Explore the vast range of titles available.

Articular cartilage injuries have poor repair capacity, leading to progressive joint damage, and cannot be restored predictably by either conventional treatments or advanced therapies based on implantation of articular chondrocytes. Compared with articular chondrocytes, chondrocytes derived from the nasal septum have superior and more reproducible capacity to generate hyaline-like cartilage tissues, with the plasticity to adapt to a joint environment. We aimed to assess whether engineered autologous nasal chondrocyte-based cartilage grafts allow safe and functional restoration of knee cartilage defects. In a first-in-human trial, ten patients with symptomatic, post-traumatic, full-thickness cartilage lesions (2–6 cm2) on the femoral condyle or trochlea were treated at University Hospital Basel in Switzerland. Chondrocytes isolated from a 6 mm nasal septum biopsy specimen were expanded and cultured onto collagen membranes to engineer cartilage grafts (30 × 40 × 2 mm). The engineered tissues were implanted into the femoral defects via mini-arthrotomy and assessed up to 24 months after surgery. Primary outcomes were feasibility and safety of the procedure. Secondary outcomes included self-assessed clinical scores and MRI-based estimation of morphological and compositional quality of the repair tissue. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01605201. The study is ongoing, with an approved extension to 25 patients. For every patient, it was feasible to manufacture cartilaginous grafts with nasal chondrocytes embedded in an extracellular matrix rich in glycosaminoglycan and type II collagen. Engineered tissues were stable through handling with forceps and could be secured in the injured joints. No adverse reactions were recorded and self-assessed clinical scores for pain, knee function, and quality of life were improved significantly from before surgery to 24 months after surgery. Radiological assessments indicated variable degrees of defect filling and development of repair tissue approaching the composition of native cartilage. Hyaline-like cartilage tissues, engineered from autologous nasal chondrocytes, can be used clinically for repair of articular cartilage defects in the knee. Future studies are warranted to assess efficacy in large controlled trials and to investigate an extension of indications to early degenerative states or to other joints. Deutsche Arthrose-Hilfe.

Autologous native cartilage from the nasal septum, ear, or rib is the standard material for surgical reconstruction of the nasal alar lobule after two-layer excision of non-melanoma skin cancer. We assessed whether engineered autologous cartilage grafts allow safe and functional alar lobule restoration. In a first-in-human trial, we recruited five patients at the University Hospital Basel (Basel, Switzerland). To be eligible, patients had to be aged at least 18 years and have a two-layer defect (≥50% size of alar subunit) after excision of non-melanoma skin cancer on the alar lobule. Chondrocytes (isolated from a 6 mm cartilage biopsy sample from the nasal septum harvested under local anaesthesia during collection of tumour biopsy sample) were expanded, seeded, and cultured with autologous serum onto collagen type I and type III membranes in the course of 4 weeks. The resulting engineered cartilage grafts (25 mm × 25 mm × 2 mm) were shaped intra-operatively and implanted after tumour excision under paramedian forehead or nasolabial flaps, as in standard reconstruction with native cartilage. During flap refinement after 6 months, we took biopsy samples of repair tissues and histologically analysed them. The primary outcomes were safety and feasibility of the procedure, assessed 12 months after reconstruction. At least 1 year after implantation, when reconstruction is typically stabilised, we assessed patient satisfaction and functional outcomes (alar cutaneous sensibility, structural stability, and respiratory flow rate). Between Dec 13, 2010, and Feb 6, 2012, we enrolled two women and three men aged 76–88 years. All engineered grafts contained a mixed hyaline and fibrous cartilage matrix. 6 months after implantation, reconstructed tissues displayed fibromuscular fatty structures typical of the alar lobule. After 1 year, all patients were satisfied with the aesthetic and functional outcomes and no adverse events had been recorded. Cutaneous sensibility and structural stability of the reconstructed area were clinically satisfactory, with adequate respiratory function. Autologous nasal cartilage tissues can be engineered and clinically used for functional restoration of alar lobules. Engineered cartilage should now be assessed for other challenging facial reconstructions. Foundation of the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Basel; and Krebsliga beider Basel.

IntroductionKnee osteoarthritis often starts in the patellofemoral compartment of the knee and is diagnosed in about 39% of people with knee pain aged above 30 years. Patellofemoral osteoarthritis plays a crucial role in the reduction of quality of life and in the rise of healthcare costs. There is still no consensus for treatment recommendation for isolated patella-femoral osteoarthritis in clinical guidelines. Current therapeutic approaches are limited to pain management, alleviation of symptoms or total knee replacement. Nasal chondrocyte tissue-engineered cartilage (N-TEC) has already been successfully introduced in clinical studies phase I and II for the treatment of focal cartilage lesions and in pilot studies in osteoarthritis patients.Methods and analysisA randomised controlled trial involving 75 patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis from nine different clinical centres in Switzerland, Germany and Croatia is being conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of N-TEC implantation compared with standard treatment with platelet-rich plasma (PRP). In the intervention group, an autologous nasal cartilage cell-derived graft is implanted into the cartilage defects of the patella and/or trochlea during an open surgical procedure. The control group receives three PRP injections at weekly intervals. The primary outcome is the mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain Change from baseline to 24 months between groups. Secondary outcomes, including patients’ self-assessed questionnaires, X-ray and MRI scans, physiotherapeutic assessments and safety, will be assessed and compared between the intervention and control group. In addition, the study is complemented with a health-economic evaluation to establish the intervention’s value for money and impact on productivity in working-age individuals. The planned duration of the study is 4 years including baseline and follow-up measurements at 6, 12 and 24 months.Ethics and disseminationAll centres involved in the implementation of the intervention have obtained approval from their respective competent ethics committees. This includes approval from the following ethics committees: Ethics Committees of North-Western and Central Switzerland (EKNZ): 2024–00075 (associated ethical committees: Cantonal Ethics Committee Bern, Cantonal Research Ethics Commission Geneva (CCER), Cantonal Ethics Committee Ticino, Cantonal Ethics Committee Zurich). The EKNZ covers several cantons in Switzerland, including Basel. The site in Lugano falls under the Cantonal Ethics Committee Ticino. Ethics Germany according to CTIS: 2023-508640-21-00 (Medicinal Ethical Commission of the Julius-Maximilians-University Wuerzburg, Ethical Commission of the Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg) and Central Ethical Committee Croatia, Republic of Croatia Ministry of Health: 2023-508640-21-00. The Swissmedic reference number is 701788.Prior to participation, all participants must have signed informed consent. Study information will be disseminated via hospital websites, newsletters and an open-access publication of the protocol. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at national and international conferences and shared with the public.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Registration No.: NCT06163573; Registration number CTIS: 2023-508640-21-00.

Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMP) provide promising treatment options particularly for unmet clinical needs, such as progressive and chronic diseases where currently no satisfying treatment exists. Especially from the ATMP subclass of Tissue Engineered Products (TEPs), only a few have yet been translated from an academic setting to clinic and beyond. A reason for low numbers of TEPs in current clinical trials and one main key hurdle for TEPs is the cost and labor-intensive manufacturing process. Manual production steps require experienced personnel, are challenging to standardize and to scale up. Automated manufacturing has the potential to overcome these challenges, toward an increasing cost-effectiveness. One major obstacle for automation is the control and risk prevention of cross contaminations, especially when handling parallel production lines of different patient material. These critical steps necessitate validated effective and efficient cleaning procedures in an automated system. In this perspective, possible technologies, concepts and solutions to existing ATMP manufacturing hurdles are discussed on the example of a late clinical phase II trial TEP. In compliance to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines, we propose a dual arm robot based isolator approach. Our novel concept enables complete process automation for adherent cell culture, and the translation of all manual process steps with standard laboratory equipment. Moreover, we discuss novel solutions for automated cleaning, without the need for human intervention. Consequently, our automation concept offers the unique chance to scale up production while becoming more cost-effective, which will ultimately increase TEP availability to a broader number of patients.

Objectives Bioreactor‐based production systems have the potential to overcome limitations associated with conventional tissue engineering manufacturing methods, facilitating regulatory compliant and cost‐effective production of engineered grafts for widespread clinical use. In this work, we established a bioreactor‐based manufacturing system for the production of cartilage grafts. Materials & Methods All bioprocesses, from cartilage biopsy digestion through the generation of engineered grafts, were performed in our bioreactor‐based manufacturing system. All bioreactor technologies and cartilage tissue engineering bioprocesses were transferred to an independent GMP facility, where engineered grafts were manufactured for two large animal studies. Results The results of these studies demonstrate the safety and feasibility of the bioreactor‐based manufacturing approach. Moreover, grafts produced in the manufacturing system were first shown to accelerate the repair of acute osteochondral defects, compared to cell‐free scaffold implants. We then demonstrated that grafts produced in the system also facilitated faster repair in a more clinically relevant chronic defect model. Our data also suggested that bioreactor‐manufactured grafts may result in a more robust repair in the longer term. Conclusion By demonstrating the safety and efficacy of bioreactor‐generated grafts in two large animal models, this work represents a pivotal step towards implementing the bioreactor‐based manufacturing system for the production of human cartilage grafts for clinical applications. Read the Editorial for this article on doi:10.1111/cpr.12625