Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: The cavernous sinus (CS) is a highly vulnerable anatomical space, mainly due to the neurovascular structures that it contains; therefore, a detailed knowledge of its anatomy is mandatory for surgical unlocking. In this study, we compared the anatomy of this region from different endoscopic and microsurgical operative corridors, further focusing on the corresponding anatomic landmarks encountered along these routes. Furthermore, we tried to define the safe entry zones to this venous space from these three different operative corridors, and to provide indications regarding the optimal approach according to the lesion’s location. Methods: Five embalmed and injected adult cadaveric specimens (10 sides) separately underwent dissection and exposure of the CS via superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital (SETOA), extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal-transethmoidal (EEEA), and microsurgical transcranial fronto-temporo-orbitozygomatic (FTOZ) approaches. The anatomical landmarks and the content of this venous space were described and compared from these surgical perspectives. Results: The oculomotor triangle can be clearly exposed only by the FTOZ approach. Unlike EEEA, for the exposure of the clinoid triangle content, the anterior clinoid process removal is required for FTOZ and SETOA. The supra- and infratrochlear as well as the anteromedial and anterolateral triangles can be exposed by all three corridors. The most recently introduced SETOA allowed for the exposure of the entire lateral wall of the CS without entering its neurovascular structures and part of the posterior wall; furthermore, thanks to its anteroposterior trajectory, it allowed for the disclosure of the posterior ascending segment of the cavernous ICA with the related sympathetic plexus through the Mullan’s triangle, in a minimally invasive fashion. Through the anterolateral triangle, the transorbital corridor allowed us to expose the lateral 180 degrees of the Vidian nerve and artery in the homonymous canal, the anterolateral aspect of the lacerum segment of the ICA at the transition zone from the petrous horizontal to the ascending posterior cavernous segment, surrounded by the carotid sympathetic plexus, and the medial Meckel’s cave. Conclusions: Different regions of the cavernous sinus are better exposed by different surgical corridors. The relationship of the tumor with cranial nerves in the lateral wall guides the selection of the approach to cavernous sinus lesions. The transorbital endoscopic approach can be considered to be a safe and minimally invasive complementary surgical corridor to the well-established transcranial and endoscopic endonasal routes for the exposure of selected lesions of the cavernous sinus. Nevertheless, peer knowledge of the anatomy and a surgical learning curve are required.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Endoscopic skull base surgery is now the preferred treatment option to remove skull base tumors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the patient's sense of smell and mucociliary clearance time (MCT) after skull base surgery. METHODS: Patients with pituitary adenoma underwent a transnasal transsphenoidal endoscopic approach (TTEA group, n = 36), whereas patients with other benign parasellar tumors underwent an expanded endonasal approach (EEA group, n = 14) with a vascularized septal flap. Assessment of symptoms (Visual Analogue Scale), olfactometry (Barcelona Smell Test, BAST-24), and MCT (saccharin test) were performed before and 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Before surgery, patients reported poorer BAST-24 scores on detection, identification, and forced choice than the healthy population, but both study groups had similar sinonasal symptoms, BAST-24, and MCT scores. After surgery, no changes in symptom scores (Visual Analogue Scale) were observed except for the loss of smell (26.7 ± 30.5 mm, P < .05) and posterior nasal discharge (29.7 ± 30.3 mm, P < .05) compared with baseline (5.2 ± 11.3, 19.1 ± 25.3, respectively). EEA patients reported higher loss of smell and posterior nasal discharge compared with TTEA. TTEA and EEA groups had similar scores on postoperative BAST-24. After surgery, however, patients showed prolonged saccharin test (15.6 ± 10.8 min, P < .05) compared with baseline (8.4 ± 4.4 min). In addition, EEA patients reported longer MCT than TTEA patients. CONCLUSION: EEA but not TTEA has a short-term (3 months) negative impact on patient's olfaction and mucociliary clearance. Patients should be informed about smell loss as a consequence of skull base surgery to prevent legal claims. Likewise, further research and some modifications on reconstruction flaps are encouraged to avoid damaging the olfactory neuroepithelium.

Current treatment guidelines for the management of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) are far from definitive, and the prognosis remains dismal. Despite recent advancements in the pharmacological and surgical fields, numerous doubts persist concerning the optimal strategy that clinicians should adopt for patients who fail the first lines of treatment and present signs of progressive disease. With most recurrences being located within the margins of the previously resected lesion, a comprehensive molecular and genetic profiling of rGBM revealed substantial differences compared with newly diagnosed disease. In the present comprehensive review, we sought to examine the current treatment guidelines and the new perspectives that polarize the field of neuro-oncology, strictly focusing on progressive disease. For this purpose, updated PRISMA guidelines were followed to search for pivotal studies and clinical trials published in the last five years. A total of 125 articles discussing locoregional management, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy strategies were included in our analysis, and salient findings were critically summarized. In addition, an in-depth description of the molecular profile of rGBM and its distinctive characteristics is provided. Finally, we integrate the above-mentioned evidence with the current guidelines published by international societies, including AANS/CNS, EANO, AIOM, and NCCN.

Background/Objectives: The endoscopic transorbital approach (ETOA) is a minimally invasive surgical route that provides access to the lateral skull base through the superior eyelid. Originally developed as an endoscopic procedure, ETOA has recently been explored using alternative visualization tools such as the exoscope. This study evaluates the effectiveness of exoscopic visualization across the different steps of transorbital surgery. Methods: Eight formalin-fixed cadaveric specimens (16 sides) were dissected by four teams of neurosurgeons trained in ETOA. The dissection protocol consisted of three stages: skin, orbital, and intracranial. The teams were assigned to four groups: the first performed a pure endoscopic ETOA (group A) and the second and third performed a combined exoscopic/endoscopic ETOA, using exoscopic visualization, respectively, for the skin phase only (group B) or for the skin and orbital phases (group C), while the fourth group performed a pure exoscopic ETOA All surgeons rotated across groups. Operative time was recorded. After each procedure, surgeons rated operative comfort, maneuverability, and image quality on a 0–5 scale. Pre- and postoperative CT scans were used for volumetric analysis, comparing surgical cavity size with and without the endoscope in place. In addition, an illustrative exoscopic case was included. Results: Exoscopic visualization proved to be more effective during the skin phase. In the orbital phase, it improved access and reduced crowding during lateral wall drilling. However, endoscopic visualization provided superior image clarity and magnification for deep and medial orbital structures. CT-based analysis confirmed that the exoscope significantly improves the working space during orbital dissection. Moreover, the combined approaches (Groups B and C) achieved shorter operative times and higher subjective ratings. Conclusions: The exoscope could be a valuable visualizing tool for transorbital surgery. While the skin phase benefits most from exoscopic visualization, the endoscope remains essential for the intracranial phase. The orbital phase can be effectively performed with either technique, each offering specific advantages and limitations.

ObjectivesA deep knowledge of the surgical anatomy of the target area is mandatory for a successful operative procedure. For this purpose, over the years, many teaching and learning methods have been described, from the most ancient cadaveric dissection to the most recent virtual reality, each with their respective pros and cons. Photogrammetry, an emergent technique, allows for the creation of three-dimensional (3D) models and reconstructions. Thanks to the spreading of photogrammetry nowadays it is possible to generate these models using professional software or even smartphone apps. This study aims to compare the neuroanatomical photogrammetric models generated by the two most utilized smartphone applications in this domain, Metascan and 3D-Scanner, through quantitative analysis.MethodsTwo human head specimens (four sides) were examined. Anatomical dissection was segmented into five stages to systematically expose well-defined structures. After each stage, a photogrammetric model was generated using two prominent smartphone applications. These models were then subjected to both quantitative and qualitative analysis, with a specific focus on comparing the mesh density as a measure of model resolution and accuracy. Appropriate consent was obtained for the publication of the cadaver's image.ResultsThe quantitative analysis revealed that the models generated by Metascan app consistently demonstrated superior mesh density compared to those from 3D-Scanner, indicating a higher level of detail and potential for precise anatomical representation.ConclusionEnabling depth perception, capturing high-quality images, offering flexibility in viewpoints: photogrammetry provides researchers with unprecedented opportunities to explore and understand the intricate and magnificent structure of the brain. However, it is of paramount importance to develop and apply rigorous quality control systems to ensure data integrity and reliability of findings in neurological research. This study has demonstrated the superiority of Metascan in processing photogrammetric models for neuroanatomical studies.

Objective Neurosurgical indications for the superior eyelid transorbital endoscopic approach (SETOA) are rapidly expanding over the last years. Nevertheless, as any new technique, a detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the surgical target area, the operative corridor, and the specific surgical landmark from this different perspective is required for a safest and successful surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study is to provide, through anatomical dissections, a detailed investigation of the surgical anatomy revealed by SETOA via anterolateral triangle of the middle cranial fossa. We also sought to define the relevant surgical landmarks of this operative corridor. Methods Eight embalmed and injected adult cadaveric specimens (16 sides) underwent dissection and exposure of the cavernous sinus and middle cranial fossa via superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach. The anterolateral triangle was opened and its content exposed. An extended endoscopic endonasal trans-clival approach (EEEA) with exposure of the cavernous sinus content and skeletonization of the paraclival and parasellar segments of the internal carotid artery (ICA) was also performed, and the anterolateral triangle was exposed. Measurements of the surface area of this triangle from both surgical corridors were calculated in three head specimens using coordinates of its borders under image-guide navigation. Results The drilling of the anterolateral triangle via SETOA unfolds a space that can be divided by the course of the vidian nerve into two windows, a wider “supravidian” and a narrower “infravidian,” which reveal different anatomical corridors: a “medial supravidian” and a “lateral supravidian,” divided by the lacerum segment of the ICA, leading to the lower clivus, and to the medial aspect of the Meckel’s cave and terminal part of the horizontal petrous ICA, respectively. The infravidian corridor leads medially into the sphenoid sinus. The arithmetic means of the accessible surface area of the anterolateral triangle were 45.48 ± 3.31 and 42.32 ± 2.17 mm 2 through transorbital approach and endonasal approach, respectively. Conclusion SETOA can be considered a minimally invasive route complementary to the extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the anteromedial aspect of the Meckel’s cave and the foramen lacerum. The lateral loop of the trigeminal nerve represents a reliable surgical landmark to localize the lacerum segment of the ICA from this corridor. Nevertheless, as any new technique, a learning curve is needed, and the clinical feasibility should be proven.

Purpose The petroclival region represents the “Achille’s heel” for the neurosurgeons . Many ventral endoscopic routes to this region, mainly performed as isolated, have been described. The aim of the present study is to verify the feasibility of a modular, combined, multiportal approach to the petroclival region to overcome the limits of a single approach, in terms of exposure and working areas, brain retraction and manipulation of neurovascular structures. Methods Four cadaver heads (8 sides) underwent endoscopic endonasal transclival, transorbital superior eyelid and contralateral sublabial transmaxillary-Caldwell-Luc approaches, to the petroclival region. CT scans were obtained before and after each approach to rigorously separate the contribution of each osteotomy and subsequentially to build a comprehensive 3D model of the progressively enlarged working area after each step. Results The addition of the contralateral transmaxillary and transorbital corridors to the extended endoscopic endonasal transclival in a combined multiportal approach provides complementary paramedian trajectories to overcome the natural barrier represented by the parasellar and paraclival segments of the internal carotid artery, resulting in significantly greater area of exposure than a pure endonasal midline route (8,77 cm 2 and 11,14 cm 2 vs 4,68 cm 2 and 5,83cm 2 , extradural and intradural, respectively). Conclusion The use of different endoscopic “head-on” trajectories can be combined in a wider multiportal extended approach to improve the ventral route to the most inaccessible petroclival regions. Finally, by combining these approaches and reiterating the importance of multiportal strategy, we quantitatively demonstrate the possibility to reach “far away” paramedian petroclival targets while preserving the neurovascular structures.

Background Superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach (SETOA) has demonstrated broad versatility in addressing heterogeneous lesions involving the paramedian anterior and middle skull base in carefully selected patients. Although various skull base reconstruction techniques have shown promising results in reducing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, no standardized method has yet been established that consistently ensures optimal outcomes in the presence of an intraoperative CSF leak to achieve a watertight seal and minimize the risk of potentially life-threatening complications. Methods Preliminary data from a monoinstitutional surgical series of patients harboring different intracranial lesions, in whom intraoperative CSF leak was detected and who underwent reconstruction during SETOA using a novel method defined “4F”, were retrospectively analyzed. The technique consists of intradural autologous fat graft, extradural fascia lata, fibrin glue and extradural autologous fat graft. Postoperative functional and esthetic outcome, particularly reconstruction-related complications, were assessed over a follow-up period of 14–38 months. Results The surgical series included 16 patients (2 metastases, 1 orbital lymphoma, 10 meningiomas, 2 trigeminal schwannomas, 1 case of postoperative CSF leak). SETOA was performed in 13 cases, while in the remaining three patients an extended lateral rim orbitotomy variant was added. No cases of CSF leak were observed during the follow-up period. The method provided effective reconstruction, with no instances of major or even minor reconstruction-related complications —such as proptosis, enophthalmos, meningoencephalocele, diplopia, new onset ocular paresis or wound infection—and no revision surgeries were required. Conclusion This preliminary experience suggests that the 4F reconstruction technique may be a feasible option for managing osteodural defects during SETOA. It accomplishes the goals of skull base reconstruction, to achieve a watertight closure and avoid dead space. However, given the limited sample size and lack of a control group, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn. Further studies with larger cohorts, standardized outcome measures, and comparative methods are required to assess its final clinical utility.

During the last few years, the superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach has been proposed as a new minimally invasive pathway to access skull base lesions, mostly in ophthalmologic, otolaryngologic, and maxillofacial surgeries. However, most neurosurgeons performing minimally invasive endoscopic neurosurgery do not usually employ the orbit as a surgical corridor. The authors undertook this technical and anatomical study to contribute a neurosurgical perspective, exploring the different possibilities of this novel route. Ten dissections were performed on ten formalin-fixed specimens to further refine the transorbital technique. As part of the study, the authors also report an illustrative transorbital surgery case to further detail key surgical landmarks. Herein, we would like to discuss equipment, key anatomical landmarks, and surgical skills and stress the steps and details to ensure a safe and successful procedure. We believe it could be critical to promote and encourage the neurosurgical community to overcome difficulties and ensure a successful surgery by following these key recommendations.

The endoscopic contralateral transmaxillary (CTM) approach has been proposed as a potential route to widen the corridor posterolateral to the internal carotid artery (ICA). In this study, we first refined the surgical technique of a combined multiportal endoscopic endonasal transclival (EETC) and CTM approach to the petrous apex (PA) and petroclival synchondrosis (PCS) in the dissection laboratory, and then validated its applications in a preliminary surgical series. The combined EETC and CTM approach was performed on three cadaver specimens based on four surgical steps: (1) the nasal, (2) the clival, (3) the maxillary and (4) the petrosal phases. The CTM provided a “head-on trajectory” to the PA and PCS and a short distance to the surgical field considerably furthering surgical maneuverability. The best operative set-up was achieved by introducing angled optics via the endonasal route and operative instruments via the transmaxillary corridor exploiting the advantages of a non-coaxial multiportal surgery. Clinical applications of the combined EETC and CTM approach were reported in three cases, a clival chordoma and two giant pituitary adenomas. The present translational study explores the safety and feasibility of a combined multiportal EETC and CTM approach to access the petroclival region though different corridors.