Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundOnce-daily, orally administered, co-formulated glecaprevir (NS3/4A protease inhibitor) and pibrentasvir (NS5A inhibitor) (G/P) demonstrated pangenotypic activity and high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in studies outside Japan. Here we report safety and efficacy in a subset of Japanese patients with chronic HCV infection who received G/P 300/120 mg in a phase 3, open-label, multicenter study (CERTAIN-1).MethodsThis analysis focuses on three difficult-to-treat subgroups: HCV GT1/2-infected patients who failed to achieve SVR after treatment with a direct acting antiviral (DAA)-containing regimen; GT1/2-infected patients with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2); and GT3-infected patients. Patients in the renal impairment and GT3 cohorts were treatment-naive or interferon treatment-experienced. Noncirrhotic GT1/2-infected, DAA-naïve patients in the renal impairment cohort received G/P for 8 weeks; all other patients were treated for 12 weeks. Primary outcome was SVR (HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL) 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12).ResultsThe study enrolled 33 GT1/2-infected patients who failed previous DAA treatment (four with cirrhosis); 12 GT1/2-infected patients with severe renal impairment (two with cirrhosis); and 12 GT3-infected patients (two with cirrhosis). SVR12 was achieved by 31/33 (93.9%), 12/12 (100%), and 10/12 (83.3%) patients, respectively. One serious adverse event (fluid overload, not related to G/P) occurred in a patient on chronic intermittent hemodialysis.ConclusionsG/P achieved high SVR12 rates and was well tolerated in three difficult-to-treat patient subgroups with limited treatment options in Japan (DAA-experienced patients, patients with severe renal impairment, and GT3-infected patients). These results support the potential suitability of this regimen for these special populations in Japan.

BackgroundThe once-daily, all oral, RBV-free, pangenotypic direct-acting anti-viral regimen consisting of co-formulated NS3/4A protease inhibitor glecaprevir and NS5A inhibitor pibrentasvir (G/P), demonstrated high rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) in phase 2 and 3 studies outside Japan.MethodsCERTAIN-1 is a phase 3, open-label, multicenter study assessing the safety and efficacy of G/P (300/120 mg) once daily in Japanese patients with chronic HCV GT1 infection. Patients without cirrhosis received 8 weeks of G/P or 12 weeks of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir (OBV/PTV/r, 25/150/100 mg); patients with cirrhosis received G/P for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was non-inferiority of G/P compared to OBV/PTV/r by assessing SVR at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12) among non-cirrhotic patients without the NS5A Y93H polymorphism.ResultsSVR12 was achieved by 128/129 (99.2%; one patient lost to follow-up) non-cirrhotic patients in the 8-week G/P Arm (including 23/23 patients with the NS5A Y93H polymorphism) and 52/52 (100%) patients in the 12-week OBV/PTV/r Arm. No patients from the G/P Arm prematurely discontinued the study drug or experienced a treatment-emergent serious adverse event (TESAE). Three patients from the OBV/PTV/r Arm experienced five TESAEs and one of these patients discontinued the study drug due to TESAEs. All 38 (100%) patients with compensated cirrhosis achieved SVR12; in this group, no TESAEs were reported and one patient discontinued treatment due to an AE.ConclusionsCERTAIN-1 study results demonstrate high efficacy and favorable tolerability of G/P in GT1-infected Japanese patients including those with the NS5A Y93H polymorphism, with no virologic failures observed.

Nalfurafine hydrochloride, a selective κ-opioid receptor agonist has been approved for pruritus in patients with chronic liver disease. However, not all patients respond to nalfurafine hydrochloride. The aim of this study was to clarify the efficacy of nalfurafine hydrochloride. The subjects were patients with chronic liver disease complicated by pruritus who were treated with nalfurafine hydrochloride between May, 2015, and May, 2021. The degree of pruritus was evaluated based on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and the Kawashima’s pruritus score. Nalfurafine hydrochloride 2.5 μg was orally administered once a day for 12 weeks. A decrease in the VAS score of ≥ 25 mm or the Kawashima’s pruritus score of ≥ 1 scores was designated as relevant response . The former of ≥ 50 mm or the latter of ≥ 2 scores as remarkable response. The 326 patients who were evaluated the efficacy at 12 weeks. The median time suffering from pruritus to administration of nalfurafine hydrochloride was 4 months. The median VAS score improved from 70.0 mm before administration to 40.0 and 30.0 mm at 4 and 12 weeks of treatment, respectively. On multivariate analysis, shorter itching period and lower FIB-4 index value were extracted as the independent factors related to remarkable responder. On multivariate analysis, shorter itching period was extracted as the only independent factor related to relevant responder. In conclusion, this study suggested nalfurafine hydrochloride treatment markedly improves pruritus in patients with chronic liver disease. A short pruritus period and less-advanced fibrosis were associated with response to nalfurafine hydrochloride.

INTRODUCTION:Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are both first-line hepatitis B virus (HBV) therapies, but ETV-to-TAF switch outcome data are limited. We aimed to assess outcomes up to 96 weeks after ETV-to-TAF switch.METHODS:ETV-treated (≥12 months) chronic hepatitis B patients switched to TAF in routine practice at 15 centers (United States, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan) were included. Primary outcome was complete viral suppression (CVS) rate (HBV DNA <20 IU/mL).RESULTS:We analyzed 425 eligible patients (mean age 60.7 ± 13.2 years, 60% men, 90.8% Asian, 20.7% with diabetes, 27% with hypertension, 14.8% with cirrhosis, 8.3% with hepatocellular carcinoma, and mean ETV duration before switch 6.16 ± 3.17 years). The mean baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 89 ± 19 (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stages: 55.6% stage 1, 35.7% stage 2, and 8.8% stages 3–5). CVS rate increased from 91.90% at switch (from 90.46% 24 weeks before switch) to 95.57% and 97.21% at 48 and 96 weeks after (P = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively). Over the 96 weeks after switch, mean HBV DNA (P < 0.001) but not alanine aminotransferase or CKD stage decreased. Between switch and 96-week follow-up, 11% (26/235) of CKD stage 1 patients migrated to stage 2 and 8% (12/151) of stage 2 patients to stages 3–5, whereas 18% (27/151) from stage 2 to 1, and 19% (7/37) from stages 3–5 to 2. On multivariable generalized estimated equation analysis adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, and cirrhosis, baseline eGFR, age (P < 0.001), and CKD stages 2 and 3–5 (vs 1) (both P < 0.001) were associated with lower follow-up eGFR.DISCUSSION:After an average of 6 years on ETV, CVS increased from 91.9% at TAF switch to 97.2% at 96 weeks later.

Background Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC] B). However, it often leads to a poor prognosis and decreased hepatic function especially in patients with BCLC substage B2. Lenvatinib (LEN) was demonstrated to be efficacious in these patients in the REFLECT phase 3 trial. We therefore aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LEN as a first-line treatment for the patients with HCC at BCLC substage B2. Methods This prospective observational study used LEN in TACE-naïve patients with HCC at BCLC substage B2 and preserved hepatic function. The primary endpoint was overall survival. A one-year survival rate threshold of 60% and an expected survival rate of 78%, based on previous reports of TACE, was assumed for setting the sample size. With a one-sided α-type error of 5% and 70% detection power, 25 patients were required over a 2-year enrollment period and 10-month follow-up period. Results Thirty-one patients were enrolled in this study from June 2018 to June 2020. The 1-year survival rate was 71.0% (90% confidence interval, 68.4–73.6%). Median overall and progression-free survival periods were 17.0 and 10.4 months, and the objective response rates according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.1 and modified RECIST criteria were 22.6% and 70.0%, respectively. Common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (68%), hypertension (65%), anorexia (61%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (39%), and thrombocytopenia (32%) of any grade; aspartate aminotransferase increased (23%), alanine aminotransferase increased (16%), and grade ≥ 3 proteinuria (13%). Treatment interruption and dose reduction were required in 61% and 81% of patients, respectively. LEN was discontinued in 29 patients due to disease progression ( n  = 17), AEs ( n  = 9), conversion to curative treatments ( n  = 2), and sudden death ( n  = 1), whereas post-LEN treatments were administered in 18 patients, including systemic chemotherapy ( n  = 11), TACE ( n  = 6), transarterial infusion ( n  = 1) and clinical trial ( n  = 1). Conclusions The results suggest that LEN provides treatment benefits as an initial therapeutic in patients with BCLC substage B2 HCC with a safety profile comparable to that previously reported.

The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the early stages is important for successful clinical management. Laminin (Ln)‐γ2 expression has been reported in various types of malignant carcinomas. We recently developed a highly sensitive method to measure serum monomeric Ln‐γ2 levels using a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). Using our CLIA, we evaluated its diagnostic value in sera from patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Serum alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP) and des‐gamma‐carboxy prothrombin (DCP) were also examined in these subjects. Median levels of Ln‐γ2 were significantly higher in patients with HCC (173.2 pg/mL; range: 39.5–986 pg/mL) compared with patients with CLD (76.7 pg/mL; range: 38.7–215.9 pg/mL) and with healthy volunteers (41.1 pg/mL; range: 10.9–79.0 pg/mL). The optimal cutoff value for Ln‐γ2 that allowed us to distinguish between HCC and nonmalignant CLD was 116.6 pg/mL. Elevated Ln‐γ2 levels were observed in 0% of healthy volunteers, 17% of patients with CLD, and 63% of patients with HCC. The positivity rate in patients with HCC for the combination of Ln‐γ2 and DCP was 89.5%, which was better than that for either of the two markers alone (63% and 68%, respectively). Among patients with early‐stage HCC (T1 or T2), the positivity rates for monomeric Ln‐γ2, AFP and DCP were 61%, 39% and 57%, respectively. Serum Ln‐γ2 may be a potential biomarker for HCC surveillance. The combination of Ln‐γ2 and DCP may be more sensitive for laboratory diagnosis of HCC than the combination of AFP and DCP. Serum monomeric Ln‐γ2 may be a potential biomarker for HCC surveillance. The combination of monomeric Ln‐γ2 and DCP may be more sensitive for laboratory diagnosis of HCC than the combination of AFP and DCP.

We examined the association between serum miRNA (-192-5p, -122-3p, -320a and -6126-5p) levels and the efficacy of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. We enrolled 61 CHB patients treated with Peg-IFNα-2a weekly for 48 weeks, of whom 12 had a virological response (VR) and 49 did not VR (non-VR). A VR was defined as HBV DNA < 2,000 IU/ml, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative, and nucleos(t)ide analogue free at 48 weeks after the end of treatment. The non-VR group showed a significantly higher HBeAg-positivity rate, ALT, HBV DNA, and serum miR-192-5p levels at baseline ( P = 0.024, P = 0.020, P = 0.007, P = 0.021, respectively). Serum miR-192-5p levels at 24-weeks after the start of treatment were also significantly higher in the non-VR than the VR group ( P = 0.011). Multivariate logistic regression analysis for predicting VR showed that miR-192-5p level at baseline was an independent factor (Odds 4.5, P = 0.041). Serum miR-192-5p levels were significantly correlated with the levels of HBV DNA, hepatitis B core-related antigen, and hepatitis B surface antigen (r = 0.484, 0.384 and 0.759, respectively). The serum miR-192-5p level was useful as a biomarker for the therapeutic efficacy of Peg-IFN in CHB treatment.

BackgroundThis study aimed to clarify the morphological changes in esophageal varices after achieving sustained virological response (SVR) with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in patients with cirrhosis.MethodsA total of 243 patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy before DAA treatment and after achieving SVR. Morphological changes in esophageal varices were investigated using esophagogastroduodenoscopy.ResultsThis study comprised 125 males and 118 females with a median age of 68 years. Esophageal varices at baseline were classified into no varix in 155 (63.8%), F1 in 59 (24.3%), F2 in 25 (10.3%) and F3 in 4 (1.6%) patients. The improvement, unchanged, and aggravation rates of esophageal varices after SVR were 11.9%, 73.3%, and 14.8%, respectively. High ALBI score at SVR12 was an independent factor associated with post-SVR esophageal varices aggravation (p = 0.045). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed a cut-off value of − 2.33 for ALBI score at SVR12 in predicting post-SVR esophageal varices aggravation. Of the 155 patients without esophageal varices at baseline, 17 developed de novo post-SVR esophageal varices. High ALBI score at SVR12 was a significant independent factor associated with de novo post-SVR esophageal varices (p = 0.046). ROC curve analysis revealed a cut-off value of − 2.65 for ALBI score at SVR12 in predicting de novo post-SVR esophageal varices.ConclusionsPatients with cirrhosis can experience esophageal varices aggravation or de novo esophageal varices, despite achieving SVR. In particular, patients with high ALBI score at SVR12 have a high likelihood of developing post-SVR esophageal varices aggravation or de novo post-SVR esophageal varices.

BackgroundA new device with metallic wires for scrape cytology was developed.AimsTo compare the diagnostic performance of scrape cytology and conventional cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliary strictures.MethodsA total of 420 cases with biliary stricture underwent transpapillary bile cytology. Among them, there are 79 cases with scrape cytology using the new device (scrape group) and 341 cases with conventional cytology (control group). Seventy-two and 174 cases underwent biliary biopsy at the same time as bile cytology in the scrape and control group, respectively.ResultsThe sensitivity for malignancy of bile cytology in the scrape and control group was 41.2% [pancreatic cancer (PC): 23.1%, biliary cancer (BC): 52.5%] and 27.1% (PC: 16.3%, BC: 38.0%), respectively (P = 0.023). When analyzed PC and BC, respectively, there was no significant difference between the two groups. In the both groups, the sensitivity was significantly higher for BC than PC. In the scrape group, there was no difference in the sensitivity between cytology and biopsy [39.7% (PC: 17.4%, BC: 55.3%)], but in the control group, a significantly lower sensitivity was observed with cytology than biopsy (36.4% (PC: 19.7%, BC: 50.0%)) (P = 0.046). When analyzed PC and BC, respectively, there was no significant difference between cytology and biopsy. The sensitivity of combined cytology and biopsy was 55.6% (PC: 30.4%, BC: 71.1%) in the scrape group and 47.0% (PC: 24.6%, BC: 64.3%) in the control group.ConclusionScrape bile cytology for biliary strictures may be superior to conventional cytology.

Background. Only 15% to 20% of patients with chronic hepatitis C have a sustained virological response to interferon monotherapy. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of interferon, in combination with oral cyclosporin A, with interferon monotherapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Methods. We assigned 120 patients with chronic hepatitis C to receive the standard Japanese dose of interferon α2b alone for 24 weeks or that dose of interferon α2b in combination with cyclosporin A, at doses of 200 mg daily for the first 4 weeks and 100 mg daily for the following 20 weeks. All patients were assessed for drug safety, tolerance, and efficacy at the end of weeks 4, 12, 24, and 48. Efficacy was assessed by the disappearance of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA by polymerase chain reaction and normalization of serum aminotransferase. The primary endpoint was a sustained virological response; i.e., sustained undetectable serum HCV RNA at 48 weeks. Results. The sustained virological response rate was significantly higher in the combination therapy group (42/76) than in the monotherapy group (14/44; P = 0.01). The sustained biochemical response rate was also higher in the combination therapy group (46/76) than in the monotherapy group (17/44; P = 0.017). In patients with genotype 1 and high viral loads, the sustained virological response rate was markedly higher in the combination therapy group (16/38) than in the monotherapy group (1/21; P = 0.006). Side-effect profiles were similar in the two groups. Conclusions. In patients with chronic hepatitis C; combined interferon and cyclosporin A treatment was more effective than interferon monotherapy. The benefit was mostly achieved in patients with a high viral load and HCV genotype 1.