Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
2 result(s) for "神经生长因子类"
Sort by:
脑源性神经营养因子前体对小鼠海马神经元存活和突起生长的抑制作用
目的探讨脑源性神经营养因子前体(proBDNF)对小鼠海马神经元存活和突起生长的影响,以及p75神经营养素受体(p75NTR)在其中的介导作用。方法取p75NTR转基因18日龄胎鼠(野生型p75NTR+/+,基因敲除型p75NTR–/–)海马组织,进行新生海马神经元原代培养。p75NTR+/+基因型神经元设对照组、proBDNF(30ng/ml)组和proBDNF(30ng/ml)+p75/Fc(30μg/ml)组,p75NTR–/–基因型神经元设对照组和proBDNF(30ng/ml)组。采用MTT法检测各组处理24h后新生海马神经元的存活情况,免疫荧光染色观察各组处理72h后的突起长度。结果经MAP2和DAPI双重荧光染色鉴定,成功培养出高纯度新生海马神经元。MTT检测结果显示,在p75NTR+/+型海马神经元中,proBDNF组570nm处吸光度值(A570)明显小于对照组(P〈0.05),加入p75NTR受体竞争性抑制剂p75/Fc后与对照组相比差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);在p75NTR–/–型海马神经元中,proBDNF组A570值与对照组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。免疫荧光染色显示,p75NTR+/+神经元proBDNF组神经突起长度明显小于对照组(P〈0.05),proBDNF(30ng/ml)+p75/Fc(30μg/ml)组与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);p75NTR–/–神经元proBDNF组神经突起长度与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论 proBDNF通过p75NTR受体途径抑制神经元的存活和突起生长,具有毒性作用。
胶质瘤VEGF、VEGF—C和VEGFR-3表达对间质血管生成及肿瘤细胞增殖的影响
目的探讨胶质瘤血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、血管内皮生长因子-C(VEGF-C)和血管内皮生长因子受体-3(VEGFR-3)表达变化,以及对肿瘤细胞增殖和间质血管生成的影响。方法收集2000~2009年手术切除WHOI~Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级胶质瘤标本各20例,采用组织微阵列技术及免疫组织化学染色(SPAB法)观察不同级别胶质瘤组织中VEGF、VEGF—C、VEGFR-3和Ki-67抗原的表达及CD31阳性血管密度。结果60例胶质瘤组织中肿瘤细胞及间质血管内皮细胞VEGF、VEGF—C和VEGFR-3阳性表达率分别为88-33%(53160)和100%(60160)、100%(60160)和16.67%(10/60)、100%(60/60)和21.67%(13/60),不同级别组间差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。I~Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级及Ⅳ缀组的VEGF阳性肿瘤细胞密度分别为(17.65-t-9.00)、(37.30±18.54)和(83.40±22.98)个/0.05mm2;VEGF—c阳性肿瘤细胞密度为(38.00±17.82)、(79.30±5.23)和(102.00±13.07)个,0.05mm2;VEGFR-3阳性血管密度(3.65±2.01)、(10.50±3.98)和(14.60±7.29)血管数,4HF;Ki.67抗原阳性肿瘤细电密度(9.30±3.43)、(31.15±9.44)和(60.15±13.60)个,0.05mm2;CD3I阳性血管密度(6,75±2.24)、(10.35±2.98)和〈14.30±3.51)血管数/4HF,各组之间以上5种指标比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05或P〈0.01),且拔此闷均呈显著性正相关关系(r=0.663—0.910,P〈0.01)。结论胶质瘤细胞普遍过表达VEGF和VEGF-C,面胶质瘤间质血管内皮细胞则普遍过表达VEGFR-3,三者表达水平均随着肿瘤级别的升高而相应增加;由此形成的旁分泌环通过诱导间质血管生成促进肿瘤细胞增殖,在胶质癌的发生、发展过程中起着重要作用。