Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
7
result(s) for
"Zung, Jessica L."
Sort by:
Bee- to bird-pollination shifts in Penstemon: effects of floral-lip removal and corolla constriction on the preferences of free-foraging bumble bees
by
Forrest, Jessica R. K.
,
Zung, Jessica L.
,
Castellanos, Maria Clara
in
Analysis
,
Animal behavior
,
Animal Ecology
2015
Plants might be under selection for both attracting efficient pollinators and deterring wasteful visitors. Particular floral traits can act as exploitation barriers by discouraging the unwelcome visitors. In the genus
Penstemon
, evolutionary shifts from insect pollination to more efficient hummingbird pollination have occurred repeatedly, resulting in the convergent evolution of floral traits commonly present in hummingbird-pollinated flowers. Two of these traits, a reduced or reflexed lower petal lip and a narrow corolla, were found in a previous flight-cage study to affect floral handling time by bumble bees, therefore potentially acting as “anti-bee” traits affecting preference. To test whether these traits do reduce bumble bee visitation in natural populations, we manipulated these two traits in flowers of bee-pollinated
Penstemon strictus
to resemble hummingbird-adapted close relatives and measured the preferences of free-foraging bees. Constricted corollas strongly deterred bee visitation in general, and particularly reduced visits by small bumble bees, resulting in immediate specialization to larger, longer-tongued bumble bees. Bees were also deterred—albeit less strongly—by lipless flowers. However, we found no evidence that lip removal and corolla constriction interact to further affect bee preference. We conclude that narrow corolla tubes and reduced lips in hummingbird-pollinated penstemons function as exploitation barriers that reduce bee access to nectaries or increase handling time.
Journal Article
Mosquito brains encode unique features of human odour to drive host seeking
2022
A globally invasive form of the mosquito
Aedes aegypti
specializes in biting humans, making it an efficient disease vector
1
. Host-seeking female mosquitoes strongly prefer human odour over the odour of animals
2
,
3
, but exactly how they distinguish between the two is not known. Vertebrate odours are complex blends of volatile chemicals with many shared components
4
–
7
, making discrimination an interesting sensory coding challenge. Here we show that human and animal odours evoke activity in distinct combinations of olfactory glomeruli within the
Ae. aegypti
antennal lobe. One glomerulus in particular is strongly activated by human odour but responds weakly, or not at all, to animal odour. This human-sensitive glomerulus is selectively tuned to the long-chain aldehydes decanal and undecanal, which we show are consistently enriched in human odour and which probably originate from unique human skin lipids. Using synthetic blends, we further demonstrate that signalling in the human-sensitive glomerulus significantly enhances long-range host-seeking behaviour in a wind tunnel, recapitulating preference for human over animal odours. Our research suggests that animal brains may distil complex odour stimuli of innate biological relevance into simple neural codes and reveals targets for the design of next-generation mosquito-control strategies.
Select chemical compounds enriched in human odour activate an olfactory glomerulus in the brain of
Aedes aegypti
mosquitoes, which strengthens host-seeking behaviour and helps explain their strong preference for biting humans.
Journal Article
How a fly came to love the vomit fruit
2020
Neurogenetic tools commonly used in model organisms have now been adapted to investigate feeding behaviour in the fly
Drosophila sechellia
. The experiments shed light on why this fly is such a fussy eater.
The evolution of an unusual dietary preference in Drosophila sechellia.
Journal Article
Exploring natural odour landscapes: A case study with implications for human-biting insects
2023
The natural world is full of odours-blends of volatile chemicals emitted by potential sources of food, social partners, predators, and pathogens. Animals rely heavily on these signals for survival and reproduction. Yet we remain remarkably ignorant of the composition of the chemical world. How many compounds do natural odours typically contain? How often are those compounds shared across stimuli? What are the best statistical strategies for discrimination? Answering these questions will deliver crucial insight into how brains can most efficiently encode olfactory information. Here, we undertake the first large-scale survey of vertebrate body odours, a set of stimuli relevant to blood-feeding arthropods. We quantitatively characterize the odour of 64 vertebrate species (mostly mammals), representing 29 families and 13 orders. We confirm that these stimuli are complex blends of relatively common, shared compounds and show that they are much less likely to contain unique components than are floral odours-a finding with implications for olfactory coding in blood feeders and floral visitors. We also find that vertebrate body odours carry little phylogenetic information, yet show consistency within a species. Human odour is especially unique, even compared to the odour of other great apes. Finally, we use our newfound understanding of odour-space statistics to make specific predictions about olfactory coding, which align with known features of mosquito olfactory systems. Our work provides one of the first quantitative descriptions of a natural odour space and demonstrates how understanding the statistics of sensory environments can provide novel insight into sensory coding and evolution.The natural world is full of odours-blends of volatile chemicals emitted by potential sources of food, social partners, predators, and pathogens. Animals rely heavily on these signals for survival and reproduction. Yet we remain remarkably ignorant of the composition of the chemical world. How many compounds do natural odours typically contain? How often are those compounds shared across stimuli? What are the best statistical strategies for discrimination? Answering these questions will deliver crucial insight into how brains can most efficiently encode olfactory information. Here, we undertake the first large-scale survey of vertebrate body odours, a set of stimuli relevant to blood-feeding arthropods. We quantitatively characterize the odour of 64 vertebrate species (mostly mammals), representing 29 families and 13 orders. We confirm that these stimuli are complex blends of relatively common, shared compounds and show that they are much less likely to contain unique components than are floral odours-a finding with implications for olfactory coding in blood feeders and floral visitors. We also find that vertebrate body odours carry little phylogenetic information, yet show consistency within a species. Human odour is especially unique, even compared to the odour of other great apes. Finally, we use our newfound understanding of odour-space statistics to make specific predictions about olfactory coding, which align with known features of mosquito olfactory systems. Our work provides one of the first quantitative descriptions of a natural odour space and demonstrates how understanding the statistics of sensory environments can provide novel insight into sensory coding and evolution.
Journal Article
Olfactory receptor coexpression and co-option in the dengue mosquito
2024
The olfactory sensory neurons of vinegar flies and mice tend to express a single ligand-specific receptor. While this 'one neuron-one receptor' motif has long been expected to apply broadly across insects, recent evidence suggests it may not extend to mosquitoes. We sequenced and analyzed the transcriptomes of 46,000 neurons from antennae of the dengue mosquito
to resolve all olfactory, thermosensory, and hygrosensory neuron subtypes and identify the receptors expressed therein. We find that half of all olfactory subtypes coexpress multiple receptors. However, coexpression occurs almost exclusively among genes from the same family-among odorant receptors (ORs) or among ionotropic receptors (IRs). Coexpression of ORs with IRs is exceedingly rare. Many coexpressed receptors are recent duplicates. In other cases, the recruitment or co-option of single receptors by multiple neuron subtypes has placed these genes together in the same cells with distant paralogs. Close examination of data from
reveal rare cases of both phenomena, indicating that the olfactory systems of these two species are not fundamentally different, but instead fall at different locations along a continuum likely to encompass diverse insects.
Journal Article
An updated catalogue of split-GAL4 driver lines for descending neurons in Drosophila melanogaster
by
Costa, Marta
,
Zung, Jessica L
,
Flylight Project Team
in
Drosophila melanogaster
,
Electron microscopy
,
Insects
2025
Descending neurons (DNs) occupy a key position in the sensorimotor hierarchy, conveying signals from the brain to the rest of the body below the neck. In Drosophila melanogaster flies, approximately 480 DN cell types have been described from electron-microscopy image datasets. Genetic access to these cell types is crucial for further investigation of their role in generating behaviour. We previously conducted the first large-scale survey of Drosophila melanogaster DNs, describing 98 unique cell types from light microscopy and generating cell-type-specific split-Gal4 driver lines for 65 of them. Here, we extend our previous work, describing the morphology of 137 additional DN types from light microscopy, bringing the total number DN types identified in light microscopy datasets to 235, or nearly 50%. In addition, we produced 500 new sparse split-Gal4 driver lines and compiled a list of previously published DN lines from the literature for a combined list of 738 split-Gal4 driver lines targeting 171 DN types.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Chemical signatures of human odour generate a unique neural code in the brain of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes
2020
Abstract A globally invasive form of the mosquito Aedes aegypti specializes in biting humans, making it an efficient vector of dengue, yellow fever, Zika, and chikungunya viruses. Host-seeking females strongly prefer human odour over the odour of non-human animals, but exactly how they distinguish the two is not known. Vertebrate odours are complex blends of volatile chemicals with many shared components, making discrimination an interesting sensory coding challenge. Here we show that human and animal odour blends evoke activity in unique combinations of olfactory glomeruli within the Aedes aegypti antennal lobe. Human blends consistently activate a ‘universal’ glomerulus, which is equally responsive to diverse animal and nectar-related blends, and a more selective ‘human-sensitive’ glomerulus. This dual signal robustly distinguishes humans from animals across concentrations, individual humans, and diverse animal species. Remarkably, the human-sensitive glomerulus is narrowly tuned to the long-chain aldehydes decanal and undecanal, which we show are consistently enriched in (though not specific to) human odour and which likely originate from unique human skin lipids. We propose a model of host-odour coding wherein normalization of activity in the human-sensitive glomerulus by that in the broadly-tuned universal glomerulus generates a robust discriminatory signal of the relative concentration of long-chain aldehydes in a host odour blend. Our work demonstrates how animal brains may distil complex odour stimuli of innate biological relevance into simple neural codes and reveals novel targets for the design of next-generation mosquito-control strategies. Competing Interest Statement Princeton University has filed a patent (US 62/705,910, status pending) for using synthetic blends that mimic the response to human odour in the mosquito brain as mosquito attractants, listing C.S.M. and Z.Z. as inventors. Other authors declare no competing interests.