Explore the vast range of titles available.

Metabolomic analysis provides a wealth of information that can be predictive of distinctive phenotypes of pathogenic processes and has been applied to better understand disease development. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease with the establishment of chronic synovial inflammation that affects joints and peripheral tissues such as skeletal muscle and bone. There is a lack of useful disease biomarkers to track disease activity, drug response and follow-up in RA. In this review, we describe potential metabolic biomarkers that might be helpful in the study of RA pathogenesis, drug response and risk of comorbidities. TMAO (choline and trimethylamine oxide) and TCA (tricarboxylic acid) cycle products have been suggested to modulate metabolic profiles during the early stages of RA and are present systemically, which is a relevant characteristic for biomarkers. Moreover, the analysis of lipids such as cholesterol, FFAs and PUFAs may provide important information before disease onset to predict disease activity and treatment response. Regarding therapeutics, TNF inhibitors may increase the levels of tryptophan, valine, lysine, creatinine and alanine, whereas JAK/STAT inhibitors may modulate exclusively fatty acids. These observations indicate that different disease modifying antirheumatic drugs have specific metabolic profiles and can reveal differences between responders and non-responders. In terms of comorbidities, physical impairment represented by higher fatigue scores and muscle wasting has been associated with an increase in urea cycle, FFAs, tocopherols and BCAAs. In conclusion, synovial fluid, blood and urine samples from RA patients seem to provide critical information about the metabolic profile related to drug response, disease activity and comorbidities.

In view of the method of diagnosing sarcopenia being complex and considered to be difficult to introduce into routine practice, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) recommends the use of the SARC-F questionnaire as a way to introduce assessment and treatment of sarcopenia into clinical practice. Only recently, some studies have turned their attention to the presence of sarcopenia in systemic sclerosis (SSc).There is no data about performance of SARC-F and other screening tests for sarcopenia in this population. To compare the accuracy of SARC-F, SARC-CalF, SARC-F+EBM, and Ishii test as screening tools for sarcopenia in patients with SSc. Cross-sectional study of 94 patients with SSc assessed by clinical and physical evaluation. Sarcopenia was defined according to the revised 2019 EWGSOP diagnostic criteria (EWGSOP2) with assessments of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, handgrip strength, and short physical performance battery (SPPB). As case finding tools, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, SARC-F+EBM and Ishii test were applied, including data on calf circumference, body mass index, limitations in strength, walking ability, rising from a chair, stair climbing, and self reported number of falls in the last year. The screening tests were evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Standard measures of diagnostic accuracy were computed using the EWGSOP2 criteria as the gold standard for diagnosis of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was identified in 15 (15.9%) patients with SSc by the EWGSOP2 criteria. Area under the ROC curve of SARC-F screening for sarcopenia was 0.588 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.420-0.756, p = 0.283). The results of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (-LR) and diagnostic Odds Ratio (DOR) with the EWGSOP2 criteria as the gold standard were 40.0% (95% CI, 19.8-64.2), 81.0% (95% CI, 71.0-88.1), 2.11 (95% CI, 0.98-4.55), 0.74 (95% CI, 0.48-1.13) and 2.84 (95% CI, 0.88-9.22), respectively. SARC-CalF and SARC-F+EBM showed better sensitivity (53.3%, 95% CI 30.1-75.2 and 60.0%, 95% CI 35.7-80.2, respectively) and specificity (84.8%, 95% CI 75.3-91.1 and 86.1%, 95% CI 76.8-92.0, respectively) compared with SARC-F. The best sensitivity was obtained with the Ishii test (86.7%, 95% CI 62.1-96.3), at the expense of a small loss of specificity (73.4%, 95% CI 62.7-81.9). Comparing the ROC curves, SARC-F performed worse than SARC-CalF, SARC-F+EBM and Ishii test as a sarcopenia screening tool in this population (AUCs 0.588 vs. 0.718, 0.832, and 0.862, respectively). Direct comparisons between tests revealed differences only between SARC-F and Ishii test for sensitivity (p = 0.013) and AUC (p = 0.031). SARC-CalF, SARC-F+EBM, and Ishii test performed better than SARC-F alone as screening tools for sarcopenia in patients with SSc. Considering diagnostic accuracy and feasibility aspects, SARC-F+EBM seems to be the most suitable screening tool to be adopted in routine care of patients with SSc.

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are frequently isolated in clinical specimens and are important reservoirs of resistance genes. In 2019, the Brazilian government set the BrCAST/EUCAST (Brazilian Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) guidelines as the national standard, resulting in changes in the interpretation of CoNS susceptibility tests. From outpatients, disk-diffusion susceptibility of 65 CoNS cultures were evaluated and compared using classification criteria from both CLSI and BrCAST/EUCAST. The isolates were identified using matrix assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF), and the presence of the mecA gene was determined. The most prevalent species were Staphylococcus saprophyticus (32.3%), S. haemolyticus (18.5%), and S. epidermidis (9.2%). Almost perfect agreement was seen between the guidelines, except concerning oxacillin and gentamicin, and the prevalence of multidrug resistant isolates increased with the use of BrCAST/EUCAST. Of all, 15 (23.1%) isolates, mainly S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus , were positive for the mecA gene, and only three were detected when using CLSI or BrCAST/EUCAST disk-diffusion screening. This, using either guideline, could reveal the difficulty of determining oxacillin resistance. Using warning zones or molecular methods might well be indicated for CoNS. In conclusion, adoption of the BrCAST/EUCAST guidelines will result in certain artificial changes in epidemiological susceptibility profiles, and clinicians and institutions should be aware of the possible implications.

Malignant gliomas have a dismal prognosis despite multi-modality treatments like neurosurgical resection, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Evidence has indicated that gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) and its receptor (GRPR) play a role in the development of a variety of cancers including gliomas. In the present study, we investigated the effects of RC-3095, a selective GRPR antagonist, alone or in combination with temozolomide (TMZ), a DNA alkylating agent, in in vitro and in vivo experimental rat C6 glioma models. Cellular proliferation was significantly reduced by all treatments with the combined administration of TMZ and RC-3095 being the most effective treatment. In in vivo experiments, the control group displayed the largest tumors (52 ± 15.5 mm 3 ), whereas RC-3095 reduced the tumor size, with the most significant effect at the dose of 0.3 mg/kg (21 ± 9.7 mm 3 ). The combined therapy produced further reduction in tumor size (10 ± 7.5 mm 3 ). Our results show that the combination of RC-3095 with TMZ produced an important reduction in in vitro and in vivo glioma growth therefore making RC-3095 a candidate drug to potentiate the effects of the DNA alkylating agent TMZ in the treatment of glioma.

The online version of the original article can be found under doi: 10.1007/s11060-008-9775-2