Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
2 result(s) for "Yost, Jenifer L."
Sort by:
Evaluating Intra-Field Spatial Variability for Nutrient Management Zone Delineation through Geospatial Techniques and Multivariate Analysis
This research study underscores the importance of effectively managing soil nutrients in a site-specific manner to enhance crop productivity while considering the spatial variability of the soil. The objective is to identify subfields with similar soil characteristics, referred to as management zones (MZs), to promote sustainable land utilization. This study was conducted in two central pivot fields located in Southern Idaho, USA, where barley and sugar beets were grown. Soil samples were collected from each field in a grid pattern and analyzed for various chemical properties. These properties included soil pH, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, excess lime, electrical conductivity, total inorganic nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, iron, manganese, copper, and boron. Descriptive statistics and normality assessments were performed, and the coefficient of variation was calculated to assess the heterogeneity of soil properties, revealing significant variability. To determine the spatial variability of soil properties, ordinary kriging was used revealing diverse spatial patterns for each location and soil variable examined with moderate to strong spatial dependence. To develop the MZs, a combination of principal component analysis and fuzzy k-means clustering was utilized, and specific parameters that represented the overall variability of soil properties in each field were identified. Based on the identified parameters, two clusters were created in each field. The first management zone (MZ1) exhibited lower values of soil pH, excess lime content, and electrical conductivity compared to the MZ2. Consequently, higher crop productivity was observed in MZ1 in both fields. The biomass yields of barley and sugar beets in MZ1 surpassed those in MZ2. This study highlights the effectiveness of the methodology employed to delineate MZs, which can be instrumental in precise soil nutrient management and maximizing crop productivity.
How deep is the soil studied – an analysis of four soil science journals
Background and aims Soil depth is a critical attribute of any soil, and determines rooting, moisture and nutrient storage, mineral reserve, anchorage, and a range of conditions that affect plant growth. We reviewed papers from four primary soil science journals and extracted how deep the soils were studied in those papers. Methods Soil depth was obtained over a 30-years period (1989–2019) from papers in: European Journal of Soil Science , Geoderma, Plant and Soil , and Soil Biology and Biochemistry . In total, 1146 papers were reviewed, and 37% (420 papers) included information on how deep the soil was studied. Results The number of papers that included soil depth increased from 31% in 1989 to 47% in 2019. The average soil depth studied was 27 cm, but it was 53 cm between 1989 and 1999, and 24 cm between 2004 and 2019. Most of the studies were from Europe, and 41% of the papers contained soil classification. Research that focused on soil mineralogy and technology tended to study soils to a greater depth (average 74 cm), whereas the depth in soil biology research was on average 18 cm. Over 80% of the soils were sampled by fixed depth and not by soil horizon. Conclusions Soil depth is lacking from about half of the papers in these four journals. The depth of the soil studied has halved in the past 30 years. Soil processes, soil properties, and microbial communities are depth-dependent, and for a more complete understanding, soils should be studied to a greater depth.