Explore the vast range of titles available.

The TheraP study reported improved prostate-specific antigen responses with lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel. In this Article, we report the secondary outcome of overall survival with mature follow-up, and an updated imaging biomarker analysis. We also report the outcomes of participants excluded due to ineligibility on gallium-68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-[18F]FDG) PET-CT. TheraP was an open-label, randomised phase 2 trial at 11 centres in Australia. Eligible participants had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel, and PET imaging with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and 2-[18F]FDG that showed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive disease and no sites of metastatic disease with discordant 2-[18F]FDG-positive and PSMA-negative findings. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (every 6 weeks for a maximum of six cycles; starting at 8·5 GBq, decreasing by 0.5 GBq to 6·0 GBq for the sixth cycle) versus cabazitaxel (20 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, maximum of ten cycles). Overall survival was analysed by intention-to-treat and summarised as restricted mean survival time (RMST) to account for non-proportional hazards, with a 36-month restriction time corresponding to median follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03392428, and is complete. 291 men were registered from Feb 6, 2018, to Sept 3, 2019; after study imaging, 200 were eligible and randomly assigned to treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (n=99) or cabazitaxel (n=101). After completing study treatment, 20 (20%) participants assigned to cabazitaxel and 32 (32%) assigned to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 were subsequently treated with the alternative regimen. After a median follow-up of 35·7 months (IQR 31·1 to 39·2), 77 (78%) participants had died in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 70 (69%) participants had died in the cabazitaxel group. Overall survival was similar among those assigned to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus those assigned to cabazitaxel (RMST 19·1 months [95% CI 16·9 to 21·4] vs 19·6 months [17·4 to 21·8]; difference –0·5 months [95% CI –3·7 to 2·7]; p=0·77). No additional safety signals were identified with the longer follow-up in this analysis. 80 (27%) of 291 men who were registered after initial eligibility screening were excluded after [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and 2-[18F]FDG PET. In the 61 of these men with follow-up available, RMST was 11·0 months (95% CI 9·0 to 13·1). These results support the use of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 as an alternative to cabazitaxel for PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel. We did not find evidence that overall survival differed between the randomised groups. Median overall survival was shorter for men who were excluded because of low PSMA expression or 2-[18F]FDG-discordant disease. Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Endocyte (a Novartis company), Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization, Movember, It's a Bloke Thing, CAN4CANCER, and The Distinguished Gentleman's Ride.

Enzalutamide and lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 both improve overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Androgen and PSMA receptors have a close intracellular relationship, with data suggesting complementary benefit if targeted concurrently. In this study, we assessed the activity and safety of enzalutamide plus adaptive-dosed [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus enzalutamide alone as first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ENZA-p was an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial done at 15 hospitals in Australia. Participants were men aged 18 years or older with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer not previously treated with docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, gallium-68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-PET-CT (PSMA-PET-CT) positive disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, and at least two risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by a centralised, web-based system using minimisation with a random component to stratify for study site, disease burden, use of early docetaxel, and previous treatment with abiraterone acetate. Patients were either given oral enzalutamide 160 mg daily alone or with adaptive-dosed (two or four doses) intravenous 7·5 GBq [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 every 6–8 weeks dependent on an interim PSMA-PET-CT (week 12). The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, defined as the interval from the date of randomisation to the date of first evidence of PSA progression, commencement of non-protocol anticancer therapy, or death. The analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population, using stratified Cox proportional hazards regression. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04419402, and participant follow-up is ongoing. 162 participants were randomly assigned between Aug 17, 2020, and July 26, 2022. 83 men were assigned to the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group, and 79 were assigned to the enzalutamide group. Median follow-up in this interim analysis was 20 months (IQR 18–21), with 32 (39%) of 83 patients in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 16 (20%) of 79 patients in the enzalutamide group remaining on treatment at the data cutoff date. Median age was 71 years (IQR 64–76). Median PSA progression-free survival was 13·0 months (95% CI 11·0–17·0) in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 7·8 months (95% CI 4·3–11·0) in the enzalutamide group (hazard ratio 0·43, 95% CI 0·29–0·63, p<0·0001). The most common adverse events (all grades) were fatigue (61 [75%] of 81 patients), nausea (38 [47%]), and dry mouth (32 [40%]) in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and fatigue (55 [70%] of 79), nausea (21 [27%]), and constipation (18 [23%]) in the enzalutamide group. Grade 3–5 adverse events occurred in 32 (40%) of 81 patients in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 32 (41%) of 79 patients in the enzalutamide group. Grade 3 events that occurred only in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group included anaemia (three [4%] of 81 participants) and decreased platelet count (one [1%] participant). No grade 4 or 5 events were attributed to treatment on central review in either group. The addition of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 to enzalutamide improved PSA progression-free survival providing evidence of enhanced anticancer activity in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide and warrants further evaluation of the combination more broadly in metastatic prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Research Alliance (Movember and Australian Federal Government), St Vincent's Clinic Foundation, GenesisCare, Roy Morgan Research, and Endocyte (a Novartis company).

The phase III MAX clinical trial randomised patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to receive first-line capecitabine chemotherapy alone or in combination with the anti-VEGF-A antibody bevacizumab (± mitomycin C). We utilised this cohort to examine whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VEGF-A , VEGFR1 , and VEGFR2 are predictive of efficacy outcomes with bevacizumab or the development of hypertension. Genomic DNA extracted from archival FFPE tissue for 325 patients (69% of the MAX trial population) was used to genotype 16 candidate SNPs in VEGF-A , VEGFR1 , and VEGFR2, which were analysed for associations with efficacy outcomes and hypertension. The VEGF-A rs25648 ‘CC’ genotype was prognostic for improved PFS (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.85; P  = 0.002) and OS (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.94; P  = 0.019). The VEGF-A rs699947 ‘AA’ genotype was prognostic for shorter PFS (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.002 to 1.74; P  = 0.048). None of the analysed SNPs were predictive of bevacizumab efficacy outcomes. VEGFR2 rs11133360 ‘TT’ was associated with a lower risk of grade ≥ 3 hypertension ( P  = 0.028). SNPs in VEGF-A, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 did not predict bevacizumab benefit. However, VEGF-A rs25648 and rs699947 were identified as novel prognostic biomarkers and VEGFR2 rs11133360 was associated with less grade ≥ 3 hypertension.

Interim analysis of the ENZA-p trial showed improved prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival with the addition of lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 to enzalutamide as first-line treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Here, we report the secondary endpoints of overall survival and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) with longer follow-up. ENZA-p was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done at 15 hospitals in Australia. Participants were men aged 18 years or older who had not previously been treated with docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, gallium-68 [68Ga]Ga PSMA-PET-CT-positive disease, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, and at least two risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by a centralised, web-based system using minimisation with a random component to stratify for study site, disease burden, early docetaxel, and previous treatment with abiraterone. Treatment was oral enzalutamide 160 mg daily alone or with adaptive-dosed (two or four doses) intravenous 7·5 GBq [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 every 6–8 weeks. The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, which has been previously reported. Overall survival, defined as the interval from the date of randomisation to date of death from any cause, or the date last known alive, and HRQOL were key secondary endpoints. HRQOL was assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the Patient Disease and Treatment Assessment Form. For HRQOL analyses, deterioration-free survival was measured from randomisation until the earliest occurrence of death, clinical progression, discontinuation of study treatment; or a worsening of 10 points or more from baseline in physical function, or in overall health and QOL. Analyses of these secondary endpoints were prespecified and are by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04419402, and follow-up is complete. Between Aug 17, 2020, and July 26, 2022, 79 patients were randomly assigned to enzalutamide and 83 to enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. 96 deaths was reported after a median follow-up of 34 months (IQR 29–39): 53 (67%) in the enzalutamide group and 43 (52%) in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group. Overall survival was longer in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group than the enzalutamide group (median 34 months [95% CI 30–37] vs 26 months [23–31]; HR 0·55 [95% CI 0·36–0·84], log-rank p=0·0053). HRQOL was rated by 154 (95%) of 162 participants. Deterioration-free survival at 12 months and stratified log-rank p values favoured enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 for both physical function (median 10·64 months [95% CI 7·66–12·42] vs 3·42 months [3·19–7·89]; HR 0·51 [95% CI 0·36–0·72], log-rank p<0·0001) and overall health and QOL (8·71 months [6·41–11·56] vs 3·32 months [3·09–5·26]; HR 0·47 [95% CI 0·33–0·67], log-rank p=0·0001). Mean scores for pain until progression favoured enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 over enzalutamide (difference 7·3 [95% CI 1·6–12·9]; p=0·012). Mean scores for fatigue until progression favoured enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 over enzalutamide (difference 5·9 [95% CI 1·1–10·7]; p=0·016). The frequency of self-rated xerostomia was lower in the enzalutamide group than in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group (43 [57%] of 75 vs 58 [74%] of 78; p=0·039), and scores were not significantly different between groups for all other domains. Grade 3–5 adverse events occurred in 35 (44%) of 79 patients in the enzalutamide group and 37 (46%) of 81 patients in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group. No deaths were attributed to study treatment in either group. The addition of [177Lu] Lu-PSMA-617 to enzalutamide was associated with improved survival and some aspects of HRQOL in patients with high-risk metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Our findings warrant phase 3 evaluation of adaptive-dosed [177Lu] Lu-PSMA-617 in combination with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors in people with metastatic prostate cancer. The Prostate Cancer Research Alliance initiative (Movember and Australian Federal Government), St Vincent's Clinic Foundation, GenesisCare, RoyMorgan, AdAcAp (a Novartis company), and Astellas.

Background Mutations and fusions in Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 ( FGFR3) occur in 10–20% of metastatic urothelial carcinomas and confer sensitivity to FGFR inhibitors. However, responses to these agents are often short-lived due to the development of acquired resistance. The objective of this study was to identify mechanisms of resistance to FGFR inhibitors in two previously uncharacterised bladder cancer cell lines harbouring FGFR3 fusions and assess rational combination therapies to enhance sensitivity to these agents. Methods Acquired resistance to FGFR inhibitors was generated in two FGFR3 fusion harbouring cell lines, SW780 ( FGFR3-BAIAP2L1 fusion) and RT4 ( FGFR3-TACC3 fusion), by long-term exposure to the FGFR inhibitor BGJ398. Changes in levels of receptor tyrosine kinases were assessed by phospho-RTK arrays and immunoblotting. Changes in cell viability and proliferation were assessed by the Cell-Titre Glo assay and by propidium iodide staining and FACS analysis. Results Long term treatment of FGFR3 -fusion harbouring SW780 and RT4 bladder cancer cell lines with the FGFR inhibitor BGJ398 resulted in the establishment of resistant clones. These clones were cross-resistant to the clinically approved FGFR inhibitor erdafitinib and the covalently binding irreversible FGFR inhibitor TAS-120, but remained sensitive to the MEK inhibitor trametinib, indicating resistance is mediated by alternate activation of MAPK signalling. The FGFR inhibitor-resistant SW780 and RT4 lines displayed increased expression of pERBB3, and strikingly, combination treatment with an FGFR inhibitor and the ATP-competitive pan-ERBB inhibitor AZD8931 overcame this resistance. Notably, rapid induction of pERBB3 and reactivation of pERK also occurred in parental FGFR3 fusion-driven lines within 24 h of FGFR inhibitor treatment, and combination treatment with an FGFR inhibitor and AZD8931 delayed the reactivation of pERBB3 and pERK and synergistically inhibited cell proliferation. Conclusions We demonstrate that increased expression of pERBB3 is a key mechanism of adaptive resistance to FGFR inhibitors in FGFR3-fusion driven bladder cancers, and that this also occurs rapidly following FGFR inhibitor treatment. Our findings demonstrate that resistance can be overcome by combination treatment with a pan-ERBB inhibitor and suggest that upfront combination treatment with FGFR and pan-ERBB inhibitors warrants further investigation for FGFR3 -fusion harbouring bladder cancers.

BackgroundLymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) is an inhibitory immunoreceptor that negatively regulates T-cell activation. This paper presents preclinical characterization of the LAG-3 inhibitor, ieramilimab (LAG525), and phase I data for the treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors with ieramilimab ±the anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody, spartalizumab.MethodsEligible patients had advanced/metastatic solid tumors and progressed after, or were unsuitable for, standard-of-care therapy, including checkpoint inhibitors in some cases. Patients received ieramilimab ±spartalizumab across various dose-escalation schedules. The primary objective was to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase II dose (RP2D).ResultsIn total, 255 patients were allocated to single-agent ieramilimab (n=134) and combination (n=121) treatment arms. The majority (98%) had received prior antineoplastic therapy (median, 3). Four patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities in each treatment arm across various dosing cohorts. No MTD was reached. The RP2D on a 3-week schedule was declared as 400 mg ieramilimab plus 300 mg spartalizumab and, on a 4-week schedule (once every 4 weeks; Q4W), as 800 mg ieramilimab plus 400 mg spartalizumab; tumor target (LAG-3) suppression with 600 mg ieramilimab Q4W was predicted to be similar to the Q4W, RP2D schedule. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 75 (56%) and 84 (69%) patients in the single-agent and combination arms, respectively. Most common TRAEs were fatigue, gastrointestinal, and skin disorders, and were of mild severity; seven patients experienced at least one treatment-related serious adverse event in the single-agent (5%) and combination group (5.8%). Antitumor activity was observed in the combination arm, with 3 (2%) complete responses and 10 (8%) partial responses in a mixed population of tumor types. In the combination arm, eight patients (6.6%) experienced stable disease for 6 months or longer versus six patients (4.5%) in the single-agent arm. Responding patients trended towards having higher levels of immune gene expression, including CD8 and LAG3, in tumor tissue at baseline.ConclusionsIeramilimab was well tolerated as monotherapy and in combination with spartalizumab. The toxicity profile of ieramilimab in combination with spartalizumab was comparable to that of spartalizumab alone. Modest antitumor activity was seen with combination treatment.Trial registration numberNCT02460224.

Quantitative parameters derived from gallium-68 [68Ga]Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 PET-CT (PSMA-PET-CT) such as whole-body standardised uptake value (SUV)mean and total tumour volume (PSMA-TTV) have shown prognostic value for response to lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 monotherapy in patients with prostate cancer. Adding [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 to enzalutamide improved overall survival compared with enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the ENZA-p trial. This prespecified substudy of ENZA-p evaluated baseline PSMA-PET quantitative parameters as predictive and prognostic biomarkers for enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and enzalutamide monotherapy. ENZA-p was an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done in 15 hospitals in Australia. Participants were aged 18 years or older with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had not previously been treated with docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (abiraterone permitted) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, had [68Ga]Ga PSMA-PET-CT-positive disease, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, and at least two risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a centralised, web-based system using minimisation with a random component to either enzalutamide 160 mg daily (oral) or enzalutamide 160 mg daily plus adaptive-dosed (two or four doses) intravenous [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 7·5 GBq every 6–8 weeks. The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, which has been reported previously. All participants underwent baseline [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT to assess eligibility (SUVmax >15 at a single site and SUVmax >10 at all larger tumour sites). PSMA-PET parameters were quantified with semi-automated software to derive PSMA-TTV and SUVmean and correlated with overall and PSA progression-free survival in a prespecified analysis, with the primary endpoint of this substudy being overall survival. Thresholds were based on SUVmean highest quartile (Q4 vs Q1–3) and PSMA-TTV median at baseline. We used the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression models and analysed patients on a treatment received basis. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04419402, and follow-up is complete. Between Aug 17, 2020, and July 26, 2022, 162 participants were randomly assigned to enzalutamide (n=79) or enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (n=83). This substudy included the 160 of the 162 randomly assigned patients who received study treatment (79 in the enzalutamide group and 81 in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group). Median follow-up at the final data cutoff (July 31, 2024) was 34 months (IQR 29–39), with 96 overall survival events (53 with enzalutamide and 43 with enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617). Baseline median SUVmean was 7·7 (IQR 6·5–9·8) and median PSMA-TTV was 234 mL (76–687). Median overall survival for PSMA-TTV below or above the median in the enzalutamide group was 39 months (95% CI 31–not estimable) versus 20 months (13–24; HR 0·23 [95% CI 0·13–0·42], log-rank p<0·0001). The corresponding median overall survival for PSMA-TTV below or above the median in the enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group was 35 months (95% CI 32–37) versus 28 months (26–34; HR 0·66 [0·36–1·21], log-rank p=0·18). The test for interaction between PSMA-TTV and treatment group for overall survival was p=0·0078. Median overall survival for SUVmean Q4 versus Q1–3 in the enzalutamide group was 29 months (95% CI 17–39) versus 25 months (21–31; HR 0·84 [0·44–1·60], log-rank p=0·59). For enzalutamide plus [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, median overall survival for SUVmean Q4 versus Q1–3 was 32 months (95% CI 21–not estimable) versus 34 months (27–35; HR 0·80 [0·38–1·68], log-rank p=0·56). The test for interaction between SUVmean (Q4 vs Q1–3) and treatment group for overall survival was p=0·88. Baseline PSMA-TTV is prognostic for overall survival and predictive for a beneficial effect on overall survival with the addition of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 to enzalutamide as first-line treatment for high-risk metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. By contrast, PSMA SUVmean was not prognostic for PSA progression-free survival or overall survival when [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 was administered with enzalutamide. The Prostate Cancer Research Alliance initiative (Movember and Australian Federal Government), Prostate Cancer Foundation Challenge Award, St Vincent's Clinic Foundation, GenesisCare, RoyMorgan, Endocyte (a Novartis company), and Astellas.

BackgroundAvailability of checkpoint inhibitors has created a paradigm shift in the management of patients with solid tumors. Despite this, most patients do not respond to immunotherapy, and there is considerable interest in developing combination therapies to improve response rates and outcomes. B7-H3 (CD276) is a member of the B7 family of cell surface molecules and provides an alternative immune checkpoint molecule to therapeutically target alone or in combination with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)–targeted therapies. Enoblituzumab, an investigational anti-B7-H3 humanized monoclonal antibody, incorporates an immunoglobulin G1 fragment crystallizable (Fc) domain that enhances Fcγ receptor-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Coordinated engagement of innate and adaptive immunity by targeting distinct members of the B7 family (B7-H3 and PD-1) is hypothesized to provide greater antitumor activity than either agent alone.MethodsIn this phase I/II study, patients received intravenous enoblituzumab (3–15 mg/kg) weekly plus intravenous pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg) every 3 weeks during dose-escalation and cohort expansion. Expansion cohorts included non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; checkpoint inhibitor [CPI]–naïve and post-CPI, programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1] <1%), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC; CPI-naïve), urothelial cancer (post-CPI), and melanoma (post-CPI). Disease was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 after 6 weeks and every 9 weeks thereafter. Safety and pharmacokinetic data were provided for all enrolled patients; efficacy data focused on HNSCC and NSCLC cohorts.ResultsOverall, 133 patients were enrolled and received ≥1 dose of study treatment. The maximum tolerated dose of enoblituzumab with pembrolizumab at 2 mg/kg was not reached. Intravenous enoblituzumab (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks plus pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg) every 3 weeks was recommended for phase II evaluation. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 116 patients (87.2%) and were grade ≥3 in 28.6%. One treatment-related death occurred (pneumonitis). Objective responses occurred in 6 of 18 (33.3% [95% CI 13.3 to 59.0]) patients with CPI-naïve HNSCC and in 5 of 14 (35.7% [95% CI 12.8 to 64.9]) patients with CPI-naïve NSCLC.ConclusionsCheckpoint targeting with enoblituzumab and pembrolizumab demonstrated acceptable safety and antitumor activity in patients with CPI-naïve HNSCC and NSCLC.Trial registration numberNCT02475213.

Advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR signalling pathway is hyperactivated in a subset of BTCs, and clinical activity of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus has been observed in some patients with BTC. The goal of this study was to identify biomarkers predictive of everolimus response. Twenty BTC cell lines were assessed for everolimus sensitivity with a spectrum of growth inhibitory responses observed. Molecular biomarkers of sensitivity and resistance were identified by interrogation of the activation status of the Ras/MAPK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways. K‐Ras mutations and/or amplifications were identified in 45% of cell lines and were associated with resistance to everolimus. Activating mutations in PIK3CA or loss of PTEN was not predictive of everolimus response; however, high basal levels of pAKT were associated with sensitivity, independent of Ras/MAPK pathway activation status. Notably, everolimus inhibited mTOR signalling to a similar extent in sensitive and resistant cell lines, suggesting that relative dependence on the mTOR pathway rather than the magnitude of pathway inhibition determines everolimus response. Consistent with the known limitations of rapalogs, everolimus induced feedback‐mediated activation of AKT in BTC cell lines, which could be overcome by cotreatment with an AKT inhibitor or ATP‐competitive mTORC1/mTORC2 inhibitors. However, both approaches failed to induce greater apoptosis compared to everolimus, and mTORC1/mTORC2 kinase inhibitors induced compensatory activation of pERK, identifying an inherent limitation of these agents in BTC cell lines. These findings suggest that future trials of everolimus in BTC would benefit from preselecting patients based on their K‐Ras and PI3K/mTOR pathway activation status. The study also identifies strategies for enhancing inhibition of the PI3K/mTOR pathway in BTC cell lines. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is activated in a subset of biliary tract cancers. In this study, we demonstrate that K‐Ras mutations and amplifications predict resistance to everolimus. Conversely, basal levels of pAKT are associated with sensitivity, independent of Ras/MAPK pathway activation status.

Background The impact of molecular imaging (MI) on patient management after biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy has been described in many studies. However, it is not known if MI-induced management changes are appropriate. This study aimed to determine if androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) management plan is improved by MI in patients who are candidates for salvage radiation therapy. Methods Data were analyzed from the multicenter prospective PROPS trial evaluating PSMA/Choline PET in patients being considered for salvage radiotherapy (sRT) with BCR after prostatectomy. We compared the pre- and post-MI ADT management plans for each patient and cancer outcomes as predicted by the MSKCC nomogram. A higher percentage of predicted BCR associated with ADT treatment intensification after MI was considered as an improvement in a patient’s management. Results Seventy-three patients with a median PSA of 0.38 ng/mL were included. In bivariate analysis, a positive finding on MI (local or metastatic) was associated with decision to use ADT with an odds ratio of 3.67 (95% CI, 1.25 to 10.71; p = 0.02). No factor included in the nomogram was associated with decision to use ADT. Also, MI improved selection of patients to receive ADT based on predicted BCR after sRT : the predicted nomogram 5-year biochemical-free survivals were 52.5% and 43.3%, (mean difference, 9.2%; 95% CI 0.8 to 17.6; p = 0.03) for sRT alone and ADT±sRT subgroups, while there was no statistically significant difference between subgroups before MI. Conclusions PSMA and/or Choline PET/CT before sRT can potentially improve patient ADT management by directing clinicians towards more appropriate intensification.