Explore the vast range of titles available.

综合重症与专科重症有着各自独立的发展路线,在急危重症的救治中发挥着重要作用。综合重症的优势在于对各种重症横向、广泛的研究,强调在整体治疗理念的指导下,平衡各个功能不全脏器之间的关系。专科重症的优势在于对某个专科或者专病进行纵向、深入的研究,强调在专科理论的指导下,专业化地解决某个重症的主要矛盾。当前,重症医学面临的最大挑战是如何避免惯性思维。综合重症需要向专科重症学习,不断加深对各专业领域的探索,以便在处理专科重症时更加得心应手。专科重症也需要向综合重症学习,不断强化整体救治观念,以便优化利用各种救治资源,提高专科重症的救治效果。综合重症和专科重症的互相借鉴、融合和共同提高,将最终使双方获益,使专科重症医学的治疗宽度更广,综合重症医学的治疗深度更深。各自独立的专科重症、专病重症之间也需要互相联合,共同为重症医学学科体系填补新的内涵。

本文以1997年至2006年圖書資訊學之引用文 獻與被引用文獻作為分析對象，除研究圖書資訊 學知識來源與知識擴散程度外，並探討四種知識 來源與知識擴散指標之差異性與適用性，包括 COC、WCOC、Brillouin’s Index、Originality/ Generality。本文發現，圖書資訊學知識來源程度 較知識擴散程度高。圖書資訊學知識來源的學科 自我引用率逐漸降低，而知識擴散仍以學科境內擴散為主，但與過去研究結果相比，對其他學科 影響逐漸提高。在各指標比較上，COC與WCOC 著重跨學科引用程度，兩指標相關性極高，相互 取代性大；Brillouin’s Index易受樣本特性影響， 適用於衡量分類較細之專利號或學科；Originality/ Generality則適用於衡量分類較粗之學科

Jonathan Arac is one of the leading American post-modernists who once taught at Columbia University and served as Andrew W. Mellon Professor of English as well as the founding director of the Humanities Center at the University of Pittsburgh. He is considered to be one of the most notable \"New Americanists\" with an eclectic range of interests in literary theory, US literature (with an emphasis on the controversy of Huckleberry Finn). His research methods range from theoretical framing, cultural study to interdisciplinary study. This interview, which was conducted in oral and written form at the University of Pittsburgh from December 2019 to December 2020, touches upon such topics as Arac's academic connection with Chinese academia, the essence of literary theory and its relationship with cultural studies and interdisciplinary research. Arac perceives his studies on literary theory, \"new literary history,\" and cross-disciplinary research since the 1960s as an integrated whole which \"opens boundaries\" and \"extends our powers.\"

Europe＇s mountains cover nearly half of the continent＇s area and are home to one fifth of the European population. Mountain areas are hotspots of biodiversity and agriculture has played a multifunctional role in defining and sustaining mountain biodiversity. Ongoing trends of agricultural decline are having negative impacts on mountain biodiversity. This paper presents results from an interdisciplinary European research project, BioScene, which investigated the relationship between agriculture and biodiversity in six mountain study areas across Europe to provide recommendations for reconciling biodiversity conservation with social and economic activities through an integrated rural development strategy. BioScene used scenario analysis and stakeholder participation as tools for structuring the analysis of alternative mountain futures. Three main BioScene scenarios were evaluated： Business as Usual （BAIT）, Agricultural Liberalisation （Lib）, Managed Change for Biodiversity （MCB）. BioScene brought together ecologists, economists, sociologists and rural geogra- phers, to carry out interdisciplinary analysis of the scenarios： identifying key drivers of change, assessing the biodiversity consequences and evaluating costeffectiveness. BioScene used a sustainability assessment to integrate the research outputs across natural and social science disciplines to assess the broader sustainability of the scenarios in terms of biodiversity, natural resources, rural development, social development, economic development and institutional capacity. The sustainability assessment showed that the MCB scenario was potentially the most sustainable of the three BioScene scenarios. Through the reconciliation of potentially conflicting objectives, such as conservation, economic development and human livelihoods, and with a strong participatory planning approach, the MCB scenario could represent an alternative approach to BaU for sustainable rural development in Europe＇s mountains. BioScene confirms the necessity for natural and social scientists to work together to seek solutions to environmental problems. Interdisciplinary research can assist with the definition of integrated strategies with the potential to reconcile the ecological, social and economic parameters that determine a sustainable future for European mountain areas.

Mountainous regions cover about 27 per cent of the world＇s land surface and are home to some 22 per cent of the global population （UNEP 2002）. A much greater number of people depend on mountain environments for a wide range of services, including clean water, energy, timber, biodiversity, recreation, and protection from environmental hazards, such as landslides and floods. At the same time, mountain areas are extremely vulnerable ecosystems and under continuous threat of environmental degradation due to such diverse factors as climate change, extraction of their rich natural resources, high population pressure, and insecure and inequitable resource ownership. Mountain people are often among the most marginalized groups in society. Political and social discrimination is largely accompanied by pervasive poverty and food insecurity. A recent FAO study on vulnerability in mountains found that as many as 245 million people in the mountains of developing and transition countries are at risk of, or actually suffering from hunger and food insecurity （Diouf 2006）. At the same time, mountain areas are major sources and production areas of narcotic plants, such as opium poppy in Afghanistan and Myanmar, qat in Yemen and Ethiopia, and coca in Colombia, Peru and Bolivia. The remoteness and frequent position of mountain regions along disputed political and ethnic borders also make them more prone to armed conflict. It was estimated that between 1946 and 2ool, around 41 per cent of mountainous areas experienced violent conflicts compared to 26 per cent of non-mountain regions （UNEP 2002）. On the other hand, mountainous regions are treasures of biological and agricultural diversity. Perhaps no other life zone contains such high degree of variation between habitats and ecosystems as mountains （Denniston 1995）. Genetic diversity in agricultural resources also tends to be higher in mountainous regions than in the lowlands, largely due to ethnic and cultural diversity and the extreme micro-variability of environmental conditions. Mountain communities in the Andes region are reported to conserve more than 150 distinct potato varieties, while highland farmers in Central Africa cultivate mixtures of 30 bean varieties simultaneously （UNEP 2002）.

针对中国中小型高校图书馆学科服务中出现的人才储备不足、服务水平偏低等问题,以山西大学图书馆开展学科服务的实践为例,从学科服务策略的制定、学科服务的模式确立与团队组建、构建学科服务体系、宣传推广学科服务,为普通高校图书馆开展学科服务提供了对策和建议。

地方文献资源与学科建设是高校图书馆建设和学科发展研究的重要课题通过对目前高校图书馆地方文献资源与学科建设具体事例分析,研究探讨了地方文献资源建设现状和学科建设与设置存在的问题,并就地方文献资源服务学科建设的措施进行论证,拟解决现实中地方文献资源服务学科建设所面临的共同问题.

学科馆员一直是图书馆界研究的热点,其发展现状值得关注。文章利用STADS工具,对2006年-2015年关于学科馆员方面的论文进行统计,分别从学术关注趋势、发文核心期刊统计、核心研究作者、核心研究机构、高被引论文等方面进行析,最后对学科馆员的面临的问题提出了一些建议。

G252.6; 近年来国内图书馆界对高校图书馆学科服务的研究日趋活跃,对近五年(2008年-2012年)国内主要学术基础上发表的研究成果进行总结,归纳出高校图书馆学科服务研究的6个重点,分别是:高校图书馆开展学科服务必要性;高校学科服务的特点;学科服务的内容和模式;学科服务体系要素研究;国内开展学科服务的实践研究,国(境)外开展学科服务的实践研究.这些反映了国内近五年高校图书馆学科服务理论研究的概况.

＂第六届中美国际肺癌多学科综合治疗论坛＂（简称＂中美肺癌论坛＂）将于2016年9月1日-3日在北京召开。本届论坛由中国癌症基金会主办,中国医学科学院肿瘤医院和北京大学肿瘤医院共同承办。＂中美肺癌论坛＂由王洁教授、陈克能教授及朱广迎教授于2005年创立,每两年举办一届,迄今已经历十余载。