Explore the vast range of titles available.

Introduction Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI)-related hospitalizations in older adults. Without RSV-specific treatment for adults, testing is uncommon, leading to potential underestimation of RSV incidence in real-world data studies. This study aimed to quantify the frequency of RSV testing during LRTI-related hospitalizations of older adults to inform interpretation of incidence estimates. Methods Administrative and billing data for hospitalizations of adults aged ≥ 65 years with a primary or secondary diagnosis of LRTI during the 2016–2019 RSV seasons (October–April) were extracted from the US all-payer Premier Healthcare Database (PHD). Billing codes identified RSV tests administered during eligible hospitalizations. The proportion of LRTI-related hospitalizations with a billed RSV test was calculated for each hospital in PHD, and summarized descriptively by hospital bed size, teaching status, and population served. Results Most of the 937 study hospitals performed RSV testing infrequently during LRTI hospitalization; median percentage of LRTI hospitalizations with RSV testing was 4.3%, and 78.4% of hospitals performed RSV testing in less than 25% of LRTI-related hospitalizations. RSV testing varied extensively by hospital type. Median percentage tested was significantly higher for hospitals with ≥ 200 beds (9.1%) versus < 200 beds (1.6%), for teaching (11.0%) versus non-teaching (2.5%) hospitals, and in urban (7.4%) versus rural (0.7%) settings. The median percentage of RSV testing increased over time, from 0.8% to 6.3% between the 2016/17 and 2018/19 seasons. Conclusion A small proportion of older adults hospitalized with LRTI are tested for RSV in US hospitals. Large variability occurs across hospital types. Consequently, retrospective database analyses likely result in a substantial underestimation of the true RSV-related hospitalization incidence. RSV incidence studies using real-world data need to assess for RSV testing frequency and adjust their results for under ascertainment associated with limited testing.

Introduction Nearly all existing respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) incidence estimates are based on real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) testing of nasal or nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs. Adding testing of additional specimen types to NP swab RT–PCR increases RSV detection. However, prior studies only made pairwise comparisons and the synergistic effect of adding multiple specimen types has not been quantified. We compared RSV diagnosis by NP swab RT–PCR alone versus NP swab plus saliva, sputum, and serology. Methods This was a prospective cohort study over two study periods (27 December 2021 to 1 April 2022 and 22 August 2022 to 11 November 2022) of patients aged ≥ 40 years hospitalized for acute respiratory illness (ARI) in Louisville, KY. NP swab, saliva, and sputum specimens were collected at enrollment and PCR tested (Luminex ARIES platform). Serology specimens were obtained at acute and convalescent timepoints (enrollment and 30–60-day visit). RSV detection rate was calculated for NP swab alone and for NP swab plus all other specimen type/test. Results Among 1766 patients enrolled, 100% had NP swab, 99% saliva, 34% sputum, and 21% paired serology specimens. RSV was diagnosed in 56 (3.2%) patients by NP swab alone, and in 109 (6.2%) patients by NP swab plus additional specimens, corresponding to a 1.95 times higher rate [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62, 2.34]. Limiting the comparison to the 150 subjects with all four specimen types available (i.e., NP swab, saliva, sputum, and serology), there was a 2.60-fold increase (95% CI 1.31, 5.17) compared to NP swab alone (3.3% versus 8.7%). Sensitivities by specimen type were: NP swab 51%, saliva 70%, sputum 72%, and serology 79%. Conclusions Diagnosis of RSV in adults was several-fold greater when additional specimen types were added to NP swab, even with a relatively low percentage of subjects with sputum and serology results available. Hospitalized RSV ARI burden estimates in adults based solely on NP swab RT–PCR should be adjusted for underestimation.

Background Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is an important pathogen causing acute respiratory illnesses in adults. RSV infection can lead to severe outcomes, including hospitalizations and even death. Despite the increased recognition of the burden in older adults, immediate post-discharge care needs among adults hospitalized with RSV are not well characterized and have not been compared to other serious medical conditions (such as influenza, acute myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke) for which there have been long-standing disease prevention efforts. Objectives This study aims to describe the immediate post-discharge care needs among adults hospitalized with RSV in the United States and descriptively compare it to those hospitalized with influenza, acute MI, or stroke. Design Retrospective observational cohort study. Patients Adults aged ≥ 18 years, hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of RSV, influenza, acute MI, or stroke from January 01, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were identified from the Premier Healthcare Database using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes. Main measures Immediate post-discharge care was categorized into three different levels of care based on the discharge dispositions. Descriptive analyses were performed. Key results In total, 3,629 RSV, 303,577 influenza, 388,682 acute MI, and 416,750 stroke hospitalizations were identified, the majority occurred among patients aged ≥ 65 years. Professional home care needs were the highest for RSV hospitalizations (19.1%), followed by influenza (17.7%), stroke (15.4%), and acute MI (9.8%). Additionally, institutional care needs immediately following discharge were similar for RSV, influenza, and acute MI hospitalizations (14.2%, 15.8%, and 14.1%, respectively). Conclusions Immediate post-discharge care needs among adults hospitalized with RSV, especially in older adults, can be considerable and comparable to influenza and acute MI discharges. With recently approved RSV vaccines, efforts to increase vaccination in older adults are needed to prevent RSV and associated healthcare consequences.

IntroductionWhile it is widely recognized that older adults, adults with chronic medical conditions (CMC), and adults with immunocompromising conditions (IC) are at increased risk of lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI), evidence of the magnitude of increased risk is limited. This study was thus undertaken to characterize rates of hospitalized and ambulatory LRTI among United States (US) adults by age and comorbidity profile.MethodsA retrospective cohort design and US healthcare claims database (2016–2019) were employed. Study population included adults aged ≥ 18 years and was stratified by age and comorbidity profile (CMC−, CMC+ , IC). LRTI was ascertained overall and by pathogen pathogen (e.g., respiratory syncytial virus [RSV]), and was classified by care setting (hospital, emergency department [ED], physician office/hospital outpatient [PO/HO]).ResultsRelative rates (RR) of LRTI generally increased with older age across care settings (vs. 18–49 years), with the most marked increase for hospitalizations: for LRTI-hospitalized, RRs ranged from 3.3 for 50–64 years to 46.6 for ≥ 85 years; for LRTI-ED and LRTI-PO/HO, RRs ranged from 1.0 to 2.7 and from 1.3 to 1.5, respectively. Within age groups, LRTI rates were also consistently higher among CMC+ and IC adults (vs. CMC− adults). Age-specific RRs of LRTI patients hospitalized due to RSV were largely comparable to overall LRTI; age-specific RRs for other care settings, and RRs for CMC+ and IC adults (vs. CMC− adults), were generally higher for LRTI due to RSV.ConclusionsIncidence of LRTI, including that due to RSV, especially for events requiring acute inpatient care, is markedly higher among older adults and adults of all ages with CMC or IC.

•This was a phase 3 randomized, double-blind PCV20 study in adults 18–49 years old.•The immunogenicity of 3 PCV20 lots was evaluated and safety of PCV20 was described.•Equivalence of vaccine responses was observed for 20 serotypes across 3 PCV20 lots.•All of the PCV20 lots elicited robust immune responses to the vaccine serotypes.•Safety and tolerability of PCV20 was acceptable and similar to PCV13. Introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs), including the 13-valent PCV (PCV13), has considerably reduced pneumococcal disease burden. However, additional serotypes not in PCV13 continue to present a substantial disease burden. The 20-valent PCV (PCV20) was developed to expand protection against pneumococcal disease beyond PCV13. As part of the phase 3 clinical development program, the current study assessed consistency of immune responses across 3 lots of PCV20 and described the safety profile of PCV20. This phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind study of pneumococcal vaccine-naive adults 18–49 years of age randomized 1710 participants in a 2:2:2:1 ratio to receive 1 of 3 lots of PCV20 or PCV13. Immunogenicity was assessed through serotype-specific opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) titers before and approximately 1 month (28–42 days) after vaccination. Reported local reactions within 10 days, systemic events within 7 days, adverse events (AEs) within 30 days, and serious AEs (SAEs) and newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions (NDCMCs) within 6 months after vaccination were evaluated. Equivalence in immune responses (OPA geometric mean titers) for all 20 vaccine serotypes was demonstrated across the 3 PCV20 lots. Robust responses, assessed by OPA geometric mean fold rises, percentage of participants achieving ≥4-fold rises, and percentage of participants with OPA titers ≥lower limit of quantitation, were observed after PCV20. Reported rates of local reactions, systemic events, and AEs were similar between the pooled PCV20 lots and PCV13; most events were mild or moderate. Reported rates of SAEs and NDCMCs were low and similar between the PCV20 and PCV13 groups. Three different lots of PCV20 demonstrated robust and consistent immunogenicity. The safety and tolerability of PCV20 was acceptable and similar to that of PCV13. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03828617).

•Study evaluated BNT162b2 booster given with PCV20 or separately in adults ≥65 years.•Safety profiles were acceptable in all groups.•Immune responses to BNT162b2 + PCV20 were similar to separate administration. Older adults are at increased risk of adverse outcomes from pneumococcal disease and COVID-19. Vaccination is an established strategy for preventing both illnesses. This study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of coadministration of the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) and a booster (third dose) of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicentre study included 570 participants aged ≥65 years randomized 1:1:1 to PCV20 and BNT162b2 coadministered, or PCV20 or BNT162b2 only (administered with saline for blinding). Primary safety endpoints included local reactions, systemic events, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). Secondary objectives were immunogenicity of PCV20 and BNT162b2 when administered together or separately. Coadministration of PCV20 and BNT162b2 was well tolerated. Local reactions and systemic events were generally mild-moderate; injection-site pain and fatigue were the most frequent local and systemic events, respectively. AE and SAE rates were low and similar across groups. No AEs led to discontinuation; no SAEs were considered vaccination-related. Robust immune responses were observed, with opsonophagocytic activity geometric mean fold rises (GMFRs; from baseline to 1 month) of 2.5–24.5 and 2.3–30.6 across PCV20 serotypes in Coadministration and PCV20-only groups, respectively. GMFRs for full-length S-binding IgG of 35.5 and 39.0, and for neutralizing titres against SARS-CoV-2-wild type virus of 58.8 and 65.4, were observed in the Coadministration and BNT162b2-only groups, respectively. Safety and immunogenicity of coadministered PCV20 and BNT162b2 were similar to those of PCV20 or BNT162b2 administered alone, suggesting that the 2 vaccines may be coadministered. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04887948.

•This study evaluated PCV20 given with QIV.•Adults ≥ 65 years of age received QIV and PCV20 at the same time or separately.•Immune response to coadministered QIV + PCV20 was noninferior to separate QIV/PCV20.•The PCV20 safety profile was acceptable and similar across groups. Older adults are at increased risk of adverse outcomes from pneumococcal disease and influenza infections. Vaccination is an established strategy for preventing both illnesses. This study evaluated coadministration of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) and an adjuvanted quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIV). This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study included 1796 US adults ≥ 65 years of age randomized 1:1 to receive either PCV20 and QIV followed 1 month later by saline (Coadministration group) or QIV and saline followed 1 month later by PCV20 (Separate Administration group). Primary immunogenicity objectives were to show noninferiority of PCV20 and QIV coadministration compared with separate administration of either vaccine based on serotype-specific opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) titers for PCV20 and strain-specific hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) titers for QIV. Safety endpoints included local reactions, systemic events, and adverse events (AEs). Noninferiority for pneumococcal and influenza antibody responses (lower bound 95 % CI of the OPA and HAI geometric mean ratios of > 0.5 and > 0.67, respectively) was shown for the Coadministration group compared with the Separate Administration group for all 20 pneumococcal serotypes and all 4 influenza vaccine strains. Local reactions and systemic events were mostly mild or moderate in severity across groups; injection site pain was the most frequent local reaction, and fatigue was the most frequent systemic event. Mild and moderate fatigue were reported more frequently after PCV20 and QIV coadministration compared with separate administration (mild, 20.0 % vs 10.8 %-12.6 %; moderate, 12.3 % vs 8.4 %-9.6 %); this was not considered clinically significant. AE reporting rates were similar across groups, and no serious AEs were considered vaccination-related. Immune responses after coadministration of PCV20 and QIV were noninferior to separate administration of either vaccine. The PCV20 safety profile was similar when given together with or after QIV. These findings support PCV20 and QIV coadministration. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04526574.

Background. From December 2013 through May 2014, physicians, dermatopathologists, and public health authorities collaborated to characterize an outbreak of Mycobacterium marinum and other nontuberculous mycobacterial skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) associated with handling fish in New York City's Chinatown. Clinicopathologic and laboratory investigations were performed on a series of patients. Methods. Medical records were reviewed for 29 patients. Culture results were available for 27 patients and 24 biopsy specimens were evaluated by histopathology, immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for acid-fast bacilli (AFB), and mycobacterial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. Results. All patients received antibiotics. The most commonly prescribed antibiotic regimen was clarithromycin and ethambutol. Of the 29 patients in this case series, 16 (55%) received surgical treatment involving incision and drainage, mass excision, and synovectomy. Of these, 7 (44%) had deep tissue involvement. All patients showed improvement. For those with culture results, 11 of 27 (41%) were positive for M. marinum; the remainder showed no growth. Poorly formed granulomas (96%), neutrophils (75%), and necrosis (79%) were found in 24 biopsies. Of 15 cases that were culture-negative and analyzed by other methods, 9 were PCR positive for M. marinum group species, 8 were IHC positive, and 3 were positive by AFB stains. Conclusions. A multidisciplinary approach was used to identify cases in an outbreak of M. marinum infections. The use of histopathology, culture, and IHC plus PCR from full thickness skin biopsy can lead to improved diagnosis of M. marinum SSTIs compared to relying solely on mycobacterial culture, the current gold standard.

Abstract Background Estimates of the cost of medically attended lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in adults, especially beyond the acute phase, is limited. This study was undertaken to estimate the attributable costs of RSV-LRTI among US adults during, and up to 1 year after, the acute phase of illness. Methods A retrospective observational matched-cohort design and a US healthcare claims repository (2016–2019) were employed. The study population comprised adults aged ≥18 years with RSV-LRTI requiring hospitalization (RSV-H), an emergency department visit (RSV-ED), or physician office/hospital outpatient visit (RSV-PO/HO), as well as matched comparison patients. All-cause healthcare expenditures were tallied during the acute phase of illness (RSV-H: from admission through 30 days postdischarge; ambulatory RSV: during the episode) and long-term phase (end of acute phase to end of following 1-year period). Results The study population included 4526 matched pairs of RSV-LRTI and comparison patients (RSV-H: n = 970; RSV-ED: n = 590; RSV-PO/HO: n = 2966). Mean acute-phase expenditures were $42 179 for RSV-H (vs $5154 for comparison patients), $4409 for RSV-ED (vs $377), and $922 for RSV-PO/HO (vs $201). By the end of the 1-year follow-up period, mean expenditures—including acute and long-term phases—were $101 532 for RSV-H (vs $36 302), $48 701 for RSV-ED (vs $27 131), and $28 851 for RSV-PO/HO (vs $20 523); overall RSV-LRTI attributable expenditures thus totaled $65 230, $21 570, and $8327, respectively. Conclusions The cost of RSV-LRTI requiring hospitalization or ambulatory care among US adults is substantial, and the economic impact of RSV-LTRI may extend well beyond the acute phase of illness. Study findings indicate that acute-care costs for lower respiratory tract illness due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV-LRTI) are high among US adults, and that attributable costs for RSV-LRTI remain high throughout the 1-year period following the acute phase of illness.