Explore the vast range of titles available.

Malignant melanoma is an aggressive, therapy-resistant malignancy of melanocytes. The incidence of melanoma has been steadily increasing worldwide, resulting in an increasing public health problem. Exposure to solar UV radiation, fair skin, dysplastic nevi syndrome, and a family history of melanoma are major risk factors for melanoma development. The interactions between genetic and environmental risk factors that promote melanomagenesis are currently the subject of ongoing research. Avoidance of UV radiation and surveillance of high-risk patients have the potential to reduce the population burden of melanoma. Biopsies of the primary tumor and sampling of draining lymph nodes are required for optimal diagnosis and staging. Several clinically relevant pathologic subtypes have been identified and need to be recognized. Therapy for early disease is predominantly surgical, with a minor benefit noted with the use of adjuvant therapy. Management of systemic melanoma is a challenge because of a paucity of active treatment modalities. In the first part of this 2-part review, we discuss epidemiology, risk factors, screening, prevention, and diagnosis of malignant melanoma. Part 2 (which will appear in the April 2007 issue) will review melanoma staging, prognosis, and treatment.

Current pathologic criteria cannot reliably distinguish cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma from other CD30-positive T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (lymphomatoid papulosis, systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma with skin involvement, and transformed mycosis fungoides). We previously reported IRF4 (interferon regulatory factor-4) translocations in cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphomas. Here, we investigated the clinical utility of detecting IRF4 translocations in skin biopsies. We performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for IRF4 in 204 biopsies involved by T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders from 182 patients at three institutions. In all, 9 of 45 (20%) cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphomas and 1 of 32 (3%) cases of lymphomatoid papulosis with informative results demonstrated an IRF4 translocation. Remaining informative cases were negative for a translocation (7 systemic anaplastic large cell lymphomas; 44 cases of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome (13 transformed); 24 peripheral T-cell lymphomas, not otherwise specified; 12 CD4-positive small/medium-sized pleomorphic T-cell lymphomas; 5 extranodal NK/T-cell lymphomas, nasal type; 4 gamma-delta T-cell lymphomas; and 5 other uncommon T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders). Among all cutaneous T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders, FISH for IRF4 had a specificity and positive predictive value for cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma of 99 and 90%, respectively ( P =0.00002, Fisher's exact test). Among anaplastic large cell lymphomas, lymphomatoid papulosis, and transformed mycosis fungoides, specificity and positive predictive value were 98 and 90%, respectively ( P =0.005). FISH abnormalities other than translocations and IRF4 protein expression were seen in 13 and 65% of cases, respectively, but were nonspecific with regard to T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder subtype. Our findings support the clinical utility of FISH for IRF4 in the differential diagnosis of T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders in skin biopsies, with detection of a translocation favoring cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Like all FISH studies, IRF4 testing must be interpreted in the context of morphology, phenotype, and clinical features.

Malignant melanoma is an aggressive, therapy-resistant malignancy of melanocytes. The incidence of melanoma has been steadily increasing worldwide, resulting in an increasing public health problem. Exposure to solar UV radiation, fair skin, dysplastic nevi syndrome, and a family history of melanoma are major risk factors for melanoma development. The interactions between genetic and environmental risk factors that promote melanomagenesis are currently the subject of ongoing research. Avoidance of UV radiation and surveillance of high-risk patients have the potential to reduce the population burden of melanoma. Biopsies of the primary tumor and sampling of draining lymph nodes are required for optimal diagnosis and staging. Several clinically relevant pathologic subtypes have been identified and need to be recognized. Therapy for early disease is predominantly surgical, with a minor benefit noted with the use of adjuvant therapy. Management of systemic melanoma is a challenge because of a paucity of active treatment modalities. In the first part of this 2-part review, we discuss epidemiology, risk factors, screening, prevention, and diagnosis of malignant melanoma. Part 2 (which will appear in the April 2007 issue) will review melanoma staging, prognosis, and treatment.

Critical to the clinical management of a patient with malignant melanoma is an understanding of its natural history. As with most malignant disorders, prognosis is highly dependent on the clinical stage (extent of tumor burden) at the time of diagnosis. The patient's clinical stage at diagnosis dictates selection of therapy. We review the state of the art in melanoma staging, prognosis, and therapy. Substantial progress has been made in this regard during the past 2 decades. This progress is primarily reflected in the development of sentinel lymph node biopsies as a means of reducing the morbidity associated with regional lymph node dissection, increased understanding of the role of neoangiogenesis in the natural history of melanoma and its potential as a treatment target, and emergence of innovative multimodal therapeutic strategies, resulting in significant objective response rates in a disease commonly believed to be drug resistant. Although much work remains to be done to improve the survival of patients with melanoma, clinically meaningful results seem within reach.

It can be difficult to distinguish pyoderma gangrenosum from other causes of cutaneous ulceration. In this study, the authors identified 95 patients with skin ulcers that resembled pyoderma gangrenosum. The ulcers were actually caused by vascular occlusive or venous disease, vasculitis, cancer, infection, drug-induced or exogenous tissue injury, or other inflammatory disorders. Most patients who received a diagnosis of pyoderma gangrenosum were treated, and 36 percent of those who were treated had exacerbation of their underlying condition or a delay in its diagnosis. The misdiagnosis of pyoderma gangrenosum can have serious consequences. Cutaneous ulcerations in patients with suspected pyoderma gangrenosum often prove, on further workup, to have a different cause. Moreover, treatment directed at pyoderma gangrenosum — high-dose prednisone or other immunosuppressive medications — may be contraindicated in patients with any of several diseases that may produce ulceration resembling that of pyoderma gangrenosum, such as infectious or malignant processes. Numerous case reports describe diseases that “mimic” or “masquerade as” pyoderma gangrenosum, but no large studies evaluating this phenomenon have been conducted. This lack of data prompted us to review our experience and the . . .

Disorders associated with cutaneous vasculitis include numerous well-described etiologies. Primary cutaneous vasculitis limits discussion to primary leukocytoclastic vasculitis, essential mixed cryoglobulinemia, urticarial vasculitis, Henoch-Schönlein purpura, and erythema elevatum diutinum. Although the therapeutics for these disorders are based on limited data, we attempt to construct a consensus opinion on the management of primary cutaneous vasculitis. Therapy of primary cutaneous vasculitis is indicated for symptomatic or systemic involvement, because cutaneous small vessel vasculitis is frequently a self-limited, single episodic disease. Conservative, symptomatic treatment includes leg elevation, warming, antihistamines, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. For mild recurrent disease, colchicine, dapsone, and prednisone are first-choice agents. Systemic or severe cutaneous disease requires more potent immunosuppression (eg, prednisone, azathioprine, or mycophenolate mofetil). Plasmapheresis/plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin are viable considerations for refractory disease, but are cumbersome and expensive modalities. There is insufficient evidence to advocate the use of new biological or monoclonal antibody therapies in primary cutaneous vasculitis.

To the Editor: Weenig et al. (Oct. 31 issue) 1 stress the need for extensive investigations in cases of skin ulcers that are suggestive of pyoderma gangrenosum. However, their recommendation of colonoscopy in Table 3 of their article is unclear. We believe that the decision to perform colonoscopy should be tailored to individual patients according to the expected effect on the management of their condition. In a series of 86 patients with pyoderma gangrenosum from the Mayo Clinic, 2 31 had inflammatory bowel disease. Pyoderma gangrenosum coincided with a flare of known inflammatory bowel disease in six patients and antedated the onset . . .