Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundA phase 3, multinational, randomized, non-inferiority trial (REFLECT) compared the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib (LEN) and sorafenib (SOR) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). LEN had an effect on overall survival (OS) compared to SOR, statistically confirmed by non-inferiority [OS: median = 13.6 months vs. 12.3 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79–1.06], and demonstrated statistically significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and the objective response rate (ORR) in the overall population. The results of a subset analysis that evaluated the efficacy and safety of LEN and SOR in the Japanese population are reported.MethodsThe intent-to-treat population enrolled in Japan was analyzed.ResultsOf 954 patients in the overall population, 168 Japanese patients were assigned to the LEN arm (N = 81) or the SOR arm (N = 87). Median OS was 17.6 months for LEN vs. 17.8 months for SOR (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.62–1.29). LEN showed statistically significant improvements over SOR in PFS (7.2 months vs. 4.6 months) and ORR (29.6% vs. 6.9%). The relative dose intensity of LEN and SOR in the Japanese population was lower than in the overall population. Frequently observed, related adverse events included palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (PPES), hypertension, decreased appetite, and proteinuria in the LEN arm, and PPES, hypertension, diarrhea, and alopecia in the SOR arm.ConclusionsThe efficacy and safety of LEN in the Japanese population were similar to those in the overall population of REFLECT. With manageable adverse events, LEN is a new treatment option for Japanese patients with uHCC.Trial registration IDClinicalTrials.gov. No. NCT01761266.

Background There are few published data regarding long-term outcome survival after microwave ablation (MWA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within 3 cm and 3 nodules. The aim of this study was to examine long-term outcomes after operative MWA for HCC within 3 cm and 3 nodules. Methods This cohort of this retrospective study comprised 559 patients who underwent operative MWA for HCC within 3 cm and 3 nodules in our institute between 1996 and 2017. We analyzed overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), and evaluated factors related to prognosis. Results Median follow-up time was 69 months for the entire cohort. OS rates were 1-year: 98%, 3-year: 87%, 5-year: 73%, and 10-year:39%; RFS rates were 1-year: 91%, 3-year: 60%, 5-year: 42%, and 10-year: 21%. Multivariate analysis revealed that hepatitis C virus (HCV)–positive status, ALBI grade 2 or 3, maximum tumor diameter ≥ 20 mm, and multiple nodules were independent risk factors for both OS and RFS. A prognostic staging model using one point for each risk factor provided a well-categorized predictive model. The 5-year OS rates were 93%, 81%, and 57% for scores of 0, 1 or 2, and 3 or 4, respectively ( P  < 0.001). The 5-year RFS rates were 70%, 48%, and 28% for scores of 0, 1 or 2, and 3 or 4, respectively ( P  < 0.001). Conclusions Our results revealed good long-term outcomes after operative MWA for HCC within 3 cm and 3 nodules.

Background Few clinical studies concerning the efficacy of microwave ablation for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma have been published. Our purpose was to examine perioperative and long-term outcomes after operative microwave ablation for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods This retrospective study included 246 patients who had undergone operative microwave ablation for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma in our institute between January 2001 and December 2017. We analyzed overall and recurrence-free survival and used the Cox proportional hazard model to evaluate potential prognostic factors. Results The overall median follow-up time was 51 months. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 98%, 74%, 51%, and 28%, respectively, whereas the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year recurrence-free survival rates were 80%, 32%, 18%, and 10%, respectively. The major complication rate (Clavien–Dindo classification IIIa or above) after operative microwave ablation was 7%, with no procedure-related mortality. Multivariate analysis identified beyond up-to-7 criteria (the sum of the largest tumor’s diameter in cm and the total number of tumors), Child–Pugh grade B, and serum alpha-fetoprotein concentration ≥ 100 ng/mL as independent risk factors for overall survival after operative microwave ablation. The overall survival of patients within up-to-7 and Child–Pugh grade A was better than that of the remaining patients, 5-year overall survivals being 67% and 37%, respectively ( P  < 0.001). Conclusions Operative microwave ablation is safe and effective in patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma. In particular, patients within up-to-7 and Child–Pugh grade A can be expected to have better long-term outcomes after operative microwave ablation.

Background Little evidence exists regarding long-term survival after microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study is to determine actual 10-year survival and clarify the clinicopathological features of patients surviving ≥ 10 years after surgical microwave ablation. Patients and Methods This retrospective study identified 459 patients who underwent surgical microwave ablation for HCC with curative intent between 2001 and 2008. We compared 100 patients who survived ≥ 10 years with 321 patients who died within 10 years. Results Median overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were 5.5 and 2.4 years, respectively. The actual 10-year overall survival rate was 23.8%, and the actual 10-year recurrence-free survival rate was 8.1%. Multivariate analysis showed that age > 70 years [odds ratio 1.87, P  = 0.029], hepatitis C virus positivity (OR 2.30, P  = 0.004), Child–Pugh class B (OR 3.28, P  = 0.003), and platelet count < 10 × 10 4 /µL (OR 1.93, P  = 0.033) were independent risk factors for actual 10-year survival. During 10-year follow-up, 66% of the ≥ 10-year survivors developed recurrence, and 91% of these patients underwent further curative treatment, including hepatic resection or local ablation, for HCC recurrence. Conclusion Ten-year survival after surgical microwave ablation for HCC can be expected in approximately 24% of patients, even though nearly 2/3 of our 10-year survival patients experienced recurrence. Close postoperative follow-up and further curative treatment for recurrence are important for improving long-term survival.

The feasibility and safety of microwave ablation in elderly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of surgical microwave ablation for HCC in patients older than 80 years of age. This retrospective study enrolled consecutive 114 patients older than 80 years of age who underwent surgical microwave ablation for HCC between July 1994 and December 2017. We analyzed perioperative outcomes and long-term outcomes to clarify the prognostic factors. The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were 97.3%, 76.0%, 49.2% and 84.2%, 44.7%, and 32.5%, respectively. The overall major morbidity rates (Clavien–Dindo grade IIIA or above) were 2.6%. There were no cases of mortality. Multivariate analysis showed that hepatitis C virus antibody (HCV-Ab) positivity and the presence of multiple tumors were independent prognostic factors for long-term outcomes. The overall survival rate of patients with HCV-Ab negative and single tumor was better than that of other patients ( p  = 0.026). Surgical microwave ablation was feasible and safe for elderly patients with HCC. Elderly patients with HCV-Ab negative and single tumor would be expected to have better long-term outcomes after surgical microwave ablation.

Introduction: Several clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus molecular-targeted agents versus TACE alone revealed no clinical benefits in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Here, we report the final OS analysis from the TACTICS trial, which previously demonstrated significant improvement in PFS with TACE plus sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (NCT01217034). Methods: Patients with unresectable HCC were randomized to a TACE plus sorafenib group (N = 80) or a TACE alone group (N = 76). Patients in the combination treatment group received sorafenib 400 mg once daily for 2–3 weeks before TACE, followed by 800 mg once daily during on-demand conventional TACE sessions until time to untreatable progression. In this trial, TACE-specific PFS was used. TACE-specific PFS is defined as the time from randomization to progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, and PD was defined as untreatable progression, caused by the inability of a patient to further receive or benefit from TACE for reasons that include intrahepatic tumor progression (25% increase vs. baseline) according to response evaluation criteria in cancer of the liver, the detection of extrahepatic spread, vascular invasion, or transient deterioration of liver function to Child-Pugh C after TACE. Results: At the cut-off date of July 31, 2020, 131 OS events were observed. The median OS was 36.2 months with TACE plus sorafenib and 30.8 months with TACE alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.861; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.607–1.223; p = 0.40, ΔOS, 5.4 months). The updated PFS was 22.8 months with TACE plus sorafenib and 13.5 months with TACE alone (HR = 0.661; 95% CI, 0.466–0.938; p = 0.02). Post-trial treatments with active procedures/agents were received by 47 (58.8%) patients in the TACE plus sorafenib group and 58 (76.3%) in the TACE alone group (p = 0.01). In post hoc analysis, PFS and OS benefit were shown in HCC patients with tumor burden beyond up-to-7 criteria. Conclusions: In TACTICS trial, TACE plus sorafenib did not show significant OS benefit over TACE alone; however, clinical meaningful OS prolongation and significantly improved PFS was observed. Thus, the TACE plus sorafenib can be considered a choice of treatment in intermediate-stage HCC, especially in patients with high tumor burden. Trial Registration: NCT01217034.

Introduction: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for unresectable intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but recurrence after TACE is common. The present phase 2, prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial, the TACTICS-L trial, investigated the efficacy and safety of TACE plus lenvatinib (LEN), a drug that more strongly promotes vascular normalization and has a better objective response rate (ORR) than sorafenib (jRCTs031180074). Methods: Participants were patients with HCC who had not previously received systemic therapy, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, or immunotherapy and who were ineligible for resection or percutaneous ablation therapy. LEN was to be administered 14–21 days before the first TACE, stopped 2 days before TACE, and resumed 3 days after TACE. Key inclusion criteria were unresectable HCC, Child-Pugh A liver function, 0–2 prior TACE sessions, tumor size ≤10 cm, number of tumors ≤10, and ECOG performance status 0–1. Key exclusion criteria were vascular invasion and extrahepatic spread. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by RECICL, and secondary endpoints were time to untreatable progression, ORR, overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: A total of 62 HCC patients were enrolled in this trial. The median age was 72 years, 77.4% of patients were men, and 95.2% had PS 0. The primary endpoint of median PFS was 28.0 months (90% confidence interval [CI] 25.1–31.0) after a minimum 24 months of follow-up. The secondary endpoint of median OS was not reached (90% CI 35.5 months–NR). LEN-TACE achieved a high response rate and high complete response (CR) rate (4 weeks after the first TACE: ORR 79.0%, CR rate 53.2%; best response: ORR 88.7%, CR rate 67.7%) by RECICL. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed that the characteristics of responders/nonresponders (ORR and CR rate) were similar and that LEN-TACE would be effective in all subgroups, including the population in whom TACE alone would be less likely to be curative (e.g., patients with the non-simple nodular type or a high tumor burden). The relative dose intensity of LEN before the first TACE was important for achieving higher CR rate/ORR by LEN-TACE. No new safety concerns were observed. Conclusion: The results of this trial provide encouraging evidence, supporting the efficacy and favorable safety profile of LEN-TACE in patients who are ineligible for locoregional therapy.

BackgroundThe global, randomized, phase 3 REACH-2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02435433) found significantly longer overall survival (OS) for second-line ramucirumab versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.710, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.531–0.949, P = 0.0199) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥ 400 ng/mL. This prespecified subgroup analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in the Japanese patients enrolled in the study.MethodsPatients with advanced HCC and AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL after first-line sorafenib were randomized 2:1 to ramucirumab (8 mg/kg intravenously) or placebo every 2 weeks. Hazard ratios for progression-free survival (PFS) and OS (primary endpoint of the overall study) were estimated using the stratified Cox regression model. We also pooled individual patient data from REACH-2 with data from REACH (NCT01140347) for patients with AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL.ResultsIn the Japanese REACH-2 subpopulation, there were improvements for ramucirumab (n = 41) versus placebo (n = 18) in PFS (HR 0.282, 95% CI 0.144–0.553) and OS was numerically prolonged (HR 0.599, 95% CI 0.303–1.187), consistent with the significant benefit seen in the overall REACH-2 study population. In the ramucirumab and placebo arms, respectively, the objective response rate was 7.3% and 0%, and the disease control rate was 70.7% and 33.3%. The most frequently reported grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event was hypertension (ramucirumab: 15%; placebo: 11%).ConclusionsRamucirumab after prior sorafenib improved PFS and OS compared with placebo, with a manageable safety profile, in the Japanese REACH-2 subpopulation, consistent with the overall REACH-2 study results. Ramucirumab is the first agent to demonstrate clinical benefit for Japanese patients with HCC in the second-line setting.

This study aimed to clarify local recurrence (LR) predictive factors following intraoperative microwave ablation (MWA) for colorectal liver metastases. The data from 195 patients with 1392 CRLM lesions, who were preoperatively diagnosed by gadolinium-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic CT and treated with intraoperative MWA (2450 MHz) with or without hepatectomy, from January 2005 to December 2019, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using logistic regression. In addition, the margins were measured on contrast-enhanced CT 6 weeks post-ablation. Overall, 1066 lesions were ablated. The LRs occurred in 44 lesions (4.1%) among 39 patients (20.0%). The multivariate analysis per patient showed that tumor size > 20 mm and ablation margin < 5 mm were significant predictors for LR. Furthermore, multivariate analysis per lesion revealed that segments 1, 7, and 8 and tumor size > 15 mm, ablation margin < 5 mm, tumor size > 20 mm, and proximity to the Glisson were significant LR predictors. Finally, the outcome of this study may help determine indications for MWA.

Introduction: Combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with a targeted antiangiogenic agent may leverage complementary mechanisms of action for the treatment of advanced/metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Avelumab is a human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 antibody with clinical activity in various tumor types; axitinib is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3. We report the final analysis from VEGF Liver 100 (NCT03289533), a phase 1b study evaluating safety and efficacy of avelumab plus axitinib in treatment-naive patients with aHCC. Methods: Eligible patients had confirmed aHCC, no prior systemic therapy, ≥1 measurable lesion, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1, and Child-Pugh class A disease. Patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks plus axitinib 5 mg orally twice daily until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Endpoints included safety and investigator-assessed objective response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) for HCC. Results: Twenty-two Japanese patients were enrolled and treated with avelumab plus axitinib. The minimum follow-up was 18 months as of October 25, 2019 (data cutoff). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 16 patients (72.7%); the most common (≥3 patients) were hypertension (n = 11 [50.0%]), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (n = 5 [22.7%]), and decreased appetite (n = 3 [13.6%]). No grade 4 TRAEs or treatment-related deaths occurred. Ten patients (45.5%) had an immune-related AE (irAE) of any grade; 3 patients (13.6%) had an infusion-related reaction (IRR) of any grade, and no grade ≥3 irAE and IRR were observed. The objective response rate was 13.6% (95% CI: 2.9–34.9%) per RECIST 1.1 and 31.8% (95% CI: 13.9–54.9%) per mRECIST for HCC. Conclusion: Treatment with avelumab plus axitinib was associated with a manageable toxicity profile and showed antitumor activity in patients with aHCC.