Explore the vast range of titles available.

PurposePathological evaluation of pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection (PLND) is important for management of cystectomy patients. However, challenges such as unclear interobserver variability of LN counting remain. Here, we assess interobserver variability of LN measures and their clinical utility, with a focus on variant histology.MethodsWe retrieved radical cystectomy cases with PLND between 2010 and 2016 and reevaluated pathological parameters; number of total and metastatic LN, LN density (LND), length of metastatic LN and metastases, extranodal extension (ENE).ResultsWe report 96 patients: median age of 71a, 34 cases pN+, 36 cases with any extent of variant histology, median follow-up 10 months. Perivesical LN were only rarely identified, but frequently metastatic (4/9). Variant histology (34 cases) frequently exhibited LN metastasis (53% of pN+ cases). Interobserver variance was poor for total LN (kappa = 0.167), excellent for positive LN (0.85) and pN staging (0.96), and mediocre for LND (0.53). ROC analysis suggests that both LND and the sum of LN metastasis length may predict outcome (AUC 0.83 and 0.75, respectively).ConclusionOur study confirms the notion of LND as a prognostic measure, but cautions due to strong interobserver variance of LN counts. The sum length of LN metastases could be a measure that is independent of LN counts. We find that microscopically identified perivesical LN merit particular attention. In summary, our study highlights current challenges in pathological reporting of PLND, confirms previous observations and forms a basis for further studies.

Therapeutic strategies for epithelial ovarian cancers are evolving with the advent of immunotherapy, such as PD-L1 inhibitors, with encouraging results. However, little data are available on PDL-1 expression in ovarian cancers. Thus, we set out to determine the PD-L1 expression according to histological subtype. We evaluated the expression of two PD-L1 clones – QR1 and E1L3N – with two scores, one based on the percentage of labeled tumor cells (tumor proportion score, TPS) and the other on labeled immune cells (combined proportion score, CPS) in a consecutive retrospective series of 232 ovarian cancers. PD-L1 expression was more frequent in high grade serous carcinoma (27.5% with E1L3N clone and 41.5% with QR1 clone), grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma (25% with E1L3N clone and 50% with QR1 clone), and clear-cell carcinomas (27.3% with E1L3N clone and 29.6% with QR1 clone) than other histological subtypes with CPS score. Using the CPS score, 17% of cases were labeled with E1L3N vs 28% with QR1. Using the TPS score, 14% of cases were positive to E1L3N vs 17% for QR1. For TPS and CPS, respectively, 77% and 78% of the QR1 cases were concordant with E1L3N for the thresholds of 1%. Overall and progression-free survival between PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative patients were not different across all histological types, and each subtype in particular for serous carcinomas expressing PD-L1. Expression of PD-L1 is relatively uncommon in epithelium ovarian tumors. When positive, usually <10% of tumor cells are labeled. QR1 clone and CPS appear the best tools to evaluate PD-L1 expression.

The objective of this systematic review was to summarize our current knowledge of the role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers for identifying mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) tumors in endometrial cancer (EC). Identification of MMRd tumors, which occur in 13% to 30% of all ECs, has become critical for patients with colorectal and endometrial cancer for therapeutic management, clinical decision making, and prognosis. This review was conducted by two authors applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using the following terms: “immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability endometrial cancer” or “immunohistochemistry and mismatch repair endometrial cancer” or “immunohistochemistry and mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer”. Among 596 retrieved studies, 161 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Articles were classified and presented according to their interest for the diagnosis, prognosis, and theragnostics for patients with MMRd EC. We identified 10, 18, and 96 articles using IHC expression of two, three, or four proteins of the MMR system (MLH1, MSH2, MHS6, and PMS2), respectively. MLH1 promoter methylation was analyzed in 57 articles. Thirty-four articles classified MMRd tumors with IHC markers according to their prognosis in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), stage, grade, and lymph node invasion. Theragnostics were studied in eight articles underlying the important concentration of PD-L1 in MMRd EC. Even though the role of IHC has been challenged, it represents the most common, robust, and cheapest method for diagnosing MMRd tumors in EC and is a valuable tool for exploring novel biotherapies and treatment modalities.

We report the case of an 81-year-old patient with a pleomorphic giant cell adenocarcinoma of the prostate. After diagnosis, he rapidly developed bone metastasis and died within 1 year. This variant of acinar adenocarcinoma is extremely rare and prognosis is poor. This entity has been included into the 2016 WHO classification. The principal differential diagnosis is urothelial carcinoma. To assess the prostatic origin, routine immunohistochemistry can be problematic. Loss of epitopes in this poorly differentiated entity can occur, such as loss of expression of PSA and p504s. We recently described a very sensitive and specific marker of prostate cancer, HOXB13, which once again has proven to be highly specific and sensitive. This is the first description of a pleomorphic giant cell prostate cancer expressing HOXB13.

Pathological assessment of bladder cancer is becoming an increasingly complex task owing to the growing availability of molecular data for different histological subtypes and the appreciation of their importance in determining outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Urologists are aware of the need to closely collaborate with pathologists, and comprehensive sharing of information is crucial to achieve optimal patient management. Numerous steps towards this goal have been made during the past years. Important advances in the assessment and reporting of grading and staging, especially substaging of pT1 urothelial carcinomas, have been made. As part of the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR), an international expert group has suggested worldwide reporting standards for urothelial lesions. Nevertheless, several issues remain unresolved, for example, regarding the reporting of heterogeneous lesions and substaging as well as the gross handling and the reporting for lymphadenectomy specimens. During the past few years, major insights have been gained into the molecular changes that occur during bladder cancer development, but a consensus on how to integrate these data into daily practice has not been achieved.

Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) is rare in young patients and as a result little information as to tumor type and clinical course are available. We present clinicopathological data of a large series of patients less than 40 years with bladder carcinoma. We included in this retrospective study covering the period from 1992 to 2013 patients less than 40 years with a first diagnosis of bladder cancer. Lesions were classified according to the WHO 2004 classification by uropathologists of ten centers. Stage, grade, multifocality, smoking habits, recurrence, and survival were studied. The cohort comprised of 152 patients, 113 males and 39 females with a mean age of 33.2 years. The large majority of the patients (142) was diagnosed with an urothelial carcinoma, the ten others with various histopathological diagnoses. In the age group less than 30 years old, 40.3 % of the cases concerned a papillary urothelial neoplasia of low malignant potential (PUNLMP). In the age group over 30 years, the proportion of PUNLMP decreased to 27.2 %. Only 5.6 % of the UBC was associated with carcinoma in situ. In 14.1 %, a high grade muscle invasive UC was found; 7.0 % had lymph node and 4.9 % distant metastasis at time of presentation. Four patients presented with a history of schistosomiasis; all had an infiltrating carcinoma. After initial resection, 36 patients relapsed, 17 % as PUNLMP, 53 % as pTa low grade, and 30 % as pTa-pT2 high grade UC. During follow-up, 6 % of the patients died. PUNLMP is the most frequent entity in this patient group. It is important that the PUNLMP entity is maintained in future classification systems.

PurposePrevious studies of the cell cycle progression (CCP) score in surgical specimens of prostate cancer (PCa) in patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) demonstrated significant association with time to biochemical recurrence (BCR). In this study, we compared the ability of the CCP score and the expression of PTEN or Ki-67 to predict BCR in a cohort of patients treated by RP. Finally, we constructed the best predictive model for BCR, incorporating biomarkers and relevant clinical variables.Materials and methodsThe study population consisted of 652 PCa patients enrolled in a retrospective cohort and who had RP surgery in French urological centers from 2000 to 2007.ResultsAmong the 652 patients with CCP scores and complete clinical data, BCR events occurred in 41%, and the median time from surgery to the last follow-up among BCR-free patients was 72 months. In univariate Cox analysis, the continuous CCP score and positive Ki-67 predicted recurrence with a HR of 1.44 (95% CI 1.17–1.75; p = 5.3 × 10−4) and 1.89 (95% CI 1.38–2.57; p = 1.6 × 10−4), respectively. In contrast, PTEN expression was not associated with BCR risk. Of the three biomarkers, only the CCP score remained significantly associated in a multivariable Cox model (p = 0.026). The best model incorporated CAPRA-S and CCP scores as predictors, with HRs of 1.32 and 1.24, respectively.ConclusionThe CCP score was superior to the two IHC markers (PTEN and Ki-67) for predicting outcome in PCa after RP.

The origin of a primary or metastatic carcinoma in the pelvic area is sometimes difficult to establish, in particular the distinction between those originating in the bladder and the prostate. A candidate marker is the HOXB13 gene, essential for prostate development. Some studies have shown expression of HOXB13 protein by immunohistochemistry in the nuclear compartment of benign prostate luminal epithelium and prostate carcinoma. Forty-two cases of biopsies and resection specimens of the prostate and urinary bladder, metastatic lymph nodes, and pelvic masses were retrieved from our databases. In all cases, doubt persisted regarding prostatic versus urothelial origin. All cases were stained for CK7, p63, p504s, PSA, CK20, and HOXB13. Chromogranin A, CD56, and synaptophysin were used when neuroendocrine differentiation was suspected. HOXB13 staining was negative or only weakly positive in all carcinomas of urothelial origin. Three of four carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation did not express HOXB13. The fourth carcinoma, in a patient with a history of prostate carcinoma, was positive. In two cases with a synchronous prostatic and urothelial carcinoma, HOXB13 was exclusively expressed in the prostatic carcinoma. Our results demonstrate that HOXB13 expression identifies prostatic origin of a carcinoma with good sensitivity (89 %) and very good specificity (100 %). HOXB13 is a specific and sensitive marker for prostate cells and a valuable diagnostic tool, especially when poorly differentiated or neuroendocrine tumors are encountered. These results justify testing of HOXB13 as a prostate-specific carcinoma marker in larger cohorts for a more thorough evaluation of its sensitivity and specificity.