Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abrams focuses on the five things to know about asthma and Covid-19. These include viruses commonly trigger asthma exacerbations, asthma exacerbation and COVID-19 are difficult to differentiate clinically, good asthma control can help prevent asthma exacerbations during the COVID-19 pandemic, nebulization should be avoided if possible, and oral steroids should still be used to treat asthma exacerbations.

Résumé Le présent point de pratique résume la mise à jour des lignes directrices de la Société canadienne de thoracologie publiée en 2021 sur le diagnostic et la prise en charge de l’asthme chez les enfants d’âge préscolaire, les enfants et les adultes. Ces nouvelles recommandations incluent, parmi les critères de contrôle de l’asthme, une diminution de la fréquence des symptômes diurnes et de l’utilisation de médicaments pour soulager l’asthme à un maximum de deux fois par semaine. Elles comprennent également l’évaluation du risque d’exacerbation de l’asthme, la non-utilisation de bêta-agonistes à courte durée d’action seuls au besoin chez les patients à plus fort risque d’exacerbation et la possibilité d’administrer du budésonide-formotérol au besoin aux jeunes de 12 ans ou plus qui sont incapables de prendre des corticostéroïdes inhalés au quotidien malgré une éducation sur l’asthme et un soutien importants. La préférence pour la prise quotidienne de corticostéroïdes inhalés afin de traiter l’asthme léger chez les enfants et la recommandation d’éviter les courts traitements intermittents de corticostéroïdes inhalés ne changent pas.

Asthma often starts before six years of age. However, there remains uncertainty as to when and how a preschool-age child with symptoms suggestive of asthma can be diagnosed with this condition. This delays treatment and contributes to both short- and long-term morbidity. Members of the Canadian Thoracic Society Asthma Clinical Assembly partnered with the Canadian Paediatric Society to develop a joint working group with the mandate to develop a position paper on the diagnosis and management of asthma in preschoolers. In the absence of lung function tests, the diagnosis of asthma should be considered in children one to five years of age with frequent (≥8 days/month) asthma-like symptoms or recurrent (≥2) exacerbations (episodes with asthma-like signs). The diagnosis requires the objective document of signs or convincing parent-reported symptoms of airflow obstruction (improvement in these signs or symptoms with asthma therapy), and no clinical suspicion of an alternative diagnosis. The characteristic feature of airflow obstruction is wheezing, commonly accompanied by difficulty breathing and cough. Reversibility with asthma medications is defined as direct observation of improvement with short-acting ß 2 -agonists (SABA) (with or without oral corticosteroids) by a trained health care practitioner during an acute exacerbation (preferred method). However, in children with no wheezing (or other signs of airflow obstruction) on presentation, reversibility may be determined by convincing parental report of a symptomatic response to a three-month therapeutic trial of a medium dose of inhaled corticosteroids with as-needed SABA (alternative method), or as-needed SABA alone (weaker alternative method). The authors provide key messages regarding in whom to consider the diagnosis, terms to be abandoned, when to refer to an asthma specialist and the initial management strategy. Finally, dissemination plans and priority areas for research are identified.

Background. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has impacted healthcare services and outcomes. We aimed to investigate healthcare resource utilization and early health outcomes of infants born to mothers with perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods. The study included all infants born alive between February 1, 2020, and April 30, 2021, in British Columbia. We used linked provincial population-based databases including data on COVID-19 testing, birth, and health information for up to one year from birth. Perinatal COVID-19 exposure for infants was defined being born to mothers with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy or at delivery. Cases of COVID-19-exposed infants were matched with up to four non‐exposed infants by birth month, sex, birthplace, and gestational age in weeks. Outcomes included hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and in-/outpatient diagnoses. Outcomes were compared between groups using conditional logistic regression and linear mixed effects models including effect modification by maternal residence. Results. Among 52,711 live births, 484 infants had perinatal exposure to SARS-CoV-2, an incidence rate of 9.18 per 1000 live births. Exposed infants (54.6% male) had a mean gestational age of 38.5 weeks, and 99% were born in hospital. Proportions of infants requiring at least one hospitalization (8.1% vs. 5.1%) and at least one emergency department visit (16.9% vs. 12.9%) were higher among the exposed vs. unexposed infants, respectively. Among infants from the urban area, those with exposure were more likely to have respiratory infectious diseases (odds ratio: 1.74; 95% confidence intervals: 1.07, 2.84), compared with those without exposure. Interpretation. In our cohort, infants born to mothers with SARS-CoV-2 infection have increased healthcare demands in their early infancy, which warrants further investigation.

IntroductionVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among neonates requiring life-saving mechanical ventilation in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), particularly those who are born prematurely and/or with very-low-birth-weight (VLBW), or critically ill. Despite its clinical significance, neonatal VAP lacks standardised diagnostic criteria, resulting in variability in incidence reporting, over or under diagnosis and inappropriate antimicrobial use which further exacerbates the emergence of antibiotic-resistant organisms. Current diagnostic criteria and prevention strategies, often adapted from paediatric populations and adults, fail to address the unique anatomical and clinical characteristics of neonates. Building on a pilot investigation across Canadian NICUs, the goal of this study is to establish standardised, neonatal-specific VAP diagnostic criteria and prevention strategies to improve diagnostic accuracy, promote antimicrobial stewardship and enhance clinical outcomes.Methods and analysisBeginning in 2025, a 4-year, multicentre, prospectively-designed retrospective cohort study will be conducted across tertiary NICUs in Canada. All VLBW (birth weight <1500 g) neonates admitted to participating NICUs will be included. Our first aim is to use the Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) platform, integrated with advanced data screening tools, to collect standardised demographic, clinical, ventilatory and microbiological data to assess VAP incidence and outcomes based on existing definitions. Next, we will develop a neonatal-specific VAP diagnostic criteria, by combining statistical analyses, including univariate analysis, multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses, with expert consensus building through the Delphi method. Concurrently, we will focus on implementing evidence-based VAP prevention strategies and evaluate outcome measures, such as VAP incidence, adherence to prevention bundles and antimicrobial stewardship practices.Ethics and disseminationThis study has received ethics approval from the University of Alberta Health Research Ethics Board-Health Panel (Pro00149177). Findings will be disseminated through open-access publications, conference presentations and online platforms to promote widespread adoption.Trial registration numberNCT07109791.

Several placebo-controlled trials have been recently published evaluating novel therapies targeting the defective CFTR protein. This systematic review examines the clinical efficacy and safety of CFTR modulators in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) with specific genetic mutations. Online sources were searched for placebo-controlled, parallel-design clinical trials investigating CFTR modulators from January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2018. The primary outcome of interest was FEV 1 % predicted (ppFEV 1 ). Fourteen RCTs met our eligibility criteria. The largest improvement in ppFEV 1 favouring treatment was observed for ivacaftor (IVA) in G551D individuals (≥6 years old). Both tezacaftor-ivacaftor (TEZ-IVA) and lumacaftor-ivacaftor (LUM-IVA) also improved ppFEV 1 in F508del homozygous individuals but there was increased reporting of respiratory adverse events with LUM-IVA compared to placebo. IVA also significantly improved ppFEV 1 in a sub-group of individuals ≥18 years old with an R117H mutation. No significant improvements in ppFEV 1 were observed for IVA, LUM, or TEZ in F508del homozygous individuals, LUM or LUM-IVA in F508del heterozygous individuals, or ataluren in individuals with a nonsense mutation. Significant improvements in ppFEV 1 and other clinical outcomes were observed for IVA in G551D individuals, TEV-IVA and LUM-IVA in F508del homozygous individuals, and IVA in adults with a R117H mutation.

Background Childhood asthma prevalence is widely measured by parental proxy report of physician-diagnosed asthma in questionnaires. Our objective was to validate this measure in a North American population. Methods The 2884 study participants were a subsample of 5619 school children aged 5 to 9 years from 231 schools participating in the Toronto Child Health Evaluation Questionnaire study in 2006. We compared agreement between \"questionnaire diagnosis\" and a previously validated \"health claims data diagnosis\". Sensitivity, specificity and kappa were calculated for the questionnaire diagnosis using the health claims diagnosis as the reference standard. Results Prevalence of asthma was 15.7% by questionnaire and 21.4% by health claims data. Questionnaire diagnosis was insensitive (59.0%) but specific (95.9%) for asthma. When children with asthma-related symptoms were excluded, the sensitivity increased (83.6%), and specificity remained high (93.6%). Conclusions Our results show that parental report of asthma by questionnaire has low sensitivity but high specificity as an asthma prevalence measure. In addition, children with \"asthma-related symptoms\" may represent a large fraction of under-diagnosed asthma and they should be excluded from the inception cohort for risk factor studies.

Background A randomized controlled trial of adults with empyema recently demonstrated decreased length of stay in hospital in patients treated with intrapleurally administered dornase alfa and fibrinolytics compared to fibrinolytics alone. Whether this treatment strategy is safe and effective in children remains unknown. Methods/design This study protocol is for a superiority, placebo-controlled, parallel-design, multicenter randomized controlled trial. The participants are previously well children admitted to a children’s hospital with a diagnosis of empyema requiring chest tube insertion and fibrinolytics administered intrapleurally. Children will be randomized after the treating physician has decided that pleural drainage is required but prior to chest tube insertion. After chest tube insertion, participants in the treatment group will receive intrapleurally administered tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) 4 mg followed by dornase alfa 5 mg. Participants in the placebo group will receive tPA 4 mg followed by normal saline. Study treatments will be administered once daily for 3 days. All participants, parents or caregivers, clinicians, and research personnel will remain blinded. The primary outcome is length of stay from chest tube insertion to discharge from hospital. Secondary outcomes include time to meeting discharge criteria, chest tube duration, fever duration, need for additional procedures, adverse events, hospital readmission, cost of hospitalization, and mortality. Discussion This multicenter randomized controlled trial will assess the safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of combined treatment with dornase alfa and fibrinolytics compared to fibrinolytics alone for the treatment of empyema in children. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01717742 . Registered on 8 October 2012.