Explore the vast range of titles available.

Functional drug actions refer to drug-affected GO terms. They aid in the investigation of drug effects that are therapeutic or adverse. Previous studies have utilized the linkage information between drugs and functions in molecular level biological networks. Since the current knowledge of molecular level mechanisms of biological functions is still limited, such previous studies were incomplete. We expected that the multi-level biological networks would allow us to more completely investigate the functional drug actions. We constructed multi-level biological networks with genes, GO terms, and diseases. Meta-paths were utilized to extract the features of each GO term. We trained 39 SVM models to prioritize the functional drug actions of the various 39 drugs. Through the multi-level networks, more functional drug actions were utilized for the 39 models and inferred by the models. Multi-level based features improved the performance of the models, and the average AUROC value in the cross-validation was 0.86. Moreover, 60% of the candidates were true.

In silico network-based methods have shown promising results in the field of drug development. Yet, most of networks used in the previous research have not included context information even though biological associations actually do appear in the specific contexts. Here, we reconstruct an anatomical context-specific network by assigning contexts to biological associations using protein expression data and scientific literature. Furthermore, we employ the context-specific network for the analysis of drug effects with a proximity measure between drug targets and diseases. Distinct from previous context-specific networks, intercellular associations and phenomic level entities such as biological processes are included in our network to represent the human body. It is observed that performances in inferring drug-disease associations are increased by adding context information and phenomic level entities. In particular, hypertension, a disease related to multiple organs and associated with several phenomic level entities, is analyzed in detail to investigate how our network facilitates the inference of drug-disease associations. Our results indicate that the inclusion of context information, intercellular associations, and phenomic level entities can contribute towards a better prediction of drug-disease associations and provide detailed insight into understanding of how drugs affect diseases in the human body.

Biomarkers prognostic for colorectal cancer (CRC) would be highly desirable in clinical practice. Proteins that regulate bile acid (BA) homeostasis, by linking metabolic sensors and metabolic enzymes, also called bridge proteins, may be reliable prognostic biomarkers for CRC. Based on a devised metric, \"bridgeness,\" we identified bridge proteins involved in the regulation of BA homeostasis and identified their prognostic potentials. The expression patterns of these bridge proteins could distinguish between normal and diseased tissues, suggesting that these proteins are associated with CRC pathogenesis. Using a supervised classification system, we found that these bridge proteins were reproducibly prognostic, with high prognostic ability compared to other known markers.

A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has been fixed in the paper.A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has been fixed in the paper.

A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML version of this paper. The error has been fixed in the paper.A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML version of this paper. The error has been fixed in the paper.

Background Interactions between biological entities such as genes, proteins and metabolites, so called pathways, are key features to understand molecular mechanisms of life. As pathway information is being accumulated rapidly through various knowledge resources, there are growing interests in maintaining the integrity of the heterogeneous databases. Methods Here, we defined conflict as a status where two contradictory pieces of evidence (i.e. 'A increases B' and 'A decreases B') coexist in a same pathway. This conflict damages unity so that inference of simulation on the integrated pathway network might be unreliable. We defined rule and rule group. A rule consists of interaction of two entities, meta-relation (increase or decrease), and contexts terms about tissue specificity or environmental conditions. The rules, which have the same interaction, are grouped into a rule group. If the rules don't have a unanimous meta-relation, the rule group and the rules are judged as being conflicting. Results This analysis revealed that almost 20% of known interactions suffer from conflicting information and conflicting information occurred much more frequently in the literature than the public database. With consideration for dual functions depending on context, we thought it might resolve conflict to consider context. We grouped rules, which have the same context terms as well as interaction. It's revealed that up to 86% of the conflicts could be resolved by considering context. Subsequent analysis also showed that those contradictory records generally compete each other closely, but some information might be suspicious when their evidence levels are seriously imbalanced. Conclusions By identifying and resolving the conflicts, we expect that pathway databases can be cleaned and used for better secondary analyses such as gene/protein annotation, network dynamics and qualitative/quantitative simulation.