Explore the vast range of titles available.

In response to the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Million Veteran Program (MVP) organized efforts to better understand the impact of COVID-19 on Veterans by developing and deploying a self-reported survey. The MVP COVID-19 Survey was developed to collect COVID-19 specific elements including symptoms, diagnosis, hospitalization, behavioral and psychosocial factors and to augment existing MVP data with longitudinal collection of key domains in physical and mental health. Due to the rapidly evolving nature of the pandemic, a multipronged strategy was implemented to widely disseminate the COVID-19 Survey and capture data using both the online platform and mailings. We limited the findings of this paper to the initial phase of survey dissemination which began in May 2020. A total of 729,625 eligible MVP Veterans were invited to complete version 1 of the COVID-19 Survey. As of October 31, 2020, 58,159 surveys have been returned. The mean and standard deviation (SD) age of responders was 71 (11) years, 8.6% were female, 8.2% were Black, 5.6% were Hispanic, and 446 (0.8%) self-reported a COVID-19 diagnosis. Over 90% of responders reported wearing masks, practicing social distancing, and frequent hand washing. The MVP COVID-19 Survey provides a systematic collection of data regarding COVID-19 behaviors among Veterans and represents one of the first large-scale, national surveillance efforts of COVID-19 in the Veteran population. Continued work will examine the overall response to the survey with comparison to available VA health record data.

The risk factors associated with the stages of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) disease progression are not well known. We aim to identify risk factors specific to each state of COVID-19 progression from SARS-CoV-2 infection through death. We included 648,202 participants from the Veteran Affairs Million Veteran Program (2011-). We identified characteristics and 1,809 ICD code-based phenotypes from the electronic health record. We used logistic regression to examine the association of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), race, and prevalent phenotypes to the stages of COVID-19 disease progression: infection, hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and 30-day mortality (separate models for each). Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, ethnicity, number of visit months and ICD codes, state infection rate and controlled for multiple testing using false discovery rate (≤0.1). As of August 10, 2020, 5,929 individuals were SARS-CoV-2 positive and among those, 1,463 (25%) were hospitalized, 579 (10%) were in ICU, and 398 (7%) died. We observed a lower risk in women vs. men for ICU and mortality (Odds Ratio (95% CI): 0.48 (0.30-0.76) and 0.59 (0.31-1.15), respectively) and a higher risk in Black vs. Other race patients for hospitalization and ICU (OR (95%CI): 1.53 (1.32-1.77) and 1.63 (1.32-2.02), respectively). We observed an increased risk of all COVID-19 disease states with older age and BMI ≥35 vs. 20-24 kg/m2. Renal failure, respiratory failure, morbid obesity, acid-base balance disorder, white blood cell diseases, hydronephrosis and bacterial infections were associated with an increased risk of ICU admissions; sepsis, chronic skin ulcers, acid-base balance disorder and acidosis were associated with mortality. Older age, higher BMI, males and patients with a history of respiratory, kidney, bacterial or metabolic comorbidities experienced greater COVID-19 severity. Future studies to investigate the underlying mechanisms associated with these phenotype clusters and COVID-19 are warranted.

Objective The development of clinical research informatics tools and workflow processes associated with re-engaging biobank participants has become necessary as genomic repositories increasingly consider the return of actionable research results. Materials and Methods Here we describe the development and utility of an informatics application for participant recruitment and enrollment management for the Veterans Affairs Million Veteran Program Return Of Actionable Results Study, a randomized controlled pilot trial returning individual genetic results associated with familial hypercholesterolemia. Results The application is developed in Python-Flask and was placed into production in November 2021. The application includes modules for chart review, medication reconciliation, participant contact and biospecimen logging, survey recording, randomization, and documentation of genetic counseling and result disclosure. Three primary users, a genetic counselor and two research coordinators, and 326 Veteran participants have been integrated into the system as of February 23, 2023. The application has successfully handled 3367 task requests involving greater than 95 000 structured data points. Specifically, application users have recorded 326 chart reviews, 867 recruitment telephone calls, 158 telephone-based surveys, and 61 return of results genetic counseling sessions, among other available study tasks. Conclusion The development of usable, customizable, and secure informatics tools will become increasingly important as large genomic repositories begin to return research results at scale. Our work provides a proof-of-concept for developing and using such tools to aid in managing the return of results process within a national biobank. Lay Summary The Million Veteran Program Return Of Actionable Results (MVP-ROAR) Study is exploring the acceptance and feasibility of returning genetic results related to familial hypercholesterolemia (family-related high blood cholesterol) to participants in the US Department of Veterans Affairs Million Veteran Program. We developed a user-friendly computer application that can be used by our research team to help manage the process for re-contacting, re-consenting, and enrolling MVP participants into the MVP-ROAR Study. The computer application includes multiple modules that allow our research team to track where participants are in the return of results process as well as enter important operational and study data, including the recording of information related to health record reviews, recruitment and enrollment information, participant surveys, and genetic counseling sessions. Our experience building a computer system for managing a return of results process may be important to future return of results initiatives in MVP and can be used as an example by other large biobanks that would like to return genetic results to their participants.

Background: Approximately 697,000 members of the U.S. Armed Forces were deployed to the Persian Gulf in support of the 1990–1991 Persian Gulf War (GW). Subsequently, many deployed and some non-deployed veterans developed a chronic multi-symptom illness, now named Gulf War Illness (GWI). This manuscript outlines the methods and rationale for studying the genomics of GWI within the Million Veteran Program (MVP), a VA-based national research program that has linked medical records, surveys, and genomic data, enabling genome-wide association studies (GWASs). Methods: MVP participants who served in the military during the GW era were contacted by mail and invited to participate in the GWI study. A structured health questionnaire, based on a previously tested instrument, was also included in the mailing. Data on deployment locations and exposures, symptoms associated with GWI, clinical diagnoses, personal habits, and health care utilization were collected. Self-reported data will be augmented with chart reviews and structured international classification of disease codes, to classify participants by GWI case status. We will develop a phenotyping algorithm, based on two commonly used case definitions, to determine GWI status, and then conduct a nested case-control GWAS. Genetic variants associated with GWI will be investigated, and gene–gene and gene–environment interactions studied. The genetic overlap of GWI with, and causative mechanisms linking this illness to, other health conditions and the effects of genomic regulatory mechanisms on GWI risk will also be explored. Conclusions: The proposed initial GWAS described in this report will investigate the genomic underpinnings of GWI with a large sample size and state-of-the-art genomic analyses and phenotyping. The data generated will provide a rich and expansive foundation on which to build additional analyses.

Racial/ethnic health disparities persist among veterans despite comparable access and quality of care. We describe racial/ethnic differences in self-reported health characteristics among 437,413 men and women (mean age (SD) = 64.5 (12.6), 91% men, 79% White) within the Million Veteran Program. The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test and linear mixed models were used to compare age-standardized frequencies and means across race/ethnicity groups, stratified by gender. Black, Hispanic, and Other race men and women reported worse self-rated health, greater VA healthcare utilization, and more combat exposure than Whites. Compared to White men, Black and Other men reported more circulatory, musculoskeletal, mental health, and infectious disease conditions while Hispanic men reported fewer circulatory and more mental health, infectious disease, kidney, and neurological conditions. Compared to White women, Black women reported more circulatory and infectious disease conditions and Other women reported more infectious disease conditions. Smoking rates were higher among Black men, but lower for other minority groups compared to Whites. Minority groups were less likely to drink alcohol and had lower physical fitness than Whites. By identifying differences in burden of various health conditions and risk factors across different racial/ethnic groups, our findings can inform future studies and ultimately interventions addressing disparities.

As a mega-biobank linked to a national healthcare system, the Million Veteran Program (MVP) can directly improve the health care of participants. To determine the feasibility and outcomes of returning medically actionable genetic results to MVP participants, the program launched the MVP Return of Actionable Results (MVP-ROAR) Study, with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) as an exemplar actionable condition. The MVP-ROAR Study consists of a completed single-arm pilot phase and an ongoing randomized clinical trial (RCT), in which MVP participants are recontacted and invited to receive clinical confirmatory gene sequencing testing and a telegenetic counseling intervention. The primary outcome of the RCT is 6-month change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) between participants receiving results at baseline and those receiving results after 6 months. The pilot developed processes to identify and recontact participants nationally with probable pathogenic variants in low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) on the MVP genotype array, invite them to clinical confirmatory gene sequencing, and deliver a telegenetic counseling intervention. Among participants in the pilot phase, 8 (100%) had active statin prescriptions after 6 months. Results were shared with 16 first-degree family members. Six-month ΔLDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) after the genetic counseling intervention was −37 mg/dL (95% CI: −12 to −61; P = .03). The ongoing RCT will determine between-arm differences in this primary outcome. While underscoring the importance of clinical confirmation of research results, the pilot phase of the MVP-ROAR Study marks a turning point in MVP and demonstrates the feasibility of returning genetic results to participants and their providers. The ongoing RCT will contribute to understanding how such a program might improve patient health care and outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04178122.

To address gaps in understanding the pathophysiology of Gulf War Illness (GWI), the VA Million Veteran Program (MVP) developed and implemented a survey to MVP enrollees who served in the U.S. military during the 1990–1991 Persian Gulf War (GW). Eligible Veterans were invited via mail to complete a survey assessing health conditions as well as GW-specific deployment characteristics and exposures. We evaluated the representativeness of this GW-era cohort relative to the broader population by comparing demographic, military, and health characteristics between respondents and non-respondents, as well as with all GW-era Veterans who have used Veterans Health Administration (VHA) services and the full population of U.S. GW-deployed Veterans. A total of 109,976 MVP GW-era Veterans were invited to participate and 45,270 (41%) returned a completed survey. Respondents were 84% male, 72% White, 8% Hispanic, with a mean age of 61.6 years (SD = 8.5). Respondents were more likely to be older, White, married, better educated, slightly healthier, and have higher socioeconomic status than non-respondents, but reported similar medical conditions and comparable health status. Although generally similar to all GW-era Veterans using VHA services and the full population of U.S. GW Veterans, respondents included higher proportions of women and military officers, and were slightly older. In conclusion, sample characteristics of the MVP GW-era cohort can be considered generally representative of the broader GW-era Veteran population. The sample represents the largest research cohort of GW-era Veterans established to date and provides a uniquely valuable resource for conducting in-depth studies to evaluate health conditions affecting 1990–1991 GW-era Veterans.

Cases for a disease can be defined broadly using diagnostic codes, or narrowly using gold-standard confirmation that often is not available in large administrative datasets. These different definitions can have significant impacts on the results and conclusions of studies. We conducted this study to assess how using melanoma phecodes versus histologic confirmation for invasive or in situ melanoma impacts the results of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using the Million Veteran Program. Melanoma status was determined three ways: (1) by the presence of two or more phecodes, (2) histologically-confirmed invasive melanoma, and (3) histologically-confirmed melanoma in situ. We conducted a GWAS for variants with minor allele frequencies of 1% or greater. There were 45,665 cases in the phecode cohort, 5364 cases in the confirmed invasive melanoma cohort, and 4792 cases in the confirmed melanoma in situ cohort. There were 20,457 variants significant at the genome-wide level in the phecode cohort, 2582 in the invasive melanoma cohort, and 1989 in the melanoma in situ cohort. Most of the variants identified in the phecode cohort did not replicate in the histologically-confirmed cohorts. The different case definitions led to large differences in sample size and variants associated at the genome-wide level. Unvalidated and imprecise case definitions can lead to less accurate results. Investigators should use validated phenotypes when gold-standard definitions are not available.

Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk variants have been identified in European ancestry cohorts that have stronger effects at certain ages, in individuals with a specific sex, or in those with specific isoforms of APOE , the strongest AD risk locus. However, sample sizes in African ancestry (AA) cohorts have been underpowered to perform stratified analyses. Methods We generated genome-wide association study datasets stratified by sex, age at onset (< 75 vs ≥ 75), and APOE -ε4 carrier status in AA cohorts from MVP and the Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC). Outcomes in MVP were AD and related dementias (ADRD; n = 4073 cases and 19,648 controls) and proxy dementia (i.e., reported dementia in a parent, n  = 6216 cases and 21,566 controls) while ADGC analyses examined AD ( n  = 2425 cases and 5069 controls). The proxy dementia GWASs were included in the sex-stratified meta-analysis corresponding to the sex of the affected parent. The top genes were tested for differential expression in AA brain tissue. Results In addition to the APOE region, genome-wide significant associations were observed in an intergenic region near the EPHA5 gene (rs141838133, p  = 2.19 × 10 –8 ) in individuals with onset < 75 years, in GRIN3B near the known AD risk gene ABCA7 (rs115882880, p  = 3.83 × 10 –8 ) in females, and near TSPEAR (rs139130053, p  = 4.27 × 10 –8 ) in APOE -ε4 non-carriers. EPHA5 regulates glucose homeostasis, and ephrin receptors modify the strength of existing synapses in the brain and in pancreatic islets. It is unclear whether GRIN3B represents a locus distinct from ABCA7 . Rs115882880 was a significant eQTL for GRIN3B but not ABCA7 in AA brain samples. TSPEAR regulates Notch signaling but has not been linked to neuronal function. Conclusions Age, sex, and APOE -stratified analyses of dementia in AA participants from two cohorts revealed potential new associations. Stratified analyses may yield critical information about the genetic heterogeneity underlying dementia risk and lead to advances in precision medicine.

Alcohol genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have generally focused on alcohol consumption and alcohol use disorder (AUD); few have examined habitual drinking behaviors like maximum habitual alcohol intake (MaxAlc). To identify genetic loci associated with MaxAlc and to elucidate the genetic architecture across alcohol traits. This MaxAlc genetic association study was performed among Million Veteran Program participants enrolled from January 10, 2011, to September 30, 2020. Ancestry-specific GWASs were conducted in participants with European (n = 218 623) and African (n = 29 132) ancestry, then meta-analyzed (N = 247 755). Linkage-disequilibrium score regression was used to estimate single nucleotide variant (SNV)-heritability and genetic correlations (rg) with other alcohol and psychiatric traits. Genomic structural equation modeling (gSEM) was used to evaluate genetic associations between MaxAlc and other alcohol traits. Mendelian randomization was used to examine potential causal relationships between MaxAlc and liver enzyme levels. MTAG (multitrait analysis of GWAS) was used to analyze MaxAlc and problematic alcohol use (PAU) jointly. Genetic associations. MaxAlc was defined from the following survey item: \"in a typical month, what is/was the largest number of drinks of alcohol you may have had in one day?\" with ordinal responses from 0 to 15 or more drinks. GWASs were conducted on sample sizes of as many as 247 455 US veterans. Participants were 92.68% male and had mean (SD) age of 65.92 (11.70) years. The MaxAlc GWAS resulted in 15 genome-wide significant loci. Top associations in European-ancestry and African-ancestry participants were with known functional variants in the ADH1B gene, namely rs1229984 (P = 3.12 × 10-101) and rs2066702 (P = 6.30 × 10-17), respectively. Novel associations were also found. SNV-heritability was 6.65% (SE, 0.41) in European-ancestry participants and 3.42% (SE, 1.46) in African-ancestry participants. MaxAlc was positively correlated with PAU (rg = 0.79; P = 3.95 × 10-149) and AUD (rg = 0.76; P = 1.26 × 10-127) and had negative rg with the UK Biobank \"alcohol usually taken with meals\" (rg = -0.53; P = 1.40 × 10-50). For psychiatric traits, MaxAlc had the strongest genetic correlation with suicide attempt (rg = 0.40; P = 3.02 × 10-21). gSEM supported a 2-factor model with MaxAlc loading on a factor with PAU and AUD and other alcohol consumption measures loading on a separate factor. Mendelian randomization supported an association between MaxAlc and the liver enzyme gamma-glutamyltransferase (β = 0.012; P = 2.66 × 10-10). MaxAlc MTAG resulted in 31 genome-wide significant loci. The findings suggest that MaxAlc closely aligns genetically with PAU traits. This study improves understanding of the mechanisms associated with normative alcohol consumption vs problematic habitual use and AUD as well as how MaxAlc relates to psychiatric and medical conditions genetically and biologically.