Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Source
      Source
      Clear All
      Source
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
1 result(s) for "الاحتكار البؤري للحكم"
Sort by:
Endogenous Institutional Change in Favor of Access to Medicines
Ostrom's (1990) work on natural resources is one of the new models of governance and invites us to take a fresh look at how we think about politics, through which it opened a gap in understanding how individuals and organizations self-organize to collectively reap the benefits of renewable resources. We support the hypothesis that the notion of access to medicines must be considered as a common good in the Algerian health context. It should be carried out within the framework of \"Focal Monopoly of Governance\" presented by Meisel (2004) and is considered as a potential response to the institutional and political blockages of access to medicines in Algeria. We use the term \"Focal Monopoly of Governance\" to apply it to the question of access to medicines in Algeria, as a way of overtaking to coordinate the divergent interests between actors. This FMG would be intended to cover the needs of essential medicines under four levers of accessibility: qualitative, legal, economic and geographic.