Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2) autoantibody disease has a variable clinical phenotype. We present a case report and performed a systematic review of the literature to summarize: (1) the clinical phenotype of patients with CASPR2 antibodies, (2) the findings in neurological investigations, and (3) the associated neuroimaging findings. Methods A chart review was performed for the case report. A systematic review of the medical literature was performed from first available to June 13, 2018. Abstracts were screened, and full-text peer-reviewed publications for novel patients with CASPR2 positivity in serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were included. Selected publications were reviewed, and relevant information was collated. Data were analyzed to determine overall frequency for demographic information, clinical presentations, and investigation findings. Results Our patient was a previously healthy 61-year-old male with both serum and CSF CASPR2 antibodies who presented with limbic encephalitis and refractory epilepsy. He was successfully treated with immunosuppression. For our systematic review, we identified 667 patients from 106 studies. Sixty-nine percent were male. Median age was 54 years (IQR 39–65.5). Median disease duration was 12 months (IQR 5.6–20). Reported overall clinical syndromes were: autoimmune encephalitis [69/134 (51.5%)], limbic encephalitis [106/274 (38.7%)], peripheral nerve hyperexcitability [72/191 (37.7%)], Morvan syndrome [57/251 (22.7%)], and cerebellar syndrome [24/163 (14.7%)]. Patients had positive serum [642/642 (100%)] and CSF [87/173 (50.3%)] CASPR2 antibodies. MRI was reported as abnormal in 159/299 patients (53.1%), and the most common abnormalities were encephalitis or T2 hyperintensities in the medial temporal lobes, or hippocampal atrophy, mesial temporal sclerosis, or hippocampal sclerosis. FDG-PET was abnormal in 30/35 patients (85.7%), and the most common abnormality was temporomesial hypometabolism. The most commonly associated condition was myasthenia gravis (38 cases). Thymoma occurred in 76/348 patients (21.8%). Non-thymoma malignancies were uncommon [42/397 (10.6%)]. Conclusions Most patients have autoimmune or limbic encephalitis and corresponding abnormalities on neuroimaging. Other presentations include peripheral nerve hyperexcitability or Morvan syndromes, cerebellar syndromes, behavioral and cognitive changes, and more rarely movement disorders. The most commonly associated malignancy was thymoma and suggests a role for thymoma screening in CASPR2-related diseases.

In glioblastoma (GBM), promoter methylation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is associated with benefit from chemotherapy. Correlations between MGMT promoter methylation and visually assessed imaging features on magnetic resonance (MR) have been reported suggesting that noninvasive detection of MGMT methylation status might be possible. Our study assessed whether MGMT methylation status in GBM could be predicted using MR imaging. We conducted a retrospective analysis of MR images in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Tumor texture was assessed by two methods. First, we analyzed texture by expert consensus describing the tumor borders, presence or absence of cysts, pattern of enhancement, and appearance of tumor signal in T2-weighted images. Then, we applied space–frequency texture analysis based on the S-transform. Tumor location within the brain was determined using automatized image registration and segmentation techniques. Their association with MGMT methylation was analyzed. We confirmed that ring enhancement assessed visually is significantly associated with unmethylated MGMT promoter status (P=0.006). Texture features on T2-weighted images assessed by the space–frequency analysis were significantly different between methylated and unmethylated cases (P<0.05). However, blinded classification of MGMT promoter methylation status reached an accuracy of only 71%. There were no significant differences in the locations of methylated and unmethylated GBM tumors. Our results provide further evidence that individual MR features are associated with MGMT methylation but better algorithms for predicting methylation status are needed. The relevance of this study lies on the application of novel techniques for the analysis of anatomical MR images of patients with GBM allowing the evaluation of subtleties not seen by an observer and facilitating the standardization of the methods, decreasing the potential for interobserver bias.

Current treatment outcome of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor. Following standard therapy, recurrence is universal with limited survival. Tumors from 173 GBM patients are analysed for somatic mutations to generate a personalized peptide vaccine targeting tumor-specific neoantigens. All patients were treated within the scope of an individual healing attempt. Among all vaccinated patients, including 70 treated prior to progression (primary) and 103 treated after progression (recurrent), the median overall survival from first diagnosis is 31.9 months (95% CI: 25.0–36.5). Adverse events are infrequent and are predominantly grade 1 or 2. A vaccine-induced immune response to at least one of the vaccinated peptides is detected in blood samples of 87 of 97 (90%) monitored patients. Vaccine-specific T-cell responses are durable in most patients. Significantly prolonged survival is observed for patients with multiple vaccine-induced T-cell responses (53 months) compared to those with no/low induced responses (27 months; P  = 0.03). Altogether, our results highlight that the application of personalized neoantigen-targeting peptide vaccine is feasible and represents a promising potential treatment option for GBM patients. Despite new treatment options, prognosis for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor. Here the authors report the clinical course of patients with GBM treated with a personalized neoantigen-derived peptide vaccine treated within the scope of an individual healing attempt.

Autoimmune encephalitis is increasingly recognized as a neurologic cause of acute mental status changes with similar prevalence to infectious encephalitis. Despite rising awareness, approaches to diagnosis remain inconsistent and evidence for optimal treatment is limited. The following Canadian guidelines represent a consensus and evidence (where available) based approach to both the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with autoimmune encephalitis. The guidelines were developed using a modified RAND process and included input from specialists in autoimmune neurology, neuropsychiatry and infectious diseases. These guidelines are targeted at front line clinicians and were created to provide a pragmatic and practical approach to managing such patients in the acute setting.

Objective. A multidisciplinary approach is increasingly used in NeuroOncology clinics. Although this model has several advantages, patients report feeling overwhelmed by the complexity of their treatment protocol and staff feel rushed because each provider must evaluate the patient within the limited clinic hours. We hypothesized that the presence of a pharmacist in clinic could address these concerns by (1) reviewing all treatment protocols and side-effect management with patients, (2) being available to address questions outside of clinic and (3) answering staff related medication questions. Methods. The pharmacist met with consenting patients at the initial clinic visit and followed up by telephone two additional times. The pharmacist was available to answer questions outside of clinic hours. Surveys were developed and given to patient and staff to evaluate their experience. Results. Over 4 months, 13 patients were enrolled. The pharmacist interacted with each patient an average of 9 times with 55% of interactions occurring outside scheduled visits and two-thirds of pharmacist interventions directly involving patient care. A total of 85% of patients and staff responded to the evaluation survey and 90% of respondents indicated that the pharmacist should remain part of the NeuroOncology team. Patients reported less stress related to their treatment and clinical staff experienced improved clinical efficiency directly as a result of the presence of the pharmacist. Conclusion. Based on these results, a clinical pharmacist should become a permanent member of the outpatient NeuroOncology clinic. J Oncol Pharm Practice (2009) 15: 79—85.

•Fendrix® revaccination is an alternative for non-responders’ workers in the NHS.•Fendrix® allows to rescue 94% of the non-responders to the conventional vaccine.•Revaccination with Fendrix® is safe. No serious adverse events have been observed.•Revaccination with Fendrix® of non-responders is economically profitable. Trial Design: An interventional, phase 4, single group assignment, without masking (open label), preventive clinical trial was carried out in health workers with biological risk in their tasks, who have been filed as non-responders to conventional vaccination against Hepatitis B. 67 health workers with biological risk in their tasks, who have been filed as non-responders to conventional vaccination against Hepatitis B, were enrolled in the Clinical Trial. All participants were from 18 years up to 64 years old. Inclusion Criteria: NHS workers -including university students doing their internships in health centres dependent on the National Health System (inclusion of students is regulated and limited by specific instructions on labour prevention in each autonomous community)- classified as non-responders. The criteria defining them as non-responders to the conventional hepatitis B vaccine is anti HBsAb titers < 10 mUI/ml following the application of six doses of conventional vaccine at 20 μg doses (two complete guidelines). The objective of this study was to provide Health workers-staff with an additional protection tool against hepatitis B infection, and to evaluate the efficacy of the adjuvanted vaccine in healthy non-responders to conventional hepatitis B vaccine. The primary outcome was the measurement of antibody antiHBs before the first Fendrix® dose and a month after the administration of each dose. Other outcome was collection of adverse effects during administration and all those that could be related to the vaccine and that occur within 30 days after each dose. In this study, only one group was assigned. There was no randomization or masking. The participants were recruited between April 13, 2018 and October 31, 2019. 67 participants were enrolled in the Clinical Trial and included the analyses. The primary immunisation consists of 4 separate 0.5 ml doses of Fendrix®, administered at the following schedule: 1 month, 2 months and 6 months from the date of the first dose. Once the positivity was reached in any of the doses, the participant finished the study and was not given the following doses. 68.66% (46 out 67) had a positive response to first dose of Fendrix®. 57.14% (12 out 21) had a positive response to second dose of Fendrix®. 22.22% (2 out 9) had a positive response to third dose of Fendrix and 42.96% (3 out 7) had a positive response to last dose of Fendrix®. Overall, 94.02% (64 out 67) of participants had a positive response to Fendrix®. No serious adverse event occurred. The use of Fendrix®, is a viable vaccine alternative for NHS workers classified as “non-responders”. Revaccination of healthy non-responders with Fendrix®, resulted in very high proportions of responders without adverse events. Trial registration: The trial was registered in the Spanish National Trial Register (REEC), ClinicalTrials.gov and inclusion has been stopped (identifier NCT03410953; EudraCT-number 2016-004991-23). Funding: GRS 1360/A/16: Call for aid for the financing of research projects in biomedicine, health management and socio-health care to be developed in the centres of the Regional Health Management of Autonomous Community of Castile-Leon. In addition, this work has been supported by the Spanish Platform for Clinical Research and Clinical Trials, SCReN (Spanish Clinical Research Network), funded by the Subdirectorate General for Research Evaluation and Promotion of the Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII), through the project PT13/0002/0039 and project PT17/0017/0023 integrated in the State Plan for R&D&I 2013–2016 and co-financed by and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

Among asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis but no recent stroke or transient cerebral ischaemia, either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can restore patency and reduce long-term stroke risks. However, from recent national registry data, each option causes about 1% procedural risk of disabling stroke or death. Comparison of their long-term protective effects requires large-scale randomised evidence. ACST-2 is an international multicentre randomised trial of CAS versus CEA among asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis thought to require intervention, interpreted with all other relevant trials. Patients were eligible if they had severe unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and both doctor and patient agreed that a carotid procedure should be undertaken, but they were substantially uncertain which one to choose. Patients were randomly allocated to CAS or CEA and followed up at 1 month and then annually, for a mean 5 years. Procedural events were those within 30 days of the intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses are provided. Analyses including procedural hazards use tabular methods. Analyses and meta-analyses of non-procedural strokes use Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN21144362. Between Jan 15, 2008, and Dec 31, 2020, 3625 patients in 130 centres were randomly allocated, 1811 to CAS and 1814 to CEA, with good compliance, good medical therapy and a mean 5 years of follow-up. Overall, 1% had disabling stroke or death procedurally (15 allocated to CAS and 18 to CEA) and 2% had non-disabling procedural stroke (48 allocated to CAS and 29 to CEA). Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year non-procedural stroke were 2·5% in each group for fatal or disabling stroke, and 5·3% with CAS versus 4·5% with CEA for any stroke (rate ratio [RR] 1·16, 95% CI 0·86–1·57; p=0·33). Combining RRs for any non-procedural stroke in all CAS versus CEA trials, the RR was similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (overall RR 1·11, 95% CI 0·91–1·32; p=0·21). Serious complications are similarly uncommon after competent CAS and CEA, and the long-term effects of these two carotid artery procedures on fatal or disabling stroke are comparable. UK Medical Research Council and Health Technology Assessment Programme.

Hassalstrongylus dollfusi (Díaz-Ungría, 1963) Durette-Desset, 1971 was described in a wild house mouse, Mus musculus , from Venezuela and, since then, has never been reported again in the type host or in any other host. In this work, specimens assignable to H. dollfusi were found at 10 localities in Northeast Argentina, in five species of sigmodontine rodents. The nematodes were attributed to H. dollfusi based on diagnostic characters such as: synlophe with 22–31 subequal ridges; in males, hypertrophy of right ray 4 of the male bursa, thickening of the dorsal ray and bases of rays 8, distal tip of the spicules bent and spoon shaped; and, in females, presence of subventral postvulvar alae supported by hypertrophied struts. The new host recorded are: Oligoryzomys fornesi , O. flavescens , O. nigripes , Holochilus chacarius and Akodon azarae . The parasite showed a strong preference for host species of Oligoryzomys , which appear to act as primary hosts. The parasite could be present, parasitizing different species of Oligoryzomys , in a geographic area from the type locality in Venezuela southward to north Corrientes in Argentina. It has not been reported from populations of Oligoryzomys spp. of the Argentinean and Brazilian Atlantic Forest, nor south of 28° S, which may be explained by constraints in the environmental conditions required by the free-living stages of the parasite. This study provides the first identification and redescription of H. dollfusi in southern South America, from autochthonous hosts, six decades after its description. Hassalstrongylus dollfusi (Díaz-Ungría, 1963) Durette-Desset, 1971 a été décrit chez une souris grise sauvage, Mus musculus , au Venezuela et, depuis lors, n’a plus jamais été signalé chez l’hôte-type ni chez aucun autre hôte. Dans ce travail, des spécimens attribuables à H. dollfusi ont été trouvés dans dix localités du nord-est de l’Argentine, chez cinq espèces de rongeurs Sigmodontinae. Les nématodes ont été attribués à H. dollfusi sur la base de caractères diagnostiques tels que : synlophe avec 22–31 crêtes subégales; chez le mâle, hypertrophie de la côte 4 droite de la bourse, épaississement de la côte dorsale et des bases des côtes 8, extrémité distale des spicules recourbée et en forme de cuillère; et, chez les femelles, présence d’ailes postvulvaires subventrales à fort support cuticulaire. Les nouveaux hôtes signalés sont : Oligoryzomys fornesi , O. flavescens , O. nigripes , Holochilus chacarius et Akodon azarae . Le parasite a montré une forte préférence pour les espèces hôtes du genre Oligoryzomys , qui semblent agir comme hôtes primaires. Le parasite pourrait être présent, parasitant différentes espèces d’ Oligoryzomys , dans une zone géographique allant de la localité-type au Vénézuéla vers le sud jusqu’au nord de Corrientes en Argentine. Il n’a pas été signalé dans les populations d’ Oligoryzomys spp. de la Forêt Atlantique argentine et brésilienne, ni au sud de 28° S, ce qui peut s’expliquer par des contraintes dans les conditions environnementales requises par les stades libres du parasite. Cette étude fournit la première identification et redescription d’ H. dollfusi dans le sud de l’Amérique du Sud, à partir d’hôtes autochtones, six décennies après sa description.

Background The performance of blood biomarkers (mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and lactate) and clinical scores (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), National Early Warning Score (NEWS), and quick SOFA) was compared to identify patient populations at risk of delayed treatment initiation and disease progression after presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a suspected infection. Methods A prospective observational study across three EDs. Biomarker and clinical score values were calculated upon presentation and 72 h, and logistic and Cox regression used to assess the strength of association. Primary outcomes comprised of 28-day mortality prediction and delayed antibiotic administration or intensive care (ICU) admission, whilst secondary outcomes identified subsequent disease progression. Results Six hundred eighty-four patients were enrolled with hospitalisation, ICU admission, and infection-related 28-day mortality rates of 72.8%, 3.4%, and 4.4%, respectively. MR-proADM and NEWS had the strongest association with hospitalisation and the requirement for antibiotic administration, whereas MR-proADM alone had the strongest association with ICU admission (OR [95% CI]: 5.8 [3.1 - 10.8]) and mortality (HR [95% CI]: 3.8 [2.2 - 6.5]). Patient subgroups with high MR-proADM concentrations (≥ 1.77 nmol/L) and low NEWS (< 5 points) values had significantly higher rates of ICU admission (8.1% vs 1.6%; p  < 0.001), hospital readmission (18.9% vs. 5.9%; p  < 0.001), infection-related mortality (13.5% vs. 0.2%; p  < 0.001), and disease progression (29.7% vs. 4.9%; p  < 0.001) than corresponding patients with low MR-proADM concentrations. ICU admission was delayed by 1.5 [0.25 – 5.0] days in patients with high MR-proADM and low NEWS values compared to corresponding patients with high NEWS values, despite similar 28-day mortality rates (13.5% vs. 16.5%). Antibiotics were withheld in 17.4% of patients with high MR-proADM and low NEWS values, with higher subsequent rates of ICU admission (27.3% vs. 4.8%) and infection-related hospital readmission (54.5% vs. 14.3%) compared to those administered antibiotics during ED treatment. Conclusions Patients with low severity signs of infection but high MR-proADM concentrations had an increased likelihood of subsequent disease progression, delayed antibiotic administration or ICU admission. Appropriate triage decisions and the rapid use of antibiotics in patients with high MR-proADM concentrations may constitute initial steps in escalating or intensifying early treatment strategies.

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. CRC leads to increased activation of the clotting system. Since CRC patients present a higher rate of bleeding, careful evaluation of the risk/benefits of anticoagulant prophylaxis is necessary. Aims To evaluate low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for primary thromboprophylaxis in metastatic CRC outpatients receiving first-line systemic cancer therapy. Methods PROTINCOL (NCT05625932) is a randomized, open-label (PROBE), multicenter study. Patients will receive tinzaparin (75 IU/kg) or no pharmacological prophylaxis for 4 months and will be stratified based on: BRAF/RAS mutation, primary resection tumor and antiangiogenic therapy. The study outcomes will be assessed by a blinded central independent adjudication committee. The primary efficacy endpoints will include the cumulative incidence of any venous thromboembolism (VTE) event (symptomatic or incidental) including symptomatic central venous catheter VTE. Secondary variables will be clinically relevant bleedings, health-related quality of life and the predictive value of validated risk assessment scales of VTE, including the genetic risk score (TIC-ONCO). Our hypothesis is that prophylactic LMWH will reduce the 55% relative risk to an estimated VTE incidence of 13.5%. A total of 526 patients will be required. Discussion Risk prediction of chemotherapy-associated VTE is a compelling challenge in oncology, as VTE may result in treatment delays, impaired quality of life, and increased mortality. Patients with a single type of metastatic cancer with a high risk of VTE will be selected for study inclusion. For the first time in ambulatory prophylaxis of cancer-associated thrombosis, a precision medicine approach will be used in a clinical trial. If the individualization of antithrombotic prophylaxis can reduce the complications of outpatient cancer treatment and be cost effective, it would be of great value in the future care of patients with metastatic CRC. Trial registration NCT05625932. Registered on 15 Nov 2022. Trial status The trial started recruitment on March 2023.