Explore the vast range of titles available.

None of the clinical trials on migraine conducted thus far have focused on the possibility to modulate the phenomenon of aura. Furthermore, whether proper management of aura results in a better control of the headache phase has been poorly investigated. In the setting of a single-center, pilot, clinical trial, we aimed at comparing the effects of Aurastop (a combination of tanacetum parthenium (150 mg extracted at 0.8% = 1.2 mg di of active parthenolide), griffonia simplicifoila (20 mg of 5-hydroxy tryptophan), and magnesium (185 mg of magnesium pidolatum)) with those of magnesium alone (2.25 grams/tablet, corresponding to 184 mg of Mg++) in the treatment of acute attacks of migraine with aura. Between June 2017 and June 2018, 50 consecutive patients (27/23 male/female; mean age, 31 [18–57] years) with at least 3 episodes of aura per year were included (t0). Participants were instructed to keep track of the following 4 episodes of migraine with aura (t1) and invited to assume (1) a tablet of Aurastop at the beginning of the following 2 episodes of aura and (2) a magnesium tablet alone at the occurrence of the third and fourth aura attacks. Forty-eight patients (96.0%) had >50% reduction in aura duration when treated with Aurastop vs. 7 patients (14.0%) when treated with magnesium alone (p<0.001); 48 patients (96.0%) had >50% reduction of aura-related disability when receiving Aurastop vs. 5 patients (10.0%) when treated with magnesium alone (p<0.001); however, patients receiving Aurastop did not need to take pain killers in 35% of aura attacks vs. 3% when assuming magnesium (p<0.001). These results support the hypothesis that Aurastop might be effective in interfering with the phenomenon of aura and provide evidence that the clinical benefit attributable to this combination of molecules might be greater than that obtained with single compounds of proven effect on the biology of migraine.

Background: Lasmiditan, an oral 5-HT1F receptor agonist, has been recently approved for acute migraine treatment. While its efficacy was confirmed in randomized clinical trials, scarce data is available regarding effectiveness and tolerability in the real-world setting. Objectives: To evaluate lasmiditan effectiveness and tolerability in the real-world setting in 16 Italian headache centers. Design: LasmiDitan as Acute migRaine Treatment (DART) study is a prospective, multicentric, observational study. Methods: We enrolled 58 participants with migraine (84.5% females, age 49.0 (45.2–52.9) years, 24.1% with chronic migraine) reporting 9.4 (7.4–11.3) monthly migraine days. Participants were instructed to treat their migraine attacks with oral lasmiditan 50 or 100 mg. Using an ad hoc electronic diary, participants prospectively collected migraine attack features at baseline and every 30 min after lasmiditan administration, up to 2 h post-dose. The primary outcome was 2-h pain freedom for the first-treated attack after lasmiditan intake. We also collected the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) after administration. Results: Overall, participants treated 100 attacks, of which 58 first-treated attacks. Regarding first-treated attacks, 44.8% of subjects rated migraine intensity as severe at lasmiditan intake. Pain freedom 2-h post-dosing was reported in 32.8% (19/58) of individuals and was associated with baseline pain intensity, being higher in subjects treating a mild/moderate attack (p = 0.044). Conversely, it was not influenced by timing of intake (p = 0.375), dosage (p = 0.727), or previous triptan failure (p = 0.351). Regarding all-treated attacks, pain freedom 2-h post-dosing was 37.0% (37/100). At least one AE was reported by 53.4% of participants (31/58), predominantly asthenia, dizziness, somnolence, anxiety or agitation, and paresthesia. Tolerability was rated as good-to-excellent by 51.8% of subjects. Conclusion: Our study supports clinical effectiveness of oral lasmiditan 50 and 100 mg for the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Lasmiditan effectiveness was not associated with the previous triptan failure and may therefore represent a valuable therapeutic option in subjects who did not benefit from, or have contraindications to, triptans. Trail registration: The study was preregistered on clinicaltrial.gov, NCT05903040 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05903040?cond=migraine&intr=lasmiditan&rank=5).

Background and purpose Although there is extensive evidence about the safety of monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene‐related peptide (anti‐CGRP mAbs) in combination with traditional drugs, scarce data are available on the safety of their combination with other mAbs. This study aimed to evaluate the 6‐month effectiveness and tolerability of anti‐CGRP mAbs in combination with other mAbs for different diseases. Methods Patients included in the Italian Headache Registry and treated concomitantly with an anti‐CGRP mAb and another mAb were included. Effectiveness outcomes for migraine included reduction from baseline of monthly headache days (MHDs), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score, Headache Impact Test‐6 (HIT‐6) scores, and Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results Thirty‐eight patients were included. In 27 patients (71.1%), the anti‐CGRP mAb was added to a previously ongoing mAb. Nine patients (23.7%) discontinued one of the two mAbs before the end of treatment (seven discontinued the anti‐CGRP mAb and two the other mAb). One patient discontinued for AEs. Anti‐CGRP mAbs were discontinued due to ineffectiveness (n = 5, 55.5%) and one each (11.1%) for clinical remission and lost to follow‐up. MHDs significantly decreased from baseline to 3 months (p < 0.0001) and 6 months (p < 0.001), as did the MIDAS and the HIT‐6 scores at 3 and 6 months (p < 0.001). For anti‐CGRP mAbs, 27.4% of patients reported PGIC ≥ 5 at 3 months and 48.3% at 6 months. Mild AEs associated with introduction of a second mAb were detected in six patients (15.8%). Conclusions In this real‐world study, anti‐CGRP mAbs showed safety and effectiveness when administered concomitantly with other mAbs.

Background Real-world studies on fremanezumab, an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody for migraine prevention, are few and with limited follow-up. Objective We aimed to evaluate the long-term (up to 52 weeks) effectiveness and tolerability of fremanezumab in high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine. Methods This s an independent, prospective, multicenter cohort study enrolling outpatients in 17 Italian Headache Centers with high-frequency episodic migraine or chronic migraine and multiple preventive treatment failures. Patients were treated with fremanezumab 225 mg monthly. The primary outcomes included changes from baseline (1 month before treatment) in monthly headache days, response rates (reduction in monthly headache days from baseline), and persistence in medication overuse at months 3, 6, and 12 (all outcome timeframes refer to the stated month). Secondary outcomes included changes from baseline in acute medication intake and disability questionnaires scores at the same timepoints. A last observation carried forward analysis was also performed. Results A total of 90 patients who received at least one dose of fremanezumab and with a potential 12-month follow-up were included. Among them, 15 (18.0%) patients discontinued treatment for the entire population, a reduction in monthly headache days compared with baseline was reported at month 3, with a significant median [interquartile range] reduction in monthly headache days (− 9.0 [11.5], p < 0.001). A statistically different reduction was also reported at month 6 compared with baseline (− 10.0 [12.0]; p < 0.001) and at 12 months of treatment (− 10.0 [14.0]; p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with medication overuse was significantly reduced compared with baseline from 68.7% (57/83) to 29.6% (24/81), 25.3% (19/75), and 14.7% (10/68) at 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment, respectively ( p < 0.001). Acute medication use (days and total number) and disability scores were also significantly reduced ( p < 0.001). A ≥ 50% response rate was achieved for 51.9, 67.9, and 76.5% of all patients at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Last observation carried forward analyses confirmed these findings. Fremanezumab was well tolerated, with just one patient discontinuing treatment because of adverse events. Conclusions This study provides evidence for the real-world effectiveness of fremanezumab in treating both high-frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine, with meaningful and sustained improvements in multiple migraine-related variables. No new safety issue was identified.

Background Rimegepant, a novel oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, has been recently approved for the acute migraine treatment. While its efficacy was confirmed in randomized clinical trials, no data is available regarding real-life effectiveness and tolerability. GAINER, a prospective, multicentric study, aimed to evaluate rimegepant effectiveness and tolerability in the real-world setting. Methods Our study involved 16 headache centers across Italy. The main outcomes were: i) 2 h pain freedom, and ii) occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events after administration. Participants were instructed to treat one migraine attack with rimegepant 75 mg orally disintegrating tablet. Using an ad hoc diary, participants prospectively collected migraine attack features at baseline and every 30 min after rimegepant administration, up to 2 h post dose. A 24 h follow up was also collected. Results We enrolled 103 participants with migraine (74.8% female, mean age 44.4 [42.0 – 46.7] years, 24.3% with chronic migraine of whom 44.0% presented a concomitant diagnosis of medication overuse headache). The number of previously failed preventive classes was 2.7 [2.3 – 3.2]. Participants presented a mean of 9.6 [8.2 – 10.9] monthly migraine days at baseline. At rimegepant intake, 40.8% of patients rated migraine intensity as severe. Pain freedom 2 h post dose was reported in 44.7% (46/103) of individuals. Pain freedom 2 h post dose was not influenced by baseline pain severity ( p  = 0.316), but it was associated with timing of intake ( p  = 0.032) with a higher rate of 2 h pain freedom when rimegepant was taken within 1 h from pain onset. Mild adverse events were reported in 15.5% total attacks (16/103), predominantly fatigue ( n  = 6), gastrointestinal symptoms ( n  = 6), somnolence ( n  = 4), and transient cognitive difficulties ( n  = 3). Tolerability was rated as good-to-excellent in 85.4% cases (88/103). Conclusions Our data confirms rimegepant effectiveness and safety in the acute migraine treatment in a real-world setting in a cohort of participants that includes subjects with episodic or chronic migraine, medication overuse and a high number of prior preventive treatment failures. Trial registration The study was preregistered on clinicaltrial.gov, NCT05903027.

ObjectiveTo explore the interaction effects between cardiac interatrial right-to-left shunt (RLS) and proatherosclerotic factors on the risk of brain ischaemia.DesignMulticentre Italian case–control study.SettingUniversity hospitals.Participants588 patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS) aged ≤45 years and 585 control subjects consecutively enrolled as part of the Italian Project on Stroke in Young Adults.MethodsInteraction effects between RLS and an individual proatherosclerotic score computed from the number of conventional vascular risk factors for the risk of CS were investigated. Data were examined by logistic regression models and expressed as interaction OR or interaction risk difference (RD).ResultsCS risk increased with increasing number of proatherosclerotic factors in subjects without RLS (OR 2.73; 95% CI 1.98 to 3.76; RD +0.246; 95% CI +0.17 to +0.32; for subjects with one or more factors), but was higher in subjects with RLS and no additional proatherosclerotic factors (OR 5.14; 95% CI 3.49 to 7.58; RD +0.388; 95% CI +0.31 to +0.47) compared with subjects without RLS and no risk factors. Negative interaction and antagonistic effects between RLS and proatherosclerotic factors were observed (interaction OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.91; interaction RD −0.17; 95% CI −0.29 to −0.05).ConclusionsThe influence of RLS on the risk of CS decreases with increasing number of atherosclerotic factors, and is highest when such factors are absent. Individual proatherosclerotic profiles may help to identify patients with CS whose patent foramen ovale is probably pathogenic.