Explore the vast range of titles available.

The long-standing debate of whether patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) should proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) during first complete remission (CR1) remains unsettled. Although allogeneic HCT during CR1 used to be recommended for those with intermediate or poor cytogenetics if they had a matched sibling donor, the concept of indications for allogeneic HCT during CR1 has been evolving by virtue of advances in understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of AML and innovations in transplantation practice attained over the last few decades. The incorporation of molecular profiles of leukemia has been shown to contribute to further refinements of risk classification that had previously relied mostly on cytogenetics, while the progress in transplantation procedures has made it possible to perform transplantations more safely even for patients without a matched sibling donor. These significant changes have underpinned the need to reappraise indications for allogeneic HCT during CR1 of AML. Improvements in clinical applications of genetic and measurable residual disease information as well as in transplantation technology are expected to further refine indications for allogeneic HCT during CR1, and thus promote an individualized approach for the treatment of AML.

The advent of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) has significantly improved the outcomes of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL); nevertheless, a small fraction of patients still experience relapse. Due to the infrequency of APL relapse coupled with the rapid change in the therapeutic landscape, there are limited available data regarding the treatment of relapsed APL. In this situation, however, ATO-based therapy has been shown to result in high rates of hematological and molecular complete remission (CR). Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is considered the postremission therapy of choice when patients achieve molecular CR, whereas recent studies have suggested that molecular CR is not prerequisite for the success of autologous HCT. Allogeneic HCT can be reserved for selected patients, i.e., those who cannot achieve CR and those who relapse after autologous HCT, because of high toxicities and the expectation of highly favorable outcomes with autologous HCT during CR. For patients who are ineligible for HCT, prolonged administration of ATRA + ATO would be a viable option. To further refine the therapy for patients with relapsed APL, it is imperative to aggregate clinical data of patients who relapse after the ATRA + ATO frontline therapy within the framework of national and international collaboration.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) represents a valuable therapeutic option for younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Despite the rarity of this disease, significant research efforts have been undertaken to improve the outcomes, and autologous HCT is currently considered an established treatment for younger patients who respond to induction therapy. The past 20 years have seen further progress by incorporating rituximab and high-dose cytarabine into induction therapy and adopting rituximab as posttransplant maintenance therapy. Allogeneic HCT is generally reserved for relapsed/refractory patients because of concerns about high toxicities; however, a fraction of relapsed/refractory patients can be salvaged at the expense of high non-relapse mortality. Although significant advances have been attained over the past decades, MCL treatment still has room for improvement. A risk-adapted approach based on measurable residual disease and genetic information will promote therapeutic optimization and individualization. Moreover, the recent development of molecularly targeted drugs is expected to alter the therapeutic landscape, and the incorporation of novel drugs into the current treatment scheme is another key issue. These ongoing and future advances will change the role of HCT in MCL treatment and contribute to further improvements in outcomes.

Mutations in the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene are detected in approximately 30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The high frequency of FLT3 mutations, along with their adverse effect on prognosis, makes FLT3 a promising therapeutic target, and has spurred development of FLT3 inhibitors. First-generation inhibitors, including midostaurin and sorafenib, lack specificity for FLT3 and act on multiple kinases, whereas second-generation inhibitors, including gilteritinib, and quizartinib, are highly specific to FLT3 and are more potent than first-generation inhibitors. Several FLT3 inhibitors have recently gained regulatory approval worldwide, and several others are under development. The advent of FLT3 inhibitors has changed the standard treatment for FLT3-mutated AML in the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings and contributed to improved outcomes for this formidable AML subtype. However, numerous unresolved issues remain owing to rapid changes in practice. These include identification of optimum FLT3 inhibitors and combination therapies, the role of maintenance therapy, and the indication for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Furthermore, strategies to overcome resistance to FLT3 inhibitors must be pursued. Results of ongoing and future studies will improve our ability to use FLT3 inhibitors more effectively, which should provide significant benefits to a wider range of patients.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the most potent therapy for preventing relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although its efficacy is compromised by a high risk of treatment-related morbidity and mortality, an accumulating body of evidence has led to the general recommendation favoring allogeneic HCT from a matched sibling donor during first complete remission (CR1) for younger patients with cytogenetically intermediate- or high-risk AML. Over the past few decades, this field has seen a great many advancements. The indications for allogeneic HCT have been refined by taking into account the molecular profiles of leukemic cells and the degree of comorbidities. The introduction of high-resolution human leukocyte antigen-typing technology and advances in immunosuppressive therapy and supportive care measures have improved outcomes in alternative donor transplantation, while the parallel growth of unrelated donor registries and greater use of umbilical cord blood and haploidentical donors have considerably improved the chance of finding an alternative donor. The development of reduced-intensity and non-myeloablative conditioning has made it possible to receive allogeneic HCT for patients who might once have been considered ineligible due to advanced age or comorbidities. Thanks to these advances, the role of allogeneic HCT during CR1 has become progressively more important in the treatment of AML.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is predominantly a disease of older adults, with a median age at diagnosis of over 65 years. AML in older adults differs biologically and clinically from that in younger ones, and is characterized by stronger intrinsic resistance and lower tolerance to chemotherapy. The effects of age on both patient- and disease-related factors result in a higher incidence of early death during chemotherapy, a lower rate of complete remission, and a reduced chance of long-term survival. Treatment options for older adults with AML include intensive chemotherapy, less-intensive chemotherapy, best supportive care, or enrolment in clinical trials. Given the heterogeneous nature of AML in older adults, therapeutic decisions need to be individualized after systematic assessment of disease biology and patient characteristics. Regardless of treatment, however, outcomes for older AML patients remain in general unsatisfactory. In contrast with the progress made for younger adults, the treatment of AML in older adults has not improved significantly in recent decades. Development of less toxic and more targeted agents may well provide treatment alternatives for a majority of these patients. The overall dismal outcome with currently available treatment approaches has encouraged older AML patients to participate in prospective clinical trials.

Posttransplant relapse represents the greatest obstacle to the success of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study investigated clinical features and outcomes of posttransplant relapse of AML based on data for 1265 patients with AML suffering relapse after allogeneic HCT conducted during complete remission (CR). Relapse occurred at a median of 6.1 months. The incidence rate of relapse peaked at 29.0 per 100 patient-years during the first 3–6 months period post transplant, after which the rate declined over time, and after 3 years remained consistently at less than 1 per 100 patient-years. The probability of overall survival (OS) after posttransplant relapse was 19% at 2 years, with 68% of deaths being attributed to leukemia. The interval from transplantation to relapse was identified as the strongest indicator for OS. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and second allogeneic HCT (HCT2) were administered to 152 (12%) and 481 (38%) patients, respectively. Landmark analyses showed some signs of survival benefit when these procedures were performed during CR, but no benefit was gained when performed during non-CR. Our findings clarify clinical features of posttransplant relapse of AML, and indicate the urgent need for developing effective bridging to cellular therapies.

Cord blood transplantation (CBT) is an alternative donor transplantation method and has the advantages of rapid availability and the possibility of inducing a more potent graft-versus-leukemia effect, leading to a lower relapse rate for patients with non-remission relapse and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML). This study aimed to investigate the impact of CBT, compared to human leukocyte antigen-matched related donor transplantation (MRDT). This study included 2451 adult patients with non-remission R/R AML who received CBT (1738 patients) or MRDT (713 patients) between January 2009 and December 2018. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and the prognostic impact of CBT were evaluated using a propensity score (PS) matching analysis. After PS matching, the patient characteristics were well balanced between the groups. The five-year PFS was 25.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.2–29.5%) in the CBT group and 18.1% (95% CI: 14.5–22.0%) in the MRDT group (P = 0.009). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.69–1.00, P = 0.045); this was due to a more pronounced decrease in the relapse rate (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69–0.89, P < 0.001) than an increase in the NRM (1.42, 1.15–1.76, P = 0.001). In this population, CBT was associated with a better 5-year PFS than MRDT after allogeneic HSCT.

The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive system for predicting non-relapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) during first complete remission (CR) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). After dividing 2344 eligible patients randomly into a training set and a validation set, we first identified and scored five parameters, that is, age, sex, performance status, HCT-comorbidity index (HCT-CI), and donor type, on the basis of their impact on non-relapse mortality for patients in the training set. The non-relapse mortality-J (NRM-J) index using the sum of these scores was then applied to patients in the validation set, resulting in a clear differentiation of non-relapse mortality, with expected 2-year rates of 11%, 16%, 27%, and 33%, respectively (P < 0.001). The estimated c-statistic was 0.67, which was significantly higher than that of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation score (0.60, P = 0.002) and the HCT-CI (0.57, P < 0.001). The NRM-J index showed a significant association with overall survival, but not with relapse. Our findings demonstrate that the NRM-J index is useful for predicting post-transplant non-relapse mortality for patients with AML in first CR, for whom the decision of whether to perform allogeneic HCT is critical.

Next‐generation sequencing of AML has identified specific genetic mutations in AML patients. Hematologic Malignancies (HM)‐SCREEN‐Japan 01 is a multicenter study to detect actionable mutations using paraffin‐embedded bone marrow (BM) clot specimens rather than BM fluid in AML patients for whom standard treatment has not been established. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the presence of potentially therapeutic target gene mutations in patients with newly diagnosed unfit AML and relapsed/refractory AML (R/R‐AML) using BM clot specimens. In this study, 188 patients were enrolled and targeted sequencing was undertaken on DNA from 437 genes and RNA from 265 genes. High‐quality DNA and RNA were obtained using BM clot specimens, with genetic alterations successfully detected in 177 patients (97.3%), and fusion transcripts in 41 patients (23.2%). The median turnaround time was 13 days. In the detection of fusion genes, not only common fusion products such as RUNX1‐RUX1T1 and KMT2A rearrangements, but also NUP98 rearrangements and rare fusion genes were observed. Among 177 patients (72 with unfit AML, 105 with R/R‐AML), mutations in KIT and WT1 were independent factors for overall survival (hazard ratio = 12.6 and 8.88, respectively), and patients with high variant allele frequency (≥40%) of TP53 mutations had a poor prognosis. As for the detection of actionable mutations, 38% (n = 69) of patients had useful genetic mutation (FLT3‐ITD/TKD, IDH1/2, and DNMT3AR822) for treatment selection. Comprehensive genomic profiling using paraffin‐embedded BM clot specimens successfully identified leukemic‐associated genes that can be used as therapeutic targets. Comprehensive genomic profiling was undertaken using paraffin‐embedded bone marrow clot specimens. High accuracy mutation results (97.3%) and fusion transcripts (23.2%) in newly diagnosed unfit AML and relapsed/refractory AML were obtained.