Explore the vast range of titles available.

The morphology of cells is dynamic and mediated by genetic and environmental factors. Characterizing how genetic variation impacts cell morphology can provide an important link between disease association and cellular function. Here, we combine genomic sequencing and high-content imaging approaches on iPSCs from 297 unique donors to investigate the relationship between genetic variants and cellular morphology to map what we term cell morphological quantitative trait loci (cmQTLs). We identify novel associations between rare protein altering variants in WASF2 , TSPAN15 , and PRLR with several morphological traits related to cell shape, nucleic granularity, and mitochondrial distribution. Knockdown of these genes by CRISPRi confirms their role in cell morphology. Analysis of common variants yields one significant association and nominate over 300 variants with suggestive evidence (P < 10 −6 ) of association with one or more morphology traits. We then use these data to make predictions about sample size requirements for increasing discovery in cellular genetic studies. We conclude that, similar to molecular phenotypes, morphological profiling can yield insight about the function of genes and variants. Characterizing how genetic variation impacts cell morphology can provide an important links between disease association and cellular function. Here the authors identified the morphological impacts of genomic variants by generating high-throughput morphological profiling and whole genome sequencing data on iPSCs from 297 donors.

Cell segmentation is a critical step for quantitative single-cell analysis in microscopy images. Existing cell segmentation methods are often tailored to specific modalities or require manual interventions to specify hyper-parameters in different experimental settings. Here, we present a multimodality cell segmentation benchmark, comprising more than 1,500 labeled images derived from more than 50 diverse biological experiments. The top participants developed a Transformer-based deep-learning algorithm that not only exceeds existing methods but can also be applied to diverse microscopy images across imaging platforms and tissue types without manual parameter adjustments. This benchmark and the improved algorithm offer promising avenues for more accurate and versatile cell analysis in microscopy imaging. Cell segmentation is crucial in many image analysis pipelines. This analysis compares many tools on a multimodal cell segmentation benchmark. A Transformer-based model performed best in terms of performance and general applicability.

In image-based profiling, software extracts thousands of morphological features of cells from multi-channel fluorescence microscopy images, yielding single-cell profiles that can be used for basic research and drug discovery. Powerful applications have been proven, including clustering chemical and genetic perturbations on the basis of their similar morphological impact, identifying disease phenotypes by observing differences in profiles between healthy and diseased cells and predicting assay outcomes by using machine learning, among many others. Here, we provide an updated protocol for the most popular assay for image-based profiling, Cell Painting. Introduced in 2013, it uses six stains imaged in five channels and labels eight diverse components of the cell: DNA, cytoplasmic RNA, nucleoli, actin, Golgi apparatus, plasma membrane, endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. The original protocol was updated in 2016 on the basis of several years’ experience running it at two sites, after optimizing it by visual stain quality. Here, we describe the work of the Joint Undertaking for Morphological Profiling Cell Painting Consortium, to improve upon the assay via quantitative optimization by measuring the assay’s ability to detect morphological phenotypes and group similar perturbations together. The assay gives very robust outputs despite various changes to the protocol, and two vendors’ dyes work equivalently well. We present Cell Painting version 3, in which some steps are simplified and several stain concentrations can be reduced, saving costs. Cell culture and image acquisition take 1–2 weeks for typically sized batches of ≤20 plates; feature extraction and data analysis take an additional 1–2 weeks. This protocol is an update to Nat. Protoc . 11, 1757–1774 (2016): https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.105 We provide an updated protocol for image-based profiling with Cell Painting. A detailed procedure, with standardized conditions for the assay, is presented, along with a comprehensive description of parameters to be considered when optimizing the assay.

Cell segmentation is a critical step for quantitative single-cell analysis in microscopy images. Existing cell segmentation methods are often tailored to specific modalities or require manual interventions to specify hyper-parameters in different experimental settings. Here, we present a multi-modality cell segmentation benchmark, comprising over 1500 labeled images derived from more than 50 diverse biological experiments. The top participants developed a Transformer-based deep-learning algorithm that not only exceeds existing methods but can also be applied to diverse microscopy images across imaging platforms and tissue types without manual parameter adjustments. This benchmark and the improved algorithm offer promising avenues for more accurate and versatile cell analysis in microscopy imaging.

Distributed-Something coordinates the distribution of any Dockerized workflow using on-demand computational infrastructure from Amazon Web Services to enable at-scale workflows where neither computing power nor data storage are limited by local availability while minimizing the time-consuming and confusing aspects of architecture coordination. We also provide Distributed-Something implementations of several bioimaging tools: Distributed-CellProfiler, -Fiji, and -OmeZarrCreator. All are open-source and available at http://GitHub.com/DistributedScience.

High-content image-based phenotypic profiling combines automated microscopy and analysis to identify phenotypic alterations in cell morphology and provide insight into the cell's physiological state. Classical representations of the phenotypic profile can not capture the full underlying complexity in cell organization, while recent weakly machine-learning based representation-learning methods are hard to biologically interpret. We used the abundance of control wells to learn the in-distribution of control experiments and use it to formulate a self-supervised reconstruction anomaly-based representation that encodes the intricate morphological inter-feature dependencies while preserving the representation interpretability. The performance of our anomaly-based representations was evaluated for downstream tasks with respect to two classical representations across four public Cell Painting datasets. Anomaly-based representations improved reproducibility, Mechanism of Action classification, and complemented classical representations. Unsupervised explainability of autoencoder-based anomalies identified specific inter-feature dependencies causing anomalies. The general concept of anomaly-based representations can be adapted to other applications in cell biology.

Image-based or morphological profiling is a rapidly expanding field wherein cells are \"profiled\" by extracting hundreds to thousands of unbiased, quantitative features from images of cells that have been perturbed by genetic or chemical perturbations. The Cell Painting assay is the most popular imaged-based profiling assay wherein six small-molecule dyes label eight cellular compartments and thousands of measurements are made, describing quantitative traits such as size, shape, intensity, and texture within the nucleus, cytoplasm, and whole cell (Cimini et al., 2023). We have created the Cell Painting Gallery, a publicly available collection of Cell Painting datasets, with granular dataset descriptions and access instructions. It is hosted by AWS on the Registry of Open Data (RODA). As of January 2024, the Cell Painting Gallery holds 656 terabytes (TB) of image and associated numerical data. It includes the largest publicly available Cell Painting dataset, in terms of perturbations tested (Joint Undertaking for Morphological Profiling or JUMP (Chandrasekaran et al., 2023)), along with many other canonical datasets using Cell Painting, close derivatives of Cell Painting (such as LipocyteProfiler (Laber et al., 2023) and Pooled Cell Painting (Ramezani et al., 2023)).

Image-based or morphological profiling is a rapidly expanding field wherein cells are \"profiled\" by extracting hundreds to thousands of unbiased, quantitative features from images of cells that have been perturbed by genetic or chemical perturbations. The Cell Painting assay is the most popular imaged-based profiling assay wherein six small-molecule dyes label eight cellular compartments and thousands of measurements are made, describing quantitative traits such as size, shape, intensity, and texture within the nucleus, cytoplasm, and whole cell (Cimini et al., 2023). We have created the Cell Painting Gallery, a publicly available collection of Cell Painting datasets, with granular dataset descriptions and access instructions. It is hosted by AWS on the Registry of Open Data (RODA). As of January 2024, the Cell Painting Gallery holds 656 terabytes (TB) of image and associated numerical data. It includes the largest publicly available Cell Painting dataset, in terms of perturbations tested (Joint Undertaking for Morphological Profiling or JUMP (Chandrasekaran et al., 2023)), along with many other canonical datasets using Cell Painting, close derivatives of Cell Painting (such as LipocyteProfiler (Laber et al., 2023) and Pooled Cell Painting (Ramezani et al., 2023)).