Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
18 result(s) for "Vigerland, Sarah"
Sort by:
Internet-Delivered Psychoeducation (SCOPE) for Transition-Aged Autistic Youth: Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Psychoeducation is a recommended first-line intervention for transition-aged autistic youth, but it has not been previously evaluated in an internet-delivered format. SCOPE (Spectrum Computerized Psychoeducation) is an 8-week individual, internet-delivered, therapist-supported psychoeducative intervention. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of SCOPE through a 3-armed randomized controlled trial. The intervention aims to increase participants' understanding of autism and, in doing so, increase their quality of life (QoL). SCOPE was codeveloped with clinicians and autistic young adults. It contains 8 autism-related modules, each with (1) text describing the module topic, (2) four video vignettes with recurring characters who describe their lives and perspectives on the module topic, (3) a list of neurotypical characteristics related to the module's topic, and (4) self-reflection using 3 or 4 questions about the module topic, answered by multiple-choice bullets and voluntary open-ended written comments. Participants were randomized (2:1:1) to SCOPE, an active control (web-based self-study), or treatment as usual (TAU). The primary outcome was participants' autism knowledge, assessed using the Autism Spectrum Disorder Quiz, and secondary outcomes included acceptance of diagnosis, QoL, and symptoms of mental health problems. All outcomes were assessed at the baseline, postintervention, and 3-month follow-up time points, using mixed-effects models to assess change in outcome measures across time points. Between 2014 and 2020, a total of 141 participants were randomized to 1 of the 3 treatment arms. The SCOPE participants had significantly greater autism knowledge gains at the posttreatment time point compared to TAU participants with a moderate effect size (d=0.47; P=.05); gains were maintained at the 3-month follow-up (d=0.46; P=.05). The self-study participants also had increased knowledge gains compared to TAU participants at the posttreatment time point with a moderate effect size (d=0.60; P=.03) but did not maintain these gains at the 3-month follow-up, and their autism knowledge scores returned to baseline (mean change score: -0.13, 95% CI -1.20 to 0.94; P=.81). In addition, SCOPE participants reported improved QoL at the postintervention (d=0.37, P=.02) and 3-month follow-up time points (d=0.60; P=.001), compared to the combined controls. The gained autism knowledge was not mirrored by changes in symptoms of anxiety or depression. Effective internet-delivered interventions may facilitate first-line service access to individuals who are unable or unwilling to use traditional health care interventions or who live in geographically remote locations. Additionally, an intervention such as SCOPE could impart and sustain the knowledge gained through psychoeducation in transition-aged autistic youth. For future research, qualitative studies could further our understanding of the lived experiences of intervention participation and outcomes after internet-delivered psychoeducation. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03665363; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03665363.
Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Adolescents with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: An Open Trial
International guidelines recommend Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) as the first line treatment for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, a substantial proportion of patients do not have access to such treatment. We developed and tested the feasibility, efficacy and acceptability of a novel therapist-guided, Internet-delivered CBT (ICBT) platform for adolescents with OCD. An interactive, age-appropriate ICBT platform (\"BiP OCD\") was developed. Twenty-one adolescents (12-17 years) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of OCD and their parents were enrolled in the study. All participants received 12 weeks of ICBT with therapist support. The primary outcome measure was the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS). Acceptability was assessed at post-treatment. Participants completed on average 8.29 (SD = 3.0) of the 12 treatment chapters. Treatment yielded significant improvements on all clinician-, parent- and most self-administered outcome measures, with a large effect size of d = 2.29 (95% CI 1.5-3.07) on the CY-BOCS. Patients continued to improve at follow-up. At 6-month follow-up, 71% were classified as responders (≥35% decrease on the CY-BOCS) and 76% as being in remission (CY-BOCS score ≤12). Average clinician support time was less than 20 minutes per patient per week. The majority of participants felt that BiP OCD was age-appropriate and rated the treatment as good or very good. ICBT could be efficacious, acceptable, and cost-effective for adolescents with OCD. More rigorously controlled studies are needed to further evaluate the treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01809990.
Therapist-guided and self-guided internet-delivered behavioural activation for adolescents with depression: a randomised feasibility trial
ObjectiveAccess to effective treatments for adolescents with depression needs to improve. Few studies have evaluated behavioural activation (BA) for adolescent depression, and none remotely delivered BA. This study explored the feasibility and acceptability of therapist-guided and self-guided internet-delivered BA (I-BA) in preparation for a future randomised controlled trial (RCT).DesignA single-blinded randomised controlled feasibility trial.SettingA specialist outpatient clinic in Sweden.ParticipantsThirty-two adolescents with mild-to-moderate major depression, aged 13–17 years.InterventionsTen weeks of therapist-guided I-BA or self-guided I-BA, or treatment as usual (TAU). Both versions of I-BA included parental support. TAU included referral to usual care within child and youth psychiatry or primary care.OutcomesFeasibility measures included study take-up, participant retention, acceptability, safety and satisfaction. The primary outcome measure was the blinded assessor-rated Children’s Depression Rating Scale, Revised. The primary endpoint was the 3-month follow-up.Results154 adolescents were screened and 32 were randomised to therapist-guided I-BA (n=11), self-guided I-BA (n=10) or TAU (n=11). Participant retention was acceptable, with two drop-outs in TAU. Most participants in TAU had been offered interventions by the primary endpoint. The mean number of completed chapters (total of 8) for adolescents was 7.5 in therapist-guided I-BA and 5.4 in self-guided I-BA. No serious adverse events were recorded. Satisfaction was acceptable in both I-BA groups. Following an intent-to-treat approach, the linear mixed-effects model revealed that both therapist-guided and self-guided I-BA (Cohen’s d=2.43 and 2.23, respectively), but not TAU (Cohen’s d=0.95), showed statistically significant changes on the primary outcome measure with large within-group effect sizes.ConclusionsBoth therapist-guided and self-guided I-BA are acceptable and potentially efficacious treatments for adolescents with depression. It is feasible to conduct a large-scale RCT to establish the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of I-BA versus TAU.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04117789).
Single-blinded, randomised, parallel-group, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of therapist- and self-guided internet-delivered behavioural activation versus treatment as usual for adolescents with mild to moderate depression: study protocol
IntroductionThe number of adolescents seeking professional help for depression is increasing and, despite advances in treatment, large unmet treatment needs remain. In the current protocol, we describe the design and methodology of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the clinical efficacy of two forms of internet-delivered behavioural activation (I-BA), with and without therapist support, in reducing depressive symptoms, compared with treatment as usual (TAU). Secondary objectives include examining the 12-month maintenance of the treatment effects and conducting a health economic evaluation of the interventions.Methods and analysisIn this single-blinded RCT, we aim to include 215 participants aged 13–17 years with mild to moderate depression who will be randomised (1:1:1 ratio) to 10 weeks of either therapist-guided or self-guided I-BA, or TAU provided by regular mental health clinics. Data will be collected at baseline, weekly for the initial 10 weeks, post-treatment and at 3 and 12-month follow-ups. The primary endpoint is the 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome is blinded clinician-rated severity of depressive symptoms, measured by the Children’s Depression Rating Scale-Revised. Treatment response is defined as a score of ‘Much improved’ or ‘Very much improved’ on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale, administered at the primary endpoint. Outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment conditions at all assessment points. A health economic evaluation of I-BA will be performed, both in the short term (primary endpoint) and the long term (12-month follow-up).Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority in June 2021. The final participant was enrolled on 3 May 2024 and expected to reach the primary endpoint by November 2024. The results of this study will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and communicated to healthcare providers and the public.Trial registration numberNCT04977856.Rebecca Andersson1, Sarah Vigerland1, Fabian Lenhard 1, Johan Ahlen2, 3, Matteo Bottai4, David Mataix-Cols1,6, Eva Serlachius5, 6
Validity and reliability of social anxiety disorder diagnoses in the Swedish National Patient Register
Background Population-based administrative registers are often used for research purposes. However, their potential usefulness depends on the validity of the registered information. This study assessed the validity of the recorded codes for social anxiety disorder (SAD), also known as social phobia, in the Swedish National Patient Register (NPR). Methods The personal identification numbers of 300 randomly selected individuals with a diagnosis of SAD recorded in the NPR were obtained from the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. The medical files of these individuals were then requested from clinics nationally. A total of 117 files were received and two independent raters reviewed each file to assess the presence or absence of SAD, according to the definition of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10) and the diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). When disagreements between the two raters were found, a third rater reviewed the file to establish a best estimate diagnosis. Positive predictive values (PPV) and agreement between the two initial raters (using Cohen’s kappa) were calculated. Additionally, raters completed the Clinical Global Impression – Severity (CGI-S) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) rating scales for each file. Inter-rater agreement for the CGI-S and the GAF was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results After exclusion of files not containing sufficient information, 95 files were included in the analyses. Of these, 77 files (81.05%) were considered to be ‘true positive’ cases (PPV = 0.81, 95% confidence interval = 0.72–0.88). Inter-rater agreement regarding the presence or absence of SAD was substantial (κ = 0.72). CGI-S and GAF scores indicated that patients were in the moderate range of severity and functional impairment. Inter-rater agreement for the CGI-S and the GAF was moderate to good (ICC = 0.72 and ICC = 0.82, respectively). Conclusions The ICD-10 codes for SAD in the Swedish NPR are generally valid and reliable, but we recommend sensitivity analyses in future register-based studies to minimise the impact of potential diagnostic misclassification. Most patients were moderately severe and impaired, suggesting that results from register-based studies of SAD may be generalizable.
Comparing the treatment effects of online cognitive-behavioral therapy for pediatric functional abdominal pain disorders with and without psychiatric comorbidity
Background: Functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs) are disorders of the gut-brain interaction. FAPDs are common in children and adolescents (global prevalence 12%) and are associated with psychiatric comorbidity. Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (iCBT) is effective for FAPDs, but it’s unclear whether children with psychiatric comorbidities benefit equally from the treatment. Objectives: In this study, we assessed whether having a comorbid psychiatric diagnosis results in different rates of change in iCBT for children with FAPDs. Design: Between-groups design. Methods: Participants were 120 children with FAPDs (age 8–12 years) taking part in one of two clinical trials testing 10 weeks of iCBT. For the analyses, participants were divided into groups: presence or absence of psychiatric disorder. The primary outcome was gastrointestinal symptoms, assessed weekly using the Pediatric Quality of Life Gastrointestinal Symptom Scale. Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life, gastrointestinal-specific anxiety, and pain intensity. Multilevel modeling was used to assess differences in rates of change between groups from baseline to follow-up directly after treatment, and then to 6-month follow-up. Results: We observed significant improvements in the rates of change for both groups for the primary outcome (gastrointestinal symptoms) and all secondary outcomes during treatment. Children with psychiatric comorbidity had significantly more severe symptoms at baseline on all measures, but there was no difference in the rates of change for the primary outcome (−0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.70, 0.11, p = 0.159) or any of the secondary outcomes compared to the non-comorbid group. Treatment benefits were sustained at 6-month follow-up. Conclusion: ICBT seems to be beneficial for children with FAPDs, also in the presence of psychiatric comorbidity. Given the high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity in this patient group, the results will aid the clinical assessment and treatment planning for these patients. Plain language summary Comparing internet treatment for children with functional abdominal pain, with and without psychiatric disorders This study looked at how well internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) works for children with functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs), both with and without psychiatric conditions like anxiety or depression. FAPDs are common in children and can cause significant discomfort and reduced quality of life. Many children with FAPDs also have psychiatric conditions. The study included 120 children aged 8-12 years who previously received 10 weeks of iCBT. The children were divided into two groups: those with psychiatric conditions and those without. The results showed that iCBT helped reduce gastrointestinal symptoms and improve quality of life for all children, regardless of whether they had a psychiatric condition. Children with psychiatric conditions started with more severe symptoms but improved at the same rate as those without psychiatric conditions. The benefits of iCBT were sustained at follow-up six months after treatment. This study suggests that iCBT is an effective treatment for children with FAPDs, even if they have psychiatric conditions. This is important because many children with FAPDs have psychiatric conditions, and this treatment can help improve their overall well-being.
Developing a Brief Parent Training Intervention to Prevent Anxiety in Offspring
Offspring of parents with anxiety disorders have an increased risk of developing anxiety themselves. Very few studies have evaluated interventions aiming to prevent anxiety in offspring of anxious parents. This study was a small ( =40) randomized pilot study with three arms evaluating the feasibility of a novel parent support group for anxious parents, the Supporting Anxious Parents Program (SAPP). The primary objective was to evaluate the acceptability of the SAPP. In addition, we also evaluated preliminary effects on child anxiety, parent risk factors, and quality of life, and feasibility of the study design. Excessive parental worry and anxiety and having a child not meeting criteria for an anxiety disorder (6-12 years old), served as inclusion criteria. Thirteen parents were randomly allocated to a group-based intervention, 14 to an individual Internet-based version of the intervention, and 13 to a waitlist control condition. The intervention was developed to target three risk factors involved in the parent-child transmission of anxiety; criticism/low warmth, overprotective behaviors, and modeling of anxiety. The results showed that parents were generally very satisfied with the intervention. We did not find any significant decreases in child anxiety in the intervention conditions. However, for the parents, we found preliminary support for reduced overprotective behaviors, reduced worry, and increased quality of life. The study design was found to be feasible. According to the results, a revision of the intervention is recommended before a full randomized controlled trial could be conducted.
“On My Own, but Not Alone” - Adolescents’ Experiences of Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Childhood Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a prevalent and impairing condition that can be effectively treated with Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT). However, a majority of children and adolescents do not have access to CBT. Internet-delivered CBT (ICBT) has been suggested as a way to increase availability to effective psychological treatments. Yet, the research on ICBT in children and adolescents has been lagging behind significantly both when it comes to quantitative as well as qualitative studies. The aim of the current study was to describe the experience of ICBT in adolescents with OCD. Eight adolescents with OCD that had received ICBT were interviewed with qualitative methodology regarding their experiences of the intervention. Data was summarized into thematic categories. Two overarching themes were identified, autonomy and support, each consisting of three primary themes (self-efficacy, flexibility, secure self-disclosure and clinician support, parental support, identification/normalization, respectively). The experiential hierarchical model that was identified in this study is, in part, transferrable to previous research. In addition, it highlights the need of further study of important process variables of ICBT in young patient populations.
Development of the Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale - Short Version (SCAS-S)
The literature provides several examples of anxiety symptoms questionnaires for children. However, these questionnaires generally contain many items, and might not be ideal for screening in large populations, or repeated testing in clinical settings. The Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale (SCAS) is an extensively used and evaluated 44-item questionnaire developed to assess anxiety symptoms in children, and provides a sound base for the development of an abbreviated anxiety symptoms questionnaire. Although methodological standards have been presented in how to develop abbreviated questionnaires, previous studies have often suffered from several limitations regarding validating procedures. Guided by these methodological standards, the current study aimed at developing an abbreviated version of the SCAS, while retaining the content, convergent, and divergent validity of the original scale. A school-based sample (n = 750) was used to reduce the number of items, and an independent school-based sample (n = 371) together with a clinical sample (n = 93), were used to validate the abbreviated scale. The abbreviated version of the SCAS contained 19 items, it showed a clear factor structure as evaluated in the independent sample, and it performed as good as the original questionnaire regarding classification accuracy, convergent, and divergent validity. In our view, the abbreviated version is a very good alternative to the original scale especially for younger children, in initial screening, or in order to reduce response burden.