Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: The CALYPSO phase III trial compared CD (carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)) with CP (carboplatin-paclitaxel) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). Overall survival (OS) data are now mature. Methods: Women with ROC relapsing >6 months after first- or second-line therapy were randomised to CD or CP for six cycles in this international, open-label, non-inferiority trial. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The OS analysis is presented here. Results: A total of 976 patients were randomised (467 to CD and 509 to CP). With a median follow-up of 49 months, no statistically significant difference was observed between arms in OS (hazard ratio=0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.85, 1.16); log-rank P =0.94). Median survival times were 30.7 months (CD) and 33.0 months (CP). No statistically significant difference in OS was observed between arms in predetermined subgroups according to age, body mass index, treatment-free interval, measurable disease, number of lines of prior chemotherapy, or performance status. Post-study cross-over was imbalanced between arms, with a greater proportion of patients randomised to CP receiving post-study PLD (68%) than patients randomised to CD receiving post-study paclitaxel (43%; P <0.001). Conclusion: Carboplatin-PLD led to delayed progression and similar OS compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel in platinum-sensitive ROC.

Background: Recently, a Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) utilising human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4) and CA125 successfully classified patients as presenting a high or low risk for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We validated this algorithm in an independent prospective study. Methods: Women with a pelvic mass, who were scheduled to have surgery, were enrolled in a prospective study. Preoperative serum levels of HE4 and CA125 were measured in 389 patients. The performance of each of the markers, as well as that of ROMA, was analysed. Results: When all malignant tumours were included, ROMA (receiver operator characteristic (ROC)-area under curve (AUC)=0.898) and HE4 (ROC-AUC)=0.857) did not perform significantly better than CA125 alone (ROC–AUC=0.877). Using a cutoff for ROMA of 12.5% for pre-menopausal patients, the test had a sensitivity of 67.5% and a specificity of 87.9%. With a cutoff of 14.4% for post-menopausal patients, the test had a sensitivity of 90.8% and a specificity of 66.3%. For EOC vs benign disease, the ROC–AUC of ROMA increased to 0.913 and for invasive EOC vs benign disease to 0.957. Conclusion: This independent validation study demonstrated similar performance indices to those recently published. However, in this study, HE4 and ROMA did not increase the detection of malignant disease compared with CA125 alone. Although the initial reports were promising, measurement of HE4 serum levels does not contribute to the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.

The development of guidelines is one of the core activities of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and European Society of Gynaecologial Oncology (ESGO), as part of the mission of both societies to improve the quality of care for patients with cancer across Europe. ESMO and ESGO jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based recommendations in several selected areas in order to improve the quality of care for women with ovarian cancer. The ESMO–ESGO consensus conference on ovarian cancer was held on April 12–14, 2018 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of ovarian cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel worked on five clinically relevant questions regarding ovarian cancer relating to each of the following four areas: pathology and molecular biology, early-stage and borderline tumours, advanced stage disease and recurrent disease. Relevant scientific literature, as identified using a systematic search, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. The recommendations presented here are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. This article presents the recommendations of this ESMO–ESGO consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

PurposeIn stage IV breast cancer, the efficacy of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) targeted therapies in cases with discordance in HER2 expression between primary and metastatic site is not well known. We studied progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by HER2 concordance when treating women with taxane–trastuzumab (± pertuzumab) in first or second line and trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) or capecitabine–lapatinib in later lines.Patients and methodsRetrospective monocentric study including all breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab between January 2002 and September 2017 at the University Hospital in Leuven; we selected metastatic patients with an available HER2 status in primary and metastatic site. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for estimating PFS/OS and log-rank test for analyzing between group differences. A Cox model is used for testing difference between groups while correcting for Pertuzumab. Multivariable Cox regression is used to model overall survival as a function group, correcting for possible confounders.ResultsWe included 74 patients; 46 had an unchanged HER2 status (positive/positive), 9 lost HER2 (positive/negative), while 19 acquired HER2 amplification (negative/positive). 25 out of 28 cases with a discordant HER2 status were positive for ER and/or PgR in the primary site. HER2 positive/negative cases had a significantly lower PFS for taxane–trastuzumab–(pertuzumab) (PFS = 5.5 months), compared to HER2 positive/positive (PFS 9 months, p = 0.01) and HER2 negative/positive (PFS 14 months, p = 0.01) patients. PFS for later line T-DM1 (n = 30) was significantly higher for the HER2 positive/positive group (PFS 6.0 months) than for the discordant groups HER2 negative/positive (PFS 1.0 month, p = 0.04) and HER2 positive/negative (PFS 1.5 month, p = 0.01). After correcting for possible confounders, the HER2 positive/negative group had a significantly worse OS compared to HER2 positive/positive (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08–0.44) and negative/positive (HR 0.15, 95% 0.06–0.38).ConclusionConversion of HER2 status was seen in 28 out of 74 cases and was mostly observed in hormone receptor-positive tumors. In contrast to patients with HER2 loss, patients with a positive conversion of HER2 status derived substantial benefit from first line treatment with taxane–trastuzumab–(pertuzumab). This study highlights the importance of re-biopsying the metastatic lesion and changing treatment according to the last HER2 result.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy in the Western world. A major impediment for the successful treatment is the development of drug resistance. The molecular processes that contribute to resistance have been extensively studied; however, there is not much known about regulation by microRNAs (miRNAs). We compared miRNA expression profiles of an isogenic cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer cell line pair (A2780/A2780 DDP) and found 27 miRNAs to be differentially expressed (⩾2-fold). Five of these, including the family members miR-141/200c, showed a correlation with cisplatin sensitivity in the NCI-60 panel. Overexpression of miR-141 resulted in enhanced resistance to cisplatin in ovarian cancer cell lines. We next correlated the expression level of miR-141 in 132 primary ovarian tumors (108 serous and 24 non-serous) with response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Although no differences were observed in the serous tumors, miR-141 levels were higher in non-serous ovarian tumors that did not respond well to therapy (platinum-free interval <6 months). We demonstrate that miR-141 directly targets KEAP1, and that downregulation of KEAP1 induces cisplatin resistance. Conversely, overexpression of KEAP1 significantly enhanced cisplatin sensitivity. Expression of KEAP1 with its 3′-UTR, and a 3′-UTR in which the miR-141 target site has been mutated, revealed that miR-141 regulates KEAP1 upon exposure to cisplatin. Finally, we show that the NF-κB pathway, which can be regulated by KEAP1, is activated upon miR-141 overexpression, and that inhibition of this pathway partially reverses miR-141-mediated cisplatin resistance. These findings demonstrate that the miR-141-mediated regulation of KEAP1 has a crucial role in the cellular response to cisplatin.

Background: To compare different ultrasound-based international ovarian tumour analysis (IOTA) strategies and risk of malignancy index (RMI) for ovarian cancer diagnosis using a meta-analysis approach of centre-specific data from IOTA3. Methods: This prospective multicentre diagnostic accuracy study included 2403 patients with 1423 benign and 980 malignant adnexal masses from 2009 until 2012. All patients underwent standardised transvaginal ultrasonography. Test performance of RMI, subjective assessment (SA) of ultrasound findings, two IOTA risk models (LR1 and LR2), and strategies involving combinations of IOTA simple rules (SRs), simple descriptors (SDs) and LR2 with and without SA was estimated using a meta-analysis approach. Reference standard was histology after surgery. Results: The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves of LR1, LR2, SA and RMI were 0.930 (0.917–0.942), 0.918 (0.905–0.930), 0.914 (0.886–0.936) and 0.875 (0.853–0.894). Diagnostic one-step and two-step strategies using LR1, LR2, SR and SD achieved summary estimates for sensitivity 90–96%, specificity 74–79% and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 32.8–50.5. Adding SA when IOTA methods yielded equivocal results improved performance (DOR 57.6–75.7). Risk of Malignancy Index had sensitivity 67%, specificity 91% and DOR 17.5. Conclusions: This study shows all IOTA strategies had excellent diagnostic performance in comparison with RMI. The IOTA strategy chosen may be determined by clinical preference.

The objective of this study is to assess the therapeutic importance of surgical castration, adjuvant hormonal treatment and lymphadenectomy in endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS). A retrospective and multicentric search was performed. Clinicopathologic data were retrieved from cases that were confirmed to be ESS after central pathology review. The protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee. ESS was confirmed histopathologically in 34 women, but follow-up data were available in only 31 women. Surgical treatment ( n =31) included hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) in 23 out of 31 (74%) and 8 out of 31 (26%) cases, respectively. Debulking surgery was performed in 6 out of 31 cases (19%). Stage distribution was as follows: 22 stage I, 4 stage III and 5 stage IV. Women with stage I disease recurred in 4 out of 22 (18%) cases. Among stage I women undergoing hormonal treatment with or without BSO, 3 out of 15 (20%) and 1 out of 7 (14%) relapsed, respectively. Among stages III–IV women receiving adjuvant hormonal treatment or not, 1 out of 5 (20%) and 3 out of 4 (75%) relapsed, respectively (differences=55.0%, 95% CI=−6.8–81.2%). Kaplan–Meier curves show comparable recurrence rates for stage I disease without adjuvant hormonal treatment when compared to stages III–IV disease treated with surgery and adjuvant hormonal treatment. Furthermore, women taking hormones at diagnosis have a better outcome when compared to women not taking hormonal treatment. Three out of 31 (9%) patients had a systematic lymphadenectomy whereas 3 out of 31 (9%) had a lymph node sampling. In one case, obvious nodal disease was encountered at presentation. Isolated retroperitoneal recurrence occurred in 1 out of 31 (3%) of all cases and in 1 out of 8 (13%) recurrences. This single woman later also developed lung and abdominal metastases. Leaving lymph nodes in situ does not appear to alter the clinical outcome of ESS. Although numbers are low, the retrospective data suggest that the need for surgical castration (BSO) in premenopausal women with early-stage disease should be discussed with the patient on an individual basis. The data support the current practice in some centres to administer adjuvant hormonal treatment.

PurposeWe aimed to investigate the role of palbociclib, a first-in-class cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, in postmenopausal women with highly pretreated endocrine therapy-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC).MethodsBetween 28 September 2015 and 14 March 2017, a compassionate use program was established in the University Hospitals Leuven in which 82 postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC were included after at least four lines of systemic treatment. The efficacy and safety analysis was performed in 82 patients who had received at least one dose of palbociclib and who had at least 6-month follow-up at the data cut-off point. The primary objective was the evaluation of efficacy of the combination of palbociclib and endocrine therapy with clinical benefit as primary endpoint, defined as the absence of progressive disease and being on treatment for at least 6 months. Secondary objectives were the evaluation of toxicity and the identification of potential predictors for clinical benefit.ResultsThe median age of the patients was 67.1 years (range 34.8–85.9) at the time of inclusion. The average duration of treatment was 5.6 months (range 1–19), with a median progression-free survival of 3.17 (95% CI 2.76–4.70) months. At the data cut-off point, 10 patients were still on treatment with palbociclib. In this highly pretreated setting, 34 patients experienced no progressive disease within 6 months, resulting in an overall clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 41.5%. 20.7% (17/82) showed stable disease for ≥ 9 months and 13.4% for ≥ 12 months. None of the investigated predicting factors were significantly associated with clinical benefit at 6 months. For 43.9% of the patients, treatment delay or dose reduction was indicated.ConclusionsPalbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy shows an unexpectedly high CBR and favorable safety profile in heavily pretreated endocrine-resistant estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC patients.

Purpose In metastatic breast cancer (MBC) population treated with capecitabine monotherapy, we investigated clinical-pathological features as possible biomarkers for the oncological outcome. Methods Retrospective study of consecutive MBC patients treated at University Hospitals Leuven starting capecitabine between 1999 and 2017. The primary endpoint was the durable response (DR), defined as non-progressive disease for > 52 weeks. Other main endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Results We included 506 patients; mean age at primary breast cancer diagnosis was 51.2 years; 18.2% had de novo MBC; 98.8% were pre-treated with taxanes and/or anthracycline. DR was reached in 11.6%. Patients with DR, as compared to those without DR, were more likely oestrogen receptor (ER) positive (91.5% vs. 76.8%, p  = 0.010) at first diagnosis, had a lower incidence of lymph node (LN) involvement (35.6% vs. 49.9%, p  = 0.039) before starting capecitabine, were more likely to present with metastases limited to ≤ 2 involved sites (54.2% vs. 38.5%, p  = 0.020) and time from metastasis to start of capecitabine was longer (mean 3.5 vs. 2.7 years, p  = 0.020). ORR was 22%. Median TTP and OS were 28 and 58 weeks, respectively. In multivariate analysis (only performed for TTP), ER positivity (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.529, p  < 0.0001), HER2 negativity (HR = 0.582, p  = 0.024), absence of LN (HR = 0.751, p  = 0.008) and liver involvement (HR = 0.746, p  = 0.013), older age at capecitabine start (HR = 0.925, p  < 0.0001) and younger age at diagnosis of MBC (HR = 0.935, p  = 0.001) were significant features of longer TTP. Conclusion Our data display relevant clinical-pathological features associated with DR and TTP in patients receiving capecitabine monotherapy for MBC.

ObjectiveTo explore the barriers to ovarian cancer care, as reported in the open ended responses of a global expert opinion survey, highlighting areas for improvement in global ovarian cancer care. Potential solutions to overcome these barriers are proposed.MethodsData from the expert opinion survey, designed to assess the organization of ovarian cancer care worldwide, were analyzed. The survey was distributed across a global network of physicians. We examined free text, open ended responses concerning the barriers to ovarian cancer care. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted to identify, analyze, and report meaningful patterns within the data.ResultsA total of 1059 physicians from 115 countries completed the survey, with 438 physicians from 93 countries commenting on the barriers to ovarian cancer care. Thematic analysis gave five major themes, regardless of income category or location: societal factors, inadequate resources in hospital, economic barriers, organization of the specialty, and need for early detection. Suggested solutions include accessible resource stratified guidelines, multidisciplinary teamwork, public education, and development of gynecological oncology training pathways internationally.ConclusionsThis analysis provides an international perspective on the main barriers to optimal ovarian cancer care. The themes derived from our analysis highlight key target areas to focus efforts to reduce inequalities in global care. Future regional analysis involving local representatives will enable country specific recommendations to improve the quality of care and ultimately to work towards closing the care gap.