Explore the vast range of titles available.

Fluoroscopy has always been the cornerstone imaging method of interventional cardiology procedures. However, radiation exposure is linked to an increased risk of malignancies and multiorgan diseases. The medical team is even more exposed to X-rays, and a higher incidence of malignancies was reported in this professional group. In the last years, X-ray exposure has increased rapidly, involving, above all, the medical team and young patients and forcing alternative fluoroless imaging methods. In cardiac electrophysiology (EP) and pacing, the advent of 3D electroanatomic mapping systems with dedicated catheters has allowed real-time, high-density reconstruction of both heart anatomy and electrical activity, significantly reducing the use of fluoroscopy. In addition, the diffusion of intracardiac echocardiography has provided high anatomical resolution of moving cardiac structures, providing intraprocedural guidance for more complex catheter ablation procedures. These methods have largely demonstrated safety and effectiveness, allowing for a dramatic reduction in X-ray delivery in most arrhythmias’ ablations. However, some technical concerns, as well as higher costs, currently do not allow their spread out in EP labs and limit their use to only procedures that are considered highly complex and time-consuming and in young patients. In this review, we aim to update the current employment of fluoroless imaging in different EP procedures, focusing on its strengths and weaknesses.

Over the past decade, remote monitoring (RM) has become an increasingly popular way to improve healthcare and health outcomes. Modern cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are capable of recording an increasing amount of data related to CIED function, arrhythmias, physiological status and hemodynamic parameters, providing in-depth and updated information on patient cardiovascular function. The extensive use of RM for patients with CIED allows for early diagnosis and rapid assessment of relevant issues, both clinical and technical, as well as replacing outpatient follow-up improving overall management without compromise safety. This approach is recommended by current guidelines for all eligible patients affected by different chronic cardiac conditions including either brady- and tachy-arrhythmias and heart failure. Beyond to clinical advantages, RM has demonstrated cost-effectiveness and is associated with elevated levels of patient satisfaction. Future perspectives include improving security, interoperability and diagnostic power as well as to engage patients with digital health technology. This review aims to update existing data concerning clinical outcomes in patients managed with RM in the wide spectrum of cardiac arrhythmias and Hear Failure (HF), disclosing also about safety, effectiveness, patient satisfaction and cost-saving.

Intraprocedural stroke is a well-documented and feared potential risk of cardiovascular transcatheter procedures (TPs). Moreover, subclinical neurological events or covert central nervous system infarctions are concerns related to the development of dementia, future stroke, cognitive decline, and increased risk of mortality. Cerebral protection devices (CPDs) were developed to mitigate the risk of cardioembolic embolism during TPs. They are mechanical barriers designed to cover the ostium of the supra-aortic branches in the aortic arch, but newer devices are able to protect the descending aorta. CPDs have been mainly designed and tested to provide cerebral protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but their use in both Catheterization and Electrophysiology laboratories is rapidly increasing. CPDs have allowed us to perform procedures that were previously contraindicated due to high thromboembolic risk, such as in cases of intracardiac thrombosis identified at preprocedural assessment. However, several concerns related to their employment have to be defined. The selection of patients at high risk of thromboembolism is still a subjective choice of each center. The aim of this review is to update the evidence on the use of CPDs in either Cath labs or EP labs, providing an overview of their structural characteristics. Future perspectives focusing on their possible future employment are also discussed.

The difference between subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) and transvenous ICDs (TV-ICDs) concerns a whole extra thoracic implantation, including a defibrillator coil and pulse generator, without endovascular components. The improved safety profile has allowed the S-ICD to be rapidly taken up, especially among younger patients. Reports of its role in different cardiac diseases at high risk of SCD such as hypertrophic and arrhythmic cardiomyopathies, as well as channelopathies, is increasing. S-ICDs show comparable efficacy, reliability, and safety outcomes compared to TV-ICD. However, some technical issues (i.e., the inability to perform anti-bradycardia pacing) strongly limit the employment of S-ICDs. Therefore, it still remains only an alternative to the traditional ICD thus far. This review aims to provide a contemporary overview of the role of S-ICDs compared to TV-ICDs in clinical practice, including technical aspects regarding device manufacture and implantation techniques. Newer outlooks and future perspectives of S-ICDs are also brought up to date.

Background: The brain and heart are strictly linked and the electrical physiologies of these organs share common pathways and genes. Epilepsy patients have a higher prevalence of electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities compared to healthy people. Furthermore, the relationship between epilepsy, genetic arrhythmic diseases and sudden death is well known. The association between epilepsy and myocardial channelopathies, although already proposed, has not yet been fully demonstrated. The aim of this prospective observational study is to assess the role of the ECG after a seizure. Materials and Methods: From September 2018 to August 2019, all patients admitted to the emergency department of San Raffaele Hospital with a seizure were enrolled in the study; for each patient, neurological, cardiological and ECG data were collected. The ECG was performed at the time of the admission (post-ictal ECG) and 48 h later (basal ECG) and analyzed by two blinded expert cardiologists looking for abnormalities known to indicate channelopathies or arrhythmic cardiomyopathies. In all patients with abnormal post-ictal ECG, next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis was performed. Results: One hundred and seventeen patients were enrolled (females: 45, median age: 48 ± 12 years). There were 52 abnormal post-ictal ECGs and 28 abnormal basal ECGs. All patients with an abnormal basal ECG also had an abnormal post-ictal ECG. In abnormal post-ictal ECG, a Brugada ECG pattern (BEP) was found in eight patients (of which two had BEP type I) and confirmed in two basal ECGs (of which zero had BEP type I). An abnormal QTc interval was identified in 20 patients (17%), an early repolarization pattern was found in 4 patients (3%) and right precordial abnormalities were found in 5 patients (4%). Any kind modification of post-ictal ECG was significantly more pronounced in comparison with an ECG recorded far from the seizure (p = 0.003). A 10:1 higher prevalence of a BEP of any type (particularly in post-ictal ECG, p = 0.04) was found in our population compared to general population. In three patients with post-ictal ECG alterations diagnostic for myocardial channelopathy (BrS and ERP), not confirmed at basal ECG, a pathogenic gene variant was identified (KCNJ8, PKP2 and TRMP4). Conclusion: The 12-lead ECG after an epileptic seizure may show disease-related alterations otherwise concealed in a population at a higher incidence of sudden death and channelopathies. Post-ictal BEP incidence was higher in cases of nocturnal seizure.

Cardiac amyloidosis is the most frequent infiltrative disease caused by the deposition of misfolded proteins in the cardiac tissue, leading to heart failure, brady- and tachyarrhythmia and death. Conduction disorders, atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular arrhythmia (VA) significantly impact patient outcomes and demand recognition. However, several issues remain unresolved regarding early diagnosis and optimal management. Extreme bradycardia is the most common cause of arrhythmic death, while fast and sustained VAs can be found even in the early phases of the disease. Risk stratification and the prevention of sudden cardiac death are therefore to be considered in these patients, although the time for defibrillator implantation is still a subject of debate. Moreover, atrial impairment due to amyloid fibrils is associated with an increased risk of AF resistant to antiarrhythmic therapy, as well as recurrent thromboembolic events despite adequate anticoagulation. In the last few years, the aging of the population and progressive improvements in imaging methods have led to increases in the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. Novel therapies have been developed to improve patients’ functional status, quality of life and mortality, without data regarding their effect on arrhythmia prevention. In this review, we consider the latest evidence regarding the arrhythmic risk stratification of cardiac amyloidosis, as well as the available therapeutic strategies.

Background: Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is an anatomical abnormality associated with an increased risk of major arrhythmic events, regardless of the presence of mitral valve prolapse. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) plays a key role in diagnosing MAD and identifying myocardial fibrosis, a marker of arrhythmic vulnerability. Aim: This study reports the experience of the De Gasperis Cardiology Centre at Niguarda Hospital (Milan, Italy) in managing high-risk MAD patients who underwent implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) implantation and describes their main clinical characteristics. Methods: Between January 2020 and April 2025, five patients with MAD who received ICDs were identified and monitored remotely. Although the small sample size limits generalizability, the objective was to characterize factors associated with arrhythmic susceptibility. Results: Four patients exhibited documented ventricular arrhythmias: two with non-sustained and two with sustained ventricular tachycardia. Notably, CMR did not reveal myocardial fibrosis in two symptomatic cases, suggesting that arrhythmic vulnerability may precede detectable structural abnormalities. The observed coexistence of MAD with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies and channelopathies underscores the relevance of comprehensive genetic evaluation in these patients. Conclusions: MAD should be considered a potential arrhythmogenic substrate rather than a benign anatomical variant. A multimodal diagnostic approach and individualized risk stratification—potentially integrating genetic findings—are essential for optimal patient management.

Abstract In patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD), a minority of post-operative ventricular tachycardias (VTs) is caused by contact between the inflow cannula and the endocardium. Currently, electrophysiologic characteristics and pathologic features of this condition are lacking. We report on a case of a successfully ablated mechanical VT. After VT recurrence, heart transplantation took place. Pathologic observations were consistent with direct tissue injury and inflammation, eventually contributing to persisting arrhythmias. Radiofrequency catheter ablation can be a safe and effective option to treat arrhythmias caused by inflow cannula interference in the short term, although a high recurrence rate is expected.

Abstract A 77-year-old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy and a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) device came to our attention due to incessant ventricular tachycardia and multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks. An electrocardiogram showed non-sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (NSVTs) constantly occurring after each biventricular stimulation. During an electrophysiological study, NSVTs reproducibly recurred only after right ventricular (RV) pacing; LV pacing did not induce any NSVTs. The activation map was consistent with a localized reentry at the interventricular septum, and a double exit; at the LV exit site, a single radiofrequency energy application immediately interrupted the occurrence of the NSVTs. Current evidence supports LV pacing to be pro-arrhythmogenic in few CRT patients. This unusual case shows that RV pacing during CRT could produce frequent ventricular arrhythmias and arrhythmic storm. Catheter ablation can be considered an effective therapeutic option, especially when CRT maintenance is highly advisable.

Clinically, HBP was demonstrated to improve NYHA functional class and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) in CRT candidates, while a reduction of a combined endpoint of mortality and HF hospitalizations during long-term follow-up was reported in nonrandomized registry studies [8,9]. [...]HBP was equivalent or even superior to CRT with respect to QRS narrowing in two randomized trials [10,11]. According to the prospective randomized LBBP-RESYNC trial, in 40 patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block with CRT indication, LBBAP provided greater improvement in the LVEF compared to conventional CRT even in the intention-to-treat analysis [19]. [...]more and more interest is aroused in the possibility of using LBBAP in patients with an indication for anti-bradycardia pacing after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) [25]. [...]new onset atrioventricular conduction block remains a frequent complication of TAVR. Since standard RV pacing at high pacing burden may lead to deterioration of LVEF, LBBAP might be an advantageous solution for this category of individuals.