Explore the vast range of titles available.

Carotid near occlusion (CNO) treatment is still controversial. In the discussion of surgical revascularization of these patients, periprocedural complications and technical failure should be considered in addition to the long-term results. We examined the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment in CNO and non-CNO patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Data from 152 patients (118 male and 34 female) who underwent isolated CEA between January 2018 and June 2020 without critical contralateral lesions were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: CNO (n = 52) and non-CNO (n = 100). The groups were compared regarding postoperative transient ischemic attack (TIA), ipsilateral ischemic stroke, and mortality. The success rate of the procedure was 100% in the CNO group and 99% in the Non-CNO group. In the Non-CNO group, 1 patient had ipsilateral ischemic stroke on postoperative day 0, and this patient was treated with carotid artery stenting. While the number of patients who died in the non-CNO group was 3 (3%) overall, the exitus rate was 1 (1.9%) in the CNO group (P >.05). In the CNO group, retinal TIA was observed in 1 patient (1.9%), ischemic stroke in 2 patients (3.8%), and TIA in 1 patient (1.9%). In the non-CNO group; Retinal TIA was observed in 1 patient (1.0%), ischemic stroke in 2 patients (2.0%), and TIA in 2 patients (2.0%). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of postoperative neurologic complications and primary endpoints at 12-month follow-up (P >.05). Carotid endarterectomy is a safe, feasible, and advantageous procedure in selected CNO patients, as in non-CNO carotid artery patients. Therefore, we recommend a surgical approach to prevent neurological events in CNO patients.

Background: Inflow occlusion on beating heart and cardiopulmonary bypass techniques have been proposed for the removal of foreign material, such as stents, catheters and mass lesions, from cardiac chambers. However, both techniques are not devoid of disadvantages and complications. In this article, we define an alternative, novel 'double-hole' technique, which is based on opening the right atrium without cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: Bovine hearts were obtained from a local supermarket. Two purse-string sutures were placed in the right atrium using 2-0 braided, non-absorbable polyester suture material, one close to the auricle, and the other close to the interatrial septum. The guide wire of a haemodialysis catheter was inserted through the superior vena cava into the right atrium and passed all the way through the right ventricle. Results: We suggest that the double-hole technique may be useful, especially in revision cases with adhesions. Further research should be performed to document the efficacy and safety of this method. Conclusion: We are aware that further extensive research is necessary to investigate the utility of this novel technique in contemporary cardiovascular surgery. We believe the double hole technique has the potential to become a safe, practical and effective measure in the future.

This experimental study was performed to investigate the neuroprotective effects of progesterone on spinal cord ischemia in rabbits. Eighteen female New Zealand white rabbits were used in this study. Rabbits were randomized into 3 groups. Spinal cord ischemia was induced by clamping the abdominal aorta from a point just inferior to the left renal artery to the aortic bifurcation for a period of 30 minutes. Group 1 served as the control group, and groups 2 and 3 received intraperitoneal progesterone immediately after the onset of reperfusion, at a dose of 8 mg/kg. Two hours after reperfusion, the animals in group 1 were killed. Four hours after reperfusion, the animals in group 2 were killed, and 6 hours after reperfusion, the group 3 rabbits were killed. Spinal cords were removed and fixed in 10% formalin in a phosphate buffer. Neuronal injury was evaluated by a pathologist who was blinded to the treatment groups, and 5 sections per animal were evaluated. The number of intact large motor neuron cells in the ventral grey matter region was counted. The analysis revealed that the average mean arterial pressure for group 1 was significantly higher than that for group 2, and the mean sacrificed pressure value for group 1 was significantly higher than that for group 3 (P < .05). The number of intact neurons in group 1 was significantly lower than the number of intact neurons found in both groups 2 and 3 (P < .05). No other statistically significant differences were found between the groups. The findings from the present study indicate that progesterone effectively protects the spinal cord tissues against ischemic damage in the setting of decreased perfusion.

Congratulations to the authors reporting on the resection of tricuspid valve with inflow occlusion on beating heart (IOBH) technique. [1] Nowadays, IOBH technique is seldom preferred in cases such as pulmonary valvotomy, aortic valvotomy, atrial septectomy, cardiac injury and extraction of intracardiac thrombus or foreign body.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of zoledronic acid (ZA), as a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, on neointimal hyperplasia in rabbit carotid anastomosis model. New Zealand male rabbits were divided into two groups as placebo and treatment groups in this experimental study. After anesthesia, the right carotid artery of each rabbit was end-to-end anastomosed with an 8/0 polypropylene suture. Left carotid artery was kept as control without any operation. Placebo group (n=6) received phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (0.5mL/kg/day/s.c.) for 28 days postoperatively, whereas ZA group (n=6) received ZA (100 µg/kg/day/s.c.) for the same period. After sacrification, the anastomosed and control arteries were isolated. Morphometric and immunohistochemical examinations were performed. Statistical analyses of morphometric and immunohistochemical data were performed using two-way ANOVA and Chi-square test respectively. In PBS group, vascular injury in the anastomosed artery significantly increased the intimal area (anastomosed: 112.51±61.18 µm(2)*1000 vs. control: 22.62±4.26 µm(2)*1000, p<0.01) and intima/media index (anastomosed: 0.347±0.29 vs. control: 0.075±0.01, p<0.05) compared to control artery. ZA significantly reduced the intimal area (39.29±18.21 µm(2)*1000 , p<0.01) and intima/media index (0.112±0.07, p<0.05) compared to PBS group. Additionally, α-smooth muscle actin immunopositivity was found significantly decreased in anastomosed arteries from ZA group (ZA: 2.33±0.52 vs. PBS: 3.50±0.5, p<0.05). Moreover, intensive gelatinase (MMP-2 and MMP-9) immunoreactivities were clearly seen in anastomosed arteries compared to control arteries from PBS group. ZA apparently decreased immunopositivities for gelatinases in anastomosed arteries. ZA might be a promising agent for prevention of neointimal hyperplasia, which is the most significant cause of graft failures in late postoperative period.

Objectives: In order to reduce the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)-related complication rate in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures, manufacturers recommend following the instructions for use (IFU). However, IFU is considered too conservative in many centers. In this context, we present our experience and patient follow-up data with 248 consecutive patients with or without IFU eligibility. Methods: A total of 248 patients who underwent elective EVAR for AAA between 2014 and 2019 were included. In total, 190 patients were in the IFU group and 58 in the non-IFU group. Patients were evaluated for baseline demographic and anatomic data; unexpected periprocedural intervention; and postoperative data such as development of endoleaks during follow-up, need for re-intervention, development of complications, EVAR patency, and mean 5-year survival rate. Results: The patients did not differ in terms of basic demographic data. The basic anatomical data were suitable for the IFU standard. Intraoperative endoleak development was significantly higher in the non-IFU group. In addition, the development of endoleaks at any time, the need for re-intervention, and the development of complications were higher in the non-IFU group at postoperative follow-up. Survival analysis showed no difference in the mean 5-year follow-up. The EVAR patency rate was higher in the IFU group. Conclusions: We believe that the decision for a non-IFU EVAR should be patient-specific and that the results of the subjective medical assessment should definitely be taken into account. However, we should not forget that EVAR patients, especially non-IFU patients, are susceptible to future changes in the aorta and prone to the development of endoleaks and re-interventions.