Explore the vast range of titles available.

Dyslipidemia and hypertension increase the risk for cardiovascular disease. Combination therapy improves patient compliance. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the combination therapies telmisartan/amlodipine + rosuvastatin, telmisartan/amlodipine, and telmisartan + rosuvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. In this Phase III, multicenter, 8-week randomized, double-blind study, participants with hypertension and dyslipidemia (defined as a sitting systolic blood pressure [sitSBP] of ≥140 mm Hg, a low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [LDL-C] level of ≤250 mg/dL, and a triglyceride level of ≤400 mg/dL) were screened. After a 4-week washout/run-in period involving therapeutic lifestyle changes and telmisartan 80 mg once a day, eligible patients had a sitSBP of ≥140 mm Hg and met the LDL-C level criteria according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III cardiovascular disease risk category. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: (1) telmisartan/amlodipine 80/10 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg (TAR group); (2) telmisartan/amlodipine 80/10 mg (TA group); or (3) telmisartan 80 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg (TR group). The primary efficacy end points were the percentage changes from baseline in LDL-C in the TAR and TA groups and the mean changes in sitSBP in the TAR and TR groups at week 8 compared to baseline. Continuous variables were compared using the unpaired t test or the Wilcoxon rank sum model, and categorical variables were compared using the χ2 or Fisher exact test. Tolerability was assessed based on adverse events found on physical examination including vital sign measurements, laboratory evaluations, and 12-lead ECG. A total of 134 patients were enrolled. The least squares mean percentage changes in LDL-C at 8 weeks after administration of the drug compared to baseline were −51.9% (3.0%) in the TAR group and −3.2% (2.9%) in the TA group (P < 0.001). At 8 weeks after baseline, the least squares mean (SE) changes sitSBP were −28.3 (2.4) mm Hg in the TAR group and −10.7 (2.1) mm Hg in the TR group (P < 0.001). The prevalence rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were 15.0%, 25.0%, and 12.2% in the TAR, TA, and TR groups, respectively; those of adverse drug reactions were 15.0%, 22.7%, and 10.2%. None of the differences in rates were significant among 3 groups. Triple therapy with TAR can be an effective treatment in patients with dyslipidemia and hypertension. The TAR combination has value for hypertensive patients with hyperlipidemia in terms of convenience, tolerability, and efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03566316.

Objective: We aimed to assess the ideal cut-off value of minimal lumen area (MLA) by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and its diagnostic performance to predict ischemia, using a large-scale, pooled analysis. Methods: Eleven centers worldwide were invited to provide their clinical, IVUS and fractional flow reserve (FFR) data. A total of 881 lesions were enrolled. Results: Angiographic % diameter stenosis (r = -0.373, p < 0.0001) and IVUS MLA (r = 0.289, p < 0.0001) correlated with FFR. Best cut-off value (BCV) of IVUS MLA to define the functional significance (FFR <0.8) was 2.75 mm 2 (AUC 0.646, 95% CI 0.609-0.684). When the diagnostic performance of IVUS MLA was tested according to the lesion location, BCV could be found only in lesions in the proximal artery and the mid-left anterior descending artery. Interestingly, Asians (n = 623) and Westerners (n = 258) showed different demographic and lesion characteristics as well as different BCVs to define ischemia. The BCV for the proximal/mid-left anterior descending artery lesions was 2.75 mm 2 (AUC 0.688, 95% CI 0.635-0.742) in Asians and 3.0 mm 2 (AUC 0.695, 95% CI 0.605-0.786) in Westerners. Conclusion: In this pooled analysis, an IVUS MLA of 2.75 mm 2 was the BCV to define the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenosis. However, when IVUS MLA is used to determine the functional significance, both the lesion and patient characteristics should be considered.

Background: The reduction in plasma LDL-C concentrations with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy has been reported to reduce cardiovascular risk and mortality in individuals with or without preexisting coronary artery disease and elevated LDL-C concentrations. Atorvastatin is a statin used for lowering LDL-C concentrations. A generic formulation of atorvastatin is being developed in Korea. This study was undertaken for the purposes of marketing the generic formulation. Objective: This study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a generic formulation of atorvastatin 20 mg/d versus a branded formulation at the same dosage in hypercholesterolemic Korean adults at high risk for cardiovascular events. Methods: This 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study was conducted at 10 clinical centers in Korea between September 2008 and May 2009. Male and female patients aged 20 to 85 years at high risk for cardiovascular events (defined as an elevated LDL-C concentration [≥100 mg/dL]) were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive generic or branded atorvastatin 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage change from baseline to 8 weeks in LDL-C concentration. Secondary end points were the percentage changes from baseline in total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), HDL-C, apolipoprotein (apo) A1 and B, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations; small, dense LDL (sdLDL) fraction; and tolerability. Tolerability was assessed using physical examination, laboratory testing, and by recording adverse events (AEs) at each visit. An additional secondary end point was the proportion of patients who achieved an LDL-C goal of <100 mg/dL. Results: A total of 244 patients were randomized to treatment, and 33 patients were withdrawn from the study (9 patients did not receive the study medication, 11 patients due to AEs, and 13 patients due to withdrawal of consent). A total of 211 patients completed the study (50.7% male; 100% Asian; mean [SD] age, 61.7 [9.2] years) (106 patients in the group that received Accepted for publication October 5, 2010. the generic formulation and 105 patients in the group that received the branded formulation). LDL-C concentrations were reduced from the baseline by 44% and 46% after 8 weeks of treatment with the generic and branded formulations, respectively ( P = NS). The percentage changes from baseline to study end in HDL-C, TC, TG, apo A1, apo B, and hsCRP concentrations and sdLDL fraction the proportions of patients who achieved the LDL-C goal between the 2 groups did not reach statistical significance. The most commonly reported events were hepatobiliary laboratory abnormality (1.7%), general somatic discomfort (1.7%), and epigastric pain (0.8%) in the group that received the generic formulation, and myalgia (1.7%), epigastric pain (0.9%), and elevation of creatinine phosphokinase (0.9%) in the group that received the branded formulation. No serious AEs were reported in either group. Conclusions: After 8 weeks of treatment, the differences in the LDL-C-lowering effects between the generic and branded formulations of atorvastatin 20 mg/d did not reach statistical significance in these Korean patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. Both formulations were generally well tolerated.

A fixed-dose combination of a stain and an antihypertensive drug may be useful for the treatment of patients with hypertension and hyperlipidemia. It may also improve patient drug compliance to help control risk factors of cardiovascular disease. This study was designed to evaluate the blood pressure–lowering and cholesterol-lowering effect of a fixed-dose combination of irbesartan-atorvastatin compared with monotherapy by either agent over an 8-week treatment period. Patients with comorbid hypertension and hypercholesterolemia were screened for this randomized, double-blind, Phase III study. Eligible study patients were randomly assigned to test groups receiving a combination of irbesartan 300 mg and atorvastatin 40 mg or 80 mg (IRB300 + ATO40 and IRB300 + ATO80). Comparator groups comprised monotherapy groups with irbesartan 300 mg (IRB300) or atorvastatin 40 mg (ATO40) or atorvastatin 80 mg (ATO80), or placebo. Patients who were eligible at screening were subjected to a 4- to 6-week washout period before commencing 8 weeks of therapy per their assigned group. The primary efficacy end points were percent change in LDL-C and sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels from baseline to end of therapy. Tolerability profiles of combination therapy were compared with other groups. A total of 733 patients with comorbid hypertension and hypercholesterolemia were screened for this study; 230 eligible patients were randomized to treatment. The mean age of patients was 58.9 (8.5) years, and their mean body mass index was 25.8 (3.2) kg/m2. More than two thirds (70.9%) of the study patients were male. Mean LDL-C and sitting DBP levels at baseline were 149.54 (29.19) mg/dL and 92.32 (6.03) mm Hg, respectively. Percent reductions in LDL-C after 8 weeks were 46.74% (2.06%) in the IRB300 + ATO40 group and 48.98% (2.12%) in the IRB300 + ATO80 group; these values were 47.13% (3.21%) and 48.30% (2.98%) in the ATO40 and ATO80 comparator groups. Similarly, a reduction in sitting DBP after 8 weeks was –8.50 (1.06) mm Hg in the IRB300 + ATO40 group and 10.66 (1.08) mm Hg in the IRB300 + ATO80 group compared with 8.40 (1.65) mm Hg in the IRB300 group. The incidence rate for treatment-emergent adverse events was 22.27% and was similar between the monotherapy and combination groups. A once-daily combination product of irbesartan and atorvastatin provided an effective, safe, and more compliable treatment for patients with coexisting hypertension and hyperlipidemia. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01442987.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant risk factor for both ischemic and bleeding complications following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Optimizing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is essential for improving clinical outcomes. To evaluate whether an 11-month, unguided deescalation strategy from ticagrelor to clopidogrel was associated with reduced bleeding without an increase in ischemic events in stabilized patients with CKD after AMI. This was a post hoc secondary analysis of the multicenter, open-label, Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in Stabilized Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction (TALOS-AMI) randomized clinical trial conducted at 32 major cardiac centers in South Korea. Patients with biomarker-positive AMI who tolerated 1 month of ticagrelor-based DAPT after PCI were included in the trial. Patient enrollment occurred from February 2014 to December 2018, with follow-up at 30 days and 3, 6, and 12 months after PCI. The present analysis focused on the subgroup of patients with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]<60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Data analyses were performed from July 2023 to October 2024. In the TALOS-AMI trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to continue ticagrelor (active control group) or switch to clopidogrel (deescalation group) for 11 months after PCI. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, and bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] types 2, 3, or 5). Of 2646 patients included in the trial, 305 had CKD (11.5%; mean [SD] age, 67.2 [11.4] years; 223 males [73.1%]; mean [SD] eGFR, 49.7 [9.5] mL/min/1.73 m2) and 2341 did not have CKD (1975 male [84.4%]; mean [SD] age, 59.0 [11.0] years). Patients with CKD had an increased risk of ischemic events compared with patients without CKD (hazard ratio [HR], 2.47; 95% CI, 1.38-4.42; P = .002), but there was no difference in bleeding risk (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.80-2.31; P = .26). Among patients with CKD, deescalation (n = 160) vs active control (n = 145) was associated with reduced risks of the primary end point (10 patients [6.2%] vs 19 [13.1%]; HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.21-0.98]; P = .04) and BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding (4 patients [2.5%] vs 12 [8.3%]; HR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.09-0.89]; P = .03). No increased risk of ischemic events was observed following deescalation (7 patients [4.4%] vs 8 [5.5%]; HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.28-2.16]; P = .64). In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, deescalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel at 1 month after PCI for AMI was associated with significant reduction in bleeding without increased risk of ischemic events among study-eligible patients with CKD. Further adequately powered studies are needed to validate these findings.

The grade the student intends to earn in the course, and intention to take the CPA or the CMA exam are strong motivating factors for the students to perform well in the Graduate Managerial Accounting (GMA) course. The number of work hours, job type, and course load do not have any negative effect on student performance. Communication skills are significantly associated with student performance. The grade in the Accounting for Managers course and overall GPA are strong predictors of student performance in the GMA course. Neither age nor gender has any effect on student performance. Finally, the undergraduate major has a significant effect on student performance with the undergraduate accounting major taking the first place in leading to the best performance, followed by finance, other non-business major (surprisingly), with management and marketing tied for fourth place.

The potential benefits of P2Y12 inhibitor deescalation for acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention may be influenced by body mass index (BMI). To investigate the association of BMI on deescalation outcomes after 12 months in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention who were initially treated with aspirin plus ticagrelor for 1 month, and to assess whether BMI-based switching from aspirin plus ticagrelor (active control strategy) to aspirin plus clopidogrel (deescalation strategy) is associated with individualized benefits. This study is a post hoc analysis, based on BMI, of data from the TALOS-AMI (Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in Stabilized Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction) randomized clinical trial. Data were collected from February 14, 2014, to December 31, 2018, with follow-up to January 21, 2021. Analyses were conducted from December 1, 2021, to August 21, 2024. Among 2697 trial participants from 32 centers in South Korea, 2686 participants whose BMI data were available were included. All patients received aspirin plus ticagrelor for 1 month after percutaneous coronary intervention. Stabilized patients were then randomized to either the active control or deescalation strategy for an additional 11 months. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding type 2, 3, or 5 at 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention. The trial compared the active control and deescalation strategies according to BMIs, including an interaction test. Of the 2686 patients included (mean [SD] age, 60.0 [11.4] years; 2234 [83.2%] male), 2344 (1161 in the deescalation group and 1183 in the active control group) had a BMI less than 28, and 342 (184 in the deescalation group and 158 in the active control group) had a BMI of 28 or greater. The deescalation strategy was associated with significantly reduced composite outcomes compared with the active control strategy in the group with a BMI less than 28 (53 [4.6%] vs 98 [8.3%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.76; P < .001), primarily due to fewer bleeding complications. There was no association in the group with a BMI of 28 or greater (6 [3.3%] vs 5 [3.2%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.33-3.50; P = .91). In this post hoc analysis of the TALOS-AMI randomized clinical trial, in stabilized patients with acute myocardial infarction, an unguided deescalation strategy of switching from ticagrelor to clopidogrel after 1 month was associated with better clinical outcomes in those with lower BMIs. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02018055.

This study aims at developing the innovative partially concrete-filled composite beam, which can effectively resist the end negative and central positive moment, and also at reducing the deflection of beam. Through case studies on the loading of concentrated and uniformly distributed loads to fixed beam, we could identify the most efficient ratio of the moments of inertia and that of a (end beam length-to-span ratio). The space between the center and end of the beam can be used for the installation of facilities. Consequently, the proposed Omega beam (OMB) system is expected to achieve reduction in story height and quantity of materials used. The test is carried out to investigate the flexural behavior of the composite behavior of the suggested OMB system.

The grade the student intends to earn in the course, intention to take the CPA or the CMA exam, and intention to attend graduate school are strong motivating factors for the students to perform well in the Cost Accounting II course. The number of work hours, job type, and course load do not have any negative effect on student performance. On the contrary, students carrying higher course loads perform significantly better than students carrying lower course loads. Lastly, Cost accounting I grade and overall GPA are strong predictors of student performance in the Cost Accounting II course.