Explore the vast range of titles available.

Ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is active in CLL, but resistance may emerge. The authors observed the emergence of a CLL clone with a cysteine-to-serine change in amino acid 481 of the target protein that substantially weakens drug binding and leads to resistance. To the Editor: Ibrutinib, an inhibitor that binds covalently to C481 of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), has produced remarkable responses in patients with relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). 1 – 4 However, 5.3% of patients have disease progression, and the mechanism of resistance is largely unknown. Herein we describe the mechanism of resistance in such a case. A 49-year-old woman had a diagnosis of CLL established in 2000. After the failure of multiple treatments, she began receiving ibrutinib at a dose of 560 mg daily in 2010 as part of a phase 1, dose-escalation study of ibrutinib in B-cell cancers. . . .

SHP1, a tyrosine phosphatase, negatively regulates B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling. Ibrutinib selectively inhibits BTK and has been approved for the treatment of several types of B-cell lymphomas, but not yet in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A phase 3 clinical trial of ibrutinib–containing regimen has been completed to evaluate its activity in subtypes or subsets of DLBCL patients. Although the subtype of activated B-cell like (ABC) DLBCL is characterized by chronic active BCR signaling, only a fraction of ABC-DLBCL patients seem to benefit from ibrutinib-containing regimen. New alternative predictive biomarkers are needed to identify patients who better respond. We investigated if SHP1 plays a role in defining the level of the BCR activity and impacts the response to ibrutinib. A meta-analysis revealed that lack of SHP1 protein expression as well as SHP1 promoter hypermethylation is strongly associated with NHL including DLBCL. On a tissue microarray of 95 DLBCL samples, no substantial difference in SHP1 expression was found between the GCB and non-GCB subtypes of DLBCL. However, we identified a strong reverse correlation between SHP1 expression and promoter methylation suggesting that promoter hypermethylation is responsible for SHP1 loss. SHP1 knockout in BCR-dependent GCB and ABC cell lines increased BCR signaling activities and sensitize lymphoma cells to the action of ibrutinib. Rescue of SHP1 in the knockout clones, on the other hand, restored BCR signaling and ibrutinib resistance. Further, pharmacological inhibition of SHP1 in both cell lines and patient-derived primary cells demonstrate that SHP1 inhibition synergized with ibrutinib in suppressing tumor cell growth. Thus, SHP1 loss may serve as an alternative biomarker to cell-of-origin to identify patients who potentially benefit from ibrutinib treatment. Our results further suggest that reducing SHP1 pharmacologically may represent a new strategy to augment tumor response to BCR-directed therapies. Schematic diagram summarizing the major findings. Left panel. When SHP1 is present and functional, it negatively regulates the activity of the BCR pathway. Right pane. When SHP1 is diminished or lost, cells depend more on the increased BCR signaling and making them vulnerable to BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib. Diagram was generated using BioRender.

Ibrutinib inhibits Bruton tyrosine kinase while venetoclax is a specific inhibitor of the anti-apoptotic protein BCL2. Both drugs are highly effective as monotherapy against chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and clinical trials using the combination therapy have produced remarkable results in terms of rate of complete remission and frequency of undetectable minimal residual disease. However, the laboratory rationale behind the success of the drug combination is still lacking. A better understanding of how these two drugs synergize would eventually help develop other rational combination strategies. Using an ex vivo model that promotes CLL proliferation, we show that modeled ibrutinib proliferative responses, but not viability responses, correlate well with patients’ actual clinical responses. Importantly, we demonstrate for the first time that ibrutinib and venetoclax act on distinct CLL subpopulations that have different proliferative capacities. While the dividing subpopulation of CLL responds to ibrutinib, the resting subpopulation preferentially responds to venetoclax. The combination of these targeted therapies effectively reduced both the resting and dividing subpopulations in most cases. Our laboratory findings help explain several clinical observations and contribute to the understanding of tumor dynamics. Additionally, our proliferation model may be used to identify novel drug combinations with the potential of eradicating residual disease.

Nick Cross and colleagues report that the JAK2 V617F somatic mutation that drives the development of chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms is associated with the presence of a specific inherited haplotype in JAK2 . Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a group of related conditions characterized by the overproduction of cells from one or more myeloid lineages. More than 95% of cases of polycythemia vera, and roughly half of essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis acquire a unique somatic 1849G>T JAK2 mutation (encoding V617F) that is believed to be a critical driver of excess proliferation 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 . We report here that JAK2 V617F -associated disease is strongly associated with a specific constitutional JAK2 haplotype, designated 46/1, in all three disease entities compared to healthy controls (polycythemia vera, n = 192, P = 2.9 × 10 −16 ; essential thrombocythemia, n = 78, P = 8.2 × 10 −9 and myelofibrosis, n = 41, P = 8.0 × 10 −5 ). Furthermore, JAK2 V617F specifically arises on the 46/1 allele in most cases. The 46/1 JAK2 haplotype thus predisposes to the development of JAK2 V617F -associated MPNs (OR = 3.7; 95% CI = 3.1–4.3) and provides a model whereby a constitutional genetic factor is associated with an increased risk of acquiring a specific somatic mutation.

We studied 24 spleens with extramedullary hematopoietic proliferation (EMHP), a key feature of advanced-stage Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, obtained from 24 patients (14 primary myelofibrosis, 7 polycythemia vera and 3 unclassifiable). Hematoxylin and eosin, reticulin and trichrome stains, and immunohistochemical stains for myeloperoxidase, glycophorin-C, CD42b, CD34, CD117, CD8, nerve growth factor receptor and smooth muscle actin were evaluated. Clinical information was correlated with the morphological findings. Three distinct histological patterns of EMHP were recognized: diffuse (12), nodular (5), and mixed-nodular and diffuse (7). The preponderant lineage was granulocytic in diffuse, trilineage in nodular and erythroid in mixed EMHP. Erythropoiesis was largely intravascular, granulopoiesis was within the splenic cords and megakaryopoiesis was observed in both locations. The stromal changes paralleled the histological pattern with preservation of the splenic stromal and vascular architecture in the diffuse areas as opposed to areas of nodular EMHP. The morphological features of the splenic EMHP did not correlate with specific subtypes of myeloproliferative neoplasms. The mean duration of follow-up from initial diagnosis was 80 months. A total of 15 of the 24 patients died of disease: 8 of 12 (67%) with diffuse, 2 of 5 (40%) with nodular and 5 of 7 (71%) with mixed growth patterns. The mean duration from diagnosis to splenectomy was shorter in patients with diffuse (83 months) as compared with those with nodular EMHP (127 months). Our study demonstrates that splenic extramedullary hematopoietic proliferation in Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms shows distinct histological patterns that do not correlate with disease subtypes, but appear to suggest a trend between the histological patterns and clinical behavior. These results suggest a different biology of the disease in the nodular and diffuse extramedullary hematopoietic proliferation groups.

Melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the United States. The advent of immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy has improved progression-free and overall survival in many patients with advanced disease. However, the selection of therapeutic choices requires a nuanced approach, especially when considering molecularly targeted agents. This case report highlights a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in managing a patient with a history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and recurrent melanoma. Molecular testing suggested discordant BRAF V600E testing and a simultaneous NRAS G12D mutation. After a careful literature review, repetition of his molecular testing, and analysis of the timelines and results of all his molecular testing, we concluded that the BRAF V600E mutation result was falsely positive. The patient was treated with two cycles of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg) as per the NADINA trial and had a complete radiographic response. He then underwent resection demonstrating a pathologic partial response ranging from 20% to 95% tumor necrosis, dependent on the satellite examined. This case report underscores the importance of precise molecular diagnostics in guiding melanoma treatment and demonstrates the complexities of managing a patient with a coexisting malignancy.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare hematologic malignancy with an aggressive clinical course and poor prognosis. The genetic abnormalities in BPDCN are heterogeneous; therefore, its molecular pathogenesis and the prognostic importance of genomic alterations associated with the disease are not well defined. Here we report a case of BPDCN with a novel AFF4::IRF1 fusion predicted to lead to a loss-of-function of the IRF1 tumor suppressor, somatic mutations of ASXL1, TET2, and MYD88, as well as multiple intrachromosomal deletions. The patient showed resistance to Tagraxofusp and Venetoclax, and he died about 16 months after diagnosis. Considering the predicted effect of the AFF4::IRF1 fusion on IRF1’s antitumor effects and immune regulation, and the possibility of its relevance to the aggressive course observed in this case, we propose further evaluation of the clinical significance of this fusion in BPDCN in future cooperative group studies and the consideration of therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring IRF1-dependent antineoplastic effects in such cases.

A modified version of the PGDx elioTM Plasma Resolve assay was validated as a laboratory-developed test (LDT) for clinical use in the Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory at Fox Chase Cancer Center. The test detects single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions and deletions (indels) in 33 target genes using fragmented genomic DNA extracted from plasma. The analytical performance of this assay was assessed with reference standard DNA and 29 samples from cancer patients and detected 66 SNVs and 23 indels. Using 50 ng of input DNA, the sensitivity was 95.5% to detect SNVs at 0.5% allele frequency, and the specificity was 92.3%. The sensitivity to detect indels at 1% allele frequency was 70.4%. A cutoff of 0.25% variant allele frequency (VAF) was set up for diagnostic reporting. An inter-laboratory study of concordance with an orthologous test resulted in a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 91.7%.

The role of PPARγ in tumorigenesis is controversial. In this article, we review and analyze literature from the past decade that highlights the potential proneoplastic activity of PPARγ. We discuss the following five aspects of the nuclear hormone receptor and its agonists: (1) relative expression of PPARγ in human tumor versus normal tissues; (2) receptor-dependent proneoplastic effects; (3) impact of PPARγ and its agonists on tumors in animal models; (4) clinical trials of thiazolidinediones (TZDs) in human malignancies; (5) TZDs as chemopreventive agents in epidemiology studies. The focus is placed on the most relevant in vivo animal models and human data. In vitro cell line studies are included only when the effects are shown to be dependent on the PPARγ receptor.

Osteoclastogenesis-associated transmembrane protein 1 (OSTM1) is a membrane-integral glycosylated protein known for regulating lysosomal homeostasis, with loss-of-function mutations causing autosomal recessive osteopetrosis. Through a whole-genome CRISPR/Cas9 screen, we identified OSTM1 as a critical tumor suppressor in B-cell malignancies. In humans, OSTM1 is frequently deleted or downregulated across a wide range of B-cell malignancies. In mice, B-cell-specific monoallelic or biallelic ablation cooperates with loss to drive lymphomagenesis with near 100% penetrance. Mechanistically, we reveal that a cytosolic, non-glycosylated fraction of OSTM1 functions as an E3 ligase that targets phosphodiesterase 3B (PDE3B) for proteasomal degradation. Because PDE3B catalyzes the conversion of cAMP to AMP and thereby negatively regulating the cAMP-dependent PKA/CREB/CREBBP tumor suppressive pathway, the loss of OSTM1 leads to PDE3B stabilization and enhanced cell transformation. Our findings establish OSTM1 as a pivotal E3 ligase that prevents B-cell lymphomagenesis through the regulation of the cAMP/PKA/CREB pathway.