Explore the vast range of titles available.

In phase 1 trials, the HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor cabotegravir (GSK1265744) was well tolerated, both alone, and in combination with the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor rilpivirine. We assessed cabotegravir plus rilpivirine, as a two-drug oral antiretroviral regimen, for the maintenance of viral suppression in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected individuals. In the phase 2b Long-Acting antireTroviral Treatment Enabling (LATTE) trial, a multicentre study done in Canada and the USA, antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected adults (aged ≥18 years) were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to oral cabotegravir 10 mg once a day, 30 mg once a day, 60 mg once a day, or oral efavirenz 600 mg once a day with dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) for 24 weeks of induction. Patients who were virologically suppressed by week 24 received a two-drug maintenance regimen consisting of their randomly allocated cabotegravir dose plus oral rilpivirine 25 mg or continued efavirenz plus NRTIs for an additional 72 weeks. Patients and investigators were masked to doses of cabotegravir received for 96 weeks, but not to the assignment of cabotegravir or efavirenz. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with fewer than 50 copies per mL of HIV-1 RNA (US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm) at week 48. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01641809. Of 243 patients randomly allocated and treated, 156 (86%) of 181 patients in the cabotegravir groups (52 [87%] of 60, 51 [85%] of 60, and 53 [87%] of 61 patients in the 10 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg groups, respectively) and 46 (74%) of 62 in the efavirenz group had fewer than 50 copies per mL of HIV-1 RNA after induction therapy. After patients in the cabotegravir groups were changed over from dual NRTIs to rilpivirine at week 24, 149 (82%; 95% CI 77–88) patients in the cabotegravir groups (48 [80%; 70–90], 48 [80%; 70–90], and 53 [87%; 78–95] patients in the 10 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg groups, respectively) versus 44 (71%; 60–82) in the efavirenz group were virologically suppressed at week 48, and 137 (76%; 69–82) receiving cabotegravir (41 [68%; 57–80], 45 [75%; 64–86], and 51 [84%; 74–93] patients in the 10 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg groups, respectively) versus 39 (63%; 51–75) in the efavirenz group were virologically suppressed at week 96. Treatment-related adverse events were reported by 93 (51%) cabotegravir-treated patients (28 [47%], 32 [53%], and 33 [54%] patients in the 10 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg groups, respectively) and 42 (68%) efavirenz-treated patients. Six (3%) patients in the cabotegravir groups (one [2%], one [2%], and four [7%] patients in the 10 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg groups, respectively) withdrew because of treatment-emergent adverse events compared with nine (15%) in the efavirenz group. Cabotegravir plus dual NRTI therapy had potent antiviral activity during the induction phase. As a two-drug maintenance therapy, cabotegravir plus rilpivirine provided antiviral activity similar to efavirenz plus dual NRTIs until the end of week 96. Combined efficacy and safety results lend support to our selection of oral cabotegravir 30 mg once a day for further assessment. LATTE precedes studies of the assessment of longacting injectable formulations of both drugs as a two-drug regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. ViiV Healthcare and Janssen Research and Development.

Background The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has resulted in an increase in telemedicine utilization for routine HIV care. However, there is limited information on perceptions of and experiences with telemedicine from United States (U.S.) federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) offering HIV care. We sought to understand telemedicine experiences of stakeholders with various roles: people living with HIV (PLHIV), clinical (clinicians and case managers), programmatic (clinic administrators), and policy (policymakers). Methods Qualitative interviews about benefits and challenges of telemedicine (telephone and video) for HIV care were conducted with 31 PLHIV and 23 other stakeholders (clinicians, case managers, clinic administrators, and policymakers). Interviews were transcribed, translated to English if conducted in Spanish, coded, and analyzed for major themes. Results Almost all PLHIV felt capable of engaging in telephone visits, with some expressing interest in learning how to use video visits as well. Nearly all PLHIV wanted to continue telemedicine as part of their routine HIV care, and this was also endorsed by clinical, programmatic and policy stakeholders. Interviewees agreed that telemedicine for HIV care has benefits for PLHIV, especially savings of time and transportation costs, which also reduced stress. Clinical, programmatic, and policy stakeholders expressed concerns around patients’ technological literacy and resources, as well as their access to privacy, and some felt that PLHIV strongly preferred in-person visits. These stakeholders also commonly reported clinic-level implementation challenges, including integrating telephone and video telemedicine into workflows and difficulty with video visit platforms. Conclusions Telemedicine for HIV care, largely delivered via telephone (audio-only), was highly acceptable and feasible for both PLHIV, clinicians, and other stakeholders. Addressing barriers for stakeholders in incorporating video visits will be important for the successful implementation of telemedicine with video as part of routine HIV care at FQHCs.

Abstract Background In the LATTE study, daily oral cabotegravir + rilpivirine demonstrated higher rates of efficacy than efavirenz + 2 nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) through Week 96 in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive adults with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1. We present the results from 6 years of continued treatment with oral cabotegravir + rilpivirine. Methods LATTE was a phase IIb, randomized, multicenter, partially blinded, dose-ranging study in ART-naive adults with HIV-1. After a 24-week induction phase with cabotegravir + 2 NRTIs, participants with HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) <50 copies/mL were randomized to receive cabotegravir (10, 30, or 60 mg) + rilpivirine (25 mg) in the maintenance phase through Week 96 and switched to cabotegravir 30 mg + rilpivirine 25 mg in the open-label phase through Week 312. Results Of 160 participants who entered the maintenance phase, 111 completed the study at Week 312. At Week 312, 105 (66%) participants maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL, 15 (9%) had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL, and 40 (25%) had no virologic data. Eight participants met protocol-defined virologic failure criteria through Week 312, 2 of whom met protocol-defined virologic failure criteria after Week 144. Six participants developed treatment-emergent resistance to 1 or both agents during the study, 3 of whom developed integrase inhibitor resistance substitutions. Two participants (1%) reported drug-related serious adverse events. Few adverse events led to withdrawal during the open-label phase (n = 5, 3%). Conclusions Oral cabotegravir + rilpivirine demonstrated efficacy in the majority of participants and an acceptable safety profile through 6 years of treatment, demonstrating its durability as maintenance therapy for HIV-1. Oral cabotegravir + rilpivirine maintained virologic suppression in the majority of participants and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile through 6 years of treatment, supporting its use as a flexible treatment strategy in people with HIV-1 receiving long-acting cabotegravir + rilpivirine.

Background Cabotegravir (CAB), an INI, is under development in both oral and long-acting (LA) injectable formulations. LATTE (NCT01641809) was designed to select a daily oral dose of CAB and evaluate a two-drug ART regimen with rilpivirine (RPV), as suppressive maintenance therapy. Results enabled the LATTE-2 (NCT02120352) study to evaluate CAB LA + RPV LA dosed once every 1 or 2 months. Methods Phase 2b, multicentre, partially blinded dose-ranging study in ART-naïve HIV infected adults, randomized 1:1:1:1 to the induction regimen of once-daily oral CAB 10, 30, or 60 mg or efavirenz (EFV) 600 mg with TDF/FTC or ABC/3TC through W24. CAB patients with VL <50 c/mL immediately prior to W24 discontinued NRTIs and began RPV 25 mg as a two-drug oral maintenance regimen through W96. No change was made to the EFV arm. After W96, at the start of the open-label (OL) phase, all patients randomized to CAB were given the option to continue and switch to the sponsor-selected dose of oral CAB 30 mg. EFV patients completed the study at W96. The OL phase was completed at W312 (288 weeks on CAB + RPV). Successful CAB + RPV patients transitioned to the POLAR study (NCT03639311). Results A total of 243 patients were randomized and initiated treatment (ITT-E). Of those randomized to CAB (n = 181), 160 patients began CAB + RPV (W24) and 138 continued into OL phase (W96). One hundred and ten patients successfully completed the study (W312). Among patients who began CAB + RPV at W24, 66% maintained <50 c/mL, 9% had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 c/mL, and 25% were categorized as “No Virologic Data” by Snapshot at W312 (ITT-ME). There were 11 protocol-defined virologic failures (PDVF) on CAB; only 2 occurring after W144. Six patients developed treatment emergent (TE) resistance to one or both agents during the study; of which 4 patients developed TE major INI resistance mutations, 3 after W96. The median increase in CD4+ cell count from Baseline was 393 cells/mm3 (−174 to 1118). During the maintenance and OL phases, 4% of CAB patients reported drug-related AEs ≥ Grade 2; SAEs occurred in 9% of CAB patients (none drug related); 3% of CAB patients withdrew due to AEs. 43% of CAB patients who entered maintenance phase reported TE lab abnormalities ≥ Grade 3. Conclusion As maintenance therapy in virologically suppressed patients, the 2DR CAB + RPV provided durable viral suppression through W312. Through 7 years of study, CAB + RPV continues to be generally safe and well tolerated. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

The rate of ceftazidime resistance among Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates recovered from patients at the Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center increased from 6% in the first quarter of 1993 to 28% in the first quarter of 1994. The outbreak was hospitalwide, with the highest rates of resistance occurring on wards where ceftazidime was administered most frequently. Although many plasmid patterns were observed in the clinical isolates, molecular epidemiological analysis with use of pulsed field gel electrophoresis revealed substantial similarities between the strains; this finding suggested that most of the strains—if not all of them—were derived from the original clone. The addition of piperacillin/tazobactam to the hospital formulary and educational efforts focused on minimizing the administration of ceftazidime were associated with a marked decrease in the drug's use and a concomitant decrease in the percentage of ceftazidime-resistant isolates. We have not yet observeda significant rise in the rate of resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam among clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae.