Explore the vast range of titles available.

Considerable advances have been made over the last decade in percutaneous technology for the treatment of atherosclerotic diseases in the femoro-popliteal arteries. While treatment strategies are well defined in the iliac segment, where angioplasty and stenting perform well in appropriately selected lesions, the search for a durable transcatheter therapy for femoro-popliteal lesions continues. Whereas balloon angioplasty (PTA) is the accepted therapy for short lesions, long diffuse lesions are still recommended for surgical treatment. However, attractive new technologies ranging from transcatheter plaque excision to laser ablation, rotational atherectomy, cryoplasty, brachytherapy, and placement of drug-eluting stents to simple angioplasty with drug-coated balloons may have the potential to replace femoro-popliteal bypass surgery as a treatment of choice for complex lesions. This article reviews the status of percutaneous endovascular techniques for the treatment of femoro-popliteal artery occlusive disease.

In this trial, patients with femoropopliteal artery disease were assigned to standard angioplasty or treatment with a paclitaxel-coated balloon. At 12 months, primary patency was seen more frequently with the drug-coated balloon than with standard angioplasty. Atherosclerotic disease in the femoral and popliteal (femoropopliteal) arteries compromises perfusion to the legs and feet. Although treatment with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is effective in initially restoring blood flow, restenosis from vessel recoil and neointimal hyperplasia occur in more than 60% of patients within 1 year after the procedure. 1 Stents act as scaffolds to prevent recoil and reduce the incidence of restenosis, 2 – 9 but the permanent presence of an intravascular prosthesis may limit subsequent therapeutic options. Stent fracture, although infrequent, can have negative consequences. 10 – 13 Results with drug-eluting stents in peripheral vessels have varied, 14 – 18 although a recent study showed . . .

Background Endovascular therapy has become established as a first-line therapy in most arterial regions. However, open vascular surgery (endarterectomy) remains the treatment of choice for common femoral artery (CFA) lesions. The aim of this study is to investigate the acute and mid-term results of directional atherectomy plus drug-coated balloon (DCB) in comparison to endarterectomy in treatment of de novo arteriosclerotic CFA lesions. Methods This prospective, randomized, multicenter non-inferiority study will enroll 306 participants with symptomatic (Rutherford category 1 to 5) de novo stenosis of the CFA including the bifurcation. Patients eligible for both treatment groups could be included in this 1:1 randomized trial. Primary efficacy endpoint is patency of the target lesion at 12 months defined as restenosis < 50% without the need of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cdTLR). Primary safety endpoint is a combined endpoint including death, myocardial infarction, major or minor amputation of the target limb, and peri-procedural complications at 30 days. Secondary endpoints include primary patency of the target lesion at 6 and 24 months, secondary patency, cdTLR 6, 12, and 24 months, change in ankle-brachial index, and Rutherford-Becker class at 6, 12, and 24 months. Limb salvage, change in quality of life measured by Walking Impairment Questionnaire, and major adverse events including death, myocardial infarction, and minor or major amputation of the target limb will be determined at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Discussion Endovascular treatment of CFA lesions is still a matter of debate. Few studies compared modern endovascular therapy methods against the so-called gold standard surgical endarterectomy so far. Based on recent positive results, this study aims to confirm non-inferiority of a “leaving nothing behind” endovascular approach combining directional atherectomy and DCB compared to surgical therapy. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02517827.

Digital variance angiography (DVA) exhibits promising prospects with respect to radiation exposure in digital subtraction angiography (DSA). This study aimed to determine the reduction of radiation dose in endovascular peripheral interventions (EPI) using DVA. The DVA imaging tool v6.0 (Kinepict Medical Imaging Tool, version 6.0.4, Kinepict Health Ltd., Budapest, Hungary) was utilized for patients undergoing EPI using digital angiography. EPI normal dose (EPI-ND) protocols were adapted from 1.20 to 0.81 µGy/frame to EPI low dose (EPI-LD) protocols using DVA-LD acquisitions with 0.36 µGy/frame and occasionally 0.24 µGy/frame based on specific examination requirements. The dose area product (DAP) was evaluated and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured for each DSA acquisition. Evaluation included 370 EPI-ND and 62 EPI-LD using DVA-LD of three lower extremity regions (mean age: 73 ± 11 years, 67% male). LD protocols decreased median DAP of ND protocols significantly by 62.0% in pelvic, 53.8% in femoral and popliteal, and 59.4% in cruro-pedal regions, respectively ( p  < .005). DVA-LD increased median CNR significantly compared to DSA-LD ( p  < .001), and was equal to DSA-ND ( p  > .15). Image quality was enhanced by CNR DVA−LD /CNR DSA−ND ratio of 1.9 in pelvic, 2.4 in femoral and popliteal and in cruro-pedal regions. DVA reveals significant radiation dose reduction in lower extremity EPIs and enhances image contrast while decreasing noise.

PurposeTo report additional endpoints, including 2-year primary patency, patient outcomes, and safety results, as well as the initial assessment of hypoechogenic halo from the IMPERIAL Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).Materials and methodsIMPERIAL RCT is a prospective, randomized (2:1), multicenter study of patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery lesions (length 30–140 mm, Rutherford category 2–4) treated with the Eluvia paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent or the Zilver PTX paclitaxel-coated stent. Two-year follow-up included patency, safety, and mortality assessments and core laboratory-reviewed B-mode ultrasound imaging to screen for hypoechogenic halo in the stented segment, and assess blood flow.ResultsAt 24 months, all-cause mortality was 7.1% (21/295) for Eluvia and 8.3% (12/145) for Zilver PTX (P = 0.6649). The clinically driven target lesion revascularization rate was significantly less for patients treated with Eluvia vs Zilver PTX (12.7% vs 20.1%; P = 0.0495). The Kaplan–Meier estimate of primary patency at 24 months was 83.0% for Eluvia and 77.1% for Zilver PTX (log rank P = 0.1008). Transverse ultrasound imaging was implemented during the 24-month follow-up window and was evaluable for 27.5% (128/465) of patients. Hypoechogenic halo prevalence rates did not differ significantly between Eluvia and Zilver PTX study arms (33.7% [29/86] vs 21.4% [9/42]; P = 0.153). In no case was flow documented within the halo; no adverse events were associated with these ultrasound findings.ConclusionTwo-year follow-up suggests a sustained advantage for Eluvia for avoiding target lesion revascularization. Initial hypoechogenic halo assessment showed no difference in prevalence between the study arms, no flow within the halo, and no associated adverse events.Clinical trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02574481. Date of registration: October 14, 2015.Level of evidence: Level 1; randomized controlled trial.

In a randomized trial, 154 patients with femoropopliteal-artery disease who were undergoing angioplasty were assigned to treatment with a paclitaxel-coated angioplasty balloon, an uncoated balloon with paclitaxel dissolved in the contrast medium, or an uncoated balloon without paclitaxel (control treatment). Late lumen loss, restenosis at 6 months, and target-lesion revascularization at 6, 12, and 24 months were significantly reduced with the paclitaxel-coated balloon but not with paclitaxel-containing contrast medium. In patients with femoropopliteal-artery disease who were undergoing angioplasty, late lumen loss, restenosis at 6 months, and target-lesion revascularization at 6, 12, and 24 months were significantly reduced with a paclitaxel-coated balloon but not with paclitaxel-containing contrast medium. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for revascularization of the superficial femoral artery has an initial technical success rate of more than 95%. 1 However, restenosis occurs in 40 to 60% of the treated segments after 6 to 12 months 2 – 4 ; these rates are much higher than restenosis rates in other vascular beds, such as the coronary and renal arteries. 5 Stenting is more effective than balloon angioplasty for preventing restenosis in the coronary circulation, but a benefit of stenting in the vessels of the lower extremities remains to be confirmed. 6 – 9 Several other attempts to increase long-term patency in peripheral vascular disease have . . .

Purpose To report the 3-year results of the MAJESTIC first-in-human study of the Eluvia Drug-Eluting Vascular Stent System for treating femoropopliteal artery lesions. Methods The prospective, single-arm, multicenter clinical trial enrolled 57 patients with symptomatic lower limb ischemia (Rutherford category 2, 3, or 4) and lesions in the superficial femoral artery or proximal popliteal artery. Mean lesion length was 70.8 ± 28.1 mm, and 46% of lesions were occluded. Efficacy measures at 2 years included primary patency, defined as duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio of ≤2.5 and the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) or bypass. Safety monitoring through 3 years included adverse events and TLR. Results Primary patency was estimated as 83.5% (Kaplan–Meier analysis) at 24 months, and 90.6% (48/53) of patients maintained an improvement in Rutherford class. At 36 months, the Kaplan–Meier estimate of freedom from TLR was 85.3%. No stent fractures were identified, and no major target limb amputations occurred. Conclusion MAJESTIC results demonstrated long-term treatment durability among patients whose femoropopliteal arteries were treated with the paclitaxel-eluting Eluvia stent. Level of Evidence Level 2b, cohort study

PurposeData on the long-term safety and effectiveness of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for the treatment of long femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions in the real-world setting are rare. This study reports 3 year and 5 year outcomes of the pre-specified 150 mm balloon sub-cohort of the IN.PACT Global Study.MethodsThe IN.PACT Global Study was a prospective, multicentre, international, single-arm study evaluating the performance of the IN.PACT Admiral DCB in real-world patients with femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease. This pre-specified 150 mm DCB cohort analysis comprised 107 participants (111 lesions) with all target lesions treated with at least one 150 mm DCB.ResultsMean lesion length was 20.3 ± 9.2 cm; 18.0% had in-stent restenosis, 58.6% were totally occluded, and 17.1% were severely calcified. Through 60 months, the Kaplan–Meier estimate of freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) was 72.7% [95% confidence interval (CI):62.4%–80.5%]. The safety composite endpoint (freedom from device/procedure-related death through 30 days; freedom from target limb major amputation and clinically driven target vessel revascularization through 5 years) was 70.5%. The cumulative incidence of major amputation was 1.0% and all-cause mortality was 18.4% through 60 months. Freedom from CD-TLR rates in the provisional stented and non-stented subgroups through 36 months were 64.0% [95% CI: 46.1%–77.3%] and 81.9% [95% CI: 69.7%–89.6%] (log-rank p = 0.074), respectively.ConclusionsThe results demonstrate sustained long-term safety of the 150 mm IN.PACT Admiral DCB for long femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions in real-world patients. In particular, the results show that DCB angioplasty is an effective revascularization modality in long complex lesions. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01609296.Level of Evidence.Level 3, Cohort Study.

PurposeThis study aimed to assess 5-year effectiveness and safety of femoropopliteal angioplasty with the Luminor® 35 drug-coated balloon (DCB).Materials and MethodsThe EffPac trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that enrolled 171 patients of Rutherford category 2 to 4 with medium length femoropopliteal lesions. Patients were allocated 1:1 to either Luminor® 35 DCB angioplasty or plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Assessment at 5 years included primary patency, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), clinical improvement, and target limb amputation. Long-term vital status was ascertained in 97.1% of the participants.ResultsKaplan–Meier curves at 5 years demonstrate a primary patency of 61.4% after DCB angioplasty and 53.5% after POBA (log-rank p = 0.040) with a decreasing difference throughout the observation period. Freedom from TLR was 82.1% and 73.7%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.050). Incidence of primary clinical improvement was similar between groups (61% DCB vs. 64% POBA, p = 0.94). Major target limb amputation was necessary in one POBA-group participant. Freedom from all-cause death at 5 years was 88.5% after DCB and 86.0% after POBA (log-rank p = 0.34).ConclusionsPrimary patency after femoropopliteal DCB angioplasty remained superior to POBA throughout 5 years, however, with decreasing difference. Clinical improvement, freedom from TLR, and all-cause mortality were similar between groups over the long term. (Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Coated Luminor® Balloon Catheter Versus Uncoated Balloon Catheter in the Superficial Femoral Artery [EffPac]; NCT02540018).

Background Endovascular revascularization has established as the first-line therapy of femoropopliteal artery disease. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty proved to be superior to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) regarding prevention of restenosis and need for recurrent revascularization. Over the past years, paclitaxel was the only active drug to inhibit neointimal proliferation which could be processed to an appropriate balloon coating. The purpose of this study is to assess whether efficacy and safety of sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty is noninferior to paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty. Methods This randomized controlled, single-blinded, multicentre, investigator-initiated noninferiority trial aims to enrol a total of 478 participants with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease of Rutherford category 2 to 4 due to de novo stenosis or restenosis. After pre-dilation, participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either sirolimus- or paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty. Post-dilation with the drug-coated balloon (DCB) used or standard balloon is mandatory in case ≥ 50%, and optional in case of ≥ 30% residual diameter stenosis. Bailout stenting with bare-metal nitinol stents should be conducted in case of flow-limiting dissection. Primary noninferiority endpoints are primary patency and the composite of all-cause mortality, major target limb amputation, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months. Secondary outcomes are clinical and hemodynamic improvement, change in health-related quality of life, and safety throughout 60 months. Discussion Although concerns about long-term safety of paclitaxel-coated devices were not confirmed by recent patient-level data analyses, conflicting evidence contributed to a loss of confidence among patients and physicians. Therefore, sirolimus, known for a broader therapeutic range than paclitaxel, may serve as a welcome alternative. This will be justified if noninferiority of sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty against the current standard of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty can be demonstrated. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04475783 . Registered on 17 July 2020 EUDAMED No. CIV-20-11-035172, DRKS00022452