Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background and Objectives: Vaginal vault prolapse is a known complication following anterior pelvic exenteration in women undergoing radical cystectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and early outcomes of a novel anatomical approach for preventing vaginal vault prolapse after radical cystectomy. This study introduces a standardized laparoscopic technique that utilizes round ligament preservation and fixation to provide anatomical support to the vaginal apex. Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a single center, including thirteen female patients with uterus and adnexa in situ who underwent laparoscopic radical cystectomy with bilateral round ligament fixation to the vaginal cuff. The round ligaments were mobilized and sutured without tension. Vaginal closure was performed with barbed sutures. Results: No intraoperative complications occurred. At a median follow-up of 18.2 months, no cases of vaginal vault prolapse or dehiscence were observed. One patient experienced transient pelvic discomfort. Conclusions: This is the first report of a standardized mesh-free approach for vaginal apex support during laparoscopic anterior exenteration. The technique is feasible, safe, and may reduce postoperative prolapse risk.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) syndromes are rare and potentially malignant hereditary entities. Clinical manifestations of MEN 2B include medullary thyroid cancer, pheochromocytoma, gastrointestinal ganglioneuromatosis, and musculoskeletal and ophthalmologic lesions. Metastases to the prostate from the cancers of other organs are extremely rare. There are only a few cases of metastases to the prostate gland, originating from medullary thyroid cancer, found in literature, especially associated with MEN 2B syndrome. In this case report, we present the extremely rare case of a 28-year-old patient, diagnosed with MEN 2B syndrome, with medullary thyroid cancer metastasis to the prostate. Although a few reports of medullary thyroid cancer metastasis into the prostate gland can be found in the literature, to our knowledge, this is the first case of a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy procedure performed as a metastasectomy to treat the prostatic metastasis. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, performed as a metastasectomy, for the treatment of metastatic cancer, is an extremely rare surgical indication with distinctive requirements and difficulties. The extraperitoneal access enables the realization of the laparoscopic radical prostatectomy procedure even in the cases of patients with a history of multiple intra-abdominal operations.

PurposeRecurrent urinary retention due to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), requiring permanent catheterization, represents one of the most challenging issues geriatric patients can face. Rezūm, as a minimal invasive treatment for BPH, takes the advantage of sterile water vapor injections directly into the prostate. The purpose of this Systematic Review is to report the safety and the efficacy of Rezūm regarding urinary retention relief and permanent catheter withdrawal. MethodsPubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases were meticulously screened using the keywords “Rezum”, “retention” and “permanent catheter”. Only human studies and articles in English were included. Rezūm should be the only intervention employed in patients. Patients of included studies should not have been submitted to any prior interventions, such as transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) for the relief of their symptoms. Patients’ baseline characteristics along with intraoperative and postoperative parameters were collected and analysed. Catheter relief was the primary outcome.ResultsFive studies fulfilled all the criteria and were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Four studies were retrospective and one was prospective. All studies were non-comparative. The success rate ranged from 70.3 to 100%, while no grade ≥ III Clavien–Dindo complications were reported in any of the studies. ConclusionRezūm Water Vapor Therapy Treatment seems to be a feasible, safe and efficient minimally-invasive procedure for catheterized patients with urinary retention secondary to BPH, especially for frail ones with comorbidities who cannot undergo general anesthesia.

At the end of their residency program, urology trainees should reach the minimum skills required to be able to work by themselves and within a team. To achieve this objective, it is fundamental that the training involves not only surgical activities, but also theoretical, academic, and relational ones. What is the perfect balance between these activities within the ideal urological training? This study aims to evaluate the concordance in different concepts of good urological training between different perspectives (trainees vs professors). Between January and December 2020 the same survey was distributed via email to 967 urology trainees and urology tutors. The survey investigated 5 educational fields: theoretical, clinical, surgical, relational, and simulation. For each field, specific questions investigated the importance of different activities and the training outcomes considered fundamental to be reached by a resident. The questions were evaluated by responders through a Likert 10-point scale. The survey was completed by 155 trainees (58.9%, Group A) and 108 tutors (41.1%, Group B) from 26 different countries. Relative to the tutors, residents assigned statistically significantly lower scores to prostate biopsy (median score 9.11 vs 9.24), robotic simulator training (5.66 vs 5.93), on-call duties with consultants (6.85 vs 7.99), as well as all aspects of relational training (e.g., proper dialogue with colleagues: 7.95 vs 8.88). Conversely, residents assigned statistically significantly higher scores, albeit below sufficiency, to the performance of robotic prostatectomy as a first operator (4.45 vs 4.26). Finally, no discrepancies between residents' and tutors' scores were recorded regarding the remaining items of clinical training (e.g., urodynamics, outpatient clinic, ward duties) and surgical training (e.g., major open, laparoscopic and endoscopic surgical training; all p values >0.05). There was partial concordance between trainees and tutors regarding the activities that should be implemented and the skills that should be achieved during a urological residency. The residents aimed for more surgical involvement, while the tutors and professors, although giving importance to surgical and theoretical training, considered clinical practice as the fundamental basis on which to train future urologists.