Explore the vast range of titles available.

IntroductionPost-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) is associated with future major adverse cardiac events and may reflect residual ischaemia and suboptimal stent result (SSR). Post-PCI FFR should therefore be considered to identify patients at high risk. Whether abnormal post-PCI FFR and non-hyperaemic pressure ratios, including resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), represent SSR after PCI remains to be determined, especially after chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI. In addition, little is known about the association between post-PCI intracoronary physiology and SSR with residual anginal complaints.Methods and analysisThe physioLogy to evaluaTe procedural Result After percutaneous coronary intervention of Chronic Total Occlusion study is a prospective, multicentre, exploratory, mechanistic, investigator-initiated, single-arm study with a non-inferiority design. A total of 200 patients, undergoing CTO PCI, with FFR and RFR measured in all patients, will be included at two study sites in the Netherlands. The primary endpoint is the area under the curve (AUC) of post-PCI RFR, in comparison to the AUC of post-PCI FFR, for prediction of optical coherence tomography-detected SSR and its individual components.Ethics and disseminationThe study is approved by the local ethical review board (‘Medisch Ethische Toetsing Commissie Isala Zwolle’). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients before enrolment. The outcomes of this study are intended to be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal.Study registrationNCT04780971.

AbstractObjectiveTo show that limiting dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to six months in patients with event-free ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) results in a non-inferior clinical outcome versus DAPT for 12 months.DesignProspective, randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.SettingPatients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and second generation zotarolimus-eluting stent.ParticipantsPatients with STEMI aged 18 to 85 that underwent a primary PCI with the implantation of second generation drug-eluting stents were enrolled in the trial. Patients that were event-free at six months after primary PCI were randomised at this time point.InterventionsPatients that were taking DAPT and were event-free at six months were randomised 1:1 to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) (ie, aspirin only) or to DAPT for an additional six months. All patients that were randomised were then followed for another 18 months (ie, 24 months after the primary PCI).Main outcome measuresThe primary endpoint was a composite of all cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, any revascularisation, stroke, and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding at 18 months after randomisation.ResultsA total of 1100 patients were enrolled in the trial between 19 December 2011 and 30 June 2015. 870 were randomised: 432 to SAPT versus 438 to DAPT. The primary endpoint occurred in 4.8% of patients receiving SAPT versus 6.6% of patients receiving DAPT (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.41 to 1.27, P=0.26). Non-inferiority was met (P=0.004 for non-inferiority), as the upper 95% confidence interval of 1.27 was smaller than the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 1.66.ConclusionsDAPT to six months was non-inferior to DAPT for 12 months in patients with event-free STEMI at six months after primary PCI with second generation drug-eluting stents.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01459627.

Coronary microvascular resistance is increasingly measured as a predictor of clinical outcomes, but there is no accepted gold-standard measurement. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of 2 invasive indices of microvascular resistance, Doppler-derived hyperemic microvascular resistance (hMR) and thermodilution-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), at predicting microvascular dysfunction. A total of 54 patients (61 ± 10 years) who underwent cardiac catheterization for stable coronary artery disease (n = 10) or acute myocardial infarction (n = 44) had simultaneous intracoronary pressure, Doppler flow velocity and thermodilution flow data acquired from 74 unobstructed vessels, at rest and during hyperemia. Three independent measurements of microvascular function were assessed, using predefined dichotomous thresholds: (1) coronary flow reserve (CFR), the average value of Doppler- and thermodilution-derived CFR; (2) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived myocardial perfusion reserve index; and (3) CMR-derived microvascular obstruction. hMR correlated with IMR (rho = 0.41, p <0.0001). hMR had better diagnostic accuracy than IMR to predict CFR (area under curve [AUC] 0.82 vs 0.58, p <0.001, sensitivity and specificity 77% and 77% vs 51% and 71%) and myocardial perfusion reserve index (AUC 0.85 vs 0.72, p = 0.19, sensitivity and specificity 82% and 80% vs 64% and 75%). In patients with acute myocardial infarction, the AUCs of hMR and IMR at predicting extensive microvascular obstruction were 0.83 and 0.72, respectively (p = 0.22, sensitivity and specificity 78% and 74% vs 44% and 91%). We conclude that these 2 invasive indices of coronary microvascular resistance only correlate modestly and so cannot be considered equivalent. In our study, the correlation between independent invasive and noninvasive measurements of microvascular function was better with hMR than with IMR.

Background: Data to support the routine use of embolic protection devices for stroke prevention during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are controversial. Identifying patients at high risk for peri-procedural cerebrovascular events may facilitate effective patient selection for embolic protection devices during TAVR. Aim: To generate a risk score model for stratifying TAVR patients according to peri-procedural cerebrovascular events risk. Methods and results: A total of 8779 TAVR patients from 12 centers worldwide were included. Peri-procedural cerebrovascular events were defined as an ischemic stroke or a transient ischemic attack occurring ≤24 h from TAVR. The peri-procedural cerebrovascular events rate was 1.4% (n = 127), which was independently associated with 1-year mortality (hazards ratio (HR) 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06–2.98, p < 0.028). The TASK risk score parameters were history of stroke, use of a non-balloon expandable valve, chronic kidney disease, and peripheral vascular disease, and each parameter was assigned one point. Each one-point increment was associated with a significant increase in peri-procedural cerebrovascular events risk (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.56–2.45, p < 0.001). The TASK score was dichotomized into very-low, low, intermediate, and high (0, 1, 2, 3–4 points, respectively). The high-risk TASK score group (OR 5.4, 95% CI 2.06–14.16, p = 0.001) was associated with a significantly higher risk of peri-procedural cerebrovascular events compared with the low TASK score group. Conclusions: The proposed novel TASK risk score may assist in the pre-procedural risk stratification of TAVR patients for peri-procedural cerebrovascular events.

•Of 3 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, 1 had a major adverse event at 5 years.•At 5 years, the FIREHAWK stent was as safe and effective as the XIENCE stent.•The outcomes were not influenced by clinical presentation. In the Targeted therapy with a localised abluminal coated, low-dose sirolimus-eluting, biodegreadable polymer coronary stent (TARGET; NCT02520180) All Comers trial the biodegradable polymer (BP) sirolimus-eluting FIREHAWK stent was noninferior to the durable polymer (DP) everolimus-eluting XIENCE stent with respect to target lesion failure (TLF) at 1 and 5 years; however, the long-term safety and efficacy in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are not known. We sought to assess the long-term outcomes in ACS versus chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) with BP sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) versus DP everolimus-eluting stent (EES). The TARGET AC study was a multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial of all comer patients randomly allocated 1:1 to BP SES or DP EES (stratified by ST-elevation myocardial infarction and study site). In this predefined substudy, the outcomes were compared based on clinical presentation (ACS vs CCS) and treatment allocation. A total of 1,653 patients were enrolled (728 with ACS and 922 with CCS), with 94% completing the 5-year follow-up. The baseline characteristics were well-matched between the 2 stent types; however, co-morbidities were more prevalent in the CCS than in the ACS population. TLF (15.5% vs 17.7%, p = 0.24), patient-oriented outcomes (32.0% vs 34.4%, p = 0.31), and stent thrombosis (4.1% vs 3.3%, p = 0.40) were similar between patients with ACS and patients with CCS. In the ACS cohort, the outcomes at 5 years for BP SES versus DP EES were similar for TLF (16.0% vs 14.9%, p = 0.70), ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (5.6% vs 8.3%, p = 0.17), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (2.7% vs 4.6%, p = 0.18). The same was true for the CCS cohort, with 5-year outcomes for BP SES versus DP EES for TLF (18.0% vs 17.4%, p = 0.82), ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (6.4% vs 5.0%, p = 0.37), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (3.0% vs 1.8%, p = 0.26). In conclusion, in the TARGET AC trial, 1 in 3 patients had a major adverse event at 5 years, irrespective of CCS or ACS presentation. Long-term, the BP sirolimus-eluting FIREHAWK stent was as safe and effective as the DP everolimus-eluting XIENCE stent across the spectrum of clinical presentations.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is the leading cause of ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries disease (INOCA) disease. Diagnosis of CMD relies on surrogate physiological indices without objective proof of ischemia. Intracoronary electrocardiogram (icECG) derived hyperemic indices may accurately and objectively detect CMD and reversible ischemia in related territory. INOCA patients with proven ischemia by myocardial perfusion scan (MPS) and completely normal coronary arteries underwent simultaneous intracoronary electrophysiological (icECG) and physiological (intracoronary Doppler) assessment in all 3 coronary arteries during rest and under adenosine induced hyperemia. Sixty vessels in 21 patients were included in the final analysis. All patients had at least one vessel with abnormal CFR. 41 vessels had CMD (CFR < 2.5), of which 26 had increased microvascular resistance (structural CMD, HMR > 1.9 mmHg.cm−1.s) and 15 vessels had CMD (CFR < 2.5) with normal microvascular resistance (functional CMD, HMR <= 1.9 mmHg.cm−1.s). Only one-third of the patients (n = 7) had impaired CFR < 2.5 in all 3 epicardial arteries. Absolute ST shift between hyperemia and rest (∆ST) has shown the best diagnostic performance for ischemia (cut-off 0.10 mV, sensitivity: 95%, specificity: 72%, accuracy: 80%, AUC: 0.860) outperforming physiological indices (CFR: 0.623 and HMR: 0.653 DeLong's test P = .0002). In INOCA patients, CMD involves coronary artery territories heterogeneously. icECG can accurately detect CMD causing perfusion abnormalities in patients with INOCA outperforming physiological CMD markers, by demonstrating actual ischemia instead of predicting the likelihood of inducible ischemia based on violated surrogate thresholds of blunted flow reserve or increased minimum microvascular resistance. In 21 INOCA patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and myocardial perfusion scan proved ischemia, hyperemic indices of intracoronary electrocardiogram (icECG) have accurately detected vessel-specific CMD and resulting perfusion abnormalities & ischemia, outperforming invasive hemodynamic indices. Absolute ST shift between hyperemia and rest (∆ST) has shown the best classification performance for ischemia in no Obstructive Coronary Arteries (AUC: 0.860) outperforming Doppler derived CMD indices (CFR: 0.623 and HMR: 0.653 DeLong's test P = .0002).icECG can be used to diagnose CMD causing perfusion defects by demonstrating actual reversible ischemia at vessel-level during the initial CAG session, obviating the need for further costly ischemia tests. NCT05471739. [Display omitted]

BackgroundEmergency Medical Services (EMS) patients with chest pain are often suspected of having non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Current risk stratification protocols for NSTE-ACS have limitations, leading to a lack of a well-organised prehospital diagnostic pathway. Recent studies have demonstrated that using clinical risk scores (CRS) including point-of-care (POC)-troponin in the EMS can improve prehospital diagnostic pathways for suspected NSTE-ACS. The primary aim of this systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis was to assess safety of low-risk stratification for suspected NSTE-ACS patients in the prehospital setting.MethodsProspective studies using CRS or POC-troponin for risk stratification in suspected NSTE-ACS patients within the EMS setting were included. Safety was assessed using sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for patients identified as low risk, based on CRS or POC-troponin measurement, for three different endpoints within 30 days: (1) all-cause mortality, (2) composite of mortality and/or acute myocardial infarction (AMI), (3) major adverse cardiac events (MACE).ResultsOf 1526 articles screened, 6 were included, comprising 5.239 patients, and all utilised CRS derived from the History, ECG, Age, Risk-factor and Troponin (HEART) score. The summary of low-risk CRS diagnostic performance predicted all-cause mortality with a sensitivity of 93.2% (83.5–98.1) and NPV of 99.8% (99.5–99.9); mortality and/or AMI with a sensitivity of 91.8% (83.0–96.2) and an NPV of 97.3% (89.9–99.3); and MACE with a sensitivity of 92.8% (88.7–95.5) and an NPV of 97.2% (92.1–99.0). Lowering the CRS cut-off value for identifying low-risk patients increased sensitivity and NPV but decreased the proportion of patients classified as low risk.ConclusionIn well-trained EMS systems, where prompt and accurate follow-up of low-risk patients is possible, HEART-derived CRS effectively identify patients with a very low risk of 30-day mortality and MACE. However, implementation in other healthcare systems requires additional validation, given the variations in healthcare structure, risk stratification processes and follow-up capabilities.

Patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease frequently have vasomotor dysfunction as the underlying mechanism for symptoms. Patients with vasomotor dysfunction have a high angina burden and their treatment frequently fails to reduce complaints sufficiently. Targeted therapies are currently unavailable due to heterogeneity in the patient population and incomplete understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. One of the vasomotor dysfunction endotypes, epicardial spasm, is hypothesized to be a possible target for endothelin receptor antagonism treatment. The EDIT-CAS trial is a registry based, double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial and aims to compare the efficacy of 10 weeks of add-on bosentan treatment versus placebo to prevent epicardial spasm at repeat spasm provocation test. Secondary and explorative outcomes are the effect on anginal complaints, safety of bosentan treatment, changes in coronary reactivity and the relationship between baseline endothelin levels and treatment success. We will include 100 patients with previously diagnosed epicardial vasospasm on a maximal triggering dose of 100 micrograms of acetylcholine and continuing angina(-like) symptoms at least weekly despite optimal medical treatment. The is registered in Clinical Trials Information System (2023-507782-25-00) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06432452).

The FIREHAWK is a drug-eluting stent with a fully biodegradable sirolimus-containing polymer coating localised to recessed abluminal grooves on the stent surface. We investigated clinical outcomes with this targeted, low-dose, biodegradable polymer, sirolimus-eluting stent compared with XIENCE durable polymer, everolimus-eluting stents in an all-comers population. The TARGET All Comers study was a prospective, multicentre, open-label randomised non-inferiority trial done at 21 centres in ten European countries. Patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic coronary artery disease and objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia who qualified for percutaneous coronary intervention were randomised 1:1 to undergo implantation of a FIREHAWK or XIENCE. Randomisation was web-based, with random block allocation and stratification by centre and ST elevation myocardial infarction. Outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation, but treating physicians and patients were not. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure at 12 months, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation. The control event rate for XIENCE was assumed to be 7%, the non-inferiority margin was 3.5%, and the primary analysis was in the intention-to-treat population, censoring patients who did not have either an event before 365 days or contact beyond 365 days. Late lumen loss was the primary endpoint of an angiographic substudy designed to investigate the non-inferiority of the FIREHAWK compared with the XIENCE stent. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02520180. From Dec 17, 2015, to Oct 14, 2016, 1653 patients were randomly assigned to implantation of the FIREHAWK (n=823) or XIENCE (n=830). 65 patients in the FIREHAWK group and 66 in the XIENCE group had insufficient follow-up data and were excluded from the analyses. At 12 months, target lesion failure occurred in 46 (6·1%) of 758 patients in the FIREHAWK group and in 45 (5·9%) of 764 patients in the XIENCE group (difference 0·2%, 90% CI −1·9 to 2·2, pnon-inferiority=0·004, 95% CI −2·2 to 2·6, psuperiority=0·88). There were no differences in ischaemia-driven revascularisation or stent thrombosis rates at 12 months. 176 patients were included in the angiographic substudy, in which in-stent late lumen loss was 0·17 mm (SD 0·48) in the FIREHAWK group and 0·11 mm (0·52) in the XIENCE group (p=0·48), with an absolute difference of 0·05 mm (95% CI −0·09 to 0·18, pnon-inferiority=0·024). In a broad all-comers population of patients requiring stent implantation for myocardial ischaemia, the FIREHAWK was non-inferior to the XIENCE as assessed with the primary endpoint of target lesion failure at 12 months and in-stent late lumen loss at 13 months. The FIREHAWK is a safe and effective alternative stent to treat patients with ischaemic coronary artery disease in clinical practice. Shanghai Microport Medical.