Explore the vast range of titles available.

IntroductionIn recent years, cannabis use among PTSD patients has become more common than ever. However, data available today regarding the effectiveness and safety of medical cannabis in PTSD treatment is limited, based on cross sectional studies, self-report surveys and a few clinical studies with small sample size.ObjectivesTo characterize patterns of use and adverse effects over time in patients with PTSD using medical cannabis in real life setting.MethodsData were acquired from the Israeli national database of all patients licensed to use medical cannabis from January 2014 to December 2021. A license for medical cannabis is given to patients with PTSD of at least moderate intensity after treatment failure of at least two drugs and two psychological interventions. Comparative statistics were used to evaluate patterns of use and adverse effects.Results12,977 patients were licensed to use medical cannabis in the study period for PTSD (8.2% of all users; 70% men) during the above-mentioned time period. PTSD was the 3rd most common indication after chronic pain and symptoms related to oncological disease and chemotherapy treatment. Over time, the relative increase in use of medical cannabis among PTSD patients was higher than that found in non-PTSD patients. In 2021 36.2% of all PTSD patients using medical cannabis had their license issued that year compared to 28.1% of all non-PTSD patients. PTSD patients were significantly younger compared to non-PTSD patients (40.9 years vs. 52.9 years). PTSD patients consume slightly higher monthly amount at the beginning of treatment compared to non-PTSD patients (32.1gr vs. 30.6gr) with higher Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration (15.2% vs. 12.9%) and lower Cannabidiol (CBD) concentration (4.7% vs. 6.0%). Over two years of use, amount, and composition of cannabis among the two groups were comparable and showed an increase in total amount and THC concentration, reaching the maximal available THC concentration of 20%. Data regarding adverse effects were available for 6,242 PTSD patients (48.1%) and 39,497 non-PTSD patients (26.6%). PTSD patients reported more physical adverse effects (RR 1.45 [95%CI 1.34-1.56]), anxiety (RR 1.47 [95%CI 1.13-1.92]), and derealization (RR 3.44 [95%CI 2.42-4.89]).ConclusionsPTSD is one of the leading indications for medical cannabis use in Israel, despite scarcity in good quality data supporting its effectiveness and safety. The increased risk of mental adverse effects among PTSD patients emphasizes the need for cautious use in cannabis in this population. Expanding the knowledge regarding patterns of use and risks in medical cannabis use among PTSD patients is important for understanding the role of cannabis in PTSD treatment and to ensure an effective and safe treatment.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

Introduction Cannabis use is associated with mental illness among men and women, especially induction or exacerbation of psychosis, anxiety, and depression. Although safety and efficacy of cannabis in most medical conditions have not been established, use of medical cannabis is growing exponentially. In particular, albeit sex-related differences in the activity of the endocannabinoid system in animals and humans, differential effects of cannabis on men and women have rarely been sought. Objectives To characterize patterns of use and adverse effects experienced by men and women using medical cannabis. Methods Data from the Israeli national database of patients licensed to use medical cannabis in Israel from January 2014 to December 2021 was analyzed. The database includes indications for cannabis use, monthly cannabis quantities, Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD) concentrations, and reports of adverse effects. Comparative statistics were used to evaluate the sex related differences. Results 161,644 persons (62% men) were issued a license to use medical cannabis during the study period. Men are significantly younger than women (50.5±19.1 vs. 56.5±18.4). The leading indications among both men and women are chronic pain (58% of men, 57% of women), symptoms related to oncological disease and chemotherapy treatment (21% of men, 24% of women) and post-traumatic stress disorder (9% of men, 6% of women). Men consume significantly higher monthly quantities at the beginning of treatment compared to women (31.6 gram vs. 29.3 gram) with a higher THC concentration (13.9% vs. 11.6%) and lower CBD concentration (5.3% vs. 6.7%). Over two years of use, there is an increase among both men and women in the amount and THC concentration, and a decrease in the CBD concentration. The differences between men and women remain significant throughout the whole period. Data on adverse effects are available for 28,629 men and 17,204 women (28.6% of men, 28.0% of women). Women report significantly more physical adverse effects (RR 1.48 [95%CI 1.39-1.57]), anxiety (RR 1.45 [95%CI 1.35-1.56]), depression (RR 1.36 [95%CI 0.95-1.96]) and derealization (RR 3.44 [95%CI 2.42-4.89]). Conclusions Although the prevalence of medical conditions for which medical cannabis is indicated are similar for both genders, approximately 60% more men consume medical cannabis. While consuming lower cannabis amount and THC concentration, women report more physical and psychiatric adverse effects than men. Understanding the differences in usage patterns and adverse effects between men and women will enable more accurate policy determinations and more effective and safer treatment strategies. Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

This study aimed to evaluate the utilization of medical cannabis in a pediatric population and compare short-term persistence rates with those in adolescents and young adults. In this retrospective, nationwide cohort study supplemented by data from an open-label study of children with ASD, patient cases under 12 years of age who received medical cannabis treatment between 2018 and 2022 were analyzed. The primary outcome assessed was treatment persistence within the first 3 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in THC ratios, amounts dispensed, and reasons for treatment discontinuation. The patient population consisted of 1,341 children using medical cannabis for ASD (751), epilepsy (330), Tourette syndrome (165), and pediatric cancer (95). Out of 3,007 consecutive medical cannabis sessions, the adjusted hazard ratio for discontinuation in the first 3 months was 0.83 (95% CI [0.71-0.96], p = 0.01) for young adults compared to children. Approximately 60%-70% of children discontinued therapy within the first 6 months. Significant alterations in THC ratios or dispensed amounts were observed in most sessions within the initial 6 months. In the open-label study dataset, most treatment discontinuations were primarily attributed to adverse effects and a perceived lack of therapeutic efficacy. Our findings suggest that short-term persistence of medical cannabis therapy is lower in children compared to adolescents and young adults. Moreover, many pediatric patients required adjustments to their THC ratios and showed a high frequency of treatment discontinuation. These observations underscore the importance of targeted strategies to improve medical cannabis treatment effectiveness and adherence in the pediatric population. Although MC may offer therapeutic benefits for pediatric patients, our findings emphasize the importance of careful patient selection and close medical follow-up to optimize clinical outcomes.