Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose To validate, in the context of adaptive radiotherapy, three commercial software solutions for atlas-based segmentation. Methods and materials Fifteen patients, five for each group, with cancer of the Head&Neck, pleura, and prostate were enrolled in the study. In addition to the treatment planning CT (pCT) images, one replanning CT (rCT) image set was acquired for each patient during the RT course. Three experienced physicians outlined on the pCT and rCT all the volumes of interest (VOIs). We used three software solutions (VelocityAI 2.6.2 (V), MIM 5.1.1 (M) by MIMVista and ABAS 2.0 (A) by CMS-Elekta) to generate the automatic contouring on the repeated CT. All the VOIs obtained with automatic contouring (AC) were successively corrected manually. We recorded the time needed for: 1) ex novo ROIs definition on rCT; 2) generation of AC by the three software solutions; 3) manual correction of AC. To compare the quality of the volumes obtained automatically by the software and manually corrected with those drawn from scratch on rCT, we used the following indexes: overlap coefficient (DICE), sensitivity, inclusiveness index, difference in volume, and displacement differences on three axes (x, y, z) from the isocenter. Results The time saved by the three software solutions for all the sites, compared to the manual contouring from scratch, is statistically significant and similar for all the three software solutions. The time saved for each site are as follows: about an hour for Head&Neck, about 40 minutes for prostate, and about 20 minutes for mesothelioma. The best DICE similarity coefficient index was obtained with the manual correction for: A (contours for prostate), A and M (contours for H&N), and M (contours for mesothelioma). Conclusions From a clinical point of view, the automated contouring workflow was shown to be significantly shorter than the manual contouring process, even though manual correction of the VOIs is always needed.

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate how a substantial organization gradually builds a management accounting system from scratch, changing its accounting routines by learning processes. The paper uses the experiential learning theory and the concept of learning style to investigate the learning process during management accounting change. The study aims to expand the domain of management accounting change theory to emphasize the learning-related aspects that can constitute it. Design/methodology/approach The paper provides an interpretation of management accounting change based on the model of problem management proposed by Kolb (1983) and the theory of experiential learning (Kolb, 1976, 1984). The study is based on a 14-year longitudinal case study (1994‐2007). The case examined can be considered a theory illustration case. Data were obtained from a broad variety of sources including interviews, document analysis and adopting an interventionist approach during the redesign of the costing system. Findings The paper contributes to two important aspects of management accounting change. First, it becomes apparent that the costing information change was not a discrete event but a process of experience and learning conducted through several iterations of trial-and-error loops that extended over the years. Second, the findings reveal that the learning process can alter management accounting system design in a radical or incremental way according to the learning style of the people involved in the process of change. Research limitations/implications Because of the adopted research approach, results could be extended only to other organizations presenting similar characteristics. Several further areas of research are suggested by the findings of this paper. In particular, it would be of interest to investigate the links between learning styles and communication and its effect on management accounting change. Practical implications The paper includes implications for the management of learning during management accounting change, to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of this process. Originality/value This paper is one response to the call for an interdisciplinary research approach to the management accounting change phenomena using a “method theory” taken from the discipline of management to provide an explanation of the change in management accounting. In respect of the previous literature, it provides two main contributions, namely, the proposal of a model useful both to interpret and manage learning processes; the effect of learning style on management accounting routines change.

Introduction: Recent randomized evidence suggests that stage II–IV non metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma is best managed with perioperative chemotherapy (CHT) and surgery. Intensification of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiochemotherapy are proposed before surgery in high-volume centers with the aim of increasing both systemic and locoregional control. However, few data comparing intensified RTCHT, CHT plus RTCHT and perioperative CHT with FLOT in real-life scenarios are available. Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective series, including three cohorts of patients treated for esophageal adenocarcinoma: Cohort A: nRTCHT; Cohort B: TCF plus RTCHT, defined as triplet chemotherapy followed by dose-reduced triplet therapy + RT; Cohort C: perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT regimen. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoints were pathologic complete response (pCR), pathologic lymph-node complete response (ypN0), overall survival (OS), and perioperative acute toxicity. Results: From January 2013 to December 2023, 142 patients were identified. All patients received multimodal therapy with radical esophagectomy. A total of 95% of patients were male; the majority of patients presented with stage cT3cN1. A total of 63 patients were treated in Cohort A (31 cases with doublet 5FU-CDDP concurrent to 50.4 Gy and 32 cases with CROSS regimen), 36 in Cohort B, and 43 in Cohort C. After a median FU of 36 months, the 3-year DFS resulted 58.6%. pCR occurred in 26 cases (18.6%). Three-year OS had a value of 72%. At univariate analysis, ypN0 was related to better DFS; cN+ disease was related with worse OS. The treatment cohort did not impact survival outcomes; however, an effect on CR was shown, with pCR in 15% (A), 36.3% (B), 11% (C) of cases, respectively (χ: 0.008). A total of 67% of patients in Cohort B experienced a ypN0. Two treatment-related deaths occurred (one in Cohort A and one in C) with a slight increase in G3 toxicity in cohort C. Conclusions: In this real-life multicenter series, oncological results were adequate for all three neoadjuvant strategies. TCF plus RTCHT guaranteed a higher pCR and ypN0 rate without increasing toxicity. An intensified neoadjuvant schedule, such as TCF plus RTCHT, may be useful in cases where higher tumor and nodal responses are needed. Taken together, our data highlight that further investigation is warranted before abandoning radiotherapy-based neoadjuvant approaches in esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Background: Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) in pancreatic and biliary tract cancer (PBC) suffers from proximity to any organ(s) at risk (OARs). Some strategies to manage this issue have previously been proposed, such as Simultaneous Integrated Protection (SIP), with the aim of maintaining a biological effective dose prescription while reducing toxicities. We performed a systematic review of the literature about SRT techniques applied in patients with tumor in proximity to OARs, with the aim of testing safety and efficacy. Methods: using PRISMA guidelines, we selected studies from a pool of more than 25,000 articles published from 2010 to 30 January 2023 that explored the use of SRT to deliver targeted treatment for PBC. We then selected the ones referring to decreases in prescription doses (for SRT only) in the area of overlap between planning target volume (PTV) and OARs. Local control (LC) and toxicities being detailed were exclusion criteria for articles. Results: 9 studies were included in our review, considering 368 patients. One-year LC probability ranges between 67% and 98.3% were reported. Late G3 toxicities ranged between 0% and 5.3%, while G4-G5 late toxicities were both reported as 0.3%. Conclusion: prioritizing critical OAR constraints limits severe toxicities while preserving LC in PBC SRT. Improving in-study reporting is essential to confirm these promising results.

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the potentiality in the application of process analysis and activity-based costing (ABC) in a healthcare setting to produce usable, useful and correct information on resource consumption and processes. The paper aims to analyze changes applied to the traditional costing model in order to represent the work flow of the organization and the related additional information usable by decision makers at different levels. In particular, the paper is focused on economic analysis related to the introduction of a new surgical technique in healthcare.Design methodology approach - An empirical case study is developed in a Tuscan hospital from September 2005 to March 2006, data being collected through interviews to employees and direct observations.Findings - Several factors are found to be critical in such a process analysis and in an ABC implementation in healthcare. First, the need to ground the development of the model structure on the specific characteristics of the organizational setting and the clinical work performed. Second, a problem of culture and language, because professionals have difficulties in understanding the language of activities, and they cannot accept a model designed to measure their work; therefore, some resistances may occur. Third, the constraint of information; in fact more precise estimation may be limited by the information available, as in this case.Research limitations implications - The paper provides a framework for future research. The replication of the methodology in other hospitals, in order to test the validity of the model and to compare results, can be interesting and another can be the analysis of benefits that the application of the system can provide (in terms of improved efficiency) through a longitudinal analysis.Originality value - The paper contributes to the field study of ABC and process analysis in healthcare. The original contribution of the model lies in the classification of activities in a hierarchy across the organization, which allows a more precise identification of cost driver; and in the \"hybrid\" nature (a combination of cost centres and activities) of the model. The latter allows one to identify a \"full cost\" of the patient.

Overall survival (OS)-predictive models to clinically stratify patients with stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are still unavailable. The aim of this work was to build a predictive model of OS in this setting. Clinical variables of patients treated in three Institutions with SBRT for stage I NSCLC were retrospectively collected into a reference cohort A (107 patients) and 2 comparative cohorts B1 (32 patients) and B2 (38 patients). A predictive model was built using Cox regression (CR) and artificial neural networks (ANN) on reference cohort A and then tested on comparative cohorts. Cohort B1 patients were older and with worse chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) than cohort A. Cohort B2 patients were heavier smokers but had lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). At CR analysis for cohort A, only ECOG Performance Status 0-1 and absence of previous neoplasms correlated with better OS. The model was enhanced combining ANN and CR findings. The reference cohort was divided into prognostic Group 1 (0-2 score) and Group 2 (3-9 score) to assess model's predictions on OS: grouping was close to statistical significance (p=0.081). One and 2-year OS resulted higher for Group 1, lower for Group 2. In comparative cohorts, the model successfully predicted two groups of patients with divergent OS trends: higher for Group 1 and lower for Group 2. The produced model is a relevant tool to clinically stratify SBRT candidates into prognostic groups, even when applied to different cohorts. ANN are a valuable resource, providing useful data to build a prognostic model that deserves to be validated prospectively.

Background: One of the challenges in treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is to manage lesions abutted to the duodenum, bowel and stomach. Simultaneous integrated protection (SIP) is one of the proposed approaches to increase plan reproducibility and quality. However, no clinical data are available regarding the dosimetric objectives impacting local control probability. Methods: This is a prospective, single-arm study. Key inclusion criteria were as follows: PDAC histology; tumor abutment with duodenum, stomach, or small bowel; and SRT schedule consisting of 45 Gy in six fractions. Delineation of the PTV overlapped with critical OARs (PTV_SIP) and PTV outside critical OARs (PTV_Dominant) was mandatory. Dose constraints were as follows: (near) maximum dose, D2cc, and D20cc to critical OARs 38 Gy, 32 Gy, and 24 Gy, respectively. This study was designed to prospectively investigate the main clinical and dosimetric parameters impacting freedom from local recurrence (FFLR). Results: From June 2019 to January 2024, 104 patients were enrolled. One-year FFLR was 91.7%. Fifteen events of local failure occurred (17.6%). Mapping of local relapses showed a relapse inside the PTV_SIP area in nine patients and outside the PTV_SIP in six cases (NS). Whole PTV > 69 cc, PTV_SIP > 4 cc, PTV-SIP/whole PTV ratio > 7%, (near) Dmin to PTV_SIP < 25 Gy, mean dose to PTV_SIP < 28 Gy, and (near) Dmin to PTV_Dominant < 29 Gy were associated with worse FFLR. Multivariable analysis showed PTV_SIP absolute volume of more than 4 cc, mean dose to PTV_SIP < 28 Gy and whole PTV > 69 cc were independently related to worse FFLR. One case of acute G4 toxicity and two cases of acute G3 toxicity occurred, with two late toxicity deaths not certainly due to treatment. Conclusions: In this prospective study, SIP planning strategy with six fractions is safe and effective in pancreatic targets with critical contact with critical OARs. Given its potential advantages, SIP planning is a potential innovative strategy that should be compared to standard SRT planning in an ad hoc trial design.

Background: Lymph-nodal prostate cancer oligometastases are differently treated according to their site: pelvic are locoregional lymph nodes; instead, para-aortic lymph nodes are considered as distant metastases. The aim of the study was a comparison between para-aortic and pelvic oligometastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis. De novo metastatic or extra-nodal disease were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed; the pattern of recurrence was also evaluated. A propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to create comparable cohorts. The primary end-point was the progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end-points were biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), ADT-free survival (ADTFS), polymetastases-free survival (PMFS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), and pattern of relapse. Results: In total, 240 lymph-nodal oligometastases in 164 patients (127 pelvic and 37 para-aortic) were treated. The median PFS was 20 and 11 months in pelvic and para-aortic patients, respectively (p = 0.042). The difference was not confirmed in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.06). The median BRFS was 16 and 9 months, respectively, in the pelvic and para-aortic group (p = 0.07). No statistically significant differences for ADTFS or PMFS were detected. The cumulative 5-year LPFS was 90.5%. In PSM, no statistically significant differences for all the study end-points were detected. Conclusions: Patients affected by para-aortic disease might have a PFS comparable to pelvic disease; local control is high in both cohorts. Our results also support the use of SBRT for para-aortic metastases.

PurposeTo assess the maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancies affected by hypertensive disorders treated with nifedipine versus labetalol.MethodsA retrospective study in hypertensive patients treated during pregnancy with nifedipine or labetalol was conducted. After the charts review the patients were divided in the four groups: gestational hypertension (113 patients); mild preeclampsia (77 patients); severe preeclampsia (31 patients); HELLP syndrome (21 patients). The pregnancy and neonatal records were analyzed by paired and unpaired t test.ResultsWe found that there was an higher rate of intrauterine growth restriction infants among women treated with labetalol compared with those treated with nifedipine (38.8 vs. 15.5 %; p < 0.05), but only in the subgroup of women affected by Gestational Hypertension and Mild Preeclampsia. In this group was also higher the rate of fetal worsening assessed by fetal heart rate tracing (33.3 vs. 14.2 %; p < 0.05). No neonatal malformations and no differences in the rate of adverse side effects were observed.ConclusionsAntihypertensive therapy in pregnancy with Labetalol may have the potential to impair fetal behavior in low degrees hypertensive diseases of pregnancy. Optimal care must balance the potentially conflicting risks and benefits to mother and fetus.