Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectCountry Of PublicationPublisherSourceTarget AudienceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
367
result(s) for
"الصيدلة"
Sort by:
Pharmacovigilance
by
Jimmy Jose
,
Shirly Varughese
,
Hussain Al Ramimmy
in
Clinical medicine
,
Clinical trials
,
Collaboration
2021
According to the world health organization (WHO), the original definition of adverse drug reaction (ADR) is “a response to a drug that is noxious and unintended and occurs at doses normally used in man for prophylaxis, diagnosis or therapy of disease, or for modification of physiological function”.1 ADRs pose a common clinical problem and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality.2 Pharmacovigilance is defined as “the science and activities relating to the detection, assessment, understanding and prevention of adverse effects or any other drug-related problem”.3
Journal Article
التفكير التأملي وعلاقته باتخاذ القرار لدى عينة من طلبة كلية الصيدلة بجامعة دمشق
2024
هدف البحث الحالي إلى الكشف عن العلاقة بين التفكير التأملي واتخاذ القرار لدى عينة من طلبة جامعة دمشق، وكذلك التعرف إلى الفروق في التفكير التأملي واتخاذ القرار تبعا للمتغيرات التالية: (الجنس والسنة الدراسية). وتكونت عينة البحث من (300) طالبا وطالبة تم اختيارهم بطريقة عشوائية من طلبة كلية الصيدلة بجامعة دمشق، وتم استخدام مقياس التفكير التأملي من إعداد مروة ومحمد (2019)، ومقياس اتخاذ القرار لدى طلبة الجامعة من إعداد مصطفى عطية إبراهيم مصبح (2011)، وتم اعتماد منهج البحث الوصفي. وأشارت النتائج إلى وجود وعلاقة ارتباطية موجبة دالة إحصائيا بين التفكير التأملي واتخاذ القرار، ووجود فرق في التفكير التأملي وفي اتخاذ القرار تعزى لمتغير الجنس ولصالح الذكور، ووجود فرق أيضا في التفكير التأملي وفي اتخاذ القرار تعزى لمتغير السنة الدراسية ولصالح السنة الرابعة.
Journal Article
Public Health and Paediatric Risk Assessment of Aluminium, Arsenic and Mercury in Infant Formulas Marketed in Nigeria
by
Zelinjo Igweze
,
Ify Nwaogazie
,
Orish Orisakwe
in
ALUMINIUM
,
Aluminum - analysis
,
Aluminum - toxicity
2020
Infant formulas are useful alternatives to breast milk in many circumstances but may pose
health risks to infants and children due to contamination by potentially toxic metals. This study aimed to determine
the aluminium, arsenic and mercury concentrations and carry out an exposure health risk assessment in commonly
consumed infant formulas in Nigeria. Methods: Different brands of both locally manufactured and imported infant
formulas were purchased in March 2017 from stores in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Analysis of metals in the samples
was performed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The health risk was assessed by comparing estimated daily
intake of aluminium, arsenic and mercury with the provisional tolerable daily intake acceptable by the Joint Food and
Agricultural Organization/World Health Organization Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). Results: A total
of 26 infant formulas were analysed. The levels of arsenic were higher in cereal-based formulas compared to milkbased formulas, but the difference was not significant (P >0.05). The intake levels of aluminium, arsenic and mercury
in infant formulas were found to be 8.02–14.2%, 437.1–771% and 23.7–41.8% of the provisional tolerable daily intake
JECFA threshold values, respectively. Conclusion: Commonly consumed infant formulas in Nigeria may add to the
body burden of arsenic in children
Journal Article