Explore the vast range of titles available.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most lethal histologic subtype of lung cancer. It is characterized by rapid tumor growth and early metastatic dissemination, resulting in an extremely poor prognosis. The addition of immunotherapy to standard chemotherapy has led to a modest improvement in survival for patients with extensive-stage disease. However, the overall clinical benefit remains limited due to both primary and acquired resistance to immunotherapy. Indeed, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is influenced by multiple factors, including tumor heterogeneity, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and intrinsic molecular characteristics of the disease. In recent years, active research has been conducted to identify and therapeutically overcome resistance mechanisms to immunotherapy, and accumulating suggestive evidence is lighting the way for new strategies for clinical management of patients with SCLC. In this review article, we summarize and discuss the substantial obstacle to immunotherapy clinical efficacy, with a particular emphasis on the published and ongoing clinical trials that investigated the potential strategies to overcome mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy. Moreover, we report and discuss the new therapeutic approaches tested, especially the use of antibody–drug conjugates, bi-specific antibodies, adoptive cell therapies and combination strategies.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with mutated or rearranged oncogene drivers can be treated with upfront selective inhibitors achieving higher response rates and longer survival than chemotherapy. The RET gene can undergo chromosomal rearrangements in 1%-2% of all NSCLC patients, involving various upstream fusion partners such as KIF5B, CCDC6, NCOA4, and TRIM33. Many multikinase inhibitors are active against rearranged RET. Cabozantinib, vandetanib, sunitinib, lenvatinib, and nintedanib achieved tumor responses in about 30% of these patients in retrospective studies. Prospective phase II trials investigated the activity and toxicity of cabozantinib, vandetanib, sorafenib, and lenvatinib, and did not reach significantly higher response rates. VEGFR and EGFR inhibition represented the main ways of developing off-target toxicity. An intrinsic resistance emerged according to the type of RET fusion partners, as KIF5B-RET fusion is the most resistant. Also acquired mutations in rearranged RET oncogene developed as resistance to these multikinase inhibitors. Interestingly, RET fusions have been found as a resistance mechanism to EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. The combination of EGFR and RET inhibition can overcome this resistance. The limitations in terms of activity and tolerability of the various multikinase inhibitors prompted the investigation of new highly selective RET inhibitors, such as RXDX-105, BLU-667, and LOXO-292. Some data emerged about intracranial antitumor activity of BLU-667 and LOXO-292. If these novel drugs will achieve high activity in RET rearranged NSCLC, also these oncogene-addicted tumors can undergo a significant survival improvement.

BIM is a proapoptotic protein that initiates apoptosis triggered by EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). mTOR negatively regulates apoptosis and may influence response to EGFR TKI. We examined mRNA expression of BIM and MTOR in 57 patients with EGFR -mutant NSCLC from the EURTAC trial. Risk of mortality and disease progression was lower in patients with high BIM compared with low/intermediate BIM mRNA levels. Analysis of MTOR further divided patients with high BIM expression into two groups, with those having both high BIM and MTOR experiencing shorter overall and progression-free survival to erlotinib. Validation of our results was performed in an independent cohort of 19 patients with EGFR -mutant NSCLC treated with EGFR TKIs. In EGFR -mutant lung adenocarcinoma cell lines with high BIM expression, concomitant high mTOR expression increased IC 50 of gefitinib for cell proliferation. We next sought to analyse the signalling pattern in cell lines with strong activation of mTOR and its substrate P-S6. We showed that mTOR and phosphodiesterase 4D (PDE4D) strongly correlate in resistant EGFR -mutant cancer cell lines. These data suggest that the combination of EGFR TKI with mTOR or PDE4 inhibitors could be adequate therapy for EGFR -mutant NSCLC patients with high pretreatment levels of BIM and mTOR.

Introduction p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) stimulates growth and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Protein kinase C iota (PKCι) is an enzyme highly expressed in NSCLC, regulating PAK1 signaling. In the present study we explored whether the PKCι-PAK1 signaling pathway approach can be an efficient target in different types of NSCLC cell and mouse models. Methods The effect of IPA-3 (PAK1 inhibitor) plus auranofin (PKCι inhibitor) combination was evaluated by cell viability assay, colony formation and western blotting assay, using three types of NSCLC cell lines: EGFR or KRAS mutant adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma with PAK1 amplification. In addition, for clinical availability, screening for new PAK1 inhibitors was carried out and the compound OTSSP167 was evaluated in combination with auranofin in cell and mice models. Results The combination of IPA-3 or OTSSP167 plus auranofin showed high synergism for inhibiting cell viability and colony formation in three cell lines. Mechanistic characterization revealed that this drug combination abrogated expression and activation of membrane receptors and downstream signaling proteins crucial in lung cancer: EGFR, MET, PAK1, PKCι, ERK1/2, AKT, YAP1 and mTOR. A nude mouse xenograft assay demonstrated that this drug combination strongly suppressed tumor volume compared with single drug treatment. Conclusions Combination of IPA-3 or OTSSP167 and auranofin was highly synergistic in EGFR or KRAS mutant adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma cell lines and decreased tumor volume in mice models. It is of interest to further test the targeting of PKCι-PAK1 signaling pathways in EGFR mutant, KRAS mutant and squamous NSCLC patients.

Immunotherapy has offered a new opportunity for the treatment of many malignancies. In patients with lung cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved survival. However, little is known about predictive factors or primary and acquired resistance mechanisms. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a complex of phenotypic changes involved in carcinogenesis and resistance to cancer treatments. Specifically, immune cells in the tumor microenvironment can promote EMT, and mesenchymal phenotype acquisition negatively regulates the anticancer immune response. EMT is associated with higher expression of PD-L1 and other immune checkpoints. In this review, we focused on the role of EMT in the interplay between tumor cells and the immune system, with particular emphasis on lung cancer. On the basis of our findings, we hypothesize that the effects of EMT on immune cells could be overcome in this disease by a new combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) is a Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) subtype with a strong clinical association with smoking habits and a very low incidence in never-smokers. Molecular profiling of SCC in never-smokers could unveil tumor vulnerabilities and new treatment strategies. We considered a patient cohort of 17 former or current smokers (51.5%) and 16 never-smoker SCC patients (48.5%). TruSight Oncology 500, investigating hotspots in 523 cancer-related genes, Tumor mutation burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI), and RNA sequencing was performed on tumor tissue. Genomic and transcriptomic profiles were compared between smokers and never-smoker patients. The most frequently altered genes were (67%), (20%) and (17%), with no substantial differences between groups, except for which was more frequently mutated in smokers (86.7% vs 46.7%, p = 0.05), who also showed a higher TMB with respect to non-smokers (median 11 mut/Mb vs 5.5 mut/Mb, p = 0.028); all patients were stable for MSI score (median 1.87 vs 1.82, p = 0.87). Activating mutations in and were found in one and two never-smokers, respectively. Three smoker patients had simultaneous amplifications in and . Enrichment analyses showed that cyclin-dependent protein Ser/Thr kinase activity and PI3K signaling pathways were affected in both groups, while cellular damage response was exclusively altered in never-smokers. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering on transcriptomes effectively identified different specific transcriptional subtypes between smokers and never-smokers. Gene set enrichment analysis highlighted that tumors from never-smokers are characterized by dysregulation in cell membrane potential and ion homeostasis across cell membrane pathways. Genomic and transcriptomic profiles deeply differentiate SCC occurring in never-smokers with respect to SCC in smoker patients. Moreover, SCC could carry canonical NSCLC) activating mutations. Our data suggest that deep molecular analyses resolve tumor heterogeneity and may help with new algorithm-based treatment strategies for SCC.

Immune checkpoint inhibition induced a great step forward in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients. In cancer immune microenvironment many checkpoints were studied and their involvement could represent a mechanism of resistance to cancer immunotherapy. For this reason, the inhibition of multiple immune checkpoints is under development. However, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and exhausted immune cells could limit the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. We analyzed the variation of circulating immune suppressive-like cell subsets and exhausted immune cells in three non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with the combination of anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 plus anti-LAG-3 at T0 (baseline), T1 (after 2 months) and T2 (after 4 months). We also describe the clinical and radiological course of the disease during this treatment in all three patients. We observed both clinical differences and changes in the composition of immune suppressive-like cell subsets and exhausted immune cells between the patients receiving the same schedule of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The study on a wider patient population and experimental model design could help to clarify the kinetics of these cell subpopulations with the perspective to find new targets for treatment or new biomarkers for resistance to cancer immunotherapy.

Lung cancer (LC) is the deadliest malignancy worldwide. In an operable stage I–III patient setting, the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) after curative treatment could identify patients at higher risk of relapse. In this context, the study of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is emerging as a useful tool to identify patients who could benefit from an adjuvant treatment, and patients who could avoid adverse events related to a more aggressive clinical management. On the other hand, ctDNA profiling presents technical, biological and standardization challenges before entering clinical practice as a decisional tool. In this paper, we review the latest advances regarding the role of ctDNA in identifying MRD and in predicting patients’ prognosis, with a particular focus on clinical trials investigating the potential of ctDNA, the technical challenges to address and the biological parameters that influence the MRD detection.

The real-world, retrospective, NEROnE registry investigated the impact of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) at three oncology units in the north of Italy between January 2020 and December 2022. We focused on the clinical characterization and outcomes of NSCLC with rare molecular alterations: EGFR exon 20 insertion, non-activating EGFR mutations, BRAF V600E and non-V600, ROS1 and RET rearrangements, MET, ErbB2, and FGFR mutations. Overall, these represented 6.4% (62/970) of the pts analysed with NGS in the daily practice. The most heavily represented rare alterations were ROS1 rearrangement (15 pts—24%) and MET exon 14 skipping mutation (11 pts—18%). No associations were found with the demographic and clinical features. Forty-nine pts received targeted therapies, of which 38.8% were first- and 9.8% were second-line. The remaining pts received chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. In terms of the clinical outcomes, although not statistically significant, a tendency toward shorter OS was seen when therapies other than specific targeted therapies were used (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 0.79–4.33, p = 0.158). The pts with co-mutations (19.4%) seemed to receive an advantage from the front-line chemotherapy-based regimen. Finally, an NLR score (a well-known inflammatory index) ≥ 4 seemed to be related to shorter OS among the pts treated with immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy (HR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.08–7.40, p = 0.033). Prospective evaluations need to be performed to clarify whether these indexes may help to identify patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC who could benefit from immunotherapy.