Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Empirical evidence shows that 4.6–6.3% of all women develop a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and approximately 10–15% postpartum depression (PPD) following childbirth. This study explores the relationship between delivery mode and the occurrence of PTSD and PPD, specifically examining four distinct caesarean section (CS) modes: primary on maternal request (Grade 4), medically indicated primary (Grade 3), secondary CS from relative indication (Grade 2) and emergency secondary CS (Grade 1), compared to vaginal and assisted vaginal delivery (AVD). The research aims to understand how these six subcategories of delivery modes impact PPD and PTSD levels. Common predictors, including the need for psychological treatment before childbirth, fear of childbirth, planning of pregnancy, induction of labor, birth debriefing, and lack of social support after childbirth, will be analyzed to determine their association with postpartum mental health outcomes. Methods The study was planned and carried out by a research team of the psychology department at the Medical School Hamburg, Germany. Within an online-study (cross-sectional design) N  = 1223 German speaking women with a baby who did not die before, during or after birth were surveyed once between four weeks and twelve months postpartum via an anonymous online questionnaire on demographic and gynecological data, delivery mode, PTSD (PCL-5) and PPD (EPDS). Results For both psychiatric disorders, ANOVA revealed significant differences between delivery mode and PPD and PTSD. With weak effects for PPD and medium to strong effects for PTSD. Post-hoc tests showed increased levels of PPD for two CS types (Grade 1, Grade 3) compared to vaginal delivery. For PTSD, secondary CS from relative indication (Grade 2), emergency secondary CS (Grade 1) and assisted vaginal delivery (AVD) were associated with elevated levels of PTSD. Regression analysis revealed delivery mode as a significant predictor of EPDS- (medium effect size) and PCL-5-Score (medium to high effect size). Limitation Delivery was considered as the potential traumatic event, and any previous traumas were not documented. Additionally, the categorization of delivery modes relied on subjective reports rather than medical confirmation. Conclusion The study highlights the influence of delivery mode on the mental health of postpartum mothers: different modes influence postpartum disorders in various ways. However, the definition of delivery mode was only stated subjectively and not medically confirmed. Further research should investigate which aspects of the different delivery modes affect maternal mental health and explore how the perception of childbirth may be influenced by specific delivery experiences.

Background A rare disease (RD) diagnosis and therapy can affect the family’s quality of life and mental health. A lack of information and missing care options lead to helplessness and psychological stress within families. This work aims to identify patients’ and parents’ experiences in daily life and with the health care system as well as their needs and current pathways to psychosocial care to develop implementation strategies adapted to the families’ needs. Methods The present analysis is part of the national multicenter study “Children Affected by Rare Disease and Their Families-Network (CARE-FAM-NET).“ We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with children, adolescents, and young adults with RD (aged 12 to 21 years) and parents of children with RD (aged 0 to 17 years). We analyzed the transcribed and anonymized interviews using the method of focused interview analyses to identify previous experiences with medical and psychosocial care and possible needs for improvement and support. Results Seventy-four parents of children with RD and 15 children, adolescents, and young adults with RD participated. Five main themes emerged. Daily life with an RD : RD affects the everyday and social life of the respondents, negatively impacting mental well-being. Experiences with the health care system : The long diagnostic path is stressful for families. Professionals’ lack of information/education leads to inadequate care for those affected. Psychosocial support : Families do not know about psychosocial care services. In some cases, the families take advantage of psychosocial support services (such as support groups or advocacy groups), which are predominantly very helpful. Difficulties and barriers : Time, socio-legal and organizational problems burden families and lead to advantages in using psychosocial services. Improvements for patient-oriented support : Those affected wished for timely, preventive support (especially in administrative and socio-legal matters) and education regarding psychosocial care services. Conclusion RD represent a great challenge for all family members – patients, parents, and siblings. The patients’ and parents’ previous experiences in daily life, medical and psychosocial care show a need for target-group specific support, including training of health care professionals and low-threshold access care services and practical help for all family members.

The current demographic change means that young psychotherapists and older patients will increasingly come into contact. Unique for this constellation is the intergenerational therapeutic relationship, which forms the basis of psychotherapy, but has not yet been the focus of empirical research. This qualitative study provides preliminary insights into how older patients (aged over 65) experience and perceive the therapeutic relationship with young psychotherapists (aged in their mid-20s to mid-30s). We conducted semi-structured interviews with twelve older patients (8 women, 4 men) and analysed their data using the grounded theory approach. We found a connection between the type of transference a participant demonstrated and their biographical as well as social experiences, desires, and fantasies. Overall, a tendency to seek harmony was observed among the participants, which was reflected in their behaviour towards young psychotherapists: (a) conflict avoidance, (b) (fantasised) therapy discontinuation, (c) adaption/subordination, and (d) solidarity, support, and protection. Our findings demonstrated that various intergenerational transference phenomena, including the roles in which young therapists are perceived, are associated with certain particularities and challenges, such as the topic of sexuality. It can be valuable for young psychotherapists to become aware of a potential role reversal that may result in older patients trying to support them.

Parent–child communication represents an important variable in clinical child and family psychology due to its association with a variety of psychosocial outcomes. To give an overview of instruments designed to measure the quality of parent–child communication from the child’s (8–21 years) perspective and to assess the psychometric quality of these instruments, we performed a systematic literature search in Medline and PsycInfo (last: February 25, 2022). Peer-reviewed journal articles published in English with a child-rated instrument measuring the quality of parent–child communication were included. Initial screening for eligibility and inclusion, subsequent data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by couples of review team members. Based on the screening of 5115 articles, 106 studies reported in 126 papers were included. We identified 12 parent–child communication instruments across the studies. The Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS) was used in 75% of the studies. On average, the evidence for psychometric quality of the instruments was low. Few instruments were used in clinical and at-risk samples. Several instruments are available to rate parent–child communication from the child’s perspective. However, their psychometric evidence is limited and the theoretical foundation is largely undocumented. This review has limitations with regard to selection criteria and language bias.Registration PROSPERO: CRD42021255264.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic is affecting many areas of life and has posed additional strains on the highly vulnerable group of caregivers of children with rare diseases (RDs). The psychosocial situation of the family caregivers deserves more attention, both in research and practice. The current study explores the distress level of caregivers of children with RDs, their psychosocial information needs, and caregiver-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of children with RDs in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Data from a cross-sectional online survey conducted within the German CARE-FAM-NET project ( children affected by rare diseases and their families-network ) between March and August 2020 were examined. The study sample included 149 family caregivers, mostly mothers (83.2%) of 167 children with RDs. The survey assessed demographic and disease-related characteristics, distress and everyday problems of caregivers (Distress Thermometer for Parents; scale 0–10), psychosocial information needs (self-developed items; scale 0–100), and caregiver-reported HRQoL of the children with RDs (DISABKIDS Chronic Generic Measure, short-form; scale 0–100). Using descriptive statistics, we analyzed the psychosocial situation of families during the COVID-19 pandemic. We further conducted correlation analysis to investigate interrelations. Results The distress level among caregivers was high ( M  = 6.84, SD  = 2.43); 89.6% reported clinical distress (≥ 4). Everyday problems (e.g., sleep problems, fatigue, being out of shape, fears, feeling tense or nervous, and worry) were frequent. Caregivers reported a wide range of psychosocial information needs. In about half of the children (49.5%), caregiver-reported HRQoL was low, while average HRQoL ( M  = 58.7, SD  = 19.5) was comparable to parent-reported norm data of children with severe clinical conditions. Distress correlated positively with psychosocial information needs ( r  = 0.40), and negatively with the caregiver-reported HRQoL of the children ( r  =  − 0.46). Conclusions This study indicates a high psychosocial burden on family caregivers of children with RDs during the early COVID-19 pandemic, characterized by high distress levels and wide-ranging everyday problems, unmet psychosocial information needs, and reduced caregiver-reported HRQoL in children with RDs. The findings highlight the ongoing need for target group-specific, low-threshold support services (e.g., websites) during and after the pandemic.

Background The integration of evidence-based research into clinical practice faces several challenges. One major barrier is the effective dissemination of information regarding new interventions. To illustrate this, the CHIMPS-NET (Children of Mentally Ill Parents) program, a family-centered intervention in German psychiatric clinics, is used as an example. This study evaluates the referral criteria, the dissemination of information, and the accessibility of outpatient specialists involved in the gatekeeping process for accessing and referring patients to CHIMPS-NET. This study serves as part of the implementation strategy for the sustainable anchoring of the CHIMPS-NET program. Methods We identified all outpatient professionals ( n =2828) in each catchment area of the psychiatric specialist clinics that provided the new CHIMPS-NET form of care. We identified them as potential gatekeepers. These professionals worked across a range of fields, some had a psychological professional background. Professionals in the intervention group ( n =946) received information from us about the new intervention, while professionals in the control group ( n =1882) did not. Before and after the information was sent by post, all participants were asked via a questionnaire about their knowledge of family-centered intervention and its importance for the vulnerable target group of children of mentally ill parents. There was an interval of three months between the first questionnaire and the information being sent out and a further three months after this the final questionnaire was sent. Results There was no significant change in knowledge across the two measurement points. Reaching out to gatekeepers had no influence on knowledge of the CHIMPS-Net intervention. However, awareness of family-centered health interventions was four times higher if the gatekeeper had a psychological professional background. Conclusion Dissemination of information by post about CHIMPS-Net was not effective at communicating information or reaching gatekeepers. Knowledge of family-centered health interventions was four times higher among the group of specialists and therapists with a psychological background. We therefore suggest that general (somatic) practitioners, who make up most of the gatekeeper population in Germany, need to be approached more intensively than professionals with a psychological/psychiatric background. It is also recommended that individual clinics address their catchment area more intensively and directly.

Βackground Children of parents with a mental illness have up to 50% chance of developing a mental illness themselves. Numerous studies have shown that preventive family-oriented interventions can decrease the risk by 40% and that professionals are a decisive factor influencing family-oriented practice. There are also substantial differences between professions in terms of their family-oriented practices. This study examines the level of family-oriented practice for different professional groups in Germany. Methods Data were used from the baseline assessment of the two-group randomized controlled multicenter trial ci-chimps as a subproject of CHIMPS-NET, which took place from January 2020 to May 2021 in 18 clinical centers in Germany. Child and adolescent mental health systems as well as adult mental health systems took part and every professional involved in the treatment was invited to participate. Data was used from 475 mental health professionals including physicians, psychologists, psychotherapists for adults and for children and adolescents, occupational/ music/ physio/ art therapists/ (social) education workers and nursing/ education service. Family-oriented mental health practice was examined using the translated version of the Family-Focused Mental Health Practice Questionnaire (FFMHPQ) with means and standard deviations calculated for each of the 18 FFMHPQ-GV subscales. ANOVAs were computed to compare professions and significant differences were examined via post hoc analyses (Scheffé). Additionally, effect sizes were calculated (Omega squared). Results Differences were seen between the professions in all aspects of family-oriented practice: Both regarding organizational policy and support aspects, issues concerning working with parent-clients, as well as professional skills and knowledge aspects. Psychotherapists for children and adolescents scored the highest family-oriented practices compared to all other professional groups on almost all subscales. Conclusion This study examines the level of family-oriented practice for different professional groups in Germany. Apart from skills and knowledge about the impact of mental illness and parenting, psychotherapists for children and adolescents had the highest scores and engaged most in family-oriented practice. Psychotherapists for adults got the least workplace support for family-oriented practice but were competent providing resources and referral information to the concerned families and feel confidence working with them. Due to these results, a training need exists to improve skills and knowledge about the impact of mental illness and parenting. Additionally, there is still potential for institutional support in promoting family-oriented work. Trial registration The CHIMPS-NET-study was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register on 2019–12-19 (DRKS00020380) and with Clinical Trials on 2020–4-30 (NCT04369625), the ci-chimps-study was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00026217) on 2021–08-27 and with Clinical Trials on 2021–11-04 (NCT05106673).

Background COVID-19 has affected our society at large, particularly vulnerable groups, such as children suffering from rare diseases and their parents. However, the psychosocial influences of COVID-19 on these have yet to be investigated. As such, the study’s goal was to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), quality of life (QoL), and mental health of children with rare congenital surgical diseases and their parents during the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures. Methods A survey of n  = 210 parents of children with rare congenital surgical diseases and a control group of n  = 88 parents of children without rare diseases was conducted cross-sectionally between April 2020 to April 2021. Data on HRQoL, QoL, and mental health was collected using standardized psychometric questionnaires for children and parents presenting to the pediatric surgery department at a university hospital. Results Mothers of children with rare pediatric surgical diseases showed significantly lower QoL and significantly higher impairment in mental health than a control group and norm data. For fathers, this was solely the case for their QoL. Children’s parent-reported HRQoL and mental health were partially impaired. Social and disease-specific risk factors of the respective outcomes in affected families were identified through regression analysis models. Conclusion Parents of children with rare diseases report severe psychosocial impairment regarding themselves and their children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, affected families should receive attention and supportive care in the form of a family-center approach to alleviate the additional burden of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background Life extension by medical interventions and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are sometimes conflicting aspects of medical care. Long-term ventilation in children with neuromuscular disease is a well-established life-extending procedure and often at the center of this conflict. HRQOL and the mental health of affected children and their families become even more important in respect to emerging therapies in neuromuscular diseases with longer life-expectancy of treated patients and considerable costs of medical treatment. Methods We performed a questionnaire survey in a total of forty-three families of children with neuromuscular disease treated in the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf and the Children’s Hospital Altona. We evaluated self- and proxy-reported HRQOL and mental health outcomes of affected children and their parents using validated and age-appropriate instruments. Results Compared to normative data, children with neuromuscular diseases and their families experienced a lower HRQOL and mental health. However, there was no additional negative influence on the overall HRQOL by ventilator use. Conclusions As ventilator use was not responsible for the reduction of HRQOL and mental health our data contributes an important aspect to the discussion about life-prolonging procedures, in particular mechanical ventilation, in severly disabled patients.

Background Rare diseases occur in early childhood and have a major impact on the quality of life of the affected children and their families. Their need for psychosocial support is considerable, but psychosocial care in Germany is still far from being part of routine care. We interviewed experts to explore how they describe the current pathways to psychosocial care, potential barriers and problems, and possibilities for improvements. Results We conducted telephone interviews with 49 experts working in somatic medicine, psychosocial medicine, patient organizations, child and youth welfare, and the educational sector. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using focused interview analysis. Results document ways of access and facilities used by families to receive psychosocial care. The barriers described by the experts can be summarized on three levels: the family-organizational level, the family-psycho-emotional level, and finally, the structural system level. Accordingly, suggestions for improvement were directed at these levels. Conclusion Based on the experts' perspectives, there is ample room for improvement to facilitate the pathways to psychosocial care for children with rare diseases and their families. Unfortunately, there seems to be a long way to go before psychosocial care will be routinely provided. However, awareness of the issue among different professional groups is high, and numerous suggestions for improvement were made, including continuous expansion of services to all family members, strengthening of low-threshold services, simplifying application procedures, and more cooperation between different funding agencies as well as between different care providers.