Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Seroma is the most common complication following breast cancer surgery, with reported incidence up to 90%. Seroma causes patient discomfort, is associated with surgical site infections (SSI), often requires treatment and increases healthcare consumption. The quilting suture technique, in which the skin flaps are sutured to the pectoralis muscle, leads to a significant reduction of seroma with a decrease in the number of aspirations and surgical site infections. However, implementation is lagging due to unknown side effects, increase in operation time and cost effectiveness. Main objective of this study is to assess the impact of large scale implementation of the quilting suture technique in patients undergoing mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Methods The QUILT study is a stepped wedge design study performed among nine teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. The study consists of nine steps, with each step one hospital will implement the quilting suture technique. Allocation of the order of implementation will be randomization-based. Primary outcome is ‘textbook outcome’, i.e.no wound complications, no re-admission, re-operation or unscheduled visit to the outpatient clinic and no increased use of postoperative analgesics. A total of 113 patients is required based on a sample size calculation. Secondary outcomes are shoulder function, cosmetic outcome, satisfaction with thoracic wall and health care consumption. Follow-up lasts for 6 months. Discussion This will be one of the first multicentre prospective studies in which quilting without postoperative wound drain is compared with conventional wound closure. We hypothesize that quilting is a simple technique to increase textbook outcome, enhance patient comfort and reduce health care consumption.

Background Breast conserving surgery (BCS) with partial breast reconstruction (PBR) results in less morbidity, better cosmetic outcomes, and improved patient satisfaction compared to mastectomy. Perforator flap reconstruction can attenuate defects prone to breast deformity after BCS. Usually, postoperative drains and inpatient admission are part of this treatment. The main objective of this study is to report on postoperative complications and patient satisfaction after drainless perforator flap reconstruction by a dedicated breast surgeon. Methods In a retrospective case series, 42 patients were included. All patients underwent BCS with drainless perforator flap reconstruction, planned and performed by a single breast surgeon. Outcomes were complication incidence and patient satisfaction reported in the Breast-Q Breast Conserving Therapy (BCT) module. Results In the study cohort, the median age was 59.5 (49.8–71.3) years. Tumour types were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS, four patients, 9.5%), invasive no special type (NST, 22 patients, 52.4%), invasive lobular (12 patients, 28.6%), and other invasive cancers (4 patients, 9.5%). Complication incidence was seven of 42 patients (16.7%), including hematoma, seroma, wound dehiscence, fat necrosis, and lymphedema, all Clavien Dindo grade 0–1, without readmission or reoperation. Reported Breast-Q scores (median of 17 months after surgery) were 87/100 for psychosocial well-being, 82/100 for breast satisfaction, and 71/100 for physical well-being. Outpatient treatment was successful in 38 patients (90.5%), and 13 patients (31.0%) had an unplanned visit to the outpatient clinic. Conclusion Drainless perforator flap reconstruction performed by the breast surgeon results in high patient satisfaction and limited complications, both in number and severity. The use of drains and hospital stays after perforator flap reconstruction must be discouraged.

Background. The rate of inpatient mastectomies remains high despite multiple studies reporting favourably on outpatient mastectomies. Outpatient mastectomies do not compromise quality of patient care and are more efficient than inpatient care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of outpatient mastectomy. Materials and Methods. Implementation of an outpatient mastectomy program was evaluated in a retrospective study. All patients who underwent mastectomy between January 2019 and September 2021 were included. Results. 213 patients were enrolled in the study: 62.4% (n = 133) outpatient mastectomies versus 37.6% (n = 80) inpatient mastectomies. A steady rise in outpatient mastectomies was observed over time. The second quarter of 2020, coinciding with the first COVID-19 wave, showed a peak in outpatient mastectomies. The only significant barrier to outpatient mastectomy proved to be bilateral mastectomy. Unplanned return to care was observed in 27.8% of the outpatient versus 36.3% of the inpatient mastectomies (P=0.198); the reason for unplanned return of care was similar in both groups. Conclusions. Outpatient mastectomy is shown to be feasible and safe with a steady increase during the study period. A barrier to outpatient mastectomy was bilateral mastectomy. Incidence of unplanned return to care or complications did not differ significantly between the outpatient and inpatient cohorts.