Explore the vast range of titles available.

PurposeTo evaluate the performance of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer (PC) after prostatectomy in a large multicentre cohort.MethodsThe centres, which contributed to this study, were the departments of nuclear medicine of Heidelberg (Germany), Technical University of Munich (Germany) and Albert Einstein Hospital of São Paulo (Brazil). A total of 2533 patients who were scanned with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT at 1 h p.i. due to recurrent PC after prostatectomy were included in this retrospective analysis. Exclusion criteria were as follows: patients with untreated primary tumour, previous chemotherapy or Xofigo®; those previously treated with exclusively external beam radiation therapy or HIFU; those referred for PSMA-therapy; and those treated with ADT (including first- and second-generation ADT) within the last 6 months. Potential influences of different factors such as PSA level, PSA doubling-time (PSADT), PSA velocity (PSAVel), Gleason Score (GSC, including the separate analysis of 7a and 7b), age and amount of injected tracer were evaluated in a multivariable analysis.ResultsThe rate of pathologic PET/CT-scans was 43% for PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/ml, 58% for PSA > 0.2 to ≤ 0.5, 72% for PSA > 0.5 to ≤ 1.0 and increased to a maximum of 93% for PSA > 10 ng/ml. A pathological PET/CT was significantly (p = 0.001) associated with PSA level and higher GSC. Amount of injected tracer, age, PSADT and PSAVel were not associated with a higher probability of a pathological scan.Conclusion[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT at 1 h p.i. confirmed its high performance in the largest patient cohort yet analysed. Tumour detection showed a clear association with higher PSA and higher GSC. No association was found between a pathological [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and age, amount of injected tracer, PSADT or PSAVel.

BackgroundThe positron emission tomography (PET) ligand 68Ga-Glu-urea-Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC (68Ga-PSMA-11) targets the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), upregulated in prostate cancer cells. Although 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET is widely used in research and clinical practice, full kinetic modeling has not yet been reported nor have simplified methods for quantification been validated. The aims of our study were to quantify 68Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in primary prostate cancer patients using compartmental modeling with arterial blood sampling and to validate the use of standardized uptake values (SUV) and image-derived blood for quantification.ResultsFifteen patients with histologically proven primary prostate cancer underwent a 60-min dynamic 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET scan of the pelvis with axial T1 Dixon, T2, and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images acquired simultaneously. Time-activity curves were derived from volumes of interest in lesions, normal prostate, and muscle, and mean SUV calculated. In total, 18 positive lesions were identified on both PET and MR. Arterial blood activity was measured by automatic arterial blood sampling and manual blood samples were collected for plasma-to-blood ratio correction and for metabolite analysis. The analysis showed that 68Ga-PSMA-11 was stable in vivo. Based on the Akaike information criterion, 68Ga-PSMA-11 kinetics were best described by an irreversible two-tissue compartment model. The rate constants K1 and k3 and the net influx rate constants Ki were all significantly higher in lesions compared to normal tissue (p < 0.05). Ki derived using image-derived blood from an MR-guided method showed excellent agreement with Ki derived using arterial blood sampling (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99). SUV correlated significantly with Ki with the strongest correlation of scan time-window 30–45 min (rho 0.95, p < 0.001). Both Ki and SUV correlated significantly with serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level and PSA density.Conclusions68Ga-PSMA-11 kinetics can be described by an irreversible two-tissue compartment model. An MR-guided method for image-derived blood provides a non-invasive alternative to blood sampling for kinetic modeling studies. SUV showed strong correlation with Ki and can be used in routine clinical settings to quantify 68Ga-PSMA-11 uptake.

PurposeSince the introduction of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for imaging prostate cancer (PC) we have frequently observed mediastinal lymph nodes (LN) showing tracer uptake despite being classified as benign. The aim of this evaluation was to further analyze such LN.MethodsTwo patient groups with biphasic 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT at 1 h and 3 h p.i. were included in this retrospective evaluation. Group A (n = 38) included patients without LN metastases, and group B (n = 43) patients with LN metastases of PC. SUV of mediastinal/paraaortal LN of group A (n = 100) were compared to SUV of LN metastases of group B (n = 91). Additionally, 22 randomly selected mediastinal and paraaortal LN of patients without PC were immunohistochemically (IHC) analyzed for PSMA expression.ResultsIn group A, 7/38 patients (18.4%) presented with at least one PSMA-positive mediastinal LN at 1 h p.i. and 3/38 (7.9%) positive LN at 3 h p.i. with a SUVmax of 2.3 ± 0.7 at 1 h p.i. (2.0 ± 0.7 at 3 h p.i.). A total of 11 PSMA-positive mediastinal/paraaortal LN were detected in nine patients considering both imaging timing points. SUVmax of LN-metastases was 12.5 ± 13.2 at 1 h p.i. (15.8 ± 17.0 at 3 h p.i.). SUVmax increased clearly (> 10%) between 1 h and 3 h p.i. in 76.9% of the LN metastases, and decreased significantly in 72.7% of the mediastinal/paraaortal LN. By IHC, PSMA-expression was observed in intranodal vascular endothelia of all investigated LN groups and to differing degrees within germinal centers of 15/22 of them (68.1%). Expression was stronger in mediastinal nodes (p = 0.038) and when follicular hyperplasia was present (p = 0.050).ConclusionPSMA-positive mediastinal/paraaortal benign LN were visible in a notable proportion of patients. PSMA-positivity on the histopathological level was associated with the activation state of the LN. However, in contrast to LN metastases of PC, they presented with significantly lower uptake, which, in addition, usually decreased over time.

ObjectivePositron emission tomography in association with magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR) and 68Ga-PSMA-11 has shown superior detection in recurrent prostate cancer patients as compared to PET/computed tomography (PET/CT). There are, however, several technological differences between PET/CT and PET/MR systems which affect the PET image quality. The objective of this study was to assess the reproducibility of PET/CT and PET/MR SUV’s in recurrent prostate cancer patients. We randomized the patients regarding the order of the PET/CT and PET/MR scans to reduce the influence of tracer uptake as a function of time.MethodsThirty patients, all with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, underwent whole-body PET/CT and PET/MR scans after intravenous injection of a single dose of 68Ga-PSMA-11. Fifteen patients underwent PET/CT first and 15 patients underwent PET/MR first. Volumes of interest on tumor lesions were outlined and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) corrected for lean body mass was calculated. Correlation and agreement between scans were assessed by generalized linear mixed-effects models and Bland–Altman analysis. The association between SUV, patient characteristics and imaging parameters was assessed.ResultsEighteen of the 30 evaluated patients had at least one positive lesion, giving an overall detection rate of 60%. In total, there were 34 visible lesions: 5 local recurrences, 22 lymph node metastases and 7 bone metastases. One group acquired PET/CT and PET/MR at median time points of 63.0 and 159.0 min, while the other group acquired PET/MR and PET/CT at median time points of 92.0 and 149.0 min. SUVmax between scans was linearly correlated, described by the equation Y(PET/CT SUVmax) = 0.75 + 1.00 × (PET/MR SUVmax), on average 20% higher on PET/CT than on PET/MR. SUV associated significantly only with type of lesion, scan time post-injection and acquisition time per bed position.ConclusionsSUVmax from PET/CT and PET/MR are linearly correlated, on average 20% higher on PET/CT than on PET/MR and should, therefore, not be used interchangeably in patient follow-up.