Explore the vast range of titles available.

Allergic conjunctivitis is one of the most common non-traumatic extraocular inflammatory diseases. The comparison of olopatadine with ketotifen remains elusive for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis, and this meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of olopatadine versus ketotifen on treatment efficacy for allergic conjunctivitis. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched, and we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of olopatadine versus ketotifen on efficacy in patients with allergic conjunctivitis. Seven RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with ketotifen intervention for allergic conjunctivitis, olopatadine intervention was associated with substantially lower hyperaemia (mean difference (MD) = -0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -1.24 to -0.30; = 0.001), but demonstrated no significant impact on itching, tearing or papillae. These suggested that olopatadine may be more effective to relieve the symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis than ketotifen.

Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is one of the endotypes of rhinitis which occurs commonly in different age groups. To present the occurrence and characteristics of LAR in Polish children and adolescents. In the study protocol, three hundred sixty-one patients aged 5-17 with chronic rhinitis were included from 8 centres in Poland. Medical history and diagnostic procedures were performed with aeroallergens: skin prick tests, allergen-specific serum IgE and nasal provocation tests. In addition to LAR, allergic rhinitis (AR), dual allergic rhinitis (DUAL) and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) were explored and compared. LAR was confirmed in 21% of patients, systemic allergic rhinitis (SAR) in 43.9%, DUAL in 9.4% and NAR in 33.9% of patients. Based on nasal provocation test (NPT), allergy to HDM prevailed in the LAR group (68%), grass in the SAR group (58%), and grass and HDM in the DUAL group (32% and 64%). Girls were prevalent in the LAR group, and severe rhinitis and asthma were more common than other endotypes ( < 0.05). LAR is a common disease in children and adolescents and is often associated with severe rhinitis and frequently coexists with asthma.

Brain injury remains a major problem in patients suffering cardiac arrest (CA). Disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) is an important factor leading to brain injury. Therapeutic hypothermia is widely accepted to limit neurological impairment. However, the efficacy is incomplete. Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), a signaling gas molecule, has protective effects after cerebral ischemia reperfusion injury. This study showed that combination of hypothermia and H 2 S after resuscitation was more beneficial for attenuated BBB disruption and brain edema than that of hypothermia or H 2 S treatment alone. CA was induced by ventricular fibrillation for 4 min. Hypothermia was performed by applying alcohol and ice bags to the body surface under anesthesia. We used sodium hydrosulphide (NaHS) as the H 2 S donor. We found that global brain ischemia induced by CA and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) resulted in brain edema and BBB disruption; Hypothermia or H 2 S treatment diminished brain edema, decreased the permeability and preserved the structure of BBB during the early period of CA and resuscitation, and more importantly, improved the neurologic function, increased the 7-day survival rate after resuscitation; the combination of hypothermia and H 2 S treatment was more beneficial than that of hypothermia or H 2 S treatment alone. The beneficial effects were associated with the inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression, attenuated the degradation of the tight junction protein occludin, and subsequently protected the structure of BBB. These findings suggest that combined use of therapeutic hypothermia and hydrogen sulfide treatment during resuscitation of CA patients could be a potential strategy to improve clinical outcomes and survival rate.

IntroductionThere are two approaches for the treatment of intracranial aneurysm (IA): interventional therapy and craniotomy, both of which have their advantages and disadvantages in terms of treatment efficacy. To avoid overtreatment of unruptured aneurysms (UIA), to save valuable medical resources and to reduce patient mortality and disability rate, it is vital that neurosurgeons select the most appropriate type of treatment to provide the best levels of care. In this study, we propose a refined, prospective, multicentre study for the Chinese population with strictly defined patient inclusion criteria, along with the selection of representative clinical participating centres.Methods and analysisThis report describes a multicentre, prospective cohort study. As IA is extremely harmful if it ruptures, ethical issues need to be taken into account with regard to this study. Researchers are therefore not able to use randomised controlled trials. The study will be conducted by 12 clinical centres located in different regions of China. The trial recruitment programme begins in 2016 and is scheduled to be completed in 2020. We expect 1500 participants with UIA to be included. Clinical information relating to the participants will be recorded objectively. The primary endpoints are an evaluation of the safety and efficiency of interventional treatment and craniotomy for 6 months after surgery, with each participant completing at least 1 year of follow-up. The secondary endpoint is the evaluation of safety and efficacy of interventional therapy and craniotomy clipping when participants are treated for 12 months. We also address the success of treatment and the incidence of adverse events.Ethics and disseminationThe research protocol and the informed consent form for participants in this study were approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University (2017-SJWK-001). The results of this study are expected to be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals in 2021.Trial registration number NCT03133598.