Explore the vast range of titles available.

Summary Introduction Intestinal injury and bleeding, which usually occurs while taking the graft through the transperitoneal tunnel, is one of the most important complications of aortobifemoral bypass surgery. In this study, case reports were examined where, for some reason, the tunneller instrument could not be used to create the transperitoneal tunnel and the tunnelling forceps was used. In some of these cases, the grafts were taken through conventionally and in others an alternative method was used. Methods Between 2002 and 2013, the records of 81 patients treated surgically by aortobifemoral bypass for peripheral arterial disease, were investigated retrospectively. In the conventional method, after creating a tunnel with tunnelling forceps, the forceps was re-introduced into the tunnel and the graft was clasped and brought through the tunnel. In the alternative method, a nylon tape was left as a guide in the tunnel while creating the tunnel, and the forceps was not introduced again. The graft was taken through the tunnel with the help of the nylon tape. Patients treated with the conventional method were included in group 1 (n = 49) and patients in which the graft was guided with nylon tape were included in group 2 (n = 32). The groups were compared peri-operatively. Results There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of co-morbidity factors. Extubation time, intensive care length of stay, revision for bleeding, other postoperative complications, and infection and late-term infection rates were similar in the two groups (p > 0.05). Hospital length of stay and blood usage were significantly higher in group 1 (p < 0.05). Drainage amounts were higher in group 1 but not statistically significant. Conclusion Using nylon tape to introduce the graft into the femoral area during aortobifemoral bypass operations was found to be more effective than using the tunnelling forceps.

Atrial septal defect (ASD) transcatheter occlusion techniques are now established as the preferred method and have become an alternative to surgery under extracorporeal circulation. In this study, we aimed to present our emergency surgical approach to cases of device embolization due to migration of the atrial septal defect occluder. Between June 2009 and June 2011, 6 patients underwent emergency operations due to device emboli secondary to migration of the transcatheter atrial septal defect occluder during the early period. Mean age was 25.5 years (15-45) and 3 of the patients were female (50%). The diagnosis was made via transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) preoperatively. All of these 6 patients underwent emergency operations. Mean postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 2.2 days and mean hospital stay was 6 days. No early or late postoperative mortality was seen. Mean postoperative follow-up time was 19.3 months (range: 5-28 months). Early- and late-period TTE examinations showed no residual interatrial shunting. One patient developed a right atrial thrombus in the postoperative 22(nd) month as a complication of long-term follow-up. He was treated with anticoagulant therapy for 6 months with complete resolution at the TTE. Transcatheter occlusion of secundum type ASD provides prominent clinical improvement, as well as a regression in dimensions of cardiac chambers. Nevertheless, this technique has drawbacks such as distal migration and residual shunts. Consequently, we think that unfavorable anatomy and device diameter are major issues in device migration. Oversizing also increases the migration risk.