Explore the vast range of titles available.

Monocytopenia is a common finding in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), but although monocytes may exhibit prognostic significance in MDS due to their role in innate immunity, they have not been incorporated in any prognostic scoring system for MDS. In this study, we analyzed national registry data from 1719 adults with MDS. Monocytopenia was present in 29.5% of the patients and was correlated with the presence of excess blasts and higher revised international prognostic scoring system categories. Univariate analysis showed that monocytopenia was prognostic of a lower overall survival [(OS), 32.0 versus 65.0 months, p < 0.001], while it retained its prognostic significance in a multivariate model comprising anemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia [hazard ratio (HR) for OS, 1.320, p < 0.001]. Moreover, it was prognostic of a lower leukemia free survival (LFS) both in univariate analysis and in a multivariate model comprising cytopenias, bone marrow blasts, and cytogenetic risk (HR for LFS 1.27, p = 0.031). The findings regarding OS and LFR were exclusive or more pronounced in lower risk patients, respectively. Moreover, monocytopenia could divide the low and intermediate risk groups of IPSS-R in prognostically distinct subgroups. Our results redefine the prognostic role of monocytes in MDS and set the basis for further studies to validate our results and expand our knowledge on the prognostic significance of monocytopenia in MDS.

This non-interventional, multicenter, prospective study aimed to evaluate the real-world activity of trabectedin, and its impact on symptom burden and quality of life in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (aSTS) treated in routine clinical settings in Greece. Patients with histologically confirmed aSTS newly initiated on trabectedin were enrolled. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included PFS rate at 3 months, median PFS, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and an assessment of the impact of treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), cancer-related symptom burden and symptom interference with function, as well as all-cause treatment discontinuation rate. A total of 64 eligible patients from 13 Greek centers were evaluated. Patients received a median of three trabectedin cycles per patient (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.0–6.0). Median PFS was 6.6 months with 67.9% and 51.2% of patients free from progression at 3 and 6 months, respectively. ORR was 7.8% and DCR 21.9%. Median OS was 13.1 months. No significant changes from enrolment were noted in HRQoL scores. In total, 30 patients (46.9%) had at least one trabectedin-related adverse drug reaction (ADR) and 9 (14.1%) at least one serious ADR. The treatment discontinuation rate due to toxicity was 9.4%. These results suggest that trabectedin is an active treatment with clinically meaningful benefits in patients with aSTS with no new safety signals.

The “POWERFUL” multicenter, retrospective, and prospective study investigated the effectiveness of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (POM/LoDex) therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in routine care in Greece. Ninety-nine eligible adult patients treated with POM/LoDex according to the approved label after having received ≥2 prior therapies, including lenalidomide and bortezomib, were consecutively enrolled between 16 November 2017 and 21 February 2019 in 18 hematology departments. Fifty patients (50.5%) started POM/LoDex as third-line treatment. During the treatment period (median: 8.3 months; range: 0.3–47.6 months), the median POM dose was 4 mg/day, and 31.3% of the patients received additional antimyeloma agents. The overall response rate was 32.3%. During a median follow-up period of 13.8 months (Kaplan–Meier estimate), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.5 months (95% CI: 7.4–14.4). The PFS was not significantly different between patients receiving POM/LoDex in the third versus later line of therapy, nor between patients receiving concomitant antimyeloma therapy versus POM/LoDEx doublet. During the prospective safety data collection period (median: 7.6 months) among patients with prospective follow-up (N = 75), POM-related adverse event incidence rate was 42.7% (serious: 18.7%; grade  ≥  3 hematological POM-related adverse events: 8.0%). Only neutropenia (13.3%) was reported at a frequency ≥10%. In conclusion, in this real-world study, POM/LoDex displayed a long PFS with no new safety signals emerging.