select cases but shows limited impact on overall survival. Advanced-stage ESS treatment focuses on complete cytoreduction, supplemented by systemic therapies. Hormonal therapy remains the standard for advanced LG-ESS, whereas HG-ESS relies on chemotherapy. Prognosis depends on the subtype and stage. LG-ESS has favorable outcomes, with five-year survival exceeding 90% in early stages, but recurrent disease remains common. HG-ESS is associated with poorer survival due to its aggressive nature. Advances in molecular profiling offer promising avenues for personalized therapies, integrating genomic insights with targeted treatments to improve outcomes in this rare malignancy.

Genomic instability (GI) influences treatment efficacy and resistance, and an accurate measure of it is lacking. Current measures of GI are based on counts of specific structural variation (SV) and mutational signatures. Here, we present a holistic approach to measuring GI based on the quantification of the steady-state equilibrium between DNA damage and repair as assessed by the residual breakpoints (BP) remaining after repair, irrespective of SV type. We use the notion of Hscore, a BP “hotspotness” magnitude scale, to measure the propensity of genomic structural or functional DNA elements to break more than expected by chance. We then derived new measures of transcription- and replication-associated GI that we call iTRAC (transcription-associated chromosomal instability index) and iRACIN (replication-associated chromosomal instability index). We show that iTRAC and iRACIN are predictive of metastatic relapse in Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and that they may be combined to form a new classifier called MAGIC (mixed transcription- and replication-associated genomic instability classifier). MAGIC outperforms the gold standards FNCLCC and CINSARC in stratifying metastatic risk in LMS. Furthermore, iTRAC stratifies chemotherapeutic response in LMS. We finally show that this approach is applicable to other cancers.

The benefit or harm of trabectedin discontinuation in patients with non-progressive soft-tissue sarcoma remains unclear. We report the final analysis of a phase 2 trial investigating the clinical benefit of continuation of trabectedin treatment until progression versus interruption of therapy after six treatment cycles in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. For this open-label, non-comparative, multicentre, phase 2 study, eligible adult patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas, who had previously received doxorubicin-based chemotherapy and were able to receive trabectedin, were enrolled from 14 centres of the French Sarcoma Group. Trabectedin was administered at a dose of 1·5 mg/m2 through a central venous line as a 24-h continuous infusion every 3 weeks. After the initial six cycles of trabectedin, patients who were free from progressive disease were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio either to continuous treatment or therapy interruption. Randomisation was done centrally by a computer-generated system using permuted blocks of four patients, stratified by tumour grade and performance status. Patients allocated to the interruption group were allowed to restart trabectedin in case of progressive disease. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months after randomisation, analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01303094. In 178 evaluable patients, 91 (51%) patients had not progressed after six cycles. Of these patients, 53 patients were randomly assigned to the two treatment groups: 27 to the continuation group and 26 to the interruption group. Overall, patients in the two groups received a similar median number of trabectedin cycles (continuation group: 11 cycles [range 6–31+] vs interruption group: 11 [range 6–23+]). After randomisation, progression-free survival at 6 months was 51·9% (95% CI 31·9–68·6) in the continuation group versus 23·1% (9·4–40·3) in the interruption group (p=0·0200). The occurrence of treatment-related grade 3 adverse events (four [16%] of 25 patients in the continuation group vs three [14%] of 21 in the interruption group) and grade 4 adverse events (one [4%] vs none) was similar in both groups. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase increases (one [4%] in the interruption group vs three [14%] in the continuation group), neutropenia (two [8%] vs two [10%]), and intestinal occlusion (one [4%] vs one [5%]). We do not recommend trabectedin discontinuation in patients with advanced, doxorubicin-refractory soft-tissue sarcoma who have not progressed after six cycles of treatment. The French National Cancer Institute (INCa) and PharmaMar SA.

Background The value of chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) remains controversial. Several expert teams consider that chemotherapy provides a survival advantage and should be proposed in high-risk (HR) patients. However, the lack of accuracy in identifying HR patients with conventional risk factors (large, deep, FNCLCC grade 3, extremity STS) is an issue that cannot be neglected. For example, while the FNCLCC grading system is a powerful tool, it has several limitations. CINSARC, a 67-gene signature, has proved to be an additional independent factor for predicting metastatic spread and outperforms histological grade. Regardless of FNCLCC grade, CINSARC stratifies patients into two separate prognostic groups: one with an excellent prognosis (low-risk (LR) CINSARC) and the other with a worse outcome (HR-CINSARC) in terms of metastatic relapse. Here we evaluate the role of chemotherapy in grade 1–2 STS patients with HR-CINSARC and assess the prognostic value of CINSARC in patients treated with standard of care. Methods CHIC is a parallel, randomized, open-label, multicenter study evaluating the effect on metastasis-free survival of adding perioperative chemotherapy to standard of care in patients with grade ½ STS sarcoma defined as HR by CINSARC. In this target selection design, 600 patients will be screened with CINSARC to randomize 250 HR-CINSARC patients between standard of care and standard of care plus chemotherapy (4 cycles of 3 weeks of intravenous chemotherapy with doxorubicin in combination with dacarbazine or ifosfamide according to histologic subtype). LR-CINSARC patients will be treated by standard of care according to the investigator. The primary endpoint is metastasis-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, disease-free survival and safety. Furthermore, the prognostic value of CINSARC will be evaluated by comparing LR-CINSARC patients to HR-CINSARC patients randomized in standard of care. Discussion CHIC is a prospective randomized phase III trial designed to comprehensively evaluate the benefit of chemotherapy in HR-CINSARC patients and to prospectively validate the prognostic value of CINSARC in grade ½ STS sarcoma patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04307277 Date of registration: 13 March 2020

The majority of sarcomas are under the influence of a tumor microenvironment that dampens immune activity, resulting in resistance to monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoints and reduced clinical effectiveness. Preclinical studies indicate that targeting abnormal neoangiogenesis by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) can alter the TME, thereby promoting T cell infiltration and increasing tumor immunogenicity. The REGOMUNE study, a phase II clinical trial, assessed the therapeutic combination of regorafenib, a multityrosine kinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR2 and the PD-L1 blocker avelumab, in individuals with advanced “cold” STS characterized by a lack of mature tertiary lymphoid structures (mTLS). Forty-nine mTLS-negative STS patients were enrolled, including leiomyosarcoma (45%), synovial sarcoma (18%), and other subtypes. The objective response rate was 11.0% (95% CI: 4.0% - 22.0%), with median progression-free survival and overall survival of 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.7–3.5 months) and 15.1 months, respectively. Frequent adverse events included grade 1 or 2 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, fatigue, and diarrhea. On-treatment multiplex immunofluorescence analysis revealed significant increases in CD8 + T cell and B cell infiltration and PD1 expression on immune cells. Plasma analysis indicated significant upregulation of soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) levels and tryptophan consumption. Overall, these results indicate that anti-angiogenic therapy modulates the tumor microenvironment in patients with cold STS and highlight the need for complementary strategies to enhance the functional activity of immune cells in this particular setting. Clinical trial registration number: NCT03475953

Background CIC‐rearranged sarcomas (CIC‐RS) represent the most frequent subset of “Ewing‐like” undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas. These tumors tend to be more aggressive than Ewing sarcomas. Moreover, treatment strategy can differ according to teams. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to describe the characteristics, treatments, and outcome for patients with CIC‐RS included in the French NETSARC+ database. Methods Pediatric and adult patients from 13 French centers with a diagnosis of CIC‐RS were registered from October 2008 to March 2021. Patients and tumors characteristics were collected from the national network NETSARC+ database (http://netsarc.sarcomabcb.org). CIC‐RS diagnosis was pathologically and molecularly confirmed with a central review by expert pathologists. Two groups of patients were studied: those treated as classical Ewing sarcomas (cohort EwS) and those treated as high‐grade soft tissue sarcomas (cohort STS) according to ESMO and/or EpSSG guidelines. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log‐rank test was used to compare survival. Results Among 79 patients, the male/female sex ratio was 0.7 and the median age at diagnosis was 27 years (range 2–87). With a median follow‐up of 37 months, 39 patients died of the disease. Median overall survival from diagnosis was 18 months, with no significant difference between both cohorts (p = 0.9). Nevertheless, when focusing on patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis (N = 21), all patients from cohort STS died of disease while some patients from cohort EwS were still alive and in complete remission. Conclusion FSG experience confirms the aggressive clinical course of CDS patients regardless of chemotherapy regimen. Two groups characterized by different patterns of care were evaluated in our study. On one hand (cohort 1), patients were treated as Ewing sarcomas, and on the other hand (cohort 2), patients were treated as high‐grade soft tissue sarcomas. Overall, the prognosis was poor and there were no statistical differences in overall survival and relapse‐free survival between the two groups. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients with metastatic CDS from cohort 1 achieved very long‐term survival and might be cured.

The regulatory microRNA miR-150 is involved in the development of hemopathies and is downregulated in T-lymphomas, such as anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) tumors. ALCL is defined by the presence or absence of translocations that activate the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), with nucleophosmin-ALK (NPM-ALK) fusions being the most common. Here, we compared samples of primary NPM-ALK(+) and NPM-ALK(-) ALCL to investigate the role of miR-150 downstream of NPM-ALK. Methylation of the MIR150 gene was substantially elevated in NPM-ALK(+) biopsies and correlated with reduced miR-150 expression. In NPM-ALK(+) cell lines, DNA hypermethylation-mediated miR-150 repression required ALK-dependent pathways, as ALK inhibition restored miR-150 expression. Moreover, epigenetic silencing of miR-150 was due to the activation of STAT3, a major downstream substrate of NPM-ALK, in cooperation with DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1). Accordingly, miR-150 repression was turned off following treatment with the DNMT inhibitor, decitabine. In murine NPM-ALK(+) xenograft models, miR-150 upregulation induced antineoplastic activity. Treatment of crizotinib-resistant NPM-ALK(+) KARPAS-299-CR06 cells with decitabine or ectopic miR-150 expression reduced viability and growth. Altogether, our results suggest that hypomethylating drugs, alone or in combination with other agents, may benefit ALK(+) patients harboring tumors resistant to crizotinib and other anti-ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Moreover, these results support further work on miR-150 in these and other ALK(+) malignancies.

Using adaptive radiotherapy (ART), to determine objective clinical criteria that identify extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) patients requiring adaptation of their preoperative radiotherapy (RT) plan. We included 17 patients with a lower extremity ESTS treated between 2019 and 2021 with preoperative RT, using helicoidal intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) tomotherapy, before surgical resection. We collected clinical, tumor parameters and treatment data. Repositioning was ascertained by daily Megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) imaging. Using the PreciseART technology we retrospectively manually delineated at least one MVCT for each patient per week and recorded volume and dosimetric parameters. A greater than 5% change between target volume and planned target volume (PTV) dosimetric coverage from the initial planning CT scan to at least one MVCT was defined as clinically significant. All 17 patients experienced significant tumor volume changes during treatment; 7 tumors grew (41%) and 10 shrank (59%). Three patients (18%), all undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS) with increased volume changes, experienced significant reductions in tumor dose coverage. Seven patients required a plan adaptation, as determined by practical criteria applied in our departmental practice. Among these patients, only one ultimately experienced a significant change in PTV coverage. Three patients had a PTV decrease of coverage. Among them, 2 did not receive plan adaptation according our criteria. None of the patients with decreased tumor volumes had reduced target volume coverage. Monitoring volume variations by estimating gross tumor volume (GTV) on MVCT, in addition to axial and sagittal linear tumor dimensions, appeared to be most effective for detecting reductions in PTV coverage throughout treatment. Variations in ESTS volume are evident during preoperative RT, but significant dosimetric variations are rare. Specific attention should be paid to grade 2-3 UPSs during the first 2 weeks of treatment. In the absence of dedicated software in routine clinical practice, monitoring of tumor volume changes by estimating GTV may represent a useful strategy for identifying patients whose treatment needs to be replanned.

Background Brain metastases from sarcomatous lesions pose a management challenge owing to their rarity and the histopathological heterogeneity. Prognostic indices such as the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) index have been developed for several primary tumour types presenting with brain metastases (e.g. lung, breast, melanoma), tailored to the specifics of different primary histologies and molecular profiles. Thus far, a prognostic index to direct treatment decisions is lacking for adult sarcoma patients with brain metastases. Methods We performed a multicentre analysis of a national group of expert sarcoma tertiary centres (French Sarcoma Group, GSF-GETO) with the participation of one Canadian and one Swiss centre. The study cohort included adult patients with a diagnosis of a bone or soft tissue sarcoma presenting parenchymal or meningeal brain metastases, managed between January 1992 and March 2012. We assessed the validity of the original GPA index in this patient population and developed a disease-specific Sarcoma-GPA index. Results The original GPA index is not prognostic for sarcoma brain metastasis patients. We have developed a dedicated Sarcoma-GPA index that identifies a sub-group of patients with particularly favourable prognosis based on histology, number of brain lesions and performance status. Conclusions The Sarcoma-GPA index provides a novel tool for sarcoma oncologists to guide clinical decision-making and outcomes research.