Explore the vast range of titles available.

Ceramides and phosphatidylcholines (PCs) are bioactive lipids and lipid bilayer membrane components. Distinct ceramides/PCs (ratios) predict cardiovascular outcome in patients with coronary artery disease. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are proposed biomarkers for cardiovascular disease and contain ceramides/PCs. Ceramides/PCs have not been studied in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) nor in EVs. We therefore investigated whether levels of ceramides/PCs in plasma and EVs are associated with postoperative risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) following CEA. In 873 patients undergoing CEA of the Athero-Express biobank, we quantitatively measured seven ceramides/PCs in preoperative blood samples: Cer(d18:1/16:0), Cer(d18:1/18:0), Cer(d18:1/24:0), Cer(d18:1/24:1), PC(14:0/22:6), PC(16:0/16:0) and PC(16:0/22:5) in plasma and two plasma EV-subfractions (LDL and TEX). We analyzed the association of ceramides, PCs and their predefined ratios with the three-year postoperative risk of MACE (including stroke, myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death). A total of 138 patients (16%) developed MACE during the three-year follow-up. In the LDL-EV subfraction, higher levels of Cer(d18:1/24:1) and Cer(d18:1/16:0)/PC(16:0/22:5) ratio were significantly associated with an increased risk of MACE (adjusted HR per SD [95% CI] 1.24 [1.01–1.53] and 1.26 [1.04–1.52], respectively). In the TEX-EV subfraction, three ratios Cer(d18:1/16:0)/Cer(d18:1/24:0), Cer(d18:1/18:0)/Cer(d18:1/24:0) and Cer(d18:1/24:1)/Cer(d18:1/24:0) were positively associated with MACE (adjusted HR per SD 1.34 [1.06–1.70], 1.24 [1.01–1.51] and 1.31 [1.08–1.58], respectively). In conclusion, distinct ceramides and PCs in plasma EVs determined in preoperative blood were independently associated with an increased 3-year risk of MACE after CEA. These lipids are therefore potential markers to identify high-risk CEA patients qualifying for secondary preventive add-on therapy.

Plasma osteoprotegerin (OPG) and vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) are important regulators in the process of vascular calcification (VC). In population studies, high levels of OPG are associated with events. In animal studies, however, high OPG levels result in reduction of VC. VSMC-derived EVs are assumed to be responsible for OPG transport and VC but this role has not been studied. For this, we investigated the association between OPG in plasma and circulating EVs with coronary artery calcium (CAC) as surrogate for VC in symptomatic patients. We retrospectively assessed 742 patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). CAC scores were determined on the MPI-CT images using a previously developed automated algorithm. Levels of OPG were quantified in plasma and two EV-subpopulations (LDL and TEX), using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Circulating levels of OPG were independently associated with CAC scores in plasma; OR 1.39 (95% CI 1.17–1.65), and both EV populations; EV-LDL; OR 1.51 (95% CI 1.27–1.80) and EV-TEX; OR 1.21 (95% CI 1.02–1.42). High levels of OPG in plasma were independently associated with CAC scores in this symptomatic patient cohort. High levels of EV-derived OPG showed the same positive association with CAC scores, suggesting that EV-derived OPG mirrors the same pathophysiological process as plasma OPG.

In a randomized trial, 1845 patients undergoing PCI were assigned to receive either everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds or everolimus-eluting metallic stents. The incidence of device thrombosis was higher with the bioresorbable scaffold than with the metallic stent. Drug-eluting stents are the standard of care in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). 1 , 2 Nevertheless, their rigid metallic cages hamper vasomotion, and they are associated with the development of neoatherosclerosis, which results in an ongoing risk of stent thrombosis (rate of 0.1 to 0.2% per year) and repeat revascularization (rate of 2 to 3% per year). 3 – 6 Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds theoretically leave no permanent implant and allow for restoration of vessel function. 7 The ABSORB III trial showed the noninferiority of the bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb, Abbott Vascular) to the cobalt–chromium everolimus-eluting metallic stent (Xience, Abbott Vascular) with respect to target-lesion failure . . .

Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) represents a minimally invasive revascularization strategy in which the durability of the internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery graft is combined with percutaneous coronary intervention to treat remaining lesions. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes after HCR with conventional coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. A comprehensive EMBASE and PUBMED search was performed for comparative studies evaluating in-hospital and 1-year death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and repeat revascularization. Six observational studies (1 case control, 5 propensity adjusted) comprising 1,190 patients were included; 366 (30.8%) patients underwent HCR (185 staged and 181 concurrent), and 824 (69.2%) were treated with CABG (786 off-pump, 38 on-pump). Drug-eluting stents were used in 328 (89.6%) patients undergoing HCR. Hybrid coronary revascularization was associated with lower in-hospital need for blood transfusions, shorter length of stay, and faster return to work. No significant differences were found for the composite of death, MI, stroke, or repeat revascularization during hospitalization (odds ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.25-1.58, P = .33) and at 1-year follow-up (odds ratio 0.49, 95% CI 0.20-1.24, P = .13). Comparisons of individual components showed no difference in all-cause mortality, MI, or stroke, but higher repeat revascularization among patients treated with HCR. Hybrid coronary revascularization is associated with lower morbidity and similar in-hospital and 1-year major adverse cerebrovascular or cardiac events rates, but greater requirement for repeat revascularization compared with CABG. Further exploration of this strategy with adequately powered randomized trials is warranted.

Diagnosing stable ischemic heart disease (IHD) is challenging, especially in females. Currently, no blood test is available. Plasma extracellular vesicles (EV) are emerging as potential biomarker source. We therefore aimed to identify stress induced ischemia due to stable IHD with plasma extracellular vesicle protein levels in chest pain patients. We analyzed 450 patients suspected for stable IHD who were referred for 82 Rb PET/CT in the outpatient clinic. Blood samples were collected before PET/CT and plasma EVs were isolated in 3 plasma subfractions named: TEX, HDL, LDL. In total 6 proteins were quantified in each of these subfractions using immuno-bead assays. CD14 and CystatinC protein levels were independent significant predictors of stress-induced ischemia in the LDL and the HDL subfraction and SerpinC1 and SerpinG1 protein levels in the HDL fraction. Subgroup-analysis on sex revealed that these associations were completely attributed to the associations in women. None of the significant EV proteins remained significant in men. Plasma EV proteins levels are associated with the presence of stable IHD in females presenting with chest pain. This finding, if confirmed in larger cohort studies could be a crucial step in improving diagnostic assessment of women with suspected IHD.

Saphenous vein graft (SVG) failure is a common finding in patients following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. In the literature SVG failure rates have been reported from 25 to over 50% within 10 years. Although common, it remains unclear to what extent SVG failure affects clinical outcome, due to differences in definition, patient selection and follow-up. Particularly the lack of agreement on a universal definition makes comparisons between studies, and therefore generalizability of associations with outcomes, challenging. We suggest using a definition of SVG failure that is based on imaging as well as clinical parameters, that includes reporting SVG failure on both graft and patient level. The use of non-invasive imaging may help improve follow-up rates, and provide a more accurate picture of the real incidence and clinical impact of SVG failure. Given the lack of supportive evidence showing a consistent association between SVG failure and major adverse cardiovascular events, SVG failure should not be considered a valid surrogate endpoint at this time.

BackgroundYoung patients suffering from cryptogenic stroke alongside a patent foramen ovale (PFO) are often considered for percutaneous device closure to reduce the risk of stroke recurrence. Residual right-to-left shunt after device closure may persist in approximately a quarter of the patients at 6 months, and some may close at a later time point. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and persistence of residual right-to-left shunt after percutaneous PFO closure.MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing transoesophageal echocardiography-guided PFO closure for cryptogenic stroke between 2006 and 2021, with echocardiographic follow-up including contrast bubble study and Valsalva manoeuvre, were enrolled. Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography was performed at 6 months and repeated at 12 months in case of residual right-to-left shunt. Primary outcomes included the prevalence and grade of residual right-to-left shunt at 6 and 12 months after percutaneous PFO closure.Results227 patients were included with a mean age of 43±11 years and 50.2% were women. At 6-month follow-up, 72.7% had no residual right-to-left shunt, 12.3% small residual right-to-left shunt, 6.6% moderate residual right-to-left shunt and 8.4% large residual right-to-left shunt. At 12-month follow-up, the presence of residual right-to-left shunt in all patients was 12.3%, of whom 6.6% had small residual right-to-left shunt, 2.6% had moderate residual right-to-left shunt and 3.1% had large residual right-to-left shunt.ConclusionsResidual right-to-left shunts are common at 6 months after percutaneous closure of PFO. However, the majority are small and two-thirds of residual right-to-left shunts achieve complete closure between 6 and 12 months.

(1) Background: Prevalence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in the general population is estimated at around 24%. We hypothesized that right-to-left shunting (RLS) resulting from PFO might contribute to angina symptoms in patients with coronary artery spasm (CAS), potentially triggered by vasoactive metabolites. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of PFO-related RLS in patients with documented CAS. (2) Methods: This single-center prospective cohort study included patients with documented CAS undergoing transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), including a contrast bubble study between 2021 and 2023. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) were used to survey patients. (3) Results: RLS (PFO group) was observed in 11 of the 48 patients included (23%). In the PFO group, 64% had epicardial spasm and 36% microvascular spasm. Furthermore, RLS was more prevalent in patients with CAS and concomitant migraine (29%). Remarkably, the density plot of the SAQ summary score showed a worse score for patients with RLS (median of 38 [Q1–Q3: 31–49]) than patients without RLS (median of 49 [Q1–Q3: 41–55]) (p = 0.0282). (4) Conclusions: The prevalence of RLS due to PFO in patients with CAS was in line with the PFO prevalence in the general population, and patients with RLS are more symptomatic according to the SAQ summary score. Whether PFO closure could be beneficial to patients with CAS and concomitant migraine requires further investigation.

p38 MAPK inhibition has potential myocardial protective effects. We assessed losmapimod, a potent oral p38 MAPK inhibitor, in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. From October, 2009, to November, 2011, NSTEMI patients were assigned oral losmapimod (7·5 mg or 15·0 mg loading dose followed by 7·5 mg twice daily) or matching placebo in a 3:3:2 ratio. Safety outcomes were serious adverse events and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations over 12 weeks, and cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, recurrent ischaemia, stroke, and heart failure) at 90 days. Efficacy outcomes were high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations at 72 h and 12 weeks, and troponin I area under the curve (AUC) over 72 h. The losmapimod groups were pooled for analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00910962. Of 535 patients enrolled, 526 (98%) received at least one dose of study treatment (losmapimod n=388 and placebo n=138). Safety outcomes did not differ between groups. HsCRP concentrations at 72 h were lower in the losmapimod group than in the placebo group (geometric mean 64·1 nmol/L, 95% CI 53·0–77·6 vs 110·8 nmol/L, 83·1–147·7; p=0·0009) but were similar at 12 weeks. Early geometric mean BNP concentrations were similar at 72 h but significantly lower in the losmapimod group at 12 weeks (37·2 ng/L, 95% CI 32·3–42·9 vs 49·4 ng/L, 38·7–63·0; p=0·04). Mean troponin I AUC values did not differ. p38 MAPK inhibition with oral losmapimod was well tolerated in NSTEMI patients and might improve outcomes after acute coronary syndromes. GlaxoSmithKline.

MiStent is a drug-eluting stent with a fully absorbable polymer coating containing and embedding a microcrystalline form of sirolimus into the vessel wall. It was developed to overcome the limitation of current durable polymer drug-eluting stents eluting amorphous sirolimus. The clinical effect of MiStent sirolimus-eluting stent compared with a durable polymer drug-eluting stents has not been investigated in a large randomised trial in an all-comer population. We did a randomised, single-blind, multicentre, phase 3 study (DESSOLVE III) at 20 hospitals in Germany, France, Netherlands, and Poland. Eligible participants were any patients aged at least 18 years who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention in a lesion and had a reference vessel diameter of 2·50–3·75 mm. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to implantation of either a sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable polymer stent (MiStent) or an everolimus-eluting durable polymer stent (Xience). Randomisation was done by local investigators via web-based software with random blocks according to centre. The primary endpoint was a non-inferiority comparison of a device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE)—cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation—between the groups at 12 months after the procedure assessed by intention-to-treat. A margin of 4·0% was defined for non-inferiority of the MiStent group compared with the Xience group. All participants were included in the safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02385279. Between March 20, and Dec 3, 2015, we randomly assigned 1398 patients with 2030 lesions; 703 patients with 1037 lesions were assigned to MiStent, of whom 697 received the index procedure, and 695 patients with 993 lesions were asssigned to Xience, of whom 690 received the index procedure. At 12 months, the primary endpoint had occurred in 40 patients (5·8%) in the sirolimus-eluting stent group and in 45 patients (6·5%) in the everolimus-eluting stent group (absolute difference −0·8% [95% CI −3·3 to 1·8], pnon-inferiority=0·0001). Procedural complications occurred in 12 patients (1·7%) in the sirolimus-eluting stent group and ten patients (1·4%) in the everolimus-eluting stent group; no clinical adverse events could be attributed to these dislodgements through a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. The rate of stent thrombosis, a safety indicator, did not differ between groups and was low in both treatment groups. The sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer stent was non-inferior to the everolimus-eluting durable polymer stent for a device-oriented composite clinical endpoint at 12 months in an all-comer population. MiStent seems a reasonable alternative to other stents in clinical practice. The European Cardiovascular Research Institute, Micell Technologies (Durham, NC, USA), and Stentys (Paris, France).