Explore the vast range of titles available.

Objectives: To assess the association between serum concentrations of adalimumab (ADL) and etanercept (ETN) and the occurrence of a flare in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who are tapering methotrexate (MTX) or their TNF inhibitor. In addition, we explored the impact of tapering MTX on immunogenicity in patients with longstanding ADL use. Methods: ADL and ETN serum concentrations and anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) quantified with a drug-tolerant assay were determined in all RA patients who participated in the TARA trial. Within the TARA trial, two tapering strategies were compared, namely gradually tapering MTX followed by tapering a TNF-inhibitor (ADL or ETN) or vice versa. Results: In the current analysis, 111 RA patients who strictly followed the tapering strategy and had >3 blood samples were included, of them 41% tapered ADL and 59% tapered ETN. Both ADL and ETN concentrations decreased during tapering and stopping, but ADL was longer detectable after cessation compared to ETN. If MTX was tapered first, more ADAs against ADL were detectable in the serum, but it did not affect the serum concentrations. Conclusions: Our data showed that the majority of flares occur when the median serum concentration of ADL and ETN falls below 1 mg/L. If MTX is tapered first, there is a notable increase in the detection of ADAs, but this does not impact the median ADL serum concentration.

Introduction Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be separated into two major subpopulations based on the absence or presence of serum anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs). The more severe disease course in ACPA + RA and differences in treatment outcome between these subpopulations suggest that ACPA + and ACPA − RA are different disease subsets. The identification of T-helper (Th) cells specifically recognizing citrullinated peptides, combined with the strong association between HLA-DRB1 and ACPA positivity, point toward a pathogenic role of Th cells in ACPA + RA. In this context we recently identified a potential pathogenic role for CCR6 + Th cells in RA. Therefore, we examined whether Th cell population distributions differ by ACPA status. Methods We performed a nested matched case–control study including 27 ACPA + and 27 ACPA − treatment-naive early RA patients matched for disease activity score in 44 joints, presence of rheumatoid factor, sex, age, duration of complaints and presence of erosions. CD4 + CD45RO + (memory) Th cell distribution profiles from these patients were generated based on differential chemokine receptor expression and related with disease duration. Results ACPA status was not related to differences in total CD4 + T cell or memory Th cell proportions. However, ACPA + patients had significantly higher proportions of Th cells expressing the chemokine receptors CCR6 and CXCR3. Similar proportions of CCR4 + and CCR10 + Th cells were found. Within the CCR6 + cell population, four Th subpopulations were distinguished based on differential chemokine receptor expression: Th17 (CCR4 + CCR10 − ), Th17.1 (CXCR3 + ), Th22 (CCR4 + CCR10 + ) and CCR4/CXCR3 double-positive (DP) cells. In particular, higher proportions of Th22 (p = 0.02), Th17.1 (p = 0.03) and CCR4/CXCR3 DP (p = 0.01) cells were present in ACPA + patients. In contrast, ACPA status was not associated with differences in Th1 (CCR6 − CXCR3 + ; p = 0.90), Th2 (CCR6 − CCR4 + ; p = 0.27) and T-regulatory (CD25 hi FOXP3 + ; p = 0.06) cell proportions. Interestingly, CCR6 + Th cells were inversely correlated with disease duration in ACPA − patients (R 2  = −0.35; p < 0.01) but not in ACPA + (R 2  < 0.01; p = 0.94) patients. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that increased peripheral blood CCR6 + Th cells proportions distinguish ACPA + RA from ACPA − RA. This suggests that CCR6 + Th cells are involved in the differences in disease severity and treatment outcome between ACPA + and ACPA − RA.

The objective was to predict insufficient response to 3 months methotrexate (MTX) in DMARD naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients. A Multivariable logistic regression model of rheumatoid arthritis patients starting MTX was developed in a derivation cohort with 285 patients starting MTX in a clinical multicentre, stratified single-blinded trial, performed in seven secondary care clinics and a tertiary care clinic. The model was validated in a validation cohort with 102 patients starting MTX at a tertiary care clinic. Outcome was insufficient response (disease activity score (DAS)28 >3.2) after 3 months of MTX treatment. Clinical characteristics, lifestyle variables, genetic and metabolic biomarkers were determined at baseline in both cohorts. These variables were dichotomized and used to construct a multivariable prediction model with backward logistic regression analysis. The prediction model for insufficient response in the derivation cohort, included: DAS28>5.1, Health Assessment Questionnaire>0.6, current smoking, BMI>25 kg/m2, ABCB1 rs1045642 genotype, ABCC3 rs4793665 genotype, and erythrocyte-folate<750 nmol/L. In the derivation cohort, AUC of ROC curve was 0.80 (95%CI: 0.73-0.86), and 0.80 (95%CI: 0.69-0.91) in the validation cohort. Betas of the prediction model were transformed into total risk score (range 0-8). At cutoff of ≥4, probability for insufficient response was 44%. Sensitivity was 71%, specificity 72%, with positive and negative predictive value of 72% and 71%. A prognostics prediction model for insufficient response to MTX in 2 prospective RA cohorts by combining genetic, metabolic, clinical and lifestyle variables was developed and validated. This model satisfactorily identified RA patients with high risk of insufficient response to MTX.

Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of autoantibodies against modified proteins, known as anti-modified protein autoantibodies (AMPAs). While the relationship between different AMPA isotypes and various risk factors remains poorly understood, investigating this association is important for a deeper understanding of RA pathophysiology. Smoking, has its primary effects in the lungs, and it remains unclear whether smoking is preferentially linked to specific AMPA isotypes, such as IgA, which could suggest a mucosal origin. Therefore, we set out to investigate the association between smoking, genetic risk factors for RA, and the presence of specific AMPA isotypes, particular IgA. Methods In 618 RA patients, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA-) and anti-acetylated protein antibodies (AAPA-) IgA, -IgG and -IgM and RF-IgA and -IgM were measured by ELISA. Associations with genetic risk factors, smoking and autoantibodies were assessed with logistic regression analysis. For replication, a comprehensive meta-analysis incorporating 3309 RA patients was performed. Results Smoking was primarily associated with IgA AMPA, with associations that prevailed after correcting for the concurrent presence of AMPA IgG (ACPA-IgA OR 1.89 [1.14–3.12], AAPA-IgA 2.30 [1.35–3.94]). To further substantiate these results, we performed a meta-analysis of 3309 RA patients and observed that smoking was again predominantly associated with the combined presence of ACPA-IgA in addition to ACPA-IgG (OR 2.05 [1.69–2.49], p  < 0.001) versus the single presence of ACPA-IgG (OR 1.18 [0.97–1.44], p  = 0.11). A gene-environment interaction between the most important genetic risk factor for RA (the HLA shared epitope alleles) and smoking was only seen in patients that were both ACPA-IgG and ACPA-IgA positive, but not in patients who were only positive for ACPA-IgG. Conclusion These data provide a pivotal refinement of existing knowledge regarding risk factor associations for RA and lend novel support to the hypothesis that smoking may exert its effect on RA by the induction of local (auto)immune responses at mucosal sites.

Rheumatoid arthritis is the most common autoimmune disease worldwide and requires long-term treatment to suppress inflammation. Currently, treatment is started when arthritis is clinically apparent. We aimed to evaluate whether earlier intervention, in the preceding phase of arthralgia and subclinical joint inflammation, could prevent the development of clinical arthritis or reduce the disease burden. We conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept-trial at the Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands. Adults aged 18 years or older with arthralgia clinically suspected of progressing to rheumatoid arthritis and MRI-detected subclinical joint inflammation were eligible for enrolment across 13 rheumatology outpatient clinics in the southwest region of the Netherlands and randomly assigned (1:1) to a single intramuscular glucocorticoid injection (120 mg) and a 1-year course of oral methotrexate (up to 25 mg/week), or placebo (single injection and tablets for 1 year). Participants and investigators were masked to group assignment. Follow-up continued for 1 year after the end of the 1-year treatment period. The primary endpoint was development of clinical arthritis (fulfilling the 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria or involving two or more joints) that persisted for at least 2 weeks. Patient-reported physical functioning, symptoms, and work productivity were secondary endpoints, which were measured every 4 months. Additionally, the course of MRI-detected inflammation was studied. All participants entered the intention-to-treat analysis. This trial is registered with EudraCT, 2014-004472-35, and the Netherlands Trial Register, NTR4853-trial-NL4599. Between April 16, 2015, and Sept 11, 2019, 901 patients were assessed for eligibility and 236 were enrolled and randomly assigned to active treatment (n=119) or placebo (n=117). At 2 years, the frequency of the primary endpoint was similar between the groups (23 [19%] of 119 participants in the treatment group vs 21 [18%] of 117 in the placebo group; hazard ratio 0·81, 95% CI 0·45 to 1·48). Physical functioning improved more in the treatment group during the first 4 months and remained better than in the placebo group (mean between-group difference in Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index over 2 years: –0·09, 95% CI –0·16 to –0·03; p=0·0042). Similarly, pain (on scale 0–100, mean between-group difference: –8, 95% CI –12 to –4; p<0·0001), morning stiffness of joints (–12, –16 to –8; p<0·0001), presenteeism (–8%, –13 to –3; p=0·0007), and MRI-detected joint inflammation (–1·4 points, –2·0 to –0·9; p<0·0001) showed sustained improvement in the treatment group compared with the placebo group. The number of serious adverse events was equal in both groups; adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile for methotrexate. Methotrexate, the cornerstone treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, initiated at the pre-arthritis stage of symptoms and subclinical inflammation, did not prevent the development of clinical arthritis, but modified the disease course as shown by sustained improvement in MRI-detected inflammation, related symptoms, and impairments compared with placebo. Dutch Research Council (NWO; Dutch Arthritis Society).

Background We present a study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that investigates the hypothesis if intervention in the symptomatic phase preceding clinical arthritis (clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA)) is effective in preventing progression from subclinical inflammation to clinically apparent persistent arthritis. Currently, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be recognized and diagnosed when arthritis (joint swelling) has become detectable at physical examination. Importantly, at this time, the immune processes have already matured, chronicity is established, and patients require long-standing treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. The TREAT EARLIER trial studies the hypothesis that intervention in the symptomatic phase preceding clinical arthritis is more often successful in permanent disease modification because of less matured underlying disease processes. Methods A two-level definition to identify patients that are prone to develop RA is used. First, patients should have CSA and recent-onset arthralgia (< 1 year) that is suspect to progress to RA according to the expertise of the treating rheumatologist. Second, patients need to have subclinical inflammation of the hand or foot joints at 1.5 T MRI. The trial aims to recruit 230 participants from secondary care hospital settings across the south-west region of The Netherlands. Intervention will be randomly assigned and includes a single-dose of intramuscular 120 mg methylprednisolon followed by methotrexate (increasing dose to 25 mg/week orally) or placebo (both; injection and tablets) over the course of 1 year. Thereafter, participants are followed for another year. The primary endpoint is the development of clinically detectable arthritis, either fulfilling the 2010 criteria for RA or unclassified clinical arthritis of ≥ 2 joints, which persists for at least 2 weeks. DMARD-free status is a co-primary endpoint. The patient-reported outcomes functioning, along with workability and symptoms, are key secondary endpoints. Participants, caregivers (including those assessing the endpoints), and scientific staff are all blinded to the group assignment. Discussion This proof-of-concept study is the logical consequence of pre-work on the identification of patients with CSA with MRI-detected subclinical joint inflammation. It will test the hypothesis whether intervention in patients in this early phase with the cornerstone treatment of classified RA (methotrexate) hampers the development of persistent RA and reduce the disease burden of RA. Trial registration Dutch Trial Register NL4599 (NTR4853). Registered on 20 October 2014

IntroductionRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a heterogeneous disease, which current treatment guidelines insufficiently accommodate, as they predominantly emphasise the suppression of disease activity. However, a step towards personalised medicine is preferred to further optimise treatment and requires homogeneous subgroups with similarities in pathophysiological mechanisms and treatment responses. Prior research has already demonstrated notable differences in the pathophysiology of patients with autoantibody-positive and autoantibody-negative RA, as well as differences in treatment responses, which may serve as a strong basis for personalised medicine. Additionally, there is evidence suggesting that an early treatment response is indicative of future courses. Based on these findings, we designed a personalised medicine trial in RA that compares the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a tailor-made approach with routine care.Methods and analysisThe PeRsonalIsed Medicine in RA (PRIMERA) trial is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial that includes 300 adult patients with newly diagnosed, DMARD-naïve RA, according to 2010 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR criteria. Patients are randomised into either routine care or a tailor-made approach. Both management approaches use a treat-to-target strategy, aiming for low disease activity (LDA, Disease Activity Score using 44 joints (DAS) ≤2.4). In routine care, initial treatment consists of methotrexate along with a single intramuscular dose of glucocorticoids (GCs) and treatment can be intensified after 3, 7 and 10 months if LDA is not reached. Conversely, initial treatment in the tailor-made approach depends on the presence of autoantibodies, with patients with autoantibody-positive and autoantibody-negative RA starting with hydroxychloroquine or methotrexate together with a single intramuscular dose of GCs, respectively. Medication intensifications will be allowed at months 1, 3, 4, 7 and 10. Intensifications at months 1 and 4 depend on whether patients have an early sufficient response to GCs and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs), respectively. The tailor-made approach is superior to routine care if no more biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) or tsDMARDs are used after 10 months of treatment, while the mean DAS over time is lower. Our primary outcome is the proportional difference in bDMARD or tsDMARD usage after 10 months of treatment between routine care and the tailor-made approach. Secondary outcomes are DAS over time, time to achieve LDA, cost-effectiveness and patient-reported outcome measurements over time.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been granted by Erasmus MC Medical Ethics Review Committee (MEC-2020-0825). The results will be disseminated through peer-review journals and medical congresses.Trial registration number ISRCTN16170070.

Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)-free remission is suggested as a preferred ultimate target in a treat-to-target management approach; however, we previously showed, in a systematic literature review, that this outcome is achievable in only 10%–20% of the RA population.3 Within the TARA trial, we showed that DMARD-free remission was achievable in 15% of the included patients with established RA. Especially, as we have previously shown that a disease flare has a significant impact on patients’ lives, which outlast the effect of a flare on disease activity.4 Noteworthy is the fact that although most patients reach low disease activity within 6 months after a flare, most of them have a higher disease activity postflare compared with preflare.4 Unfortunately, current tapering strategies are still based on a trial-and-error approach that leads to high flare rates and, therefore, a tailor-made tapering approach is preferred. [...]no consensus had been reached on how to taper medication because cohorts/trials directly comparing different tapering strategies are sparse.5 Haroon, et al showed that 60% of patients with RA were able to reduce their bDMARD dosage when a 2-step tapering protocol was used, consisting of dose reductions every 4 months of 30% followed by 50%. DMARD-free remission as novel treatment target in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review of achievability and sustainability.

Predictive values depend on the prevalence of a disease in a population. Because the prevalence of IA in a 1.5 lines setting will differ from a primary care setting, post-test probabilities of IA were estimated for two lower prior-test probabilities as example, namely 20% (estimated probability in patients GPs believe IA is likely) and 2% (prior-test probability with less preselection by GPs), using likelihood ratios and nomograms (online supplemental figures S2 and S3). The PPV was 46%, and the NPV was 77% (figure 1B,C). [...]the PPV increased hardly (from 41% to 46%), and the NPV somewhat increased (from 59% to 77%). IA, inflammatory arthritis; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value. [...]patient-reported joint swelling had little value in distinguishing patients with and without IA, for different prior-test probabilities.

ObjectiveTo identify and validate clinical baseline predictors associated with inadequate response (IR) to methotrexate (MTX) therapy in newly diagnosed patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsIn U-Act-Early, 108 disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive patients with RA were randomised to initiate MTX therapy and treated to target until sustained remission (disease activity score assessing 28 joints (DAS28) <2.6 with four or less swollen joints for ≥24 weeks) was achieved. If no remission, hydroxychloroquine was added to the treatment regimen (ie, ‘MTX+’) and replaced by tocilizumab if the target still was not reached thereafter. Regression analyses were performed to identify clinical predictors for IR, defined as needing addition of a biological DMARD, to ‘MTX+’. Data from the treatment in the Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort were used for external validation of the prediction model.ResultsWithin 1 year, 56/108 (52%) patients in U-Act-Early showed IR to ‘MTX+’. DAS28 (adjusted OR (ORadj) 2.1, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.2), current smoking (ORadj 3.02, 95% CI 1.1 to 8.0) and alcohol consumption (ORadj 0.4, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.9) were identified as baseline predictors. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of the prediction model was 0.75 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.84); the positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 65% and 80%, respectively. When applying the model to the validation cohort, the AUROC slightly decreased to 0.67 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.79) and the PPV and NPV to 54% and 80%, respectively.ConclusionHigher DAS28, current smoking and no alcohol consumption are predictive factors for IR to step-up ‘MTX+’ in DMARD-naive patients with new-onset RA.Trial registration NCT01034137; Post-results, ISRCTN26791028; Post-results.