Explore the vast range of titles available.

Mitochondrial retrograde signaling (mito-RTG) triggered by mitochondrial dysfunction plays a potential role in regulating tumor metabolic reprogramming and cellular sensitivity to radiation. Our previous studies showed phos-pyruvate dehydrogenase (p-PDH) and PDK1, which involved in aerobic glycolysis, were positively correlated with radioresistance, but how they initiate and work in the mito-RTG pathway is still unknown. Our further genomics analysis revealed that complex I components were widely downregulated in mitochondrial dysfunction model. In the present study, high expression of p-PDH was found in the complex I deficient cells and induced radioresistance. Mechanistically, complex I defects led to a decreased PDH both in cytoplasm and nucleus through [Ca 2+ ] m -PDP1-PDH axis, and decreased PDH in nucleus promote DNA damage repair (DDR) response via reducing histone acetylation. Meanwhile, NDUFS1 (an important component of the complex I) overexpression could enhance the complex I activity, reverse glycolysis and resensitize cancer cells to radiation in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, low NDUFS1 and PDH expression were validated to be correlated with poor tumor regression grading (TRG) in local advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Here, we propose that the [Ca 2+ ] m -PDP1-PDH-histone acetylation retrograde signaling activated by mitochondrial complex I defects contribute to cancer cell radioresistance, which provides new insight in the understanding of the mito-RTG. For the first time, we reveal that NDUFS1 could be served as a promising predictor of radiosensitivity and modification of complex I function may improve clinical benefits of radiotherapy in CRC.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype with the worst prognosis and the highest metastatic and recurrence potential, which represents 15–20% of all breast cancers in Chinese females, and the 5-year overall survival rate is about 80% in Chinese women. Recently, emerging evidence suggested that aberrant alternative splicing (AS) plays a crucial role in tumorigenesis and progression. AS is generally controlled by AS-associated RNA binding proteins (RBPs). Monocyte chemotactic protein induced protein 1 (MCPIP1), a zinc finger RBP, functions as a tumor suppressor in many cancers. Here, we showed that MCPIP1 was downregulated in 80 TNBC tissues and five TNBC cell lines compared to adjacent paracancerous tissues and one human immortalized breast epithelial cell line, while its high expression levels were associated with increased overall survival in TNBC patients. We demonstrated that MCPIP1 overexpression dramatically suppressed cell cycle progression and proliferation of TNBC cells in vitro and repressed tumor growth in vivo. Mechanistically, MCPIP1 was first demonstrated to act as a splicing factor to regulate AS in TNBC cells. Furthermore, we demonstrated that MCPIP1 modulated NFIC AS to promote CTF5 synthesis, which acted as a negative regulator in TNBC cells. Subsequently, we showed that CTF5 participated in MCPIP1-mediated antiproliferative effect by transcriptionally repressing cyclin D1 expression, as well as downregulating its downstream signaling targets p-Rb and E2F1. Conclusively, our findings provided novel insights into the anti-oncogenic mechanism of MCPIP1, suggesting that MCPIP1 could serve as an alternative treatment target in TNBC.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most common malignant carcinomas and its molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) could bind sites of miRNA which affect the expression of mRNA according to the competing endogenous (ceRNA) theory. The aim of the present study was to construct a ceRNA network and to identify key lncRNA to predict survival prognosis. We identified differentially expressed mRNA, lncRNA and miRNA between tumor tissues and normal tissues from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Then, using bioinformatics tools, we explored the connection of 89 lncRNA, 10 miRNA and 22 mRNA, and we constructed the ceRNA network. Furthermore, we analyzed the functions and pathways of 22 differentially expressed mRNA. Then, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of these 89 lncRNA and overall survival were explored. Nine lncRNA were finally screened out in the training group. The patients were divided into high‐risk and low‐risk groups according to the 9 lncRNA and low‐risk scores having better clinical overall survival (P < .01). Furthermore, the receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrates the predicted role of the 9 lncRNA. The 9‐lncRNA signature was successfully proved in the testing group and the entire group. Finally, multivariate Cox regression analysis and stratification analysis further proved that the 9‐lncRNA signature was an independent factor to predict survival. In summary, the present study provides a deeper understanding of the lncRNA‐related ceRNA network in ccRCC and suggests that the 9‐lncRNA signature could serve as an independent biomarker to predict survival in ccRCC patients. The lncRNA‐miRNA‐mRNA ceRNA network.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a formidable global health challenge, with the majority of patients exhibiting microsatellite stable (MSS) and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) tumors that are largely unresponsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The management of MSS/pMMR CRC remains a clinical challenge due to the intrinsic resistance to ICIs. The innovative strategy of combining cetuximab, an EGFR-targeting monoclonal antibody with immunomodulatory properties, offers a promising strategy to enhance the immunotherapeutic response in MSS/pMMR CRC. This combination therapy is rooted in the complementary therapeutic mechanisms of cetuximab and ICIs, which may synergistically improve overall response rates and durability of response. Although some preclinical and clinical data have suggested additional promising results, there are still some challenges and questions that need to be addressed. Further large-scale, randomized, phase III clinical trials are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy. The ongoing clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of cetuximab-ICI combinations are eagerly anticipated to pave the way for a new era in personalized immunotherapy for MSS/pMMR CRC.

Perineural invasion (PNI) is implicated in tumor invasion, metastasis, cancer-related pain, and adverse clinical outcomes across various malignancies. Nonetheless, the core genes and molecular mechanisms underlying PNI in colorectal cancer (CRC) remain inadequately understood. The objective of our study was to identify key genes associated with PNI in CRC through bioinformatic analysis. Transcriptomic and clinical data for CRC were obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. Using the limma package, we identified 2,446 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between CRC samples with and without PNI. Additionally, 1,793 immune-related genes (IRGs) were obtained from the ImmPort database. The intersection of differentially expressed immune-related genes (DEIRGs) was subsequently employed for functional enrichment analysis and the development of risk models. A novel prognostic model related to PNI was successfully developed and validated, demonstrating its independent prognostic value in CRC. Cardiotrophin-like cytokine factor 1 (CLCF1) was identified as a key prognostic marker associated with PNI in CRC, with elevated expression observed in tumor samples. CLCF1 was shown to enhance the proliferation, invasion, and migration capabilities of CRC cells, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target for CRC.

Liver metastases still remain a major cause of colorectal cancer (CRC) patient death. MYO10 is upregulated in several tumor types; however, its significance and the underlying mechanism in CRC are not entirely clear. Here, we found that MYO10 was highly expressed in CRC tumor tissues, especially in liver metastasis tissues. MYO10 knockout reduced CRC cell proliferation, invasion, and migration in vitro and CRC metastasis in vivo. We identified RACK1 by LC‐MS/MS and demonstrated that MYO10 interacts with and stabilizes RACK1. Mechanistically, MYO10 promotes CRC cell progression and metastasis via ubiquitination‐mediated RACK1 degradation and integrin/Src/FAK signaling activation. Therefore, the MYO10/RACK1/integrin/Src/FAK axis may play an important role in CRC progression and metastasis. 1. MYO10 knockout reduced CRC cell proliferation, invasion, and migration in vitro, and CRC metastasis in vivo. 2. We identified RACK1 by LC‐MS/MS and demonstrated that MYO10 interacts with and stabilizes RACK1. 3. MYO10 promotes CRC cell progression and metastasis via ubiquitination‐mediated RACK1 degradation and integrin/Src/FAK signaling activation.

Background Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) and modified FOLFIRINOX (FFX) are two systemic therapies that have been widely used as standard first-line chemotherapy regimens in metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, since there is no clinical trial to directly compare the efficacy and safety of the two regimens, it is not clear which regimen is more effective. In this study, we aim to examine and compare the efficacy and safety of AG and FFX as first-line chemotherapy regimens in Chinese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in a real-world setting. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 44 patients who were diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer and were treated with either AG ( n  = 24) or FFX ( n  = 20) as first-line chemotherapy between March 2017 and February 2022 at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University. Prognostic nutrition index (PNI) was calculated based on the serum albumin level and peripheral lymphocyte count. According to the optimal cutoff value of PNI, patients were divided into low PNI group (PNI < 43.70) and high PNI group (PNI ≥ 43.70). Results Of 44 patients in this study, 24 were treated with AG, and 20 were treated with FFX as first-line chemotherapy. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between the two groups. The objective response rate (ORR) was 16.7% in the AG group and 20.0% in the FFX group. The disease control rate (DCR) was 70.8% in the AG group and 60.0% in the FFX group. There was no significant difference in PFS or OS between the AG group and the FFX group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.67 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91–6.42) in the AG group and 3.33 months (95% CI, 1.87–4.79, p  = 0.106) in the FFX group. The median overall survival (OS) was 9.00 months (95% CI, 7.86–12.19) in the AG group and 10.00 months (95% CI, 7.70–12.27, p  = 0.608) in the FFX group. The second-line treatment rate was 62.5% in the AG group and 55.0% in the FFX group. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) based regimens are common second-line treatment options whether in AG or FFX group. Significantly more grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy occurred in the AG than FFX groups (4 (20.8%) vs 0 (0.0%), p  = 0.030*). The patients in the PNI (Prognostic nutrition index) ≥ 43.7 group had a significant longer median OS (PNI ≥ 43.7 vs PNI < 43.7: 10.33 vs 8.00 months, p  = 0.019). Conclusion AG and FFX showed comparable efficacy outcomes in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy with good nutritional status are likely to have a better prognosis.

It is unclear how telomere-binding protein TPP1 interacts with human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and influences cervical cancer development and progression. This study included all eligible 156 cervical cancers diagnosed during 2003–2008 and followed up through 2014, 102 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) patients, and 16 participants with normal cervix identified at the same period. Correlation of expression of TPP1 and hTERT in these lesions was assessed using Kappa statistics. TPP1 was knocked down by siRNA in three cervical cancer cell lines. We assessed mRNA expression using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and protein expression using tissue microarray-based immunohistochemical staining. We further analyzed the impact of TPP1 expression on the overall survival of cervical cancer patients by calculating the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the multivariable-adjusted Cox regression model. Compared to the normal cervix, high TPP1expression was significantly associated with CIN 3 and cervical cancers ( P <0.001 for both). Expressions of TPP1 and hTERT were highly correlated in CIN 3 (Kappa statistics = 0.50, P = 0.005), squamous cell carcinoma (Kappa statistics = 0.22, P = 0.011), and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma (Kappa statistics = 0.77, P = 0.001). Mechanistically, knockdown of TPP1 inhibited the expression of hTERT in both mRNA and protein levels. High expression of TPP1 (HR = 2.61, 95% CI 1.23–5.51) and co-high expression of TPP1 and hTERT (HR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.28–4.43) were independently associated with worse survival in cervical cancer patients. TPP1 and hTERT expression was correlated and high expression of TPP1 was associated with high risk of CIN 3 and cervical cancer and could predict a worse survival in cervical cancer.

BackgroundOH2 is a genetically engineered oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 2 designed to selectively amplify in tumor cells and express granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to enhance antitumor immune responses. We investigated the safety, tolerability and antitumor activity of OH2 as single agent or in combination with HX008, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsIn this multicenter, phase I/II trial, we enrolled patients with standard treatment-refractory advanced solid tumors who have injectable lesions. In phase I, patients received intratumoral injection of OH2 at escalating doses (106, 107 and 108CCID50/mL) as single agent or with fixed-dose HX008. The recommended doses were then expanded in phase II. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability defined by the maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in phase I, and antitumor activity assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1) and immune-RECIST in phase II.ResultsBetween April 17, 2019 and September 22, 2020, 54 patients with metastatic cancers were enrolled. Forty patients were treated with single agent OH2, and 14 with OH2 plus HX008. No DLTs were reported with single agent OH2 in phase I. Four patients, having metastatic mismatch repair-proficient rectal cancer or metastatic esophageal cancer, achieved immune-partial response, with two from the single agent cohort and two from the combination cohort. The duration of response were 11.25+ and 14.03+ months for the two responders treated with single agent OH2, and 1.38+ and 2.56+ months for the two responders in the combination cohort. The most common treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) with single agent OH2 was fever (n=18, 45.0%). All TRAEs were of grade 1–2, except one case of grade 3 fever in the 108CCID50/mL group. No treatment-related serious AEs occurred. Single agent OH2 induced alterations in the tumor microenvironment, with clear increases in CD3+ and CD8+ cell density and programmed death-ligand 1 expression in the patients’ post-treatment biopsies relative to baseline.ConclusionsIntratumoral injection of OH2 was well-tolerated, and demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with metastatic esophageal and rectal cancer. Further clinical development of OH2 as single agent or with immune checkpoint inhibitors in selected tumor types is warranted.

Stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising treatment modality for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the dosimetric efficacy of online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) in comparison to image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for pancreatic cancer. We conducted a retrospective analysis involving 8 patients diagnosed with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The gross tumor volume (GTV) delineates the visible extent of the tumor on imaging, while the planning tumor volume (PTV) was generated by expanding 5 mm from the GTV and ensuring a 3 mm distance from the small intestine, duodenum, and stomach simultaneously. Treatment planning was executed using the United Imaging Healthcare Treatment Planning System workstation. The control group underwent evaluation based on daily validated fan-beam CT (FBCT) scans, assessing both the dose delivered to actual organs at risk (OARs) and the target volume. Radiotherapy plans were developed utilizing simulation CT, and conventional radiotherapy with daily image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) was administered using FBCT-Linac. Conversely, patients in the study group received daily validated FBCT-guided adaptive radiotherapy plans, with a focus on mean dose assessment of both the target volume and OARs. Subsequently, we compared the average outcomes of each treatment fraction between IGRT and online adaptive radiotherapy (ART). Comparison between ART and IGRT treatment plans revealed significant differences in various dosimetric parameters: For PTV: V98%: ART (96.28%) vs IGRT (89.73%), p = 0.000, V95%: ART (96.28%) vs IGRT (89.73%), p = 0.031, V90%: ART (98.58%) vs IGRT (93.65%), p = 0.000, Dmean: ART (4912.91) vs IGRT (4804.11), p = 0.000. For GTV: V100%: ART (97.96%) vs IGRT (94.85%), p = 0.314, V98%: ART (100.00%) vs IGRT (96.83%), p = 0.000, V90%: ART (100.00%) vs IGRT (97.75%), p = 0.000, Dmean: ART (4972.17) vs IGRT (4907.23), p = 0.000. For the duodenum: D0.5cc: ART (2883.92) vs IGRT (3359.35), p = 0.000, D1cc: ART (2726.32) vs IGRT (3128.66), p = 0.001, D5cc: ART (2051.96) vs IGRT (2273.93), p = 0.015, D10cc: ART (1650.73) vs IGRT (1731.74), p = 0.211. For the small bowel: D0.5cc: ART (3022.3) vs IGRT (3142.64), p = 0.037. D5cc: ART (2151.09) vs IGRT (2389.15), p = 0.043, D10cc: ART (1775.20) vs IGRT (1942.00), p = 0.079. For the stomach: D0.5cc: ART (3353.92) vs IGRT (4117.85), p = 0.000, D5cc: ART (2860.20) vs IGRT (3235.41), p = 0.000, D10cc: ART (2553.72) vs IGRT (2836.73), p = 0.000. For the Dmean of the left kidney and right kidney: Left kidney: ART (248.28) vs IGRT (239.65), p = 0.100. Right kidney: ART (314.55) vs IGRT (307.17), p = 0.345. These results suggest significant improvements in PTV coverage and sparing of OARs with ART compared to IGRT, indicating the potential of ART in optimizing treatment outcomes for pancreatic cancer patients. Compared to conventional IGRT-guided SBRT programs, ART-based SBRT for pancreatic cancer not only enhances the dose distribution to the target volume but also mitigates the radiation exposure to critical organs-at-risk (OARs) such as the duodenum, small intestine, and stomach. This approach may offer a more favorable safety profile while concurrently enhancing treatment efficacy.